
The Delta Air Lines plane flip might be a crash too far for nervous flyers like me
It is often said – usually to people like me who are terrified of flying – that the reason we hear about plane crashes in the news is because they so rarely happen. And yet, in less than a month, there have been four incidents involving aircraft.
First, a military helicopter collided with an American Airlines passenger plane in Washington DC on 29 January, killing 67 people. Three days later, a medical plane carrying a child patient and their guardian, as well as medical crew, crashed in Philadelphia, killing the five passengers and one person on the ground.
On 6 February, a small plane crashed in Alaska, killing all 10 passengers. And only this Monday, a Delta Air Lines plane crashed and flipped on the runway of Toronto's Pearson Airport, injuring 18 people.
This follows several high-profile aircraft incidents in 2024, including the fatal Azerbaijan Airlines flight that crash-landed in Kazakhstan, the South Korea disaster where all but two of the 181 people on board died, and the severe turbulence experienced on a Singapore Airlines flight.
In the not-so-distant past, there was the mystery of flight MH370 and the two Boeing 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019, which killed 346 people – and that's before we even get to the reports of parts breaking off mid-flight and the seemingly endless stream of images of planes rocking in high winds at London Heathrow.
These are serious tragedies that impact relatives, loved ones and local communities the most, as well as the airlines' reputations – even if the likes of Donald Trump attempt to hijack their grief by politicising these incidents with baseless claims. But there's no denying that these events also instil a sense of significant unease in air travellers.
For people like me who are already scared of flying, they make getting on a plane even less appealing. They remind us that our safety is not a given and that freak events can and do happen. Perhaps, if these incidents were in isolation or further apart, even, people would brush them off as such. But as it stands, aviation disasters and mishaps seem to be more frequent despite industry experts reassuring flyers that safety protocols are more comprehensive than ever.
My own fear of flying isn't a result of headline-hitting incidents, but personal experience of flying in bad weather. My plane to Nice was forced to take off again when it had only just touched down, owing to particularly strong winds. My flight from Spain to London was met with torrential rain and turbulence – the sky even turned a Wicked shade of green. Then there was a flight from Corfu, which plummeted several feet before regaining control. I have flashbacks whenever I board a plane.
And that's the thing. For nervous flyers like me, there is a constant trade-off: do we give up the pleasure of travel, or endure an anxious journey? Until now, my desire to explore the world has outweighed that of keeping my feet safely on the ground, but these increasingly prominent events are giving me pause.
Human error is one thing and more avoidable than anything else (perhaps don't sack several hundred Federal Aviation Administration employees and make drastic cuts when public safety is concerned). But with global warming and the rise of freak weather conditions, there is little that we can do to ease the effects on a flight or safeguard ourselves from the fallout. I know I struggle to surrender control in such situations – and I don't have kids or other dependents to worry about.
I don't wish to scaremonger. The vast majority of flights successfully depart and arrive each day, otherwise no one would fly again. And yes, there are other modes of travel. But when some 4.4 billion passengers flew with the world's airlines in 2023 and figures are set to rise, it feels like an increasingly difficult reality to ignore.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘The US was our El Dorado': Africans on Trump's travel bans and taxes
When Essi Farida Geraldo, a Lomé-based architect, heard about partial restrictions on travel to the US from Togo as part of the travel bans announced by Donald Trump on Thursday, she lamented losing access to what many young Togolese consider to be a land of better opportunities. 'The United States was the Togolese's El Dorado,' Geraldo said. 'Many people go to work in the US to save money and support their families or projects in Africa … This will force the country to really develop stronger partnerships that exclude the US.' Trump's order, which is to come into effect on Monday, prohibits people from seven African countries – Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan – from entering the US, making Africa the worst-affected continent. People from another three African countries – Burundi, Sierra Leone and Togo – will be subject to partial restrictions, meaning they will not be able to travel to the US on certain visas. For Geraldo, an alumnus of the Mandela Washington Fellowship for Young African Leaders programme instituted by the Obama administration, the new restrictions compound the harm from Trump's foreign aid cuts, which made it harder for her to access funding for social projects in the tiny west African state. Mikhail Nyamweya, a political and foreign affairs analyst, said the new travel bans and restrictions would 'bring about a pattern of exclusion' and 'may also institutionalise a perception of Africans as outsiders in the global order'. 'In the short term, they will restrict access to education, innovation and professional mobility. In the long-term, they risk alienating African partners,' he said. The White House deputy press secretary, Abigail Jackson, said the countries on the list 'lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates or fail to share identity and threat information'. 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,' she said on X, adding that the restrictions were 'commonsense'. This interpretation was firmly rejected by Abby Maxman, the president and CEO of Oxfam America, who said the ban 'deepens inequality and perpetuates harmful stereotypes, racist tropes and religious intolerance'. She said: 'This policy is not about national security. It is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the US.' The policy has deepened a cloud of uncertainty in the affected countries, especially after the US government announced in May that visa appointments for students wishing to study in its universities had been suspended pending expanded social media vetting. There is also fear across Africa about a proposed tax on remittances under Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is under parliamentary review. If passed into law, the 3.5% tax could severely dent the GDP of many nations, for whom diaspora remittances are a huge contribution. Geoffrey Gichohi, a 34-year-old nurse working in Minnesota, recently sent money to his mother in Kenya – which is not covered by the travel ban – via an app to pay for a concrete wall and a metal gate at their home. Like many Africans abroad, he regularly sends money to his family members back home who rely on it for school fees, healthcare and other basic needs. A new tax – on top of sending and withdrawal fees – would make it more difficult, he said. 'The parents back at home in Kenya are the ones who will suffer because they'll have limited resources,' he said. 'Personally, I hope the bill doesn't get passed.' Human rights activists have criticised the restrictions and planned tax, saying they unfairly target citizens of countries in the global south. Other experts say the moves could further damage US-Africa ties in an era of rising anti-western sentiments on the continent. Feelings of despair are not universal, however. According to Jalel Harchaoui, an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, many people in Libya will be unbothered by the new policies as the US is not a major travel destination for them. 'It's not good, but it's not noticed as something catastrophic,' he said. 'People are barely paying attention to [the travel ban] or the [proposed] remittance tax … if the same thing had happened to the UK it would be a major event, but not for the US.' Authorities in many of the affected countries are yet to respond. However, on Thursday afternoon the president of Chad, Mahamat Idriss Déby, suspended the issuance of visas to US citizens, citing the need for reciprocal action. 'Chad has no planes to offer, no billions of dollars to give, but Chad has his dignity and pride,' he said in a Facebook post, referencing Qatar's controversial gift to the Trump administration. Over the last year, US and French troops have been forced to withdraw from military bases in Chad, which was previously a key ally in the Sahel for many western nations. The reaction from Sierra Leone, another US ally in west Africa, was much mellower. 'We have taken note of this proclamation,' said the information minister, Chernor Bah. 'Our understanding is that the decision is based exclusively on visa overstay rates and that it does not reflect the broader state of US-Sierra Leone relations, which remain from our perspective strong and productive.'


BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
The Global Story The President's Path: Trump's travel ban
Donald Trump has signed a ban on travel to the US from 12 countries, citing national security risks. There are also seven additional countries whose nationals will face partial travel restrictions. Caitríona Perry, Sumi Somaskanda, and Bernd Debusmann Jr. explore how the travel ban reflects Trump's broader approach to immigration and national security. They also discuss the latest phone call between Trump and Vladimir Putin, analysing its potential implications for the ongoing war in Ukraine. Every weekend, The President's Path explores the state of US politics — in Washington and beyond. We dig into the key issues shaping America and uncover what's on the minds of those closest to power. You can contact us at: path@ Producer: John Ringer Editor: Sergi Forcada Freixas (Picture: US President Donald Trump gestures as he departs the White House in Washington DC, June 6, 2025. Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)


The Independent
17 hours ago
- The Independent
State Dept says current US visas from travel ban countries will not be revoked
The State Department instructed U.S. embassies and consulates on Friday not to revoke visas previously issued to people from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries now under President Donald Trump's new travel ban, which goes into effect next week. In a cable sent to all U.S. diplomatic missions, the department said 'no action should be taken for issued visas which have already left the consular section' and that 'no visas issued prior to the effective date should be revoked pursuant to this proclamation.' However, visa applicants from affected countries whose applications have been approved but have not yet received their visas will be denied, according to the cable, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. And, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting on Monday. Still, the cable, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press, suggests there should be no issue for current visa holders from the affected countries entering the United States after the restrictions take effect on June 9 at midnight ET. During Trump's first term, a hastily written executive order ordering the denial of entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries created chaos at numerous airports and other ports of entry, prompting successful legal challenges and major revisions to the policy. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, appears designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process. Rubio's cable says the only people who should be denied entry into the U.S. are those currently outside the United States who do not have a valid visa on the effective date. Despite Rubio's cable, physically entering the United States at a port of entry is not controlled by the State Department. It is up to the Department of Homeland Security and the discretion of individual Customs and Border Patrol agents to determine if a visa holder is admitted or turned away. The visa ban applies to people from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Other visa restrictions will apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Some exceptions apply only for specific countries, like Afghanistan. Others are for most of the countries on the list, or are more general and unclear, like the policies for foreign visitors planning to come to the U.S. for the 2026 Word Cup and 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, two of the events Trump has said he is excited to host. Rubio's cable said criteria for the exemptions under a national security waiver would be issued soon.