logo
Time to obliterate the off ramp for language's sake

Time to obliterate the off ramp for language's sake

The Advertiser12 hours ago

This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-Canada trade deal talks restart after Mark Carney drops plans for a digital services tax
US-Canada trade deal talks restart after Mark Carney drops plans for a digital services tax

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

US-Canada trade deal talks restart after Mark Carney drops plans for a digital services tax

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney says trade talks with the US have resumed after Canada dropped its plan for a digital services tax that would have hit American tech companies. US President Donald Trump suspended trade talks with Canada last week over its plans to continue with the levy, which would have been targeted at Silicon Valley giants such as Amazon, Meta, Google and Apple. Mr Trump called the tax "a direct and blatant attack on our country". The Canadian government said "in anticipation" of a trade deal "Canada would rescind" the digital services tax which was due to come into effect on Monday. But following a phone call between Mr Carney and Mr Trump on Sunday, the Canadian prime minister's office announced they had agreed to resume negotiations. "Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis," Mr Carney said in a statement. At the G7 summit in Alberta, Mr Carney said that Canada and the US had set a 30-day deadline for trade talks. Canada's planned levy was 3 per cent of the digital services revenue a firm takes in from Canadian users above $CAD20 million ($24.5million) in a calendar year, and payments were to be retroactive to 2022. It would have impacted US technology firms, including Amazon, Meta, Google and Apple. The tax would have applied to periods dating back to 2022, leaving US companies with a $US2 billion ($3 billion) bill due at the end of the month. The tax collection will be halted, the statement from Canada's finance ministry said. "The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians," the statement said. "Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation." Going forward Canada's Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne will bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act. Daniel Béland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, called Mr Carney's retreat a "clear victory" for Donald Trump. "At some point this move might have become necessary in the context of Canada-US trade negotiations themselves but Prime Minister Carney acted now to appease President Trump and have him agree to simply resume these negotiations, which is a clear victory for both the White House and big tech," Mr Béland said. He said it makes Mr Carney look vulnerable to the US president's outbursts. "President Trump forced PM Carney to do exactly what big tech wanted. US tech executives will be very happy with this outcome," he added. The announcement on Friday was the latest development in the trade war Mr Trump has launched since returning to office in January. Relations between the US and Canada have been a roller coaster in recent months. The US president repeatedly suggesting Canada should become America's "51st state" provoked a furious backlash in Canada, though tensions subsided somewhat when Mr Carney was elected in March. Canada and the US have been discussing easing a series of steep tariffs Mr Trump imposed on Canadian goods. He has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium as well as 25 per cent tariffs on autos. He is also charging a 10 per cent tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period he set would expire. AP/Reuters

Israel-Gaza war will only end with ‘complete dismantlement' of Hamas
Israel-Gaza war will only end with ‘complete dismantlement' of Hamas

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Israel-Gaza war will only end with ‘complete dismantlement' of Hamas

Executive Council of Australian Jewry Co-CEO Alex Ryvchin discusses United States President Donald Trump's belief that an Israel-Gaza ceasefire could happen within the next week. 'We hope this war does end, but I think it will take the complete dismantlement of Hamas to a point where they see no way out,' Mr Rvychin told Sky News host James Macpherson. 'Either accept surrender or exile for their leadership, I think that's the only way we get to a conclusion here.'

EDITORIAL: Penny Wong the wrong person to win American's favour
EDITORIAL: Penny Wong the wrong person to win American's favour

West Australian

time3 hours ago

  • West Australian

EDITORIAL: Penny Wong the wrong person to win American's favour

Australian steel and aluminium exports to the US face punishing 50 per cent tariffs. From July 9 every single other item sent to our third largest trading partner will be subject to levies of 10 per cent. AUKUS, once touted as the 'once-in-a-generation' opportunity to foster international co-operation and boost peace and stability in the Pacific, is at risk with the Americans undertaking a 30-day review of the submarine deal — seemingly in retaliation for Australia's military budget intransigence. And US President Donald Trump has made it clear where Australia stands in his list of priorities, standing Anthony Albanese up and making no effort to schedule a make-up session. Australia's relationship with its No.1 security ally is at its lowest ebb in memory. And into this fray we are sending . . . Penny Wong. The Foreign Minister is off to Washington to meet with her counterparts in the Quad strategic partnership, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The fact that it is Ms Wong, whose procrastination in backing the US's recent strike action against Iran and repeated conflation of Israel with Hamas's terrorist leadership has won her few friends in the Republican administration, who is being deployed at this critical juncture is deeply worrying. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is seemingly no closer to securing a long awaited meeting with Mr Trump. The earliest opportunity for a sit-down is believed to be in September, when Mr Albanese is scheduled to travel to the US to address the United Nations. That would make it 10 months since Mr Trump's election, and eight since his inauguration, that the Prime Minister and the President have gone with just a handful of phone calls between them. All the while tensions continue to simmer — over AUKUS, over tariffs and over whether Australia is pulling its weight in our military alliance. It's a worrisome situation and one Mr Albanese appears content to play out, unwilling to risk further damage to his ego after Mr Trump blew him off having left the G7 summit in Canada early to deal with the conflict in the Middle East. Mr Albanese says Australia is continuing to lobby for an exemption to Mr Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs, with diplomats working behind the scenes on making the nation's case. No doubt that's true. But it's clear that those efforts have so far entirely failed to secure any traction. This is not a problem that will be resolved through diplomats — particularly if those diplomats are Kevin Rudd, who Mr Trump has a public, personal dislike for. Nor is it likely that Ms Wong will secure any meaningful wins. Australia's best chance of repairing our relationship with our most important ally comes will come at the highest level. That means Mr Albanese needs to get to DC sooner rather than later to meet with Mr Trump. And when he does so, he needs to be armed with arguments stronger than those already tried and failed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store