logo
Senate bill could establish chaplain program for Montana public schools

Senate bill could establish chaplain program for Montana public schools

Yahoo11-03-2025

A recently passed Senate Bill would allow public schools to have chaplains. (Photo illustration by Getty Images)
Religious leaders could be coming to Montana public schools under a bill passed by the state Senate last week.
Senate Bill 525, brought by Sen. Theresa Manzella, R-Hamilton, would allow — though not require — chaplains to either be paid by or volunteer at school districts to provide support, services and programs. It would apply to both public districts and at public charter schools, and if they're approved by a school board, could use public money to do so.
Supporters argued the bill could help with student mental health issues and increase safety at schools, while detractors pointed to constitutional issues and accreditation issues. They also said they didn't want to see schools replacing mental health professionals with religious leaders, especially those whose views might not be inclusive of LGBTQ+ students.
As the bill stands, chaplains could 'perform the duties required of a school counselor,' though Manzella vowed to strike the line if the bill makes it to the House while explaining the legislation on the Senate floor.
'It's not intended to be a school chaplain or a counselor,' Manzella said Thursday on the Senate floor. 'It's a school chaplain if a school chooses to utilize them, and they can utilize them paid or volunteer.'
The only requirements for a school chaplain in the bill, as it stands, would be the person be 18 years of age and be of 'good moral character.' There's also a requirement that the chaplain be certified by the Superintendent of Public Instruction in some way.
Manzella also said she'd strike a second line, that states, 'A school chaplain employed under this section is required to be certified by the superintendent of public instruction.'
Manzella said that 'the certification process is extensive,' and a change to that part of the bill would need to be made.
However, Manzella pointed to one organization that has been helping place chaplains in schools and already has an accreditation program.
She lauded the National School Chaplain Association during the bill's hearing, saying, 'We're looking for solutions, and I had heard about this amazing program sometime back.'
The organization is already in 30,000 schools, she said.
The NSCA is based in Norman, Oklahoma, according to its website. School chaplain bills are being pushed across the country by the NSCA. The Texas Tribune reported in 2023 the organization was a major proponent of its state's school chaplain legislation. Last year, Politico reported on a Florida bill that is similar to Manzella's proposed legislation. It was also supported by NSCA.
The NSCA already has an eight-week accreditation program for chaplains. It includes, 'Active Shooter Certification, Behavioral Threat Assessment Certification, and the Stop The Bleed Certification.'
Johnny Davis, the chief development officer with the NSCA, spoke in lieu of founder and CEO Rocky Malloy during the bill's hearing. Davis said '100% of school shootings are known about beforehand,' and pointed to chaplains in schools as an answer, saying they make schools safer and can help 'prevent these issues.'
He went on to say their chaplains are trained in non-religious environments. The program costs about $1,000 and includes a background check, a step spelled out in Manzella's bill.
'Chaplains are skilled and trained to work in secular environments, providing care for individuals from all walks of life, regardless of race, belief and culture, and this skill has made them invaluable in us,' Davis said. 'Institutions such as the military, hospitals, prisons, professional sports teams, universities and corporations and today, we feel that their unique skills are critically needed in our schools.'
The accreditation program is run through Oral Roberts University, an evangelical Christian school in Tulsa, Oklahoma. While it's unclear if those in the program have to abide by it, the Oral Roberts student honor code specifically prohibits relations between people of the same sex.
The NSCA seeks to have a 'chaplain on every school campus,' according to its mission statement. While Davis said the organization is trained to work in secular environments, it's also clear on where it stands on marriage equality.
'We believe in marriage as an irreplaceable and core institution created by God; one biological man and one biological woman freely and publicly enter into the marital covenant through solemn vows,' the NSCA's statement of faith states, citing several verses from Genesis and one from the Gospel of Matthew.
Religious leaders with differing views on sex, gender, and LGBTQ+ issues is a problem ACLU Montana highlighted.
'We are deeply concerned that substituting school chaplains for school counselors might deprive 2S-LGBTQIA+ students of an inclusive and welcoming school environment, depending on the religious beliefs of the chaplain,' Alex Rate, Legal Director for ACLU Montana said in an email. 'School counselors are specially trained to provide services and support to all students, regardless of their identities. Chaplains are, by definition, guided by their faith.'
Definitions of sex, as well as bathroom bills and even an attempt by the Legislature to tell the U.S. Supreme Court they were wrong to legalize same-sex marriage have all been heard this session.
While supporters of the bill pointed to crisis intervention, opponents said there were issues with accreditation. Both the Montana Federation of Public Employees and the state's Board of Education testified against the bill, as did the ACLU.
'There's nothing in this bill that remotely aligns to the requirements in our rules,' McCall Flynn, the executive director of the Montana Board of Public Education, said in the bill's hearing.
Rob Watson, representing School Administrators of Montana and speaking against the bill, pointed out the only requirement for a school chaplain as the bill was written was to be 18 years old and 'in good moral standing.'
Others pointed to the issue of adding religion to schools. Montana has a high youth suicide rate and some wondered if adding in God was really the right answer.
'A child is struggling with suicidal thoughts, abuse or trauma, they don't need religious guidance,' said Lindsay DeGroote, who is a Montana licensed school and clinical counselor. 'They need evidence-based professional care in schools.'
All but one Senate Republican voted for the bill on the second reading, while all but one of 18 Democrats voted against it. Sen. Russ Tempel, R-Chester voted against it, while Sen. Dave Fern, D-Whitefish voted for it. Tempel also voted against the bill in committee.
The Senate passed the bill without amendments, although some Senators were lukewarm on the issue.
'I think the value that they could bring to the table is worth exploring, but there are a million questions that we would need to look at,' said Sen. Sara Novak, D-Anaconda, who voted no on the bill in committee and on the floor.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From celebrating Juneteenth to the erasure of Black history: Charles M. Blow on America today
From celebrating Juneteenth to the erasure of Black history: Charles M. Blow on America today

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

From celebrating Juneteenth to the erasure of Black history: Charles M. Blow on America today

The political analyst and former New York Times columnist Charles M. Blow shares his thoughts about our nation's newest federal holiday, Juneteenth: Last month I visited Emancipation Park in Houston, a park established in 1872 by the formerly enslaved as a space to celebrate Juneteenth, the day in 1865 that the news of emancipation was proclaimed in Galveston, Texas. Ramon Manning, the board chair of the park's conservancy, told me that his corporate sponsors had grown skittish about supporting Juneteenth-related activities and anything with words like "culture," "heritage" or "Black History" – words nearly impossible to omit in this park. This, for Manning, is a bit of a whiplash. Four years ago, in the wake of the massive protests following the killing of George Floyd, and in a Senate riven by partisanship, the bill to make Juneteenth a national holiday passed unanimously. Biden signs bill making Juneteenth a federal holidayWhat is Juneteenth? Learn the history behind the federal holiday's origin and name A year before that, in the closing months of his reelection bid, Donald Trump himself had proposed making it a national holiday in his so-called Platinum Plan for Black America. In fact, in 2019, Trump's statement commemorating Juneteenth ended by saying that on Juneteenth, "... we pay tribute to the indomitable spirit of African Americans." Now, the mood of the country has shifted. Pluralism and racial justice have been demoted in the zeitgeist, as Trump has returned to office on a mission to purge the government, and much of society, of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts. Trump administration threatens public schools' federal funding over DEI initiativesTrump's DEI undoing undermines hard-won accommodations for disabled peopleCompanies could face Trump repercussions over DEI This has spurred an erasure of Black history and Black symbols in some quarters, a phenomenon that I call "The Great Blackout" – from an executive order condemning the direction of the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, to the National Park Service removing - but being forced to restore - Harriet Tubman's image and quote to a page about the Underground Railroad. There are, unfortunately, countless examples. That chill is having a dampening effect on the upcoming observation of Juneteenth, far beyond Emancipation Park, as multiple cities have cancelled Juneteenth celebrations altogether. 2025 Indianapolis Juneteenth parade canceled San Luis Obispo Juneteenth event canceled In this sad new reality, America's youngest national holiday is now caught in the crossfire of America's raging culture wars. For more info: Charles M. Blow on Instagram Story produced by Robbyn McFadden. Editor: Chad Cardin. See also: Passage: The story of Juneteenth ("Sunday Morning")Decades after a mob destroyed her house, Opal Lee is returning home ("Sunday Morning") Dad says son "may never be the same" after alleged hazing Nature: Mating grebes From celebrating Juneteenth to the erasure of Black history: Charles M. Blow on America today

Trump ally stands firm against 'big, beautiful bill' despite pressure: 'It'll completely backfire'
Trump ally stands firm against 'big, beautiful bill' despite pressure: 'It'll completely backfire'

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Trump ally stands firm against 'big, beautiful bill' despite pressure: 'It'll completely backfire'

EXCLUSIVE — One of the leading opponents of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" declared not even the commander in chief will be able to deter him from speaking out against what he sees as a bill that falls short of Republicans' goal of cutting government waste. "It'll completely backfire on him," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., told Fox News Digital of any attempts by Trump to sway him on the current legislation. Johnson has become a prominent voice of opposition against the House GOP's offering to the budget reconciliation process. Senate Republicans finally began the tedious process of parsing through the bill this week. Lawmakers in the upper chamber, Johnson included, are determined to make changes to the bill, with most wanting to make reductions to Medicaid and food stamps more palatable. Trump has made it clear his bill must pass but has acknowledged the Senate will need to make a few changes. Trump's directive has been to deliver a bill that can survive the razor-thin majorities in both chambers. Johnson, however, wants to see spending returned to pre-pandemic levels, cuts that are trillions of dollars deeper than what House Republicans could stomach. And he is ready to vote against the bill unless he sees the changes he wants. And he believes that a pressure campaign from the president against him and other like-minded fiscal hawks will fail. He said a better approach would be to work with lawmakers and fiscal hawks like him to gain a better understanding of the reality of the country's fiscal situation, a reality that "is grim," he said. Johnson has been up front about his disdain for the bill but has so far avoided public retribution from Trump. In fact, the two have spoken twice this week, once on Monday and later during a Senate Finance Committee meeting at the White House Tuesday. The lawmaker has told Trump he's in Trump's corner and that he wants "to see you succeed," but he has been steadfast in his position that the bill does not go far enough to tackle the national debt. And the debt continues to climb, nearing $37 trillion and counting, according to Fox News' National Debt Tracker. The House's offering set a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, which lawmakers in the lower chamber have pitched as a positive step forward to righting the country's fiscal ship, an offering Johnson panned as falling drastically short of the GOP's promises to cut deep into government spending. "What's so disappointing about what happened in the House is it was all rhetoric. It's all slogans," Johnson said. "They picked a number. Literally, they picked a number out of the air." Johnson views this attempt at the budget reconciliation process as a rare opportunity to "do the hard things" when it comes to spending cuts, but others in the GOP have been more hesitant to cut as deep. Johnson said a main reason Republicans have so far fallen short of meeting the moment for the most part is that lawmakers don't understand just how much the federal government shovels out the door year in and year out. The lawmaker recalled a moment roughly three years ago during a debate over another year-end omnibus spending bill, when each of the dozen appropriations bills is crammed into one, bloated package that is universally reviled and almost always passes. He asked his colleagues if they really knew just how much the government spends, and no one "volunteered to answer." "Nobody knew. I mean, think of that. The largest financier in the world. We're supposedly, in theory, the 535 members of the board of directors, and nobody knew," he said. "Why would they? We never talked about it." Johnson has been busy trying to better educate his colleagues, putting together his own charts and graphs that cut out the "noise," like the latest nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office report that found the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over a decade. The GOP has universally panned that projection. "We can't accept this as a new normal," Johnson said. "We can't accept — you can take pot shots of CBO, but you can't deny that reality. [It] might be off a little bit, but that is the trajectory, and that's undeniable."

Trump's palace coup leaves NASA in limbo
Trump's palace coup leaves NASA in limbo

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump's palace coup leaves NASA in limbo

When President-elect Donald Trump nominated Jared Isaacman to become NASA administrator, it seemed like a brilliant choice. Business entrepreneur, private astronaut, Isaacman was just the man to revamp NASA and make it into a catalyst for taking humanity to the moon, Mars and beyond. Isaacman sailed through the confirmation process in the Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), by a vote of 19 to 9. He was poised to be confirmed by the full Senate when something so bizarre happened that it beggars the imagination. The White House suddenly and with no clear reason why, pulled Isaacman's nomination. After months of a confirmation process, NASA was back to square one for getting a new leader. Ars Technica's Eric Berger offered an explanation as to why. 'One mark against Isaacman is that he had recently donated money to Democrats,' he wrote. 'He also indicated opposition to some of the White House's proposed cuts to NASA's science budget.' But these facts were well known even before Trump nominated Isaacman. Trump himself, before he ran for president as a Republican, donated to Democrats and was close friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton. Berger goes on to say that a source told the publication that, 'with Musk's exit, his opponents within the administration sought to punish him by killing Isaacman's nomination.' The idea that Isaacman's nomination is being deep-sixed because of Musk runs contrary to the public praise that the president has given the billionaire rocket and electric car entrepreneur. Trump was uncharacteristically terse in his own social media post. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' he wrote. 'I will soon announce a new nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America First in Space. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' CNN reports that Isaacman's ouster was the result of a palace coup, noting that a source said, 'Musk's exit left room for a faction of people in Trump's inner circle, particularly Sergio Gor, the longtime Trump supporter and director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, to advocate for installing a different nominee.' The motive seems to be discontent about the outsized influence that Musk has had on the White House and a desire to take him down a peg or two. Isaacman was profoundly gracious, stating in part, 'I am incredibly grateful to President Trump @POTUS, the Senate and all those who supported me throughout this journey. The past six months have been enlightening and, honestly, a bit thrilling. I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry.' The idea that a man like Isaacman, well respected by the aerospace community, who was predicted to sail through a confirmation vote in the full Senate, could be taken down by an obscure bureaucrat in White House intrigue, motivated by petty spite, is mind boggling. Even Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who has not been fond of Trump's space policy, was appalled. He posted on his X account that Isaacman 'ran into the kind of politics that is damaging our country.' 'Republicans and Democrats supported him as the right guy at the right time for the top job at NASA, but it wasn't enough.' NASA is in for months more of turmoil and uncertainty as the nomination process gets reset and starts grinding its way through the Senate. The draconian, truncated budget proposal is certainly not helpful, either. Congress, which had been supportive of Trump's space policy, is not likely to be pleased by the president's high-handed shivving of his own nominee. Whoever Trump chooses to replace Isaacman as NASA administrator nominee, no matter how qualified, should face some very direct questioning. Trump's NASA budget proposal should be dead on arrival, which, considering the cuts in science and technology, is not necessarily a bad thing. China must be looking at the spectacle of NASA being mired in political wrangling, a leadership vacuum and budget uncertainty with glee. Beijing has its own space ambitions, with a planned crewed lunar landing by 2030. It's possible that the Chinese will steal a march on NASA, with all the damage that will do to America's standing in the world. It didn't have to be this way. Isaacman could be settling in as NASA administrator, deploying his business acumen and vision to lead the space agency to its greatest achievements. Instead, America's space effort has received a self-inflicted blow from which it will be long in recovering, Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store