
Cradock Four inquest: Brutal murders were ‘calculated and premeditated', court told
Four anti-apartheid activists - Matthew Goniwe, Fort Calata, Sparrow Mkonto and Sicelo Mhlauli - were abducted and brutally murdered by apartheid security forces in June 1985.
The families of the victims still seek justice 40 years later despite two previous inquests identifying security forces as responsible for the killings of the Cradock Four.
The current inquest at the Eastern Cape High Court in Gqeberha will continue until 12 June, including site visits to the Goniwe family home, Cradock Four Monument, and the scene of abduction.
The murder of the Cradock Four by the apartheid regime's security forces was calculated and premeditated, the inquest into the deaths of the anti-apartheid activists heard on the first day of its reopening on Monday.
The inquest is being held at the Eastern Cape High Court in Gqeberha.
Matthew Goniwe, Fort Calata, Sparrow Mkonto and Sicelo Mhlauli, popularly known as the Cradock Four, were abducted and viciously murdered by the South African security police in June 1985.
This was after they were detained at a roadblock near Gqeberha.
The first inquest was opened in 1987 and concluded in February 1989 with no prosecution.
A second inquest in 1994 was presided by Judge Neville Zietsman who found security forces responsible for the murders and established that a case of suspicion had been made out against police officers and members of South African Defence Force (SADF).
Despite the findings, no action was taken against them.
On behalf of the families of the victims, Howard Varney from law firm Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, said it was unfortunate that 40 years later, the families were still waiting for justice.
Varney said the victims were murdered as part of apartheid regime's ruthless campaign against those mobilising resistance against the oppression.
He added:
These were four young men who had so much to offer South Africa. They were visionaries and leaders. They were deeply loved and treasured by their families, friends and comrades.
'We intend to demonstrate that the deaths of the Cradock Four were brought about by a way of a calculated and premeditated decision by the apartheid regime. It was meticulously planned by the security branch in an official operation.'
Varney added that the Eastern Cape, Cradock in particular, was an epicentre of the fight back against apartheid.
'We believe that the role of the state security council in authorising or approving the elimination of the Cradock Four should be closely investigated by this inquest,' Varney added.
Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, SC, who represents some Goniwe family members and the Cradock community, said there was a possibility the 'full truth' could be told in the third inquest. 'There is also a possibility of closure from a perspective of psychological trauma,' he added.
The inquest, which is expected to continue until 12 June, will include an inspection in loco at the Goniwe family home in Nxuba (formerly Cradock), the Cradock Four Monument and the Olifantskop Pass - the scene of the abduction of the four, about 89km from Gqeberha.
Families of the victims, Eastern Cape Premier Oscar Mabuyane and Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi attended the proceedings on Monday.
Judge Nomathamsanqa Beshe said the purpose of an inquest was to establish whether the death of anyone who died of something other natural causes has been brought about by any act involving or amounting to an offence on the part of any person or persons.
'In the previously held inquests, the presiding officers concluded or held that the deaths of the Cradock Four were brought about by an unknown person or persons. I will be required to make a finding as to whether the deaths were brought about by an act or omission prima facie involving or amounting to an offence on the part of any person or persons.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Karen Read's silence in murder trial raises stakes for defense
Karen Read's defense team's decision to not call her to the witness stand is a gamble that could help or hinder her case after the prosecution played her damaging interview clips in her second murder trial – allowing the jury to hear Read's version of events in her own words. Read is facing the possibility of life in prison for the alleged murder of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The prosecution claims Read struck O'Keefe with her Lexus SUV in a drunken argument, leaving him to freeze to death in the front yard of a friend's house party shortly after midnight on Jan. 29, 2022. Read's defense team insists her vehicle never made contact with O'Keefe and there was no collision. "When I first came to practice, it was 'never put your client on stand, ever,'" New York City defense attorney Louis Gelormino told Fox News Digital. "But I tend to disagree with that sometimes. I think we have gotten our biggest wins when we put our client on the stand." On Tuesday, the defense submitted the team's proposed jury instructions that indicate Read will not take the stand in her trial. "As you know, Ms. Read did not testify at this trial," the instructions read. "You may not hold that against her. Ms. Read has an absolute right not to testify because, as I've explained, she is presumed to be innocent and does not have to do anything to convince you she is innocent." The instructions stress that the reason Read chose to not take the witness stand is not relevant to the jury's deliberations and cannot be considered evidence in her trial. Legal experts tell Fox News Digital the choice to keep a defendant from speaking may not always be the best choice. Gelormino said he believes Read would put on a strong performance on the witness stand, but calling her to testify does not come without risks. "I think the reason they're hiding her is because they don't want to have to have her explain all these videos that they saw of her not acting in a good way," Gelormino said. Special prosecutor Hank Brennan played numerous clips from Read's televised interviews, picking out clips that could potentially damage the defense. "I also wonder, did I say, 'could I have hit him,'" Read said in a 2024 interview with Investigation Discovery. "Or was it told to me that I said I hit him. And I knew I never could've said that, so the closest thing I must've said was, 'did I hit him?'" In the clip, Read questions if she "really [said] it as many times as law enforcement is claiming." In another clip, she talked about spiking her own drinks with extra shots because they weren't strong enough. Gelormino said the defense team likely does not want Read to be confronted about her statements on cross-examination, possibly opening the door for days of tense questioning from the state. "They don't want to have her explaining all of these misbehaviors or what people would think would be bad behavior," Gelormino said. But the choice to keep Read off the stand could potentially keep her from providing an explanation for her statements in the interviews while also clarifying her side of the story. "There are two sides of every coin," Gelormino told Fox News Digital. "You could put her on and try to have her explain it, or you can avoid it altogether." Gelormino pointed to the reality that Read could appear defensive while offering an explanation for her on-camera stories, which could shift the jury's perception of her personality. "As a defense attorney, you are going to have to clean that up," Gelormino said. "So you are going to be spending a lot of time defending your character there." GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB The videos pose a new obstacle for the defense, since they were not played in Read's first trial last year. "The first jury almost convicted Read of manslaughter while operating under the influence," retired Massachusetts Superior Court Judge and Boston College law professor Jack Lu told Fox News Digital. "That was with no defendant video statements. Here, we have many damaging statements, and maybe a few more in rebuttal." Lu said the defense has not attempted to address the video clips or provide context regarding Read's version of events at this point in the trial. "So, the same trial plus the damaging video, where the jury almost convicted, is bad for the defense," Lu said. As the defense continues calling witnesses, the notable absence of Read's own testimony will likely only be fully felt once the jury reads its verdict, with the prosecution acting as the only side that opted to include her own words in the courtroom. "Based on the fact that they had a hung jury the last time, [the defense has] a decent case," Gelormino told Fox News Digital. "So do you want to mess that up with having her defend her actions and character for the next two or three days on the stand? That's a tough decision."


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Can Rewrite the Narrative of America in Africa
In Africa, as in many other parts of the world, Donald Trump's policies have made him the embodiment of the pejorative stereotype of the ugly American – ignorant, arrogant and dangerous. He destroyed the 25-year-old African Growth and Opportunity Act, which granted African products duty-free entry to the US, imposing punishing tariffs on the continent. He canceled billions of dollars in aid, worth $12.7 billion in 2024. He angered African leaders with his White House ambush of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. And he's ramped up his previous insults against African nations by belittling countries such as Lesotho, an impoverished kingdom of 2.3 million, while nearly obliterating its economy with tariffs of 50%, the highest initially slapped on any country globally. Nevertheless, the US president has an opportunity to change the narrative without reversing any of the measures he's taken against Africa. Following their May 21 brawl, Ramaphosa announced that after months of proclaiming that neither he nor his officials would participate in the Johannesburg G-20 meetings this year, Trump will attend the all-important November summit after all.


Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
Manhunt underway for illegal immigrant wanted in serious Nashville hit-and-run
Law enforcement officials are seeking the public's help to find an illegal immigrant who is believed to be involved in a serious hit-and-run incident last month in Nashville. Detectives said Tony Lopez-Infante, 32, of Venezuela, is wanted for the May 18 crash that seriously injured Zach Carach, 21, of Florida. A spokesperson for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) confirmed to WZTV that Lopez-Infante entered the US in August 2023. ICE also confirmed to Fox News Digital that Lopez-Infante "is in the county illegally and has a final order of removal." "MNPD detectives are working to locate Tony Lopez-Infante, 32, of Venezuela, after warrants were obtained against him for the May 18 hit & run crash on Church St that injured Zach Carach, 21, of FL," police wrote in a post on X. "Know where he is? Please call 615-742-7463. Reward offered." Police told the outlet that Carach was celebrating his 21st birthday when he was struck by Lopez-Infante's car. Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., shared that his office had obtained the "disturbing video that reportedly captured the crash" and is demanding justice for Carach. "While celebrating his 21st birthday, Zach Carach was allegedly struck by a vehicle driven by Tony Lopez — who then fled the scene. Lopez is an illegal alien with six outstanding warrants. He was last seen in Mt. Juliet — in my district," Ogles wrote in a post on his Facebook page. Police said the vehicle involved in the collision, a Mitsubishi Mirage, was returned by Lopez-Infante, with front-end damage, to a rental facility in Mt. Juliet on May 19. "Officers located the car there the next day, on May 20. Investigation resulted in Lopez-Infante, of Venezuela, being identified as the hit-and-run driver," police said. Law enforcement officials added that ongoing efforts to locate Lopez-Infante have been unsuccessful, noting that federal partners, including Homeland Security Investigations, are assisting in the search. Once captured, police said Lopez-Infante will be charged with leaving the scene of a personal injury accident, failure to render aid/file an accident report, attempted evidence tampering, and driving without a license/insurance. Officials noted he is also wanted in Williamson County on "an outstanding probation violation warrant related to a theft arrest." Carach's mom, Sheena Carach, shared with Fox News Digital that her son is on day 16 in the hospital and is fully wheelchair bound for the next two months, pleading for answers about how Lopez-Infante was in the country. "I appeal to the American people to help us find TONY GEBIAN LOPEZ INFANTE (Tony Lopez), he hit our son on 5/18 in Nashville and fled… he fled the scene, packed his belongings, tried to bribe a mechanic to repair the car and then was picked up in a gold 05 Toyota Corolla, TN plates," Sheena Carach wrote in post on her Facebook page. Anyone with information on Lopez-Infante's whereabouts is urged to call Crime Stoppers at 615-742-7463. Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to