‘Going Around' Review: A Midcentury Witness
In November 1989 El Salvador's Marxist guerrillas launched an offensive against that country's U.S.-backed government. Foreign journalists not assigned to cover the fall of the Berlin Wall flocked to San Salvador. Among them was a thin, white-haired American, dressed in a suit and tie and riding a bicycle around the tropical streets: 71-year-old Murray Kempton. At one point, Kempton joined two correspondents, from the U.S. and Japan, to check out the fighting. Caught in a crossfire, the three scrambled for cover in a concrete stairwell.
'I haven't had this much excitement since the Philippines fighting the Japs,' Kempton cried. Then, remembering the colleague from Tokyo huddling nearby, Kempton quickly added: 'No offense intended, of course.'
Intrepid, cerebral, equal parts old-fashioned manners and revolution-curious politics—Kempton produced 11,000 newspaper columns, as well as books, essays and pamphlets, in the six decades bracketed by the presidential second terms of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Bill Clinton. Before his death in 1997 at age 79, Kempton wrote for just about everybody, but most famously for Newsday, the New York Review of Books and the New York Post (mostly in its liberal incarnation before Rupert Murdoch bought it).
Kempton was to New York City roughly what Walter Lippmann was to Washington. His stock in trade, though, was not Lippmann's—high-level access. It was 'going around,' observing events, often on his bicycle. Hence the title of this collection of his writing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jon Stewart says he never realized 'Daily Show' lighting designer was a dead ringer for Pedro Pascal
Jon Stewart never saw it coming. After George Gountas, a lighting designer for Comedy Central's The Daily Show, took the crown at Sunday's Pedro Pascal look-alike contest in New York City, the host had him sit down for an interview. The Emmy winner admitted that he hadn't compared Gountas to The Last of Us actor. "I've never noticed that he looks like Pedro Pascal," Stewart said. He showed a picture of what Gountas looks like around the office — with no glasses, curlier hair on his head, and a beard on his face — to show why. "Well, it's pretty funny," Gountas said of how he'd found out about the contest. "Tyler Goldman, stage manager, had a group text on maybe Wednesday last week. And he was like, 'Yo, you should go win a year of free burritos.' And I was like, 'OK.' And then I went home. And then on Friday, I showed it to my wife, and she was like, 'You're doing this.'" Gountas explained that his neighbor is a stylist who supplied most of his wardrobe. Gountas said he showed up to the contest without having reserved a spot. "I rolled up and I'm like, 'Yo, I'm here,'" he said. "And they were like, 'You're going to win.'" Stewart said that, now that he sees it, the resemblance between Gountas, 43, and the 50-year-old actor is "really crazy." "You're a sexier, younger Pedro Pascal," Stewart joked. He also wanted to know what Gountas' wife had to say about all the hubbub. "Her position is, 'I'm cool with you getting all this attention, if I can meet Pedro Pascal.'" Gountas then looked directly at the camera while making a personal plea to Pascal. "Hey Pedro, this is Pedro #5 from New York. It would be a great, great, great gift if you could meet my wife, Jenny," Gountas said. "It would mean the world to her. We need to make this happen." Gountas' wife, Jenny Gania, told the New York Post that others have noticed the resemblance her husband has to Pascal since the star played Oberyn Martell on Game of Thrones. More people have noticed as Pascal went on to star on Disney+ series The Mandalorian and portray Joel on The Last of Us. When Gountas spoke to Stewart, he acknowledged that the attention he had received even in the first 24 hours after the contest was "f---ing insane.""So, none of this bothers me," Gountas added. "I've been in the industry for many years. I've been around famous people. But the thing that I was most, not scared of, the most uneasy about, was coming here today." Gountas feels like the people on the show are like big brothers to him. "And I knew I was gonna get roasted by my friends," he said. At least he did win those burritos, plus $50. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Boston Globe Media Celebrates Prestigious Journalism Award Wins Across The Organization
Recent accolades include four New England Emmy® Awards, three Scripps Howard Journalism Awards, an INMA Global Media Award, and a National City and Regional Magazine Award BOSTON, June 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Boston Globe Media is proud to recognize notable and award-winning work across several brands in its media portfolio, including The Boston Globe, STAT, The B-Side, and Boston magazine. "At a time when journalism is so vital, it's a true joy for so many of our teams across Boston Globe Media to be recognized and celebrated for their remarkable work, impactful stories, and commitment to holding people and organizations accountable," said Linda Henry, CEO of Boston Globe Media. "The talented editors, producers, and journalists responsible for this work are dedicated to serving our community in the region and to setting a nationwide industry standard of excellence." The Boston Globe was awarded three New England Emmy® Awards, underscoring the newsroom's commitment to amplifying its renowned journalism through video innovation. Winning entries were recognized in the categories of Societal Concerns-News for a short-form video by Olivia Yarvis and Janelle Nanos titled "Anxious? Lonely? Disconnected? Blame the post-pandemic 'human doom loop.'" The Globe received top prize in the News Promotion category for "Why didn't anyone stop the Lewiston shooter?" by Randy Vazquez and Tim Rasmussen. The former Boston Globe Today show won in the category of Politics and Government for "Breaking Down the Ballot Questions" with more than 10 individuals listed, including James Pindell, host and Globe political reporter. Boston Globe Media also celebrated an Emmy® win in the Societal Concerns - Long Form Content category for the documentary "Bearing Witness: A Name & A Voice" which was executive produced by Boston Globe Media CEO Linda Henry in collaboration with Anthem Multimedia and featured former and current members of the Globe team sharing the critical importance of accountability and investigative journalism. The Globe Spotlight team's investigation of Steward Health Care was named the recipient of a Scripps Howard Journalism Award for Best-in-the-Nation Business/Financial reporting. The Scripps Howard is considered one of the country's top journalism competitions, honoring work across visual, audio, digital, and print platforms. In addition, the Globe's coverage of the Sandra Birchmore case was a finalist in Local/Regional Investigative Reporting, and the team behind Massachusetts Legislature State Secrets earned a finalist placement in the category of Distinguished Service to the First Amendment. It's the second straight year the Spotlight newsroom has taken home a Scripps Howard. Last year, the Murder in Boston podcast won an award for Excellence in Audio Storytelling. STAT received two Scripps Howard Journalism Awards for "Health Care's Colossus": The Excellence in National/International Investigative Reporting, the Ursula and Gilbert Farfel Prize and the Impact Award, the highest honor amongst all award recipients. The judges noted that STAT's examination of UnitedHealth "stood out" by "combining old-fashioned shoe leather reporting and cutting-edge data analysis" to show how the company profited at the expense of patients, prompting legislative reform. The B-Side took home first place at the International News Media Association (INMA) 2025 Global Media Awards in New York, winning in the regional category of Best Initiative to Bolster Next-Generation Readership. The international winners announced in all categories were awarded for innovation and forward thinking in a variety of industry topics, including digital features, subscriptions, and artificial intelligence. The B-Side team was recognized for its ambitious multiplatform strategy, which has delivered the journalism of Boston Globe Media brands to a young Boston audience through a daily newsletter and social media. Boston magazine won the General Excellence award for the largest circulation division at the 40th annual National City and Regional Magazine Awards (CRMA) competition at CRMA's annual conference in Denver. Judges shared that "You can feel the ambition, energy and love for Boston on every page." The magazine also won first in the category of Feature Design for "A Nuts-and-Bolts Guide to Boston's AI Revolution" and received top honors for the best Food or Dining Section with "Beacon." Learn more about Boston Globe Media's award-winning media portfolio at Contact: Boston Globe Media Communications Team, communications@ About Boston Globe Media:Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC is a locally owned, award-winning media company serving Boston and New England for over 153 years. Its cornerstone is The Boston Globe, a 27-time Pulitzer Prize-winning news source and one of the most successful metro news organizations in the United States. The Globe is headquartered in Boston with regional bureaus in Washington, D.C., Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. The Globe has been successfully growing its direct subscriber base, today boasting the highest total number of subscribers the organization has had since 2008. The Globe hosts events that connect community members to its journalism and provides a range of digital and home-delivered advertising solutions that reach more consumers than any other New England media brand. Boston Globe Media's portfolio includes The Boston Globe, STAT, Globe Opinion, The B-Side, Boston magazine, Globe Events, Studio/B, and Globe Publishing Services. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Boston Globe Media Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Empty seats are everywhere at the Club World Cup. But does this miss the real point?
If there's a lesson to be learned from the Club World Cup so far, it's that images of nothingness can still generate hysteria. Empty seats – which are apparently a festering scourge upon the game of football, a tragedy representing the plastic bankruptcy of American soccer fandom and/or the Club World Cup, an issue demanding alarmist coverage delivered with brows fully furrowed – have been commonplace in the competition's opening dozen games. Headlines (including from this very publication) have followed. Social media is awash in panoramic photos from a nation of press boxes, informing you incredulously that this image, so obscene in its emptiness, was taken a mere 45 minutes before kickoff – or (gasp) even closer. Why do we, the fans, observers, journalists, and other people who simply watch these games, care? What is it about the sight of a whole lot of plastic folding chairs with nobody in them that inflames our passions? Since when did we all become Clint Eastwood at the 2012 Republican National Convention? Advertisement Related: Trent Alexander-Arnold takes first step of Real Madrid high-wire act | Barney Ronay Empty seats mean unrealized revenues from tickets, concessions, merchandise, parking and exploitative fees, but that stuff isn't affecting our bottom line. The marketing strategy that demanded premium prices for those seats was misguided at best and laughably hubristic at worst, but it was not ours. There were plenty of inflated promises about guaranteed sellouts, the 'greatest spectacle in club football history', involving the '32 best teams in the world' that are being made to look completely silly in hindsight – but we weren't the ones who promised them. At most, the extent of our involvement with an empty seat at the Club World Cup is sitting next to one. Still, the tenor of the zeitgeist contains a strange mix of worry, sadness, and above all, cynicism. The empty seats are taken as a physical sign that while Fifa may care a little about games taking place in front of passionate fans, it cares far more about the money it gets from selling the TV rights, advertising space, and other considerations – often to the sovereign wealth fund of the country hosting a future World Cup, or the previous one. In theory, the empty seats prove that fans and atmosphere – the things that make soccer what it is – are of secondary importance. I would suggest that these critiques, while valid and true, miss the point. We are just talking about seats here. Not all of them are empty, and many of them are in very, very large stadiums. So far, Club World Cup venues have been about 52% full on average, using attendance figures as announced by Fifa. (In reality, those figures are likely far more representative of the number of tickets sold or distributed rather than butts in seats, but they at least give us an idea.) Going by the median percentage, which downplays the outliers, stadiums have been at 43% capacity. Advertisement Those are ugly numbers. If a professional club team (or several) consistently played in front of stadiums that were half-full or less, one might question whether they're playing in the right stadiums. If this dynamic sounds vaguely familiar to you, you may be a fan of MLS. The US first division began its life by living a week-in, week-out version of this very problem – a new competition that nobody knew quite what to make of, with most teams playing in massive NFL or college football stadiums in which even decent crowds were made to look minuscule and sparse. The league slowly but surely learned its lesson – nearly every one of its 30 teams plays in their own intimate grounds, the largest of which top out at about 30,000. It's not a league of constant sellouts, but the environments have improved markedly. It's a lesson Fifa should have learned, given they're hosting this tournament in MLS's backyard. There were plenty of raucous Brazilian fans on hand at the cavernous MetLife Stadium on Tuesday for Fluminense's draw with Dortmund, but the 84,000 capacity venue was still half-full. It leaves you to wonder how much more intense the occasion might have been just down the road at the 25,000-capacity Sports Illustrated Stadium, home of the New York Red Bulls (which is also more easily-accessible by public transit). Myriad other factors have affected turnout. There are well-founded fears of Ice raids, which may well have kept immigrant fans – undocumented or not – away from stadiums. For traveling fans, visa processing times have been a nightmare. In the case of teams like Ulsan Hyundai, Urawa Red Diamonds and Mamelodi Sundowns, the competition is far enough away to make travel all but impossible. For domestic fans, many games take place in the middle of workdays. And that's without even getting into ticket prices, which started in the hundreds of dollars and have only dropped as the dynamic pricing model has kicked in with kickoffs looming. Related: David Squires on … gimmicks and surprise guests as the Club World Cup kicks off Seen one way, the 22,137 who attended Chelsea v LAFC in Atlanta left 70% of the stadium empty. Seen another way, thousands of Atlantans (as well as Chelsea and LAFC fans) showed up despite all the mitigating factors listed above, in the middle of a Monday work day, for a game in a competition that nobody seems to know what to make of, involving an MLS team that plays 3,000 miles away and who only officially qualified weeks ago. I submit to you that, given all that, the attendance was a minor triumph. Chelsea will play in front of fewer fans when they visit Bournemouth's Dean Court this upcoming Premier League season. Advertisement Similarly, perhaps it should be celebrated that just under 35,000 came to see Flamengo play Esperance de Tunis later that night in Philadelphia, or that 40,311 dealt with the well-known traffic and crowd issues at the Rose Bowl to watch Monterrey v Inter. These are not the sellouts Fifa promised, but those promises, like many Fifa boasts, were stupid. The enthusiasm evident in the crowds themselves tell the rest of the story. When crowd sizes rankle, perhaps the problem is one of perception; of Fifa's uncanny ability to get in its own way. Football's world governing body has allowed the luxurious excesses of the World Cup – as in the actual one, the one that will take place next year – to cloud its vision of what this tournament, what the club game, is and can be. The World Cup has prestige. So much prestige, in fact, that fans can be assured that no matter which teams they're going to see, they will be watching a seminal moment in the modern history of those countries' sporting stories; and perhaps a milestone in the life of a country itself. Being a club fan is far more intimate, even for the biggest clubs in the world. It's a regular, everyday devotion that simply doesn't fit with Fifa's maximalist tendencies. Maybe that's why empty seats at these games have become such a focal point – they're an uncomfortable reminder that the world of every club is only so big.
