
Badly behaved parents ruin play—and deserve to be ejected
This article is one of the winning submissions from the New York Post Scholars Contest, presented by Command Education.
Remember when youth sports meant fun and teamwork…not a reality TV brawl? These days there is often more action on the sidelines than between the lines, and it is time for a drastic change.
While playing in the Dallas Cup, a high-level youth soccer tournament, a disagreement on the sideline over a vuvuzela erupted into a battle royale. We played on as fathers were literally handcuffed to golf carts as police waited for backup. It was real-life chaos, and it was as disturbing as it was ridiculous. But this wasn't a one-off spectacle; it's part of a disturbing trend that's taken over youth sports.
At a tournament in Denmark, a parent flipped out over his kid's playing time, verbally threatening the coach at halftime. He was then seen filling his pockets with rocks and stones, presumably to throw at the coach. And after the final whistle blew, players were forced to physically restrain the father who was choking the coach. Danish tournament officials, so stunned by the events, didn't even check in on the safety of the players.
Sadly, these are just two of many such experiences I have had while playing soccer. When parents cross the line from supportive fan to harmful provocateur, the very benefits of youth sports—teamwork, resilience and enjoyment—are lost. Instead, young athletes are left disillusioned, and, in the worst cases, pushed away from sports and athletics altogether. It is hard to focus on the game and build comradery with your teammates when your father is handcuffed to a golf cart or being restrained from choking the coach by fellow players!
What's fueling this toxic nonsense? Researchers noted in 1995 that heightened competitiveness and commercialization of youth sports had led to a more pressurized environment. Parents increasingly viewed their children's sporting success as a reflection of their own status and aspirations. This led to more aggressive, overinvolved behavior on the sidelines. Youth sports participants know intuitively that the situation has gotten worse, so much so, that it is difficult to find a sufficient number of referees. In a 2023 survey of 36,000 referees, 69% say that sportsmanship is getting worse with 50% feeling unsafe.
The introduction of NIL money makes the backdrop even bleaker. Delusional parents, once aiming for college scholarships or pro contracts, now see a path to an earlier payday. The result? Further intensifying competition. Parents are demanding faster success from their children. And they are working overtime to manufacture the likeness, if not the reality, of success on social media in a zero-sum battle for eyeballs. The outcome is a far cry from building a love for the game.
Unfortunately, this pressure cooker environment is resulting in fewer athletes sticking with their sports. A six-year longitudinal study showed that only 39% of high school seniors participated in organized sports versus 90% in seventh and eighth grades. And what of the joy stripped from the sport for those that continue playing?
It's time to stand up for change. Youth sports should be about the kids and building our school community, not the parents' egos.
Here's a two-part game plan to clean up the act:
Drew Marturano
Courtesy of Drew Marturano
First, parents must sign a pledge: Pingry provides a clear set of guidelines for parental behavior at sporting events in the Athletic Handbook. However, the governing body of the high school sport (NJSIAA in the case of our soccer program) should require parents at all schools to sign a contract regarding their behavior as spectators and fans. The contract should detail the benefits of youth sports, the harm caused by toxic sideline behavior, a clear code of conduct and the consequences of breaking the commitment. I think that the contract should be tied to their child's participation in the sport. No contract, no participation.
Next, there should be zero tolerance accountability: A signed pledge will accomplish little without real consequences. Any infraction should result in the expulsion of the parent from the premises and the loss of playing time for the child. In soccer terms, if a parent gets a red card, the student athlete should as well. Repeated infractions should result in permanent expulsion from the sidelines, with even harsher penalties, up to and including removal of the child from the team, if necessary. Referees and coaches need to be empowered to enforce these consequences.
When a tiger parent risks missing their child's game, the message is crystal clear. At the Dallas Cup, the handcuffed fathers strained necks to watch the rest of their children's games from their incarcerated position. However, when a parent risks their child's playing time, the message is truly unmistakable. In Denmark, the parent that choked the coach later begged the coach to allow his son to continue playing in the tournament. The children's standing on the team is likely the one thing we can put on the line that the worst parents will respond to.
Enough is enough. The only battles in youth sports should be on the field. Let's return to prioritizing kids over the egos of parents.
A 9th-grader at The Pingry School in Bernards Township, NJ, Marturano dreams of a career in sports management.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
House settlement approves revenue sharing. Here's how Clemson will pay players
Beginning July 1, Clemson athletes will be paid revenue directly by the school plus third-party income they already earn for use of their name, image and likeness. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the House settlement, which resolves three federal antitrust lawsuits against the NCAA and four power conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC), on June 6. Her approval will allow schools that opt into the revenue sharing format to begin paying its athletes up to an annual cap estimated at around $20.5 million. That doesn't include NIL pay, which is still allowed. Advertisement This is a huge shift in college sports, which moves closer to a professional model. Here's what Clemson fans need to know about this new system. Each school will have a salary cap There will be a cap of approximately $20.5 million that a school can pay its athletes per academic year. That is 22% of the average revenue from ticket sales, media rights and sponsorships by power conference schools. That cap will increase each year, similar to how pro leagues' salary caps increase. Schools determine which athletes are paid and how much, as long as the total doesn't exceed the cap. Presumably, schools will spread revenue among several players, similar to a pro team's payroll. Advertisement Players can still have as much NIL money as the market will, but those deals must withstand a new vetting process. Here's how Clemson could divide revenue Athletic director Graham Neff did not specify exact percentages to how much revenue sharing will go to each sport, but he said it will distribute money according to revenue each sport produces. This means football will command a stronghold of the estimated cap, which football coach Dabo Swinney hinted at in November. "We're going to be as good as anybody out there," Swinney said. "Nobody will have more money, so then we will have the opportunity." Advertisement A model was prescribed in the preliminary House settlement: Approximately 75% to football players, 15% to men's basketball, 5% to women's basketball and 5% to other sports. This model for revenue distribution is just a baseline as schools will adjust those percentages based on need and different strategies. Conferences may also set standards for each member school to follow. Clemson will also fully fund every roster position, increasing scholarships totals from 275 to 425. This will cost around $2.5 million of the $20.5 million, so there will be $18 million available to directly pay players Football will likely exceed that percentage as it generates the most profit. In fiscal year 2024, Swinney's program brought in around $87.2 million, about 72% of Clemson's revenue across 21 sports, and netted a profit of $19.4 million profit, according to its latest NCAA financial report. This will cause other sports, like its men's basketball program, to receive a lower percentage of the cap. The scholarship increases will be huge for Clemson's other sports though. Baseball will have 34 instead of the previous 11.7 limit, which will help Clemson's program that has hosted three straight regional tournaments. The extra scholarships may also attract athletes to schools willing to fund them, especially non-revenue sports like baseball, soccer, softball and lacrosse. Clemson opted in to revenue sharing but every school will not Athletic department budgets have relied on this revenue for decades, but now they must share a significant portion of it with athletes. Schools will either have to cut expenses, increase revenue or both if they decide to opt in. Advertisement Clemson has prepared for the revenue-sharing era by adding a student athletics fee, increasing season-ticket prices for football games, approving the sale of alcohol at sporting events and hosting non-NCAA sports on campus like the Savannah Bananas in April. It also created a revenue-generating entity, Clemson Ventures, that will produce in-house sales and sponsorship and facilitate NIL deals with business for Clemson athletes $20.5 million is the floor, not the ceiling due to name, image and likeness Athletes can earn revenue-shared money from schools and NIL dollars. This is because businesses and third-party collectives fund NIL, while revenue shares will come directly from the school. This means the richest schools and their boosters can exceed the $20.5 million cap if they want to maximize player pay and build more talented rosters. Advertisement This method may not be feasible in the long run, though, as those same boosters and fans, who donate and buy tickets from athletic departments and fund NIL collectives, could grow tired of paying athletes through two different entities. How NIL deals will be vetted post-House Settlement The power conferences are creating a new NIL enforcement arm called the College Sports Commission. Regardless of if a school opts in to making NIL payments, any Division I athlete who has a deal, or deals, worth $600 or more will have to report those deals to a system called "NIL Go." That data will be evaluated to determine whether the deal has a 'valid business purpose' and is within 'a reasonable range of compensation,' whatever those terms are deemed to mean. This means the NCAA will no longer police revenue sharing or NIL. Advertisement This new process could turn NIL into what it was intended to be: Businesses paying athletes for endorsements rather than fans funding NIL payrolls. Still, it's a difficult standard to define and uphold, meaning lawsuits could come. Derrian Carter covers Clemson athletics for The Greenville News and the USA TODAY Network. Email him at dcarter@ and follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter, @DerrianCarter00 This article originally appeared on Greenville News: Clemson plan to pay players revenue, NIL after House settlement approved


Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
Top 10 men's college basketball players with highest NIL valuations
Cooper Flagg has been one of the big winners of the name, image and likeness (NIL) era in college sports, reportedly earning a staggering amount of money during his one year at Duke. However, top recruits and NBA Draft prospects aren't the only winners in the NIL era. At least 50 early-entry candidates withdrew their names from the 2025 NBA Draft ahead of the late May deadline with plans to return to school and cash in on NIL opportunities. "This year's draft class, more than any ever, has been affected by the NIL and the new pay-for-play," Boston Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens told NBC Sports Boston in May. "The money can be higher in some of these schools than the bottom of the 20s in the draft. Good for them." The former Butler coach's assertion seems to be correct when you look at On3's most valuable college athletes entering the 2025-26 academic year. Let's take a look at the 10 most valuable players in men's college basketball entering the 2025-26 season, via On3. 1. BYU F AJ Dybantsa ($4.1 million) Dybantsa is the highest-valued non-football college athlete entering the 2025-26 academic year, coming in at No. 4 on the overall list. The incoming BYU freshman, who is ranked as the No. 2 prospect in the 2025 college basketball recruiting class (via 247 Sports), already has reported deals with Nike and Red Bull. But the bulk of his potential college earnings might have come with the deal he struck with BYU's NIL collective, reportedly securing a deal worth around $7 million . That's just scratching the surface on Dybantsa's potential career earnings, though, as many prognosticators have him being one of the top few picks in the 2026 NBA Draft. 2. Texas Tech F JT Toppin ($2.8 million) Toppin had Texas Tech on the precipice of its second Final Four appearance, leading the Red Raiders to the Elite Eight in 2024-25. As a result, the program rewarded him in order to ensure he wouldn't enter the transfer portal or 2025 NBA Draft. It was reported that Toppin is expected to earn $4 million in NIL after he announced his decision to remain in Lubbock in April. Toppin's reported deal with Texas Tech's NIL collective is the only reported NIL deal he has. Toppin won Big 12 Player of the Year and was named a second-team All-American after scoring 18.2 points per game in the 2024-25 season. He's the 12th-highest-valued player in college sports, per On3. 3. Michigan F Yaxel Lendeborg ($2.3 million) Michigan not only got Lendeborg to remain in college for another season, but it also made him one of the highest-valued players in the sport. After the UAB transfer removed his name from the 2025 NBA Draft in late May, CBS Sports reported that Lendeborg received an NIL package from Michigan worth around $3 million. Prior to his decision to remain in school, Lendeborg was viewed as a potential first-round pick in June's draft. Now, the two-time first-team All- AAC member will play his final year of college hoops in Ann Arbor, giving Dusty May's Wolverines the No. 1 player in the transfer portal this offseason, per 247 Sports. He's also the 20th-highest valued player in college sports, per On3. 4. Florida G Boogie Fland ($2.1 million) Fland also profited from his decision to remain in college, but transfer to a different school. The former Arkansas guard declared for the 2025 Draft, but removed his name from consideration and opted to head to Florida and receive an NIL package from its collective worth over $2 million, according to CBS Sports . Fland, who averaged 13.5 points per game as a freshman in 2024-25, was the 22nd-ranked prospect in the 2024 recruiting cycle, via 247 Sports, giving the defending champs another player with high upside. Fland is also the 22nd-highest-valued player in college sports, per On3. 5. UCLA G Donovan Dent ($2 million) UCLA didn't need to incentivize Dent to remain in school. However, Dent was incentivized to make the move from New Mexico to UCLA earlier this offseason. The 2024-25 Mountain West Player of the Year reportedly received a $3 million NIL deal to transfer to UCLA in March, according to The Santa Fe New Mexican . He received $2 million of that deal up front, while he'll earn the other $1 million during the 2025-26 season. Dent, who is the 23rd-highest-valued player in college sports, averaged 20.4 points per game as a junior last season. 6. Kentucky F Jayden Quaintance ($1.9 million) Quaintance is the youngest player on this list. Even though he won't turn 18 until July, Quaintance already has a year of college hoops experience, playing at Arizona State this past season. After being named to the Big 12's All-Defensive and All-Freshman teams, Quaintance entered the portal and landed at Kentucky. While he has a pair of reported deals with PSD Underwear and Panini America, Quaintance likely cashed in on Kentucky's growing NIL budget, too. Kentucky is rumored to be one of the three-highest NIL spenders in college basketball for the 2025-26 season , helping Mark Pope land a talented transfer portal class. Quaintance, who is also ranked No. 26 in On3's most valuable college athletes list, is rehabbing from an ACL tear, but he's hopeful to be back on the court early next season as he seeks to be a top pick in the 2026 draft. 7. Purdue G Braden Smith ($1.9 million) Smith decided to forgo early entry into the 2025 NBA Draft, opting to play one more season at Purdue. Smith, who has reported NIL deals with Hey Dude Shoes and The NIL Store, also has a reported deal with Purdue's NIL collective, per On3. However, it wasn't reported if Smith agreed to a new deal with the collective when he announced his decision to remain in college for another year. Regardless, the Boilermakers will have the reigning Bob Cousy Award winner, Big Ten Player of the Year and one of the Naismith National Player of the Year finalists back on their roster for his senior season. That's something that was becoming a rarity in the pre-NIL era. Smith is ranked 28th in On3's most valuable college athletes list. 8. Cincinnati C Moustapha Thiam ($1.8 million) Another transfer, Thiam moved on from UCF to Cincinnati following his freshman season in 2024-25. Ranked 32nd in On3's most valuable college athletes list, Thiam doesn't have any reported deals with a brand, per On3. However, he inked a $2 million NIL deal to join Cincinnati, the Orlando Sentinel reported in April . Thiam averaged 10.4 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.6 blocks per game this past season. 9. Purdue C Oscar Cluff ($1.7 million) Purdue is the only team with multiple players on this list. Unlike Smith, though, Cluff transferred into the Boilermakers' program in the offseason. The 34th-ranked player in On3's most valuable college athletes list, Cluff doesn't have any reported deals with any individual brands. However, Cluff's junior college basketball coach insinuated that he turned down a school that offered more NIL money to join Purdue in an interview with the IndyStar . Cluff helped South Dakota State reach the NCAA Tournament this past season, averaging 17.6 points and 12.3 rebounds per game. 10. Kansas State G PJ Haggerty ($1.7 million) A year after making Coleman Hawkins one of the highest-paid players in the NIL era , Kansas State dished out another rich deal for a top transfer. Haggerty, ranked 35th on On3's most-valued college athletes list, reportedly agreed to a $2.5 million deal ($2 million base, $500,000 incentives) with Kansas State, according to On3 . That's actually lower than what he was seeking, as his father believed he could've snagged a $4 million NIL deal, the Field of 68 reported . Haggerty doesn't have any reported NIL deals with a brand, per On3. He was third in the nation in scoring this past season, averaging 21.7 points per game at Memphis. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily. recommended Get more from College Basketball Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Report – Man United Yet To Decide Whether To Keep, Sell Or Loan Out Inter Milan Target
Report – Man United Yet To Decide Whether To Keep, Sell Or Loan Out Inter Milan Target Man United have yet to make a decision regarding whether to keep, sell, or loan out Inter Milan target Rasmus Hojlund. This according to UK outlet ESPN, via FCInter1908. They report that the Red Devils have met with the Dane's agents to discuss his future, but haven't made a decision yet. Advertisement Rasmus Hojlund is a striker whose future looks to be at a crossroads. The Danish international joined Manchester United from Atalanta in the summer of 2023. However, he has never really found anything like his La Dea form at Old Trafford. Therefore, there are persistent rumours that United could look to offload Hojlund this summer. Man United Yet To Make A Decision On Future Of Inter Target Rasmus Hojlund BILBAO, SPAIN – MAY 21: Rasmus Hojlund of Manchester United during the UEFA Europa League Final 2025 between Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United at on May 21, 2025 in Bilbao, Spain. (Photo by) In the meantime, Inter Milan have reportedly marked Rasmus Hojlund out as a major target. The Nerazzurri are looking to freshen up their aging attack. And even though the 22-year-old Hojlund's career has stalled a bit at United, Inter still back him based on his time in Serie A. Advertisement According to ESPN, Hojlund's representatives met with United recently. They discussed what the plans are for the striker this summer. And the outlet anticipate that there has been no clear decision as of yet. The Red Devils could still keep Hojlund. They would aim to sign a replacement before they allow him to leave. However, if United do sign a replacement, then they would be ready to either loan Hojlund out, or sell him outright.