The world's most liveable city revealed as UK fails to make the top 10
A European capital has been crowned the most liveable city in the world but it's bad news for the UK as three of its major cities have slipped down the ranking since last year.
The Economist Intelligence Unit's Global Liveability Index assesses the world's biggest cities across 30 categories, including stability, healthcare, culture and environment and infrastructure.
Cities are then awarded an overall liveability score out of 100 and ranked accordingly. So, where is this year's most liveable city?
Copenhagen soars to the top of this year's index with a high score of 98. Denmark's capital knocks Vienna off the top spot for the first time in three years.
It picks up scores of 100 for stability, infrastructure and education while it's rated above 90 in every category.
Vienna slips into second place, in part due to a 'sharp' fall in the stability category. This category ranked based on the prevalence of petty and violent crime, the threat of terror, the threat of military conflict and the threat of civil unrest.
The Austrian capital saw its stability score fall to 95, following a bomb threat to a Taylor Swift concert in August 2024 and a planned attack on a city train station in 2025.
Despite falling from first place, Vienna still scores 97.1 overall leaving it tied with Zurich.
The UK fails to rank in the top 10 and three of its major cities are now rated as less liveable than they were in 2024.
London falls nine places to 54th position, while Manchester also falls by nine to 52nd place and Edinburgh slips down by five places to 64th.
According to the report's authors, each of the British cities saw their stability score fall in 2025. This is in part due to the widespread rioting that took place across the UK in August 2024.
Each of the cities still picks up an overall score above 80, meaning residents face 'few, if any challenges to living standards'.
Melbourne and Geneva round off the top five most liveable cities while Sydney lands just outside in sixth place.
Melbourne scores 100 for education and healthcare while Geneva also picks up 100 in each of those categories.
Osaka, Auckland, Adelaide and Vancouver all make the world's top 10 most liveable cities.
The USA fails to have any cities rank in the top 10 but Miami, Portland, Indianapolis and Charlotte all improve on last year's scores.
THE WORLD'S MOST AND LEAST LIVEABLE CITIES
MOST LIVEABLE
1. Copenhagen, Denmark
2. Vienna, Austria
3. Zurich, Switzerland
4. Melbourne, Australia
5. Geneva, Switzerland
6. Sydney, Australia
7. Osaka, Japan
8. Auckland, New Zealand
9. Adelaide, Australia
10. Vancouver, Canada
LEAST LIVEABLE
1. Damascus, Syria
2. Tripoli, Libya
3. Dhaka, Bangladesh
4. Karachi, Pakistan
5. Algiers, Algeria
6. Lagos, Nigeria
7. Harare, Zimbabwe
8. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
9. Kyiv, Ukraine
10. Caracas, Venezuela
Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit
At the other end of the scale, Damascus is ranked as the world's least liveable city. The Syrian capital scores just 30.7 in the index, meaning 'most aspects of living are severely restricted' for residents.
Tripoli, Dhaka, Karachi and Algiers all end up in the bottom five positions for liveability.
Lagos, Harare, Port Moresby, Kyiv and Caracas also land in the bottom 10 with liveability scores below 50.
Barali Bhattacharyya, deputy industry director at EIU, says: 'Global liveability has remained flat over the past year, and as in 2024, scores for stability have declined at a global level.
'Pressure on stability has led Vienna to lose its position as the most liveable city after a three-year stint.
'As in 2024, stability scores have declined for western Europe and the Middle East and North Africa. In this edition, they have also declined for Asia, amid intensified threats of military conflict for cities in India and Taiwan.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The lucrative reason Prince Harry and Meghan wrecked any chance of a compromise with the Royal Family during 'Megxit', royal author claims
Prince Harry and Meghan allegedly wrecked any chance of a compromise with the Royal Family during 'Megxit' because they wanted the 'freedom to make money and dip their toes into politics', a royal author has claimed. When Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals in 2020, hopes were high within the Firm that a compromise could be found. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex claimed their decision to 'step back as senior members' was to become more financially independent and to enjoy privacy from the prying eyes of the media. At the time it seemed plausible that these wishes could be fulfilled alongside an agreement to represent the Crown at a select number of events every year. However, according to royal author Valentine Low, any prospect of a soft 'Megxit' was scuppered by the Sussexes over finances. Writing in his tell-all book Courtiers, Low claims that Meghan's desire to 'earn money for herself' led the couple to abandon their duties entirely. Low revealed that during discussions about how to reach a happy middle ground - which could please the whole family - multiple scenarios were explored. These ranged from Harry and Meghan 'having a month a year to do their own thing' to 'spending most of their time privately but doing a select number of royal activities'. There was apparently a 'positive atmosphere' in the room, with each party believing a deal was close. The one caveat for the Sussexes continuing royal duties - however small or minor - was that they must stick to the 'normal rules about royal behaviour'. Crucially, that would mean Harry and Meghan could not 'act or take decisions in order to gain financially'. Low writes: 'Some suspected that in the end she wanted to make money. And the only way she was going to do that was by leaving her royal life behind and going back to America.' On top of this, the couple wanted the 'freedom to dip their toes into American politics', which would represent a major breach of royal protocol for a family with a long history of being staunchly apolitical. 'There was no way for the two sides to reach an agreement on that point. 'Crucially, it was the Queen who took the view that unless they were prepared to abide by the restrictions that applied to working members of the Royal Family, they could not be allowed to carry out official duties.' Indeed, since 'Megxit' the couple have 'dipped their toes' into US politics. During the 2020 US presidential race, the couple endorsed Joe Biden in all but name in a video address urging voters to 'reject hate speech', while Meghan labelled it the 'most important election of our lifetime'. The duke said at the time: 'This election I am not able to vote in the US. But many of you may not know that I haven't been able to vote in the UK my entire life. As we approach this November, it's vital that we reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity.' While Harry and Meghan did not name their favoured candidate, many viewers thought it 'obvious' they were backing Joe Biden over Donald Trump. As such, the Sussexes were accused of 'violating' the terms of their 'Megxit' deal. In September 2020, Trump said that he was 'no fan' of the duchess after the couple released their video. In the aftermath, Republicans and other critics called on the Royal Family to strip the couple of their titles, calling their interference 'inappropriate'. In last year's election, the couple stayed publicly neutral and instead urged Americans to go out and vote. The statement read: 'Voting is not just a right; it's a fundamental way to influence the fate of our communities. 'At The Archewell Foundation, we recognize that civic engagement, no matter one's political party, is at the heart of a more just and equitable world. 'By participating in initiatives like this, we aim to amplify the message that every voice matters.' Free from the shackles of royal protocol, Meghan appears more ambitious than ever. The former Suits actress reportedly hopes to become a billionaire by launching a career in media and as a entrepreneur. In March 2024, she soft-launched American Riviera Orchard before changing the company's name to As Ever. Announcing the venture, Meghan said: 'This new chapter is an extension of what has always been my love language, beautifully weaving together everything I cherish - food, gardening, entertaining, thoughtful living, and finding joy in the everyday.' The food products sold by the brand include an assortment of teas, edible flower sprinkles and a £20 jar of honey. Speaking on an episode of her podcast, Confessions Of A Female Founder, Meghan revealed she has decided to 'just pause' restocking her As Ever brand after previously selling out of products in less than an hour. Meghan has invested in a number of companies including the vegan coffee brand Clevr Blends and haircare line Highbrow Hippie. She has also invested in asset manager Ethic, which focuses on sustainable investments. Harry and Meghan signed a lucrative £18million deal with Spotify in 2020. However despite appearing to be a joint venture, the only show they produced was hosted by Meghan. In the series, titled Archetypes, Meghan interviewed various celebrities from Serena Williams to Paris Hilton. The deal was 'mutually ended' in June 2023 with sources claiming the music streaming giant did not see enough content to warrant the full payout. Earlier this year, the duchess launched her Confessions Of A Female Founder podcast, which saw her chat with female business owners from an array of successful companies. In a slight career change, Meghan also penned a children's book in 2021 titled The Bench. It follows the relationship of a father and son through the eyes of the mother and received mixed reviews from critics. In their television projects, Harry and Meghan have kept a much more united front, but even so, the couple appear to be working separately more often. Although an official figure was never announced, Harry and Meghan's deal with Netflix was allegedly worth around £80million, and the couple produced multiple shows. In 2022, the first Netflix series about the Sussexes was released aptly named Harry and Meghan. While it holds the record for the biggest debut for a Netflix documentary it received mixed reviews. The pair were also executive producers on the Polo sports documentary series which followed athletes at the US Open Polo Championship. In 2023, Meghan did not join Harry as an executive producer on the Heart Of Invictus series, although the duke and duchess did appear together in the show. Meghan's first major solo television project was her lifestyle programme called With Love, Meghan, which saw her team up with a number of famous guests to cook and create homeware products. Harry was almost entirely absent from the series, aside from a very brief cameo in the last episode. A source from the show has since reported that neither Harry nor their children will appear in the next season. Although The Mail On Sunday revealed in May that Harry is planning to launch his own as-yet-undisclosed commercial venture in the next few months, he remains focused on his charity work. Harry is still involved heavily with the Invictus Games and the foundation which supports the tournament as well as the HALO Trust - a charity working to remove landmines which Princess Diana supported. The duke has also launched other projects in recent years, including an eco-travel campaign through his non-profit Travalyst, aimed at encouraging sustainable travel. And in November 2023, he became the global ambassador for Scotty's Little Soldiers - a charity that cares for children whose parents died while serving in the Armed Forces. Earlier this year, Harry had his most high profile fallout with a charity to date when he and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho resigned from their roles as patrons of Sentebale.
The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Woman ‘repeatedly punched in head before being pushed out of speeding van' as cops launch urgent hunt for driver
A WOMAN was repeatedly punched in the head and pushed out of a moving car by a man, police said. Cops said is only by chance she was not seriously hurt or even killed. 1 The victim was a passenger in a small grey van with a man driving when the ordeal unfolded. Witnesses may have seen it moving "erratically and at high speeds". The woman was left with serious cuts, burns and grazes to her head, face and body. A passing motorist stopped to help her after she was shoved out of the van. The man drove off from the scene following the shocking assault, which happened between 9pm and 9.45pm on Saturday in Tunbridge Wells, Kent. Police said the woman and driver knew each other. Cops are asking drivers to check dashcams and locals to check their CCTV to help with the investigation. Detective Constable Tom Bale of Kent Police, who is investigating the assault, said: 'The victim was pushed from the vehicle at speed and it is only by chance she didn't suffer more serious or even fatal injuries. 'The suspect was driving a small grey van which may also have the appearance of a car. It approached Pembury Road from the direction of the High Street and Grove Hill Road and may have been seen moving erratically and at high speeds. 'The suspect currently remains at large and we are urging anyone who may have information and who has not yet spoken to the police to contact us straight away. 'We are also asking drivers to check for important footage they may have on dash cams, along with residents living on the route the vehicle took to check doorbell or CCTV cameras.'
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Foreign steel to be used for nearly a fifth of British railway upgrades
Foreign steel will account for almost a fifth of Britain's future railway upgrades following a 'landmark' government contract. Ministers said on Tuesday that British Steel had been handed a £500 million contract to make new rails for Network Rail. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'This landmark contract truly transforms the outlook for British Steel and its dedicated workforce in Scunthorpe, building on its decades-long partnership with Network Rail to produce rail for Britain's railways.' Under the new deal just over 80 per cent of Network Rail's supply will now come from the UK. From July, the remaining steel for rails will be sold to Britain by two Austrian and German companies, Voestalpine and Saarstahl. Network Rail said that in 2019 '95 per cent' of its rails were made in Britain. By April this year that figure had fallen to around 80 per cent. Under the Labour Government's newly unveiled plans, British Steel will only supply 377,000 of the 450,000 tonnes of rails being bought over the next five years. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'This is great news for British Steel and a vote of confidence in the UK's expertise in steelmaking, which will support thousands of skilled jobs for years to come.' Network Rail commercial director Clive Berrington added: 'We are committed to buying British where it makes economic sense to do so and British Steel remain extremely competitive in the provision of rail and will remain our main supplier in the years ahead.' The Labour Government nationalised the Scunthorpe steelworks in April at a cost to the taxpayer of £100 million, taking control after Chinese former owner Jingye threatened to shut down the site's blast furnaces. Around 2,700 jobs were at risk of redundancy until the Government stepped in with emergency legislation that was voted through Parliament on a Saturday. Jingye said in March that British Steel was losing £700,000 a day, with Zengwei An, its then-chief executive, saying at the time that the shutdown 'is a necessary decision given the hugely challenging circumstances the business faces.' In a statement, the company added that the Scunthorpe site was 'no longer financially sustainable due to highly challenging market conditions, the imposition of tariffs, and higher environmental costs relating to the production of high-carbon steel.' Scunthorpe is the only place in Britain capable of making so-called 'virgin steel', high purity metal refined from raw materials. Under net zero plans embraced by both Labour and the Conservatives, politicians had been urging steelmakers to concentrate on 'green steel', which is made by melting recycled steel items in electric-arc furnaces. Such green steel contains impurities that make it weaker than proper virgin steel. In the 2000s Scunthorpe was given substantial upgrades to allow it to produce rails in 216-metre lengths, Modern Railways magazine reported. Nowhere else in the country is capable of doing so, meaning the site is vital for Network Rail's future.
