
10 years after landmark Supreme Court ruling, Healey calls same-sex marriage "non-issue" in Massachusetts
This week marks the 10th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.
The Supreme Court's landmark Obergefell v. Hodges decision in 2015 followed years of national wrangling during which some states moved to protect domestic partnerships or civil unions for same-sex partners and others declared that marriage could exist only between one man and one woman.
More than a decade before the Supreme Court weighed in, Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex marriage in 2004.
Healey: Same-sex marriage a "non-issue"
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey said same-sex marriage will always be protected in the state.
Healey told WBZ-TV's Jon Keller on Thursday that the future of same-sex marriage is a "non-issue," saying there's bigger issues people are concerned about.
"Marriage is marriage, whether you're gay or not and that's the law here, it's going to continue to be that way," Healey said. "And you know what people really care about? They care about how they're going to pay their bills, can they afford a home, do they have access to jobs and economic mobility. That's what I'm focused on as governor and I will certainly make sure that we defend the rights of all to marry in our state and that people, gay and straight, that their rights, their freedoms are protected."
What is Obergefell v. Hodges?
James Obergefell and John Arthur, who lived in Ohio, married in Maryland since same-sex marriage was banned in their state by a voter-approved amendment in 2004. The couple married after Arthur was diagnosed with ALS. The legal battle began when they learned their marriage would not be listed on Arthur's death certificate.
After a court approved recognizing their marriage on Arthur's death certificate, Ohio appealed and the case eventually reached the Supreme Court.
The Obergefell v. Hodges decision argued that marriage is guaranteed under the Constitution's 14th Amendment, specifically the due process and equal protection clauses. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to marry is fundamental, calling it "inherent in the liberty of the person" and therefore protected by the Constitution. The ruling effectively nullified state-level bans on same-sex marriages, as well as laws declining to recognize such unions performed in other jurisdictions.
In CNN's presidential exit polls in 2004, only a quarter of Americans thought same-sex couples should be able to legally marry, with a larger percentage favoring civil unions instead. Ten years after Obergefell v. Hodges, some polls show nearly 70% approve of same-sex marriage.
contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justice Department sues Orange County Registrar over voter record access
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against Orange County's top election official, accusing him of refusing to turn over key voter registration records related to noncitizens. On Wednesday, the DOJ announced the civil suit against Orange County Registrar of Voters Bob Page, alleging he failed to provide unredacted information about noncitizens who were removed – or attempted to register – from the county's voter rolls. The federal complaint claims this violates the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), a 2002 law designed to modernize and secure the nation's election systems. According to the DOJ, the dispute centers on access to five years' worth of data involving voter registrations that were canceled for failing to meet citizenship requirements. While Orange County did respond to the DOJ's request, the department says the registrar redacted key details and warned of potential litigation if more data was demanded. The registrar's office, in turn, cited California state law as the reason for withholding certain information and suggested a compromise to avoid legal action. That effort failed, and the DOJ moved forward with the lawsuit. The issue gained attention last year when Michael Gates, then the Huntington Beach City Attorney, posted online about a noncitizen reportedly receiving a ballot in the mail. Gates now serves as a U.S. Attorney and is one of the officials leading the lawsuit. 'Voting by non-citizens is a federal crime, and states and counties that refuse to disclose all requested voter information are in violation of well-established federal elections laws,' said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon in a statement. She emphasized that accurate voter rolls are essential to maintaining election integrity. The lawsuit also comes in the wake of former President Donald Trump's executive order earlier this year, which pushed for stricter voter registration requirements, including proof of citizenship. That order is currently facing legal challenges from several states, including California. KTLA reached out to Registrar Bob Page for comment, but his office declined to speak, citing the pending litigation. The case marks a significant clash between federal oversight and California election law—and could set a precedent for how far states must go in complying with federal requests related to voter integrity. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Washington Post
37 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trumps drop 'Made in the USA' label for new phone and a debate ensues: How to define 'made'?
NEW YORK — When the Trump family unveiled a new phone before a giant American flag at its headquarters earlier this month, the pitch was simple and succinct, packed with pure patriotism: 'Made in the U.S.A.' The Trumps are apparently having second thoughts. How about 'proudly American'? Those are the two words that have replaced the 'Made in the USA' pitch that just a few days ago appeared on the website where customers can pre-order the so-called T-1 gold-toned phones with an American flag etched on the back. Elsewhere on the site, other vague terms are now being used, describing the $499 phone as boasting an 'American-Proud Design' and 'brought to life right here in the U.S.A.'


Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Mamdani's win and the future of Trump's war powers, tax bill
Mamdani's primary win in New York excited progressives as the Democratic Party tries to find its footing after its 2024 losses. Host Colby Itkowitz talks with national enterprise reporter Sarah Ellison about whether Mamdani's victory could be a road map for the party. They also talk with senior congressional reporter Paul Kane about whether the Senate will pass Trump's big tax bill and how congressional Republicans have continued to cede power to the executive branch. Today's show was produced by Laura Benshoff. It was edited by Lucy Perkins and Reena Flores. It was mixed by Sean Carter. Thanks also to Arjun Singh. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.