China criticizes attack on Iran as U.S. asks Beijing for trade route help
China has criticized the United States' weekend strike on Iranian nuclear facilities and reiterated that it's willing to join international efforts to restore peace in the Middle East.
Beijing "strongly' condemns the attacks on Iran, according to a four-sentence statement from the Foreign Ministry on Sunday.
"The U.S. move seriously violates the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter and international law and exacerbates tensions in the Middle East,' it said. "China calls on all parties to the conflict, especially Israel, to cease fire as soon as possible.'
On Monday, the state-run Global Times added to the criticism, saying the U.S.' use of bunker-buster bombs would push "the Iran-Israel conflict closer toward an uncontrollable state.'
U.S. President Donald Trump said American bombers struck Iran's three main nuclear sites and threatened more attacks if Tehran doesn't capitulate, pulling the U.S. directly into the country's conflict with Israel despite his longtime promises to avoid new wars.
Beijing hasn't yet offered substantial assistance to Tehran besides rhetorical support. Chinese leader Xi Jinping last week outlined a four-point proposal for the Iran-Israel war in a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called on China to speak to leaders in Iran about not closing the Strait of Hormuz — the waterway at the entrance to the Persian Gulf where about a fifth of the world's crude output passes through.
"I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' he told Fox News.
China is the nation most dependent on oil passing through the strait, where a third of its crude transits. Tehran could seek to retaliate for the U.S. attack by trying to close the choke point. Iran's parliament has called for closing the waterway, according to Iranian state-run TV — a move that would need the explicit approval of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to proceed.
Iran has vowed not to back down, with its foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, saying the country "reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people' and warning America's move "will have everlasting consequences.'
While China buys some 90% of Iran's oil exports in defiance of U.S. restrictions, the risks of secondary sanctions and the official stance against nuclear proliferation have prevented Beijing from intervening.
Some analysts have suggested that a distracted Washington might be good news for Beijing.
"If this results in a prolonged U.S. engagement in the Middle East, it would also mean less concentration on Beijing's immediate neighborhood, both militarily and diplomatically,' said William Yang, senior analyst for North East Asia at International Crisis Group.
Some Chinese social media users also criticized the U.S. action. "This is obviously intervening with other countries' political regime and domestic politics,' one person wrote on Weibo, getting some 3,800 likes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Efforts, restraint needed to avoid all-out war in Middle East
Demonstrators in the United States on June 22 protest the attack on Iran. (Reuters photo) The world stands at a crossroads over whether a quagmire of war will once again erupt in the Middle East. The U.S. military joined in Israel's attack on Iran and bombed three nuclear facilities. If Iran should retaliate and attack U.S. military bases scattered around the Persian Gulf, it could escalate into an all-out war involving the United States and other Middle Eastern nations. That would have an enormous effect on the security and economy of the world. We call on all relevant nations to exercise the maximum level of restraint. There is a need for the global community to make every diplomatic effort to calm the situation. JOINING THE WAR CANNOT BE LEGITIMIZED We are reminded of another act of force by the United States in the Middle East--the 2003 war on Iraq. Washington presented evidence to the U.N. Security Council that claimed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had hidden possession of weapons of mass destruction. But the United States was unable to obtain the support of many nations for a resolution authorizing the use of force. It proceeded with an attack with only a few allies, such as Britain. It was later made clear that the evidence presented was false. In the latest case, there was not even debate within the Security Council. Israel launched a first-strike attack on Iran with its one-sided argument that Tehran was close to possessing nuclear weapons. The United States then cooperated with an attack on underground facilities that Israel by itself could not destroy. In March, the head of U.S. national intelligence testified before a U.S. Senate committee session and said Iran had not manufactured nuclear weapons. But U.S. President Donald Trump called that assessment wrong in order to legitimize the attack. That was a violation of the U.N. Charter, which bans the use of force to resolve conflicts except in cases of self-defense. It was to be expected that U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres criticized the U.S. move as a 'direct threat' to international peace and security. Two days after Trump announced he would make a decision on Iran within two weeks, what can be described as a surprise attack was carried out. It also came while the foreign ministers of U.S. allies, including Britain, France and Germany, were meeting with the Iranian foreign minister to seek a diplomatic resolution. We are disheartened by the self-centered act of a superpower. Washington tried to destroy Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons. If so, it should also try to convince Israel to refrain from further attacks on Iran. Hard-line views within the Iranian leadership will likely strengthen. But we hope it makes a wise decision to avoid further sacrifice from its people. CRISES FOR NPT REGIME It can also be said that what was also destroyed by the attack was the trust in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty that has played an important role for more than half a century in nuclear arms reduction. The NPT allows only the five nations of the United States, Britain, France, China and Russia to possess nuclear weapons. While it is unequal, almost all U.N. member nations have ratified it not only due to concerns about the proliferation of nuclear weapons, but also because member nations were allowed the right to peaceful use of nuclear power in return. But Israel, which is not a party to the NPT but is said to possess nuclear weapons, attacked nuclear-related facilities of Iran, which has signed the NPT. The superpower United States also joined in the offensive. Iran is not without fault. It continues to increase the volume stored of highly enriched uranium that goes well beyond the level needed for use as fuel in nuclear plants. That led to concerns raised by Europe, which had distanced itself from the Trump administration, and provided Israel with the excuse to carry out its attack. Still, the act of taking away by force a right guaranteed by the NPT must certainly have come as a major shock to non-nuclear nations. This is also an issue that Japan, an NPT member that has operated nuclear plants while accepting inspections by international organizations, cannot brush off as someone else's problem. Not only have the nuclear powers failed to fulfill their obligation under the NPT to make efforts at arms reduction, but have instead moved toward a nuclear buildup. We are gravely concerned about a heightening of the trend toward thinking that it would be more advantageous to leave the NPT and seek to possess nuclear weapons as a means of protecting the security of one's nation. NEW MULTILATERAL COOPERATION NEEDED In addition to Russia, which continues its invasive war, the United States, another permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, has violated international law. The wavering in the rule of law is serious. Western European nations that together supported the postwar order also did not demonstrate the autonomy shown prior to the start of the Iraq War. Not only did the Group of Seven summit not ask Israel to refrain from further expanding the war front, but it even recognized its right to protect itself. Europe, Canada and Japan must fully realize it has shouldered a major responsibility for giving priority to consideration to the Israel-leaning United States rather than to concerns about the ravages of war. Giving tacit consent to an unilateral attack on a major nation is nothing but a double standard and nations will lose the basis for criticizing Russia in the future. In addition to military conflicts in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, a military encounter developed in May between India and Pakistan, which both possess nuclear weapons. In Japan's backyard of East Asia, tensions continue in the Taiwan Strait and on the Korean Peninsula. In this year, the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, the global community is progressing toward an unprecedented crisis zone. While Trump said now was the time to build peace, listening to his announcement that only heaped praise on the attack, it is difficult to believe he has some plan to bring an end to the situation. The international issues unresolved since the Iraq War are a sign not only of the confusion in the Middle East, but also an indication that the world has not yet found a way to deal with an out-of-control United States. Now is a period when the three major powers of the United States, Russia and China are challenging the existing order. What is called for in order not to create a new interwar period is for middle powers such as Western European nations and Japan to hold the resolve to construct a multilateral cooperation structure. --The Asahi Shimbun, June 23
Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
U.S. urges China to dissuade Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz
A map showing the Strait of Hormuz and Iran is seen behind a 3D printed oil pipeline in this illustration taken June 22, 2025. (REUTERS) WASHINGTON--U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Rubio's comments on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo' show came after Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20% of global oil and gas flows. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' said Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser. 'If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours.' Rubio said a move to close the strait would be a massive escalation that would merit a response from the U.S. and others. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately provide comment. U.S. officials said it 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites using 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. The strikes mark an escalation in the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict. Tehran has vowed to defend itself. Rubio on Sunday warned against retaliation, saying such an action would be 'the worst mistake they've ever made.' He added that the U.S. is prepared to talk with Iran.
NHK
3 hours ago
- NHK
South Korean president nominates 11 new ministers
South Korean president Lee Jae-myung nominated new ministers on Monday. The country's presidential office announced Lee tapped 11 people for positions in his government. Cho Hyun was chosen as foreign minister. He previously served as first vice foreign minister as well as in multiple overseas diplomatic roles. The presidential office says Cho has broad experience in multi-lateral talks and knowledge of trade issues. Veteran politician Ahn Gyu-back was picked as defense minister. Local media say he is the first civilian to be nominated for that post in more than six decades. Chung Dong-young was nominated to serve another term as unification minister, a post he held from 2004 to 2005. The nominees will be appointed after hearings in the National Assembly.
