Russia banned from ice hockey in 2026 Olympics
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has made the decision to ban Russian ice hockey teams from the upcoming Winter Olympics in Italy, the president of the International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF), Luc Tardif, told TASS on Monday.
Last week, sports broadcaster ESPN reported that the IOC had confirmed that Russian teams will remain barred from the 2026 Winter Games.
'For the Olympics – it's an IOC decision,' Tardif replied when asked by a TASS correspondent whether the committee's ruling regarding Russia's hockey team was final.
In February, the IIHF ruled to extend its sanctions and ban both Russian and Belarusian teams from participating in the federation's 2025-2026 championship season.
The IIHF, like many other international sports organizations, banned athletes from both nations at the IOC's behest following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. The committee later allowed certain Russian and Belarusian athletes to compete under a neutral flag, provided they pass a vetting process to determine that they have not supported the Ukraine conflict.
'The IOC Executive Board recommendation from March 2023 with regard to teams of athletes with a Russian passport remains in place,' ESPN wrote last week, citing the IOC. 'It is based on the fact that, by definition, a group of Individual Neutral Athletes cannot be considered a team.'
Last week, the Russian Olympic Committee announced it intends to challenge the national hockey team's ban.
Moscow has repeatedly branded the IOC sanctions a perversion of the Olympic Charter, which is supposed to keep the Games free of political interference.
The 2026 Winter Olympics will be held in February, in the cities of Milan and Cortina d'Ampezzo.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
33 minutes ago
- Russia Today
NATO summit to avoid Ukraine membership issue
NATO leaders convening for a key summit this month will deliberately avoid discussing membership for Ukraine, AFP reported on Wednesday, citing sources. The bloc's members are reportedly wary of raising the issue due to fears it could exacerbate tensions between the EU and US. Members of the US-led military bloc are highly likely to 'steer clear of its previous strong statements that Ukraine is on course to join the alliance' when the summit takes place in The Hague in late June, the agency said. One diplomatic source told AFP that the final declaration is expected to omit any mention of Ukrainian membership to maintain unity among member states. 'There will be nothing on that,' a NATO diplomat said. 'My expectation is we will be absolutely silent.' US President Donald Trump has expressed firm opposition to Ukraine's bid to join NATO. In February, he suggested that Ukraine 'can forget about NATO,' adding that Kiev's bid was 'probably the reason the whole thing started,' referring to the conflict with Russia. Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky is still expected to be present at the summit, but any formal talks between the bloc and Kiev are unlikely, AFP said. 'It will be a PR disaster if he's not there,' another diplomat told the agency. While NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has insisted that Ukraine remains a priority issue at the summit, AFP sources have painted a different picture. They suggested that the overwhelming emphasis will be on trying to satisfy Trump's demands that member states drastically ramp up their defense spending. It 'is the most important part and no one wants to jeopardize that,' the agency's source said. Russia has stated that NATO membership for Ukraine is a red line and one of the key reasons for the conflict, insisting that Ukraine adopt a neutral status as a key condition for a lasting peace. While Trump administration officials have described NATO membership as 'a bridge too far,' Kiev has refused to commit to neutrality or to refraining from hosting foreign troops on its soil, which Moscow also considers to be a red line.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Woman arrested for gathering intel near Crimean Bridge
A woman has been arrested in Russia for allegedly collecting intelligence on air defense systems near the Crimean Bridge for Kiev, the Federal Security Service (FSB) announced on Wednesday. Another woman suspected of operating on behalf of Ukraine was also detained, according to the statement. The suspected Ukrainian assets, both reportedly residents of Crimea in their late 30s, are said to have acted independently but each volunteered to work with Ukrainian security services, according to the FSB. One suspect, identified as a resident of the port city of Sevastopol, allegedly cooperated with the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) starting in late 2022. In 2023, she allegedly committed arson at a power transformer substation. She told the FSB that she also photographed Russian air defense positions near the city of Kerch. The city sits at the eastern tip of the peninsula and is connected to Russia's Krasnodar Region by the Crimean Bridge, which is Europe's longest. Ukrainian officials have repeatedly identified the destruction of the bridge as a priority goal. Kiev has launched numerous attacks against it using car bombs, Western-supplied cruise missiles, and unmanned maritime drones. On Tuesday, the SBU released video footage it claimed showed the latest attempt to destroy the bridge. The agency said it spent months planting an explosive device near one of its pillars, describing it as equivalent to 1.1 tons of TNT. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov commented on the incident Wednesday, saying Kiev's claims of serious damage were unfounded, and that the bridge remained fully operational. The second suspect was described by the FSB as a resident of the Nizhnegorsk district in northeastern Crimea. Authorities allege she contacted Ukraine's military intelligence agency (HUR) and conducted surveillance of Russian military targets. The FSB claims her tip led to a Ukrainian strike on a Russian fuel depot. Both women face up to 20 years in prison if convicted of treason, the agency said. Earlier this week, the FSB also reported the arrest of a 59-year-old man in Crimea who allegedly assembled an improvised explosive device in his garage under instructions from Ukrainian handlers.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
US intel behind Ukrainian attack on Russian planes – ex-French spy
Ukraine would not have been able to remotely attack strategic Russian aircraft parked deep inside Russian territory without direct intelligence and satellite support from the US, a former officer in the French military has claimed. Ukrainian drones struck airbases across Russia on Monday in a coordinated attack known as 'Operation Spider's Web', targeting sites from Murmansk in the Arctic to Irkutsk in Siberia. Kiev has claimed that around 40 Russian military aircraft were damaged or destroyed, including Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers. Moscow has not confirmed the claims, reporting that most of Kiev's drones were shot down. The strikes were reportedly carried out using commercial trucks rigged with explosive-laden drones that had been smuggled inside Russia. Kiev's operation involved piloting FPV drones thousands of kilometers from the front lines, Guillaume Ancel, a writer and former French army lieutenant colonel, told Le Monde on Wednesday. 'This is possible and conceivable only with the support of a powerful satellite communications system,' he said. 'Since the Ukrainians don't have this mastery, if they were able to act remotely, it's certainly thanks to the United States.' Ancel suggested that Kiev 'would not have been able to carry out the operation without information from American intelligence.' While some in the West have hailed Ukraine's latest drone operation, Stephane Audrand, an international risk consultant and reserve officer, has stressed that it would not actually have much of an impact. Despite its spectacular nature, 'Operation Spider's Web' 'will not change the tactical balance of power on the ground or the course of the war, because these weapons are not used on the battlefield,' Audrand told Le Monde. Throughout the Ukraine conflict, Moscow has described the hostilities as a Western proxy war against Russia and has condemned arms supplies to Kiev as counterproductive to the peace process. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also recently acknowledged the nature of the conflict, stating: 'Frankly, it's a proxy war between nuclear powers – the United States, helping Ukraine, and Russia.' Moscow has vehemently condemned Ukraine's continued drone strikes into Russian territory in recent weeks, claiming that they undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has claimed that the latest attacks are an attempt to derail the peace process.
