
Amid federal uncertainty, bill creating new state Medicaid trust fund passes Senate
Mar. 5—SANTA FE — With New Mexico staring at the possibility of a dip in federal funds, state lawmakers are advancing a bill creating a new trust fund to help pay for Medicaid programs in future years.
The Senate voted 37-0 on Wednesday to approve the bill, Senate Bill 88, which now advances to the House of Representatives with just over two weeks left in the 60-day legislative session.
In all, slightly more than 840,000 New Mexico residents were enrolled in Medicaid as of December — about 40% of the state's population.
Given those figures, Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe, described Medicaid as a "game-changer" for New Mexico.
"I think this is a very smart, proactive move to prepare" for possible federal funding reductions, Wirth said during Wednesday's debate.
He also credited former Gov. Susana Martinez for opting in to Medicaid expansion in 2013, a decision that paved the way for more New Mexicans to receive coverage under the joint federal-state health care program.
A new state Medicaid trust fund would be the latest in a string of similar funds created by New Mexico lawmakers over the last several years amid an oil-fueled state revenue windfall. Other funds are focused on early childhood and conservation programs.
Money for the new fund would come from investment earnings from the State Treasurer's Office — which are estimated to total about $280 million in the coming budget year.
Eventually, the fund would be expected to grow to about $2 billion, allowing annual 5% distributions — of about $100 million — to help pay for Medicaid programs, said Senate GOP floor leader William Sharer of Farmington.
"I think this is a very prudent use of our resources," Sharer said.
But he disagreed with Democrats' warnings about Republican-led budget cuts in Washington, D.C., saying, "I think they're looking for fraud, waste and abuse, not to harm us."
A concurrent budget resolution recently approved by the U.S. House calls for $880 million in savings from federal health programs.
While it's not clear if those savings might mean a reduction in Medicaid spending levels or the elimination of certain waiver programs, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham warned last week that federal budget cuts could prompt her to call legislators back to Santa Fe later this year for a special session.
New Mexico currently receives the highest federal matching rate in the nation for Medicaid spending. Federal cuts of 12%-13% would require New Mexico lawmakers to come up with more than $1.1 billion in state dollars to avoid a disruption in health care coverage, according to legislative data presented to lawmakers this week.
The bill approved Wednesday includes contingency language that would allow money in the trust fund to be used to maintain Medicaid services in the case of federal funding cuts. That authority would be in place for a three-year period, starting in July.
"If there are cuts to Medicaid, we need to have the resources to take care of that," said Sen. Pete Campos, D-Las Vegas, during Wednesday's debate.
New Mexico's Medicaid spending has surged in recent years, jumping from about $3.7 billion in the 2011 budget year to roughly $10.4 billion this year, according to legislative data.
Most of that money is federal dollars, though state Medicaid spending currently represents the second-largest portion of the state budget — behind only public schools.
Meanwhile, the idea of a new Medicaid trust fund was pushed by advocates even before the specter of federal funding cuts emerged.
Think New Mexico, a Santa Fe-based think tank, has urged lawmakers since last fall to enact such a fund, saying it could help the state increase reimbursement rates for health care providers who treat patients insured under Medicaid.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Kevin Hassett says if Senate finds Medicare abuse, then "we would look at it" in Trump bill
Kevin Hassett says if Senate finds Medicare abuse, then "we would look at it" in Trump bill White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday the Trump administration is not targeting Medicare in its sweeping budget proposal, but signaled the administration would be open to changes if senators uncover fraud or abuse as they look at the bill. "If somebody finds waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, then of course we would look at it," Hassett said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "But there have been a lot of false stories about Medicare being on the table, and it's totally not on the table." Senate Republicans this week are working on the House-passed budget bill, dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" by President Trump, which includes deep tax cuts, border security measures, and changes to Medicaid and food assistance programs. Hassett on Sunday pushed back against the idea that Republicans are targeting Medicare for cuts. "That story that got out last week was covered as our intent to go after Medicare," Hassett said bluntly. "And it was just a big fake news story." National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 2, 2025. CBS News Asked whether the administration would revisit the Medicare provision if the Senate identifies abuse, Hassett said they would. "I've seen a massive amount of waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid, and I've not been briefed on Medicare waste, fraud and abuse. But if they find something then, of course, we would look at it," he said. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated earlier this week that the bill will add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Sen. Thom Tillis told Charlotte's WCNC on Thursday that he supports legislation that would address waste in the Medicare Advantage Program. This addition, he said, would not touch beneficiaries but would focus on "eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse of the Medicare Advantage program, including costly government overpayments to insurance companies." To pay for some of Mr. Trump's tax reforms, such as extending his 2017 tax cuts and eliminating tax on tips, there are cuts to several programs. Republicans have insisted they are not cutting Medicaid, and reductions in the low-income entitlement program have become one of the most charged parts of the bill. In a closed-door session with members of the Republican conference days before the bill's passage, sources in the room told CBS News Mr. Trump said, "Don't f*** around with Medicaid." House Republicans passed the bill late last month on a 215–214 vote, sending it to the Senate where GOP leaders are weighing revisions to secure enough votes under budget reconciliation rules. "What we want to see done now is we want the Senate to pass the bill, and then we want the House and Senate to work out their differences," Hassett said. "So right now, the Senate has to get the votes they need to pass the bill, and we're supporting them in that process." Some Republican senators, including Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Josh Hawley of Missouri, have voiced concerns about Medicaid provisions in the bill, particularly new monthly premium requirements for low-income recipients. Their opposition highlights ongoing uncertainty as Senate GOP leaders work to secure enough votes. The bill can't afford to lose more than four votes in the Senate, granted that all Democrats vote against it. Hawley has called the Medicaid work requirements "both morally wrong and politically suicidal." When asked about Hawley's concerns, Hassett said, "I'd have to go see what he has and talk to him about it. And I also would want to talk to the president about the specific matter. So I can't speak to that one." The administration has repeatedly argued that failure to pass the legislation could hurt the broader economy. "If we don't pass this bill, then we lose 6 to 7 million jobs and 4% GDP," Hassett said Sunday. "If we create the jobs that we have in the bill, then we're going to create a heck of a lot more insurance than what we're talking about in waste, fraud and abuse." Senate Republicans are expected to release their version of the bill in the coming days. If there are significant changes, it will then have to go back to the House for final passage before landing on Mr. Trump's desk.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukrainian officials understand Russian leader Vladimir Putin 'much better' than President Trump, who has repeatedly said Putin wants peace, even as he rejects U.S. proposals for a ceasefire. 'With all due respect to President Trump, I think it's just his personal opinion,' Zelensky told Martha Raddatz on ABC's 'This Week' in an interview that aired Sunday morning. 'Trust me, we understand the Russians much better, the mentality of the Russians, than the Americans understand the Russians. I know for sure Putin doesn't want to stop the war.' Zelensky also took issue with Trump's comments in the Oval Office this week comparing Ukraine and Russia to children fighting. 'We are not playing in the park with the Russians like two boys, two kids. Putin is not a kid,' Zelenskyy said. 'So we can't compare and we cannot say okay, let them fight for a while.' 'And it's not about President Trump,' he added. 'Anyone living thousands of miles away can't fully understand the pain, even parents who live in Ukraine cannot feel the pain of those who lost their children.' Ukraine stunned Russia last weekend with drone attacks on Russian air bases, which it said destroyed dozens of bombers. The drones were smuggled into Russia on 18-wheeler trucks, which were parked near military bases and remotely opened ahead of the attack. Trump spoke with Putin on Wednesday, telling reporters that Russia planned to retaliate for the drone strikes. Russia killed five people in Ukraine in drone attacks the next day. Raddatz asked Zelensky if he believed that Trump thinks Russia is winning the war. 'I think he's publicly said about it, and I know that he shared this information with some people around him, and I think the separation — and I said it a lot of times, it's not true. It's not a victory when you spent, really spent one million people,' he said. Zelensky added that Trump 'must' impose stronger sanctions on Russia. Trump this week said he had yet to look at Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) Russia sanctions bill, which is co-sponsored by more than 80 senators, but said senators would not move without his blessing. Senators in both parties are itching for the green light. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that the bill could hit the floor during the current four-week work period. '[The White House is] still hopeful they'll be able to strike some sort of a deal, but … there's a high level of interest here in the Senate on both sides of the aisle in moving on it,' he said. 'I think a genuine interest in doing something to make clear to Russia that they need to come to the table … I think that would have a big impact.'


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Sanders doesn't want to try to woo ‘right-wing extremist' Musk back to Democratic Party
Sen. Bernie Sanders doesn't think Democrats should even bother trying to woo back onetime party supporter Elon Musk after he went berserk on President Trump last week. Musk has openly admitted to backing Democrats in the past, and some party bigs believe the opportunity is ripe to now win back the tech mogul given his public mega-rift with the GOP prez — but Sanders said Sunday he has major doubts. 'I think Musk has evolved over the years,' Sanders (I-Vt.) told CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'My understanding is, he actually voted for Obama, I think, in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist. 3 Sen. Bernie Sanders doesn't see an opportunity for Democrats to win Elon Musk back. Getty Images 'This is a fight between oligarchs. It's a fight among power among the few,' he said of Musk and Trump. 'And it's really an embarrassment to those of us who believe in democracy and the rule of law.' Musk and Trump's feud exploded last week when the billionaire X founder ripped the president's proposed One Big Beautiful Bill Act as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' 3 Musk exploded on President Trump last week, days after his chummy send-off from the Oval Office. Molly Riley/White House / SWNS He then contended that the president won the White House in large part because of Musk's backing and accused the administration of withholding infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's investigation files to protect the president — online accusations he later deleted. Democrats roundly cheered as the world's richest man battling the most powerful man in the world, watching their two most pronounced political adversaries go at it. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), whose district is nestled in Silicon Valley, suggested that Democrats should make overtures to Musk. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day. When we refused to meet with@RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' Khanna argued. Liberal comedian Bill Maher similarly suggested Democrats should try to win Musk back over to their camp. 3 Democratic California Rep. Ro Khanna has pushed Democrats to open their arms to Musk. AP Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) appeared to agree that Democrats should be open to working with Musk but was adamant that he wouldn't accept campaign contributions from the billionaire. 'This is not about right or left, it's about right or wrong,' Booker told NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday. 'I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way.' Trump has publicly warned Musk there would be 'consequences' if he helped boost Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. But while eager to see Musk and Trump go at it, Democrats appear unsure of the best strategy to take amid the feud. Democratic strategist Brad Bannon, who hosts the progressive podcast 'Deadline DC,' told The Post he doubts Musk will enter the Dem fold again. 'I don't see much potential in that happening,' Bannon said. 'Honestly, I don't think there's much Democrats can find in common with Musk. He's the guy who has some pretty rigid, quasi fascist political beliefs. 'I don't see how they can support him, find accommodation with him, but I think they can take advantage of this big battle.'