FMCSA refuses correction request on side underride guards on trailers
WASHINGTON — The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has ruled that it is not obligated to correct a federally funded study that a major insurance group believes underestimates the safety benefits of side underride guards on truck trailers.
In its request for the correction filed in December, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) said that FMCSA's exclusion of a crucial cost-benefit analysis in a review of side-underride studies puts at risk IIHS' reputation for providing independent, data-driven information to its members.
IIHS explained that it created a 'Toughguard' award to encourage trailer manufacturers to design rear underride guards that provide more protection for rear-end crashes than those designed to minimum regulatory requirements.
'Currently, IIHS is considering a new award for side underride guards based on our own analyses of real-world crashes as well as crash tests of an aftermarket design,' the group told FMCSA.
'The suppression of the [cost-benefit data] undermines this effort and could result in IIHS being seen as lacking justification for a side guard award. This could damage our reputation as a trustworthy, objective organization committed to public safety, weakening our position when advocating for all types of traffic safety improvements. And it could discourage trailer manufacturers from offering side underride guards that could prevent hundreds of fatalities and even more severe injuries each year.'
FMCSA was not swayed. In a response letter published on Thursday, the agency pointed out that, based on federal criteria for information quality, IIHS 'has the burden of proof with respect to establishing the necessity for correction. The IIHS has not met this burden and FMCSA has determined that there is no inconsistency' regarding the exclusion of the cost-benefit data. 'FMCSA has determined that no correction is necessary.'
FreightWaves reached out to IIHS for comment.
The determination made by FMCSA is the second setback for side-guard safety advocates in less than a month. In March, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ruled there was insufficient evidence in a petition submitted by the Institute for Safer Trucking to warrant an investigation into whether truck trailers without side underride guards should be recalled as unsafe.
Side underride guards can prevent passenger cars from sliding underneath trailers and injuring or killing the occupants.
After considering the petition, NHTSA determined that the issues raised by the safety group are better addressed in a separate underride guard rulemaking currently under review at the agency.
FMCSA listed several reasons explaining why the cost-benefit analysis cited by IIHS, which was part of a report issued by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center and paid for by the Department of Transportation, was ultimately left out of FMCSA's review.
The analysis, according to the agency, 'overestimated the target population without detailing the source of the estimate, overestimated the effectiveness of LPDs [lateral protection devices] in various crash scenarios (including pedestrian and bicyclist impacts with the cab and front of the vehicle where no LPD is present), and underestimated the cost of LPDs, installation and maintenance cost, and additional fuel cost due to the added weight of LPDs.'
Also, the methodology used in the Volpe report 'included incidents in which the vulnerable road user was struck at an impact location where LPDs would not be present, such as by the front of the commercial motor vehicle,' FMCSA asserted. 'Therefore, the analysis would result in an over-estimation of the target population associated with LPDs, thereby leading to a significant over-estimation of the benefits.'
NHTSA nominee raises concerns among truck safety advocates
NHTSA committee blasts DOT in truck underride report
NHTSA denies crash victim families' request for truck rear-guard probe
Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.
The post FMCSA refuses correction request on side underride guards on trailers appeared first on FreightWaves.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Does DOT's enforcement policy put truck safety at risk?
WASHINGTON — A new enforcement policy being considered by the U.S. Department of Transportation marks a significant change in enforcement of trucking violations, and crash-victim advocates are concerned it will make the roads less safe. In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued in May, the DOT is proposing several administrative changes, including how it oversees enforcement procedures by several of its modal agencies, including the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The NPRM 'proposes updates to the Department's procedural requirements governing the review and clearance of guidance documents, and the initiation and conduct of enforcement actions, including administrative enforcement proceedings and judicial enforcement actions brought in Federal court,' the proposal states. Significantly for the trucking industry, DOT's proposal follows a trend within government to push adjudication out of the regulatory agencies and into the federal courts. Unless a statute or regulation clearly authorizes an agency such as FMCSA to enforce a legal requirement directly through an administrative enforcement proceeding, DOT's NPRM states, 'the proper forum for the enforcement action is Federal court, and the enforcement action must be initiated in court by attorneys of the Department of Justice acting in coordination with DOT counsel.' Zach Cahalan, executive director of the Truck Safety Coalition, a truck-crash victim advocacy group, believes that placing enforcement for truck industry violations in the hands of courts and judges unfamiliar with how the industry operates could result in less enforcement and riskier carriers. 'TSC is deeply concerned that these changes will severely diminish DOT's ability to enforce safety regulations against carriers,' Cahalan told FreightWaves. 'The notion that regulated entities should have their fate decided by federal judges rather than the DOT is absurd and unheard of. Make no mistake, this is a radical departure from the longstanding accepted norms and will only benefit industry. This will result in far less enforcement and more unsafe carriers operating discriminately on our roads.' Cahalan also noted DOT's plan to adopt the 'Brady rule' in all enforcement actions, including those of the FMCSA, as part of the proposed rule. The rule states that the government has a duty to disclose exculpatory information – information that could clear someone of guilt or blame – in criminal cases. Adopting the rule for enforcement actions 'will contribute to the Department's goal of open and fair investigations and administrative enforcement proceedings,' DOT stated. 'These disclosures should include any material evidence … that may be favorable to the regulated entity in the enforcement action—including evidence that tends to negate or diminish the party's responsibility for a violation or that could be relied upon to reduce the potential fine or other penalties.' But adopting such a practice, Cahalan said, 'does strike me as favorable to industry.' Brian Stansbury, who was chief counsel at FMCSA during the Biden administration, understands why safety advocates are concerned with the proposed policy shift. 'Giving members of the regulated community the ability to disqualify the enforcement official that they're dealing with gives the regulated community real power to push back on enforcement proceedings,' Stansbury, now a partner at the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, told FreightWaves in an interview. 'My concern is that it could make enforcement harder for the department if the first move every single time by a member of the regulated community is to try to disqualify the enforcement official. This could result in additional delays and wasted resources spent addressing requests to disqualify. This is an even greater concern with respect to FMCSA enforcement, where you have so many enforcement matters occurring at any given time.' Regarding adoption of the Brady rule in administrative enforcement actions, 'I believe government enforcement officials should be held to a high level of impartiality with a focus on justice, not getting a favorable result, and I am comfortable with the regulated community to have tools to ensure they get exculpatory information,' he said. 'But it also gives bad actors a tool to delay and undermine enforcement actions, and those bad actors are probably the ones most inclined to operate unsafely. It's the risk of abuse that we have to be thoughtful about.' P. Sean Garney, co-director of Scopelitis Transportation Consulting and an FMCSA regulations expert, said that while DOT's policy shift seeks to reduce regulatory red tape, it is no gift to the trucking industry. 'I think this is more about regulatory philosophy than an industry versus safety issue,' Garney told FreightWaves. 'Some regulations protect industry and keep bad actors out. Good actors in the industry have a vested interest in setting a reasonable standard through regulation.' Garney pointed out that a provision within the proposal that weakens the power of guidance documents could actually work against the industry. 'Without this guidance they won't know how to stay compliant and will not have a reliable foundation on which to build their operations.' The deadline for public comment on DOT's proposed enforcement changes is June 16. Trump administration wants to cut FMCSA workforce by 7% DOT's deregulation barrage raises compliance concerns for trucking Freight industry: Which regulations should DOT cut? Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher. The post Does DOT's enforcement policy put truck safety at risk? appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Insurance group approves first container chassis crash guard
A container chassis designed by Stoughton Trailers has received the first award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) for protection against rear underride crashes. A rear underride guard is a metal frame attached to the back of a semitrailer to prevent passenger cars from sliding beneath the trailer in the event of a rear-end crash. Underride guards that meet IIHS's safety criteria are more likely than others to withstand an impact, reducing the severity of the crash. Wisconsin-based Stoughton had previously earned the award for its dry vans and refrigerated vans. Now the company's 53-foot intermodal chassis – which carry shipping containers directly transferred from ships or railcars – also meets IIHS's 'Toughguard' criteria, the insurance group announced on Thursday. 'We're excited about the commitment that Stoughton has shown to preventing underride crashes,' said IIHS President David Harkey in a statement. 'Improving the safety of commercial vehicles is a key part of our 30×30 strategy, which targets a 30% reduction in road fatalities by 2030.' IIHS pointed out that in 2022, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration updated federal regulations governing rear underride protection on large trucks. However, 'the new rule remains far less stringent than the Toughguard requirements and is not expected to push manufacturers to improve,' IIHS contends. Stoughton was among the earliest trailer manufacturers to earn the group's Toughguard safety award for its dry vans and refrigerated trailers in 2017. To date, nine North American trailer manufacturers, including the eight largest, have earned the awards. NHTSA side underride analysis slammed by safety, insurance advocates Trump's NHTSA nominee raises concerns among truck safety advocates US chassis makers allege foreign dumping again Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher. The post Insurance group approves first container chassis crash guard appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
New trailer type gets strong underride guard
Stoughton extends IIHS-award-winning underride protection to container shipping ARLINGTON, Va., June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A Stoughton chassis designed for container transport is the first of its kind to qualify for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's TOUGHGUARD award for superior underride protection. Wisconsin-based Stoughton, a leading manufacturer of semitrailers, previously earned the award for its dry vans and refrigerated vans. Now the company's 53-foot intermodal chassis also meets the TOUGHGUARD criteria. The award applies to models built after April 2025. An intermodal chassis is a special type of trailer that can carry shipping containers directly transferred from ships or railcars. 'We're excited about the commitment that Stoughton has shown to preventing underride crashes,' IIHS President David Harkey said. 'Improving the safety of commercial vehicles is a key part of our 30x30 strategy, which targets a 30% reduction in road fatalities by 2030.' A rear underride guard is a metal frame attached to the back of a semitrailer to prevent lower-riding vehicles from sliding beneath the trailer in the event of a rear-end crash. All rear underride guards must meet federal safety standards. However, IIHS research and crash tests have shown that many can buckle or break off in a crash. Underride guards that meet the TOUGHGUARD criteria are substantially more likely to withstand an impact, reducing the severity of the crash. Until now, only dry van, refrigerated and flatbed trailers have qualified. But with the growing importance of shipping containers in global trade, more and more freight is being transported using intermodal chassis. Chassis-type trailers present a unique challenge when it comes to underride protection. The frame of a dry van, refrigerated or flatbed trailer extends across its entire wheelbase, supporting the underride guard for its full width. In contrast, an intermodal chassis is a ladder-like structure that lies between the trailer's wheels to support the removable container. For that reason, the underride guard required a completely new design. Instead of a vertical support attached to the trailer deck, the chassis guard features long, diagonal supports running from the guard's outboard ends to the chassis rails. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) updated federal regulations governing rear underride protection on large trucks in June 2022. However, the new rule remains far less stringent than the TOUGHGUARD requirements and is not expected to push manufacturers to improve. 'A major weakness of the federal regulation is that in the required test, the underride guard is bolted to a universal testing rig instead of an actual trailer,' IIHS Senior Test Coordinator Sean O'Malley said. 'When we were developing the TOUGHGUARD program, we found that many underride guards that survived testing attached to NHTSA's rig broke off when attached to the trailer they were built to be used on, either because the attachment points on the trailer failed or the bolts did.' In contrast, IIHS evaluates underride guards on the trailers they are designed for. In the IIHS test, a midsize car crashes into the back of the parked trailer at 35 mph in three configurations, hitting the trailer with its full width, a 50% overlap and a 30% overlap. To earn the IIHS award, the guard must prevent underride in all three configurations. The 30% overlap configuration — which was left out of the new federal requirements — is the most challenging, because only the corner of the underride guard must absorb all the force of the impact. Initially, these tests were conducted in-house. Now IIHS allows trailer manufacturers to submit data and footage from tests conducted at their own facilities or by contractors for IIHS experts to review. The tests of Stoughton's intermodal chassis were conducted by Calspan. Stoughton was also among the earliest trailer manufacturers to earn a TOUGHGUARD award for its dry vans and refrigerated trailers in 2017. To date, nine North American trailer manufacturers, including the eight largest, have earned TOUGHGUARD awards. ### For more information, go to The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is an independent, nonprofit scientific and educational organization dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries and property damage from motor vehicle crashes through research and evaluation and through education of consumers, policymakers and safety professionals. IIHS is wholly supported by auto insurers. CONTACT: Joe Young Insurance Institute for Highway Safety 504-641-0491 jyoung@ in to access your portfolio
