Best Headsets for Working From Home in 2025
If you work from home, you need a headset with good ergonomics, excellent voice-calling performance and Bluetooth multipoint to drown out the noises of home. I've tested hundreds of headphones and headsets with boom microphones over 20 years, evaluating noise reduction, comfort, call and music quality to find the best pick for you. I've included some UC headphones on this list, which come with a tiny USB-A or -C dongle to plug into your PC for seamless wireless connectivity, but many are mainstream consumer headphones that also work well for everyday use. Here are our expert picks for the best headphones and headsets for working from home to keep you clearly connected in 2025.
Because everyone's preferences for working from home are different, picking the best headset or headphones for you might be tricky, but I've singled out a few models that we think may take the title of "best overall." The Shokz OpenMeet UC top the list for their excellent voice-calling performance and are a great fit for those who prefer a more lightweight and comfortable design. If you're a fan of a sturdier feel, the Logitech Zone Wireless 2 has several metal components for a substantial and premium look. Those working on a budget may prefer the JLab Go Work (Gen 2), available for less than $50.
Still, I've had hands-on testing with every model on this list, and they're all excellent choices. I'll be sure to update the list as more models are released in 2025.
Plantronics' original Voyager Focus UC has long been considered one of the best work-from-anywhere headsets. Now we get the Voyager Focus 2 UC from Poly (the company Plantronics morphed into after it acquired Polycom), and it's improved in several ways, including better noise reduction (it's stellar), two levels of active noise canceling, increased battery life (up to 19 hours with ANC off and 16 hours with it on) and superior wireless range with Bluetooth 5.1.
You can pair the Voyager Focus 2 UC with your computer with the included USB dongle or your phone (or tablet) via Bluetooth. It can also connect to a desk phone if you want to bring it to the office. Also worth noting: The boom microphone has a mute button on it, but when you flip it up it also automatically mutes the microphone. The original Voyager Focus doesn't mute when you lift the boom microphone.
The Focus 2 comes in several different versions, including USB-A and USB-C models and a version that's Microsoft Teams certified. You can get the headset by itself or in a bundle that includes a charging dock. All versions include a nice protective carrying pouch.
The Voyager Focus 2 UC is expensive but offers excellent performance and is quite comfortable for an on-ear headphone. It also sounds good for music listening with nicely detailed sound and ample bass. It may not be quite up to the level of the Sony WH-1000XM5 for music, but it offers a nice music-listening experience for a work-centric headset.
See at Amazon
If you're looking for a souped-up version of Jabra's Elite 85h headphones, which came out a few years ago, the Evolve2 85 offers even better telephony options along with a Unified Communications USB dongle for PCs. It has similar sound quality to the 85h, it has an updated audio chipset, a hideaway boom arm and two additional microphones (10 altogether, with the extra two in the boom arm) for noise reduction and picking up your voice. Its build quality is also a step up. A Microsoft Teams-certified version is available for those who need it. I found it comfortable to wear over several hours, and it offers an impressive 37 hours of battery life or slightly more than the Elite 85h.
See at Amazon
If you're an Apple-centric person who works on a MacBook and also has an iPhone (and maybe an iPad), Apple's AirPods Max noise-canceling headphones allow you to easily connect to multiple Apple devices simultaneously (so long as you're signed into your iCloud account on all the devices) and switch between them. If you're on a Zoom teleconference and a call comes in on your iPhone, the AirPods Max automatically switch to the iPhone if you pick up the call.
They sound great, and with all their microphones they do an excellent job picking up your voice and reducing ambient noise. Aside from their high price, their other potential downside is their heavy weight. Although I found them comfortable, some people have trouble with that.
See at Amazon
UC headsets that include a USB dongle so you can easily connect the headset wirelessly to your computer tend to cost more than headsets that just feature Bluetooth connectivity. Listing for around $130, the Cyber Acoustics Essential Bluetooth Headset HS-2000BT sells at a discount compared to similarly styled models from Jabra and Poly. I'm not going to say the HS-2000BT is better than those models, but it's lightweight and comfortable to wear and offers similar features, including a retractable boom microphone with automatic muting (when you retract the boom mic). It also has a couple of bonus features: active noise canceling and wireless charging (Qi wireless charging pad not included).
Callers said I sounded good though not quite as clear as when I was using the Logitech Zone Vibe 100. I thought the HS-2000BT sounded good when using them to listen to music, though the sound is on the warmer side (pushes the bass a bit). The headset is worth checking out, particularly if it goes on sale.
See at Amazon
Jabra's Evolve2 30 is a wired on-ear office headset with an integrated boom microphone. It's lightweight and comfortable and comes in USB-C and USB-A versions, as well as stereo and mono versions (I tried the USB-A stereo version). The headphones are decent but not great for music listening, but they're primarily meant for voice applications. They feature dual microphones: one for picking up your voice and the other to help reduce the ambient noise around you so callers can hear you better.
See at Amazon
Known for its value headphones and earbuds, JLab offers a pair of on-ear headphones with an integrated boom microphone (it can be rotated up when just listening to music) and multipoint Bluetooth pairing so you can connect them to your phone and computer simultaneously. JLab's Go Work headset may not be great, but it delivers better-than-expected performance for a modest price. They're also comfortable to wear with a lightweight design. You won't mistake these for premium headphones, but the build quality means that they are among the best headphones for work for around $50.
Battery life is rated at up to 45 hours at moderate volume levels, and you can mute calls using the multifunction button (an LED lights up at the end of the boom mic when the call is muted). I wouldn't call the sound quality for music listening and the headset performance stellar, but it's decent, particularly for the price. For music listening, there's ample bass and clarity and a cable is included for wired use. The headphones charge via USB-C. Note that JLab also sells over-ear Go Work headphones that cost around $80 and do sound a little better.
See at Amazon
Before anything else, you'll want to figure out how much you're willing to spend on a new wireless headset. The quality of value-priced headsets continues to improve, so you can find good affordable headsets and headphones for less than $100. The premium models, which offer better build quality and performance, tend to cost $200 or more, and sometimes much more.
When a headphone has a boom microphone, that's when it technically becomes what we describe as a "headset." Many consumer headphones work well for making calls, having an extended microphone that sits closer to your mouth can improve how well your voice gets picked, making it sound clearer. When retracted, some boom microphones will mute the headset so people can't hear you. Some boom mics now feature mute buttons on them. This is an important feature for video calls where you want to easily mute and unmute yourself. The downside to having the boom microphone is that it makes you look like you're wearing a headset instead of headphones. That's a bit of a factor if you plan on wearing whatever you buy outside your home or office.
It's key that the headset or headphones you buy fit your head well. They should offer a comfortable fit that's snug yet not too snug. Ideally, you want a headset of headphones you can wear over the course of a day with minimal breaks.
You want headset that hold up well over time, so look for models that we note have sturdy build quality.
It's critical to buy your headphones at a retailer that has a good return policy, in case you have buyer's remorse. Some people who are having trouble deciding between two models sometimes buy both, try them out for a few days, and then return one.
We test headphones and headsets based on six key criteria. These criteria include design, sound quality, noise canceling performance, voice-calling performance, features and value.
Design: Evaluating design, we assess not only how comfortable the headphones and headsets fit (their ergonomics) but their build quality and how well the controls are implemented. When it comes to earbuds, we also look at water- and dust-resistance ratings.
Sound quality: We evaluate sound quality by listening to a set playlist of music tracks as well as voice calls and comparing the headphones to top competing products in their price range. Sonic traits such as bass definition, clarity, dynamic range and how natural the headphones sound are key factors in our assessment.
Noise canceling performance: We evaluate noise canceling performance by wearing headphones in the same spot indoors near a noisy HVAC unit to see how well they do at muffling lower frequencies. Then we head out to the streets of New York to test the headphones in a real-world environment where we see how they do at muffling not only street noise but people's voices.
Extra features: Some great-sounding headphones and headsets aren't loaded with features, but we do take into account what extra features are on board. These include everything from quick-access awareness to transparency modes (your music pauses and the headphones open up to the outside world so you can have a conversation) to special sound modes to ear-detection sensors that automatically pause your music when you take the headphones off your ears. For home office headphones, Bluetooth multipoint pairing is an important feature (and other connectivity options such as an included Bluetooth dongle for easy pairing with a computer), as well as auto-muting the microphone. We also take a look at the companion app for the headphones if there is one and how user-friendly it is.
Voice-calling: When we test voice-calling performance, we make calls in the noisy streets of New York and evaluate how well the headphones or earbuds reduce background noise and how clearly callers can hear our voices. We also evaluate how they perform on video-conferencing applications such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams.
Value: We determine value after evaluating the strength of the headphones and earbuds against all these criteria and what they're able to deliver compared to other models in their price class.
Plantronics Voyager Focus UC: After Plantronics became Poly, it released a new version of this oldie-but-goodie headset called the Voyager Focus 2 (see above). This model remains on sale. We are steering people toward the newer model.
The benefit of a boom microphone is that it extends out, which puts it closer to your mouth and makes picking up your voice easier. Some headphones and earbuds with beam-forming microphones do a very good job of picking up your voice, but a good boom microphone is often the superior option. The only downside is that unless it truly retracts and is able to blend into the headphone's design when retracted, it makes the headset less attractive as a standard headphone for mobile use.
Yes. Many gaming headsets have retractable microphones and are designed for chatting online with fellow gamers. That makes them good for video-conferencing apps but not everybody likes how they appear wearing a gaming headphone for a business call.
People tend to look better wearing small earbuds than full-size headphones. It's really just a matter of personal preference. The one downside to earbuds is that they usually have far less battery life than full-size headphones, so you'll probably have to charge them during a break to use them for an entire day.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
15 hours ago
- Business Insider
The future of AI will be governed by protocols no one has agreed on yet
The tech industry, much like everything else in the world, abides by certain rules. With the boom in personal computing came USB, a standard for transferring data between devices. With the rise of the internet came IP addresses, numerical labels that identify every device online. With the advent of email came SMTP, a framework for routing email across the internet. These are protocols — the invisible scaffolding of the digital realm — and with every technological shift, new ones emerge to govern how things communicate, interact, and operate. As the world enters an era shaped by AI, it will need to draw up new ones. But AI goes beyond the usual parameters of screens and code. It forces developers to rethink fundamental questions about how technological systems interact across the virtual and physical worlds. How will humans and AI coexist? How will AI systems engage with each other? And how will we define the protocols that manage a new age of intelligent systems? Across the industry, startups and tech giants alike are busy developing protocols to answer these questions. Some govern the present in which humans still largely control AI models. Others are building for a future in which AI has taken over a significant share of human labor. "Protocols are going to be this kind of standardized way of processing non-deterministic information," Antoni Gmitruk, the chief technology officer of Golf, which helps clients deploy remote servers aligned with Anthropic's Model Context Protocol, told BI. Agents, and AI in general, are "inherently non-deterministic in terms of what they do and how they behave." When AI behavior is difficult to predict, the best response is to imagine possibilities and test them through hypothetical scenarios. Here are a few that call for clear protocols. Scenario 1: Humans and AI, a dialogue of equals Games are one way to determine which protocols strike the right balance of power between AI and humans. In late 2024, a group of young cryptography experts launched Freysa, an AI agent that invites human users to manipulate it. The rules are unconventional: Make Freysa fall in love with you or agree to concede its funds, and the prize is yours. The prize pool grows with each failed attempt in a standoff between human intuition and machine logic. Freysa has caught the attention of big names in the tech industry, from Elon Musk, who called one of its games "interesting," to veteran venture capitalist Marc Andreessen. "The core technical thing we've done is enabled her to have her own private keys inside a trusted enclave," said one of the architects of Freysa, who spoke under the condition of anonymity to BI in a January interview. Secure enclaves are not new in the tech industry. They're used by companies from AWS to Microsoft as an extra layer of security to isolate sensitive data. In Freysa's case, the architect said they represent the first step toward creating a "sovereign agent." He defined that as an agent that can control its own private keys, access money, and evolve autonomously — the type of agent that will likely become ubiquitous. "Why are we doing it at this time? We're entering a phase where AI is getting just good enough that you can see the future, which is AI basically replacing your work, my work, all our work, and becoming economically productive as autonomous entities," the architect said. In this phase, they said Freysa helps answer a core question: "What does human involvement look like? And how do you have human co-governance over agents at scale?" In May, the The Block, a crypto news site, revealed that the company behind Freysa is Eternis AI. Eternis AI describes itself as an "applied AI lab focused on enabling digital twins for everyone, multi-agent coordination, and sovereign agent systems." The company has raised $30 million from investors, including Coinbase Ventures. Its co-founders are Srikar Varadaraj, Pratyush Ranjan Tiwari, Ken Li, and Augustinas Malinauskas. Scenario 2: To the current architects of intelligence Freysa establishes protocols in anticipation of a hypothetical future when humans and AI agents interact with similar levels of autonomy. The world, however, needs also to set rules for the present, where AI still remains a product of human design and intention. AI typically runs on the web and builds on existing protocols developed long before it, explained Davi Ottenheimer, a cybersecurity strategist who studies the intersection of technology, ethics, and human behavior, and is president of security consultancy flyingpenguin. "But it adds in this new element of intelligence, which is reasoning," he said, and we don't yet have protocols for reasoning. "I'm seeing this sort of hinted at in all of the news. Oh, they scanned every book that's ever been written and never asked if they could. Well, there was no protocol that said you can't scan that, right?" he said. There might not be protocols, but there are laws. OpenAI is facing a copyright lawsuit from the Authors Guild for training its models on data from "more than 100,000 published books" and then deleting the datasets. Meta considered buying the publishing house Simon & Schuster outright to gain access to published books. Tech giants have also resorted to tapping almost all of the consumer data available online from the content of public Google Docs and the relics of social media sites like Myspace and Friendster to train their AI models. Ottenheimer compared the current dash for data to the creation of ImageNet — the visual database that propelled computer vision, built by Mechanical Turk workers who scoured the internet for content. "They did a bunch of stuff that a protocol would have eliminated," he said. Scenario 3: How to take to each other As we move closer to a future where artificial general intelligence is a reality, we'll need protocols for how intelligent systems — from foundation models to agents — communicate with each other and the broader world. The leading AI companies have already launched new ones to pave the way. Anthropic, the maker of Claude, launched the Model Context Protocol, or MCP, in November 2024. It describes it as a "universal, open standard for connecting AI systems with data sources, replacing fragmented integrations with a single protocol." In April, Google launched Agent2Agent, a protocol that will "allow AI agents to communicate with each other, securely exchange information, and coordinate actions on top of various enterprise platforms or applications." These build on existing AI protocols, but address new challenges of scaling and interoperability that have become critical to AI adoption. So, managing their behavior is the "middle step before we unleash the full power of AGI and let them run around the world freely," he said. When we arrive at that point, Gmitruk said agents will no longer communicate through APIs but in natural language. They'll have unique identities, jobs even, and need to be verified. "How do we enable agents to communicate between each other, and not just being computer programs running somewhere on the server, but actually being some sort of existing entity that has its history, that has its kind of goals," Gmitruk said. It's still early to set standards for agent-to-agent communication, Gmitruk said. Earlier this year he and his team initially launched a company focused on building an authentication protocol for agents, but pivoted. "It was too early for agent-to-agent authentication," he told BI over LinkedIn. "Our overall vision is still the same -> there needs to be agent-native access to the conventional internet, but we just doubled down on MCP as this is more relevant at the stage of agents we're at." Does everything need a protocol? Definitely not. The AI boom marks a turning point, reviving debates over how knowledge is shared and monetized. McKinsey & Company calls it an "inflection point" in the fourth industrial revolution — a wave of change that it says began in the mid-2010s and spans the current era of "connectivity, advanced analytics, automation, and advanced-manufacturing technology." Moments like this raise a key question: How much innovation belongs to the public and how much to the market? Nowhere is that clearer than in the AI world's debate between the value of open-source and closed models. "I think we will see a lot of new protocols in the age of AI," Tiago Sada, the chief product officer at Tools for Humanity, the company building the technology behind Sam Altman's World. However, "I don't think everything should be a protocol." World is a protocol designed for a future in which humans will need to verify their identity at every turn. Sada said the goal of any protocol "should be like this open thing, like this open infrastructure that anyone can use," and is free from censorship or influence. At the same time, "one of the downsides of protocols is that they're sometimes slower to move," he said. "When's the last time email got a new feature? Or the internet? Protocols are open and inclusive, but they can be harder to monetize and innovate on," he said. "So in AI, yes — we'll see some things built as protocols, but a lot will still just be products."
New York Post
19 hours ago
- New York Post
Skip the cloud and keep your files close with this 1TB flash drive, now $40 off
Discover startups, services, products and more from our partner StackCommerce. New York Post edits this content, and may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you buy through our links. TL;DR: Keep 1TB of data safe and within arm's reach with this Dual USB-C + USB-A 3.2 High Speed Flash Drive, now $69.97 through July 20. Tired of shelling out a small fortune on cloud storage fees year after year? If you've been looking for a more affordable solution to safeguard your files, the Dual USB-C + USB-A 3.2 High Speed Flash Drive not only costs under $75 but also holds 1TB and fits right in your pocket. Right now, you can make the swap to this handy flash drive for just $69.97 (reg. $109.99) through July 20. Break up with cloud storage with help from the petite powerhouse: the Dual USB-C + USB-A 3.2 High Speed Flash Drive. This storage solution is ready to house an ample 1TB of data, and you only have to pay once. It also weighs just 3.84 ounces and easily slips into your pocket easily, making file transfers on the go a breeze. The Dual USB-C + USB-A 3.2 High Speed Flash Drive offers convenient USB-C and USB-A flexibility, making it compatible with PCs, Macs, smartphones, and gaming consoles. It also offers lightning-fast 20-30MB/s read and write speeds, so transferring even large files is quick. Don't be deceived by this flash drive's small size; it's super durable. It's ready to withstand the elements — it's waterproof, dustproof, and even features an anti-drop design, so your data stays safe. Cut back on your cloud storage with this Dual USB-C + USB-A 3.2 High Speed Flash Drive, now $69.97 (reg. $109.99) through July 20. StackSocial prices subject to change.
Android Authority
20 hours ago
- Android Authority
The USB-C dream is dead and it's too late to revive it
Robert Triggs / Android Authority I've been writing about USB-C for what seems like forever (seriously, it's been seven or eight years!). From a unifying, one-size-fits-all specification to the grim reality of compatibility issues and opaque feature support, USB-C has its plaudits and detractors. Me? I sit firmly in the middle — aware of the problems yet still hoping, however foolishly, that the trusty port will one day live up to its promise. Unfortunately, as time passes, USB-C's window of opportunity is closing, and fast. To understand exactly what's 'wrong' with USB-C, just look around your living room. Can you remember which of your power packs charges which of your gadgets quickly or slowly? Laptops and PCs are no better. Back when we had DisplayPort, HDMI, and barrel sockets, you knew where you stood — but now, deciphering which of today's three or four USB-C ports does what requires serious manual-reading. And who has time for that? From charging, data, and peripherals, USB-C does it all but seldom does it well. Playing 'Guess Who?' with a socket that claims to do everything but seldom does is just a microcosm of USB-C's biggest problem — the swirling mess of the specification itself. Big points to anyone who can tell me how many different charging standards are still kicking around in the smartphone world, or how many different data speeds exist across Apple's Mac lineup. Honestly? I've given up trying to keep track. USB-C's biggest problem isn't even that it's unclear what each port does; it's that matching two products that supposedly use the same interface has become an absolute nightmare — and it's only gotten worse over the past decade. Unfortunately, much like my USB-C cable drawer, I've lost hope of ever untangling this mess. Two steps forward, one step back It's taken nearly a decade, but efforts to improve gadget charging have emerged. Perhaps the biggest recent win is that USB Power Delivery (USB PD) support is now mandatory for 15W USB-C gadgets and above, thanks to an EU directive. While this doesn't guarantee fast charging on every device, it ensures common protocol support for all 'fast' charging gadgets. The really good news? Modern chargers will supply at least some power to all modern smartphones, as we've seen from many newer models out of China. Speaking of China, it hasn't been idle either. A collective effort to unify its cluttered fast-charging portfolio has produced the Universal Fast Charging Specification (UFCS). Though UFCS is a separate standard to Power Delivery, it's designed to be compatible with USB PD 3.0, offering similar voltage levels and power capabilities. China is also gradually moving to universal charging, but it's taking a long time. Unfortunately, UFCS isn't backwards compatible with existing standards like SuperVOOC or HyperCharge, so widespread adoption will take time. Still, it shows that even China's biggest players are concerned about interoperability and e-waste. The OnePlus 13, OPPO Find X8 Pro, and HUAWEI Mate 70 series are recent smartphones supporting UFCS alongside their proprietary standards. Certainly, the gradual adoption of USB Power Delivery as the primary method for fast-charging phones, laptops, and other gadgets has been a positive step for consumers. However, even ignoring proprietary standards, the USB Implementers Forum hasn't helped consumers navigate what should be a simple plug-and-play scenario. C. Scott Brown / Android Authority The introduction of USB Power Delivery Programmable Power Supply (PPS) added flexibility for the fine voltage control required to fast-charge modern batteries. However, USB PD PPS took years to reach the plug market, and it's still not apparent to most consumers that you need a PPS-compatible USB PD plug to fast-charge the Galaxy S25 series above 18W, for example. Regular PD is still the standard, but it's going out of fashion for smartphones and even laptops. We're still buying OEM-branded chargers as a compatibility hedge — that's how bad USB-C still is. Worse, the PPS specification now has even more sub-specifications, which are as confusing as the proprietary protocols. Google's Pixel 9 Pro XL is a prime example: it will only hit 37W power levels with a specific 20V PPS plug — the 'old' 9V PPS ones won't cut it, leaving you stuck at 27W. Good luck finding that small but critical detail on many plug spec sheets, if you even bother to look. All these years later, we're still buying OEM-branded chargers as a hedge against compatibility — what a joke. USB-C is determined to undermine itself Robert Triggs / Android Authority Charging speeds dominate smartphone conversations, but USB-C encompasses far more: data transfer speeds, audio, display support, and PCI-E extensions. You name it, USB-C can probably do it, depending on the specific port configuration. Outside of charging, data is the one area where the spec continues to confuse consumers the most. Since its inception, USB-C hasn't mandated a specific data-transfer protocol. It can be backed by USB 2.0, USB 3.2, or even Thunderbolt controllers, meaning speeds range from a measly 0.48 Gbit/s up to a speedy 20 Gbit/s. Consumers and experts alike have found it anything but straightforward to figure out what each USB-C port can do. Despite promising to help, USB4 has made things even worse. USB4 was introduced in 2019 specifically to clear up some confusion. The spec was based on (but not directly compatible with) Thunderbolt 3, bundling DisplayPort 2.0 support, a baseline 20 Gbit/s data speed, and backward compatibility with older standards. While this didn't directly address legacy standards still used over USB-C, the idea was that if your product was USB4-compliant, you'd know what to expect. USB4 was meant to bring order, but instead splintered into a soup of Gen 2×1, 3×2, and Gen 4 variations — each with wildly different speeds from 10 Gbps to 120 Gbps. Confused? You're not alone. Many DisplayPort, power, and PCI features also remain optional. If all that wasn't confusing enough, you'll have to buy a top-of-the-line USB-C cable to ensure the advanced features work correctly. Despite pages of official labeling guidelines, cheap and counterfeit cables have only made the affordability-versus-quality gamble worse. So much for simplicity. Apple bungled it too A reluctant latecomer to USB-C, Apple finally adopted the port with the 2024 iPhone 15 series following the European Commission's ruling. While Apple usually tightly controls and optimizes user experience, being dragged kicking and screaming away from Lightning resulted in a half-assed approach at best. I'd hoped Apple might bring some order to the USB madhouse. Instead, the iPhone embraced the chaos plaguing the wider tech world. If anyone could reign in USB-C it was Apple. Another chance missed. There's no better example than the iPhone 16's data speeds. The budget models still use sluggish USB 2.0 ports — rare outside the cheapest Android phones. Meanwhile, the Pro models are 20x faster but still don't match the 40 Gbps Thunderbolt capabilities of the iPad Pro. Recent iPhone Pro models charge a bit faster than basic models, but Apple has never clarified when this is the case, and hasn't adopted USB PD PPS to boost speeds further. iPhone 15/16 iPhone 15/16 Plus iPhone 15/16 Pro iPhone 15/16 Pro Max Connector iPhone 15/16 USB-C iPhone 15/16 Plus USB-C iPhone 15/16 Pro USB-C iPhone 15/16 Pro Max USB-C Data speed iPhone 15/16 USB 2.0 480Mbps iPhone 15/16 Plus USB 2.0 480Mbps iPhone 15/16 Pro USB 3.1 Gen 2x1 10Gbps iPhone 15/16 Pro Max USB 3.1 Gen 2x1 10Gbps Charging Power iPhone 15/16 20W iPhone 15/16 Plus 20W iPhone 15/16 Pro 20W (~25W recorded) iPhone 15/16 Pro Max 20W (~25W recorded) The only reason the Pros have faster data speeds is to enable the transfer of ProRes video. Otherwise, Apple has done the bare minimum with USB-C to pass muster; it seems more focused on MagSafe as the future standard for its mobile products. The USB-C mess is here to stay Robert Triggs / Android Authority By now, these problems are well-documented, and I'm sure you've experienced some of these frustrations yourself. USB-C is over ten years old and has done little more than give us a reversible connector to use on all our gadgets. That's a small success, but hardly the plug-and-play future we were promised. Worse, the genie is out of the bottle. With everything from headphones, laptops, and VR headsets now mandated to use USB-C, the port is everywhere. But with that ubiquity comes a sprawling mess of standards and support that cannot be undone. There's simply no way to rewind and set things on a simpler path, even if major players like Apple or Google suddenly wanted to. That fragmentation doesn't just frustrate, it undermines one of the fundamental USB-C promises: reducing e-waste. One of USB-C's biggest selling points has been the reduction of clutter and superior reusability across devices. Instead, users are still hoarding multiple cables, chargers, and dongles to cover all possible bases. While the connector is universal in shape, it doesn't always lead to fewer accessories in circulation. If, by some miracle, USB-C gets its act together eventually, what do we do with all of today's accessories? Just bin them? USB-C isn't just frustrating, the mess undermines its eco-promise. USB-C had a unique opportunity to tame the Wild West of data and power cables, unifying them into something simpler. While a fixed specification would have stifled innovation, tighter control with gradual, cohesive upgrades across sibling specifications every few years, preferably with mandatory support levels, would have prevented many of today's issues. Instead, USB-C has become a black box of 101 different capabilities, old and new. It might make a small dent in the e-waste problem, but it could have been so much more. What a spectacular failure.
