
Downing Street risks fresh row with claims rape gang tragedy has been ‘weaponized' – but won't say by who
DOWNING Street risked a major row today after claiming the grooming gangs scandal has been "weaponised" for political gain.
A spokesperson for Sir Keir Starmer declared it was "obviously disappointing" to witness "political point scoring" on such a grave issue.
However, No. 10 refused to identify who they believed was guilty of exploiting the scandal.
It comes after Cabinet Minister Lucy Powell provoked outrage by dismissing discussions surrounding grooming gangs as 'dog whistle' politics.
Her remarks, which likened the discourse to "blowing a little trumpet," sparked calls for her resignation.
Despite the backlash, Downing Street today reaffirmed Sir Keir's full confidence in Ms Powell.
When pressed on whether the PM shared Ms Powell's view that the scandal was being "weaponised," his spokesperson said: "It's obviously disappointing for people to engage in this kind of behaviour.
"But the Prime Minister remains focused on taking the necessary action to deliver justice for victims, rather than becoming embroiled in political point scoring."
When further questioned on who exactly was guilty of such tactics, the spokesperson added: "Any attempt at political point scoring on an issue as serious as this is disappointing.
"The government's priority is ensuring justice for victims."
Dr Lawrence Newport, a prominent campaigner for a national inquiry into grooming gangs, lambasted the government's stance, accusing it of failing victims.
He said: "The government's attitude that this is political point scoring is just ignoring that people are severely disappointed that the government has done NOTHING to help victims.
"There has been a cover-up.
"This does nothing more than help those that covered it up for decades."
Earlier today, Health Secretary Wes Streeting also weighed in, branding Ms Powell's remarks "indefensible."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Student blocks leased by Home Office to house migrants empty for year
Student blocks leased by the Home Office to house nearly 700 asylum seekers have stood empty for a year at a cost of millions of pounds to taxpayers. The blocks were built in 2019 for Huddersfield University students and feature 'spacious' studio bedrooms, dining rooms, kitchens and a gym, but have never been used. They were leased for an estimated £7 million in spring 2024 by the Tory government to provide a cheaper alternative to hotels for asylum seekers. However, they are still empty with no final decision on when migrants might be moved in. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, has pledged to axe the use of hotels for asylum seekers by the end of the Parliament in four years' time. At the end of March 2025 there were more than 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels, costing up to £6 million a day, out of a total government bill for asylum accommodation and support of £3.6 billion for the current year. It is understood negotiations are under way between Home Office and local council officials to place asylum seekers in the blocks but a source familiar with the talks said a decision on moving them in was 'months away'. It is part of attempts by Labour to use alternative 'mid-sized' sites including empty tower blocks, former student accommodation or vacant college buildings as an alternative to hotels. The new strategic partnerships would see accommodation either be owned by councils and leased to the Government for asylum use or secured by the Government and leased to local authorities. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Decisions on the future use of accommodation sites will be made in due course in consultation with local authorities and other stakeholders. 'This [Huddersfield] lease agreement was agreed before the election and change of government. No asylum seekers will be moved into the site until it is ready for occupancy, including meeting legal and building regulations.' The Huddersfield student blocks were one of four large sites identified for asylum seekers by the last government. They included the Bibby barge in Portland and former RAF bases at Scampton in Lincolnshire and Wethersfield in Essex. Labour shut down the Bibby and handed Scampton back to the local council, which now plans to turn the former Dambusters' squadron base into a national heritage site and aviation hub. Wethersfield is still being used to house hundreds of asylum seekers. The Home Office earmarked £358 million to use the Huddersfield blocks until 2034, according to the National Audit Office, which had access to internal data. This included running costs of £24.7 million a year and £7.1 million for 'site acquisition, lease and set up' in 2024/25. The Home Office said these were estimates and the actual cost was lower. After the blocks were built in 2019, they were issued with a prohibition notice following the Grenfell Tower fire as their cladding and internal fire protection works were judged unsafe. Remedial work costing almost £12 million – including refurbishing the studio bedrooms – was carried out in 2023 ready for student accommodation that September until the Home Office secured the site for asylum seekers. The Home Office denied at the time that students had been kicked out. 'Students who had enquired about the accommodation prior to Home Office involvement were informed by the housing company that they would need to seek alternative options,' it said. The Home Office interest came amid a growing backlash against asylum hotels. The numbers of migrants in hotels hit a high of 56,042 in September 2023 at a cost of £8 million a day. The Tories suggested then that migrants could move into the site in autumn 2024 but then lost the election. Labour has been reviewing asylum sites since inheriting the four 'big' sites from the Tories. A Home Office spokesman said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs, having already made asylum savings of half a billion. 'We are making strong strides to deliver a more sustainable and cost-effective asylum accommodation system. This includes ending the use of hotels, testing new locally led models and working closely with local authorities and other departments to ensure a fairer, more efficient approach that supports both individuals and communities.'


BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wales needs funding review, says First Minister Eluned Morgan
Wales' first minister has called for a funding system change, saying she does not want to "continue to go cap in hand" to Morgan said that she wanted to see the way Wales received funding overhauled, but did not indicate if this was something the UK government was the chancellor's Spending Review, the UK Labour government pledged £445m for rail projects in Wales, £118m for restoring coal tips and extra cash for the day-to-day spending of the Welsh government. The UK government has been asked to comment but Rachel Reeves has defended its spending plans for Wales, saying she had delivered what the Welsh government had asked for. Welsh government ministers and Welsh Labour MPs have pressed the UK government for more money for Wales to demonstrate the benefits of having two Labour governments either side of the parties have said Wales still was not being funded fairly, and there have been long-term calls for the formula used to decide that funding to be changed, so Wales gets a fair share of funding a visit to south Wales on Friday, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she had given the Welsh government "everything they'd asked for" which prompted Plaid Cymru to accuse Eluned Morgan and Welsh Secretary, Jo Stevens, of lacking ambition for Rossiter, co-director of the Institute of Welsh Affairs, said: "Decisions on allocation of spending should be apolitical and represent a technical way to derive Wales' fair share of funding. "This should not be about the secretary of state for Wales having to fight for fair funding." 'Unfair system' Morgan told Sunday's BBC Politics Wales "underpinning the economic future of Wales, that's what I'm interested in because I don't want to continue to go cap in hand" to said: "We've had an unfair system for a very long time. We need to catch up. There's a long way to go, so this is the beginning."We'll be fighting for a lot more to come, but do we need to make sure that there is a better system so that we can be assured of getting our rightful percentage? Absolutely."Morgan was asked whether or not those systemic changes were likely to happen, but she did not answer that question vast majority of the Welsh government's funding comes from the UK government, in what's known as the block grant. Its size is determined by the Barnett formula which is based on how much the UK government spend on devolved issues such as health and education in England. Morgan also said future economic plans could be "knocked off course" by events in the Middle to developments over the weekend in the conflict between Iran and Israel, the first minister said "it's very concerning to see how that instability could spiral out of control".She added: "The implications are grave not just for the Middle East but for us as well. There will be a knock-on effect, for example on the price of petrol."We are not immune from what's happening in the Middle East. This is a very concerning situation and comes on top of the difficult situation in Gaza which is completely unacceptable." Infrastructure projects and one-off developments are funded in a different way but there are long-standing calls for the system as a whole to be leader of the Welsh Conservatives, Darren Millar MS, said: "It's an insult to the people of Wales to be awarded just £445 million to transform the rail infrastructure when we know that the previous UK Conservative government over the previous 10-year period awarded over £1.1billion."It's not something that the Welsh government should be popping the champagne corks about."Plaid Cymru's Heledd Fychan said it was disappointing that there seemed to be no imminent review of how Wales was funded, despite that being a UK Labour manifesto said: "Not even asking for what we're owed has been a failure of this Welsh government. "They lack ambition, they lack vision, and they lack any kind of fight. "In terms of just being willing to settle for less, 10% of what we're owed and Welsh Labour are celebrating, that's not something to celebrate about."


Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's enemies could dim the sun and weaponise weather
Ministers are preparing for a scenario where a hostile foreign power could weaponise sun dimming technology, The Telegraph can reveal. A ministerial letter, seen by The Telegraph, states the Government wants to understand the risks of an 'independent or third party actor' deploying technologies to reflect sunlight away from the earth. Experts said these third-party actors could include countries taking drastic action to lower their carbon emissions or hostile nations such as Russia using solar geoengineering to orchestrate an environmental disaster against their enemies. Solar geoengineering, also known as solar radiation modification, seeks to limit global warming by reducing the amount of sunlight that reaches Earth. One of the most researched techniques involves shooting aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space. In the letter, Kerry McCarthy, the climate minister, said: 'The UK is a longstanding leader on climate action and an active international collaborator in scientific research. The Government recognises the need to understand the risks and impacts of [solar radiation modification] approaches that could be deployed by an independent or third-party actor. Robust scientific evidence is essential for informing responsible and inclusive governance.'