
EDITORIAL: Culling crows is a sad but necessary step
Nov. 23—Nearly 13 years ago, Post Bulletin reporter Jeff Pieters wrote a news article about a Rochester-area resident who was on a one-man mission to chase crows out of Rochester. Armed with a $20 laser pointer, he would scout out where the birds were roosting, then harass them into relocating.
His actions weren't rooted in dislike. He admired crows, and he was afraid that eventually, the city's failed efforts to move the birds out of downtown would result in lethal action. "I don't want one crow killed," he said.
Sadly, that day of lethal reckoning is about to arrive.
On Monday, the Rochester City Council gave a reluctant go-ahead to a Mayo Clinic-backed (and funded) plan that will bring in U.S. Department of Agriculture sharpshooters to kill some crows from Dec. 1-5.
First things first: The process will be entirely safe for people and other wildlife. The USDA employees are highly trained, and they won't be blasting away with shotguns. They'll use air rifles. They'll work in carefully selected areas and will choose their targets carefully. No buildings or windows will be damaged. No owls, geese, hawks or falcons will be shot. If it weren't for news accounts about the upcoming "culling" effort, most people wouldn't have any idea it was happening.
With that being said, however, we must acknowledge that the use of lethal force against urban crows isn't a positive development. Rather, it's just the latest step in Rochester's ongoing struggle to balance the needs of its growing population against the needs of wildlife species that are increasingly adapted to urban settings and have few, if any, natural predators.
For example, there was a time when deer sightings in Rochester were relatively rare, even exciting events. Today, however, the deer are so numerous as to require specially licensed bowhunters to target them in town, just to mitigate damage to vegetation and vehicles.
Then there are the giant Canada geese, which every year befoul Rochester's beaches and turn bike trails and picnic areas into poop-covered slip-and-slides. Rochester hasn't resorted to shooting the geese just yet, but it does "addle" their eggs, preventing them from hatching.
The crows present a different challenge.
During the winter months, crows are drawn to the nighttime lights and comparative warmth of the city's urban core. Up to 20,000 of them will roost at various locations on some nights, and if your vehicle is parked under a roost tree, you might not recognize it by morning. If your morning walk to work includes an unfortunate section of sidewalk, then you are well-advised to wear rubber boots, even if there isn't a snowflake in sight.
Obviously, the world's foremost medical center would prefer that visiting patients and their families not encounter befouled benches, steps and handrails.
The city and Mayo Clinic deserve full credit for their patience. For more than a decade, city workers have used every available non-lethal method to relocate the birds, with varying degrees of success.
The problem, however, is crows' intelligence. Multiple studies have confirmed that their cognitive abilities are at or near the top of the entire animal kingdom. They have problem-solving skills, and they create tools to get food. They have a great memory and can remember specific human faces — and hold grudges against someone who has harassed them. They communicate with each other, and they can count aloud. They have a strong sense of community and will protect each other.
In other words, crows are fast learners. They quickly figure out that non-lethal harassment is no real threat — but that intelligence and learning ability could now serve Rochester well.
The goal of the sharpshooting program isn't to wipe out the crows, or even to make a substantial dent in the population. Rather, the goal is to selectively target just a few crows, and to make sure a lot of their feathered friends witness their demise. The death of a few crows at locations throughout downtown will send a message that (we hope) will not be lost on thousands of others.
Will five days of killing crows eliminate the problem? Probably not, but even a temporary dispersal of the birds across larger areas of Rochester should be considered a success. And, if the sharpshooters have to return every year or two to "re-educate" the crows, that would be acceptable.
But here's another interesting thing about crows: They share information with their offspring. It's possible that lessons learned by crows in the first week of December will be passed along to babies that will hatch next spring.
So you might want to think twice before you throw a Nerf football at the crow you see in the tree above your driveway. It might come back next year with reinforcements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Native wisteria vines are a beautiful blue
What's a native vine that can cover a trellis or fence with June flowers the purply-blue color of a country sky just before dawn? Wisteria, that's what. Specifically, it's American wisteria (), which is native to the Southeastern states, including far southern Illinois. 'It's hardy to USDA Zone 5 and 6, which includes Chicago and its suburbs,' said Spencer Campbell, Plant Clinic manager at The Morton Arboretum in Lisle. It climbs a large steel trellis in the Arboretum's Grand Garden. Gardeners may be more familiar with other species that are now considered invasive in the United States, Chinese wisteria () and Japanese wisteria (). These Asian species spread very easily to natural areas, where their vigorous growth smothers native plants. 'We should not plant those vines,' Campbell said. 'But American wisteria is just as lovely, and it's a native plant that provides nectar and pollen to native insects.' American wisteria and the closely related Kentucky wisteria () are woody vines, with a main stem like a tree trunk, and are deciduous, meaning they lose their leaves in winter. They have glossy dark green leaves and produce large, drooping clusters of pealike, lightly fragrant flowers in late May or early June. The flowers of both native species are blue to purple, but white-flowering cultivated varieties have been introduced. Although American wisteria and Kentucky wisteria are less aggressive than the Asian species, they are still vigorous and can eventually grow 25 to 30 feet long if not controlled by pruning. The woody stems and branches will be heavy, so the vines need a very sturdy support. Wisteria climbs by sending out tendrils — slender curling stems — that curl around a support, the way a clematis vine does. 'The tendrils need to find something small enough that they can reach around it, so your trellis or fence should have wires or mesh or bars that are not too wide,' Campbell said. 'Wisteria can't climb a blank wall.' These plants need full sun for best flowering, so plant them in a spot that gets six to eight hours of sunlight a day. They prefer a moist, well-drained, slightly acidic soil, with mulch over their roots. Wisteria will need pruning every year, both to control its size and to encourage flowering. Just after the plant finishes blooming, prune excess growth back to 6 inches. These stems will continue growing and flower buds will form on them. In winter, cut them again so that each stem has two to three flower buds left. Planting American or Kentucky wisteria will be an investment of time and effort. 'You'll have to erect the right kind of support and you'll have to wait a few years before the vines are mature enough to flower,' Campbell said. If you have the patience to wait, you can be surrounded by the green shade of a splendid vine with blooms of wisteria blue.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Florida gears up for annual 'Python Challenge' aimed at solving snake infestation: 'A great way to get people directly involved'
Preparations are underway for the latest annual event to combat a persistent invasive species in the Florida Everglades. Starting July 11, contestants will compete for cash prizes while helping control the population of Burmese pythons wreaking havoc on the ecosystem. The annual Florida Python Challenge is a 10-day event where contestants across eight designated hunting areas compete to capture the most pythons. As the Tampa Free Press reported, last year's event saw 195 invasive snakes removed, bringing the total of all events to date to 1,112. In addition to the grand cash prize ($10,000), there are prizes for runners-up and the longest python. According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the 2024 winner bagged an impressive 20 snakes. Burmese pythons are an invasive species that first came to the Sunshine State as exotic pets that escaped or were released into the wild by irresponsible homeowners, per the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Invasive species harm an ecosystem by outcompeting native species for resources. The Burmese python's immense size, longevity, and fertility make it a serious problem for the Everglades. They have absolutely devastated local mammal populations. A 2012 study estimated a 99% reduction in bobcats, opossums, and raccoons in areas where pythons infest. The initiative is one of several novel community-based approaches to tackling invasive species and a great example of taking local action. While some invasive species make for tasty dishes, pythons shouldn't be consumed due to their dangerous mercury levels. Of course, there are less adventurous but no less valuable ways to combat invasive species and protect local biodiversity. Better yet, they involve very little effort and can even save money in the long run. Gardening with native plants and rewilding your yard are suitable for crucial pollinators and require less water and fewer harmful chemicals. The 2025 Florida Python Challenge is shaping up to be the biggest yet. "The Python Challenge is a great way to get people directly involved in the protection and stewardship of the Everglades," the fantastically named "Alligator Ron" Bergeron, a South Florida Water Management District Governing Board member, told the Tampa Bay Free Press. Should we be actively working to kill invasive species? Absolutely It depends on the species I don't know No — leave nature alone Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
10 States With the Highest Percentage of Families on SNAP
The original Food Stamp Program, created in 1939 by the federal government, was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, in 2008. The program provides government-funded benefits to Americans most in need of food assistance. Currently, there are an estimated 42.1 million Americans who receive SNAP benefits. Find Out: For You: This large percentage of Americans in need of food assistance is essentially a poverty issue, as in America, food is generally readily accessible if you can afford it. Raising the incomes of the impoverished is the best way to provide them with access to healthy and plentiful food, though that's easier said than done. To determine the 10 states with the highest percentage of families on SNAP, GOBankingRates used the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program data tables and the U.S. Census Bureau's American Consumer Survey. Here's the ranking of states with the highest percentage of families on SNAP, presented in reverse order, along with a brief examination of the potential causes and cures for the problem. Total number of people with SNAP: 752,200 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 15% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 38% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $320 Nearly 16% of Alabama's population lives below the poverty line, so it follows that nearly the same percentage of people need food assistance. Each household member on SNAP receives an average daily benefit of $6.31. Total number of people with SNAP: 1.94 million Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 15% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 39% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $288 One of the main reasons that Illinois ranks higher than might be expected in terms of SNAP participation is that the state is very effective at getting eligible residents to sign up for the program, with between 95% and 100% of eligible individuals participating. Learn More: Total number of people with SNAP: 2 million Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 15% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 29% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $285 Pennsylvania has approximately 12% of its population living below the poverty line and a 17% child poverty rate. Households with children show a monthly average SNAP benefit of $506. Total number of people with SNAP: 277,400 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 16% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 36% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $258 West Virginia is one of the poorest states in the U.S., and this contributes greatly to the above-average SNAP participation rate. More than one in five children in the state lives below the poverty line. The average SNAP benefit for a household with children is $508 per month. Total number of people with SNAP: Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 16% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 31% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $274 Massachusetts is one of the wealthiest states in America, but nearly one-quarter of its residents still rely on SNAP. For each household member per day, the average SNAP benefit is $6.44. Total number of people with SNAP: 505,500 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 16% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 44% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $276 It's estimated that Nevada has a poverty rate of 12%. To add to that, the poverty rate for children is 16.6%. The average SNAP benefit for a household with children is $479. Total number of people with SNAP: 686,800 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 17% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 42% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $332 In Oklahoma, more than 66% of SNAP participants are in families with children and more than 42% are in working families. This combination of factors helps keep the SNAP participation rate fairly high. Total number of people with SNAP: 757,700 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 18% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 35% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $247 Unemployment and poverty rates in Oregon are both above the national average, no doubt contributing to the state's high SNAP participation rate. However, the state has also made a significant effort in the past few decades to increase awareness of SNAP benefits, which is likely pumping up numbers as well. Total number of people with SNAP: 847,100 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 18% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 41% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $336 Louisiana has one of the highest poverty rates in the nation, at 18.9%, so it makes sense that the state's SNAP participation rate would be high. This far surpasses the national poverty rate, which is estimated to be about 12.7%. Total number of people with SNAP: 451,200 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 21% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 44% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $307 New Mexico's numbers are likely boosted by the fact that the state pays out benefits to those earning high levels at the federal poverty level, whereas there are more limitations in most states. New Mexico residents can also apply online, which provides greater access to benefits, though that might be subject to change under the Trump administration. John Csiszar contributed to the reporting for this article. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed recipients of SNAP benefits to find the states with the highest percentages of families utilizing the program. Using data from the US Census American Community Survey, the total population ages 65 and over, household median income and total households were sourced for each state. The cost-of-living indices were sourced from the Missouri Economic and Research Information Center and using the average expenditure costs as sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, the average expenditure costs for each state can be calculated. The average single-family home value was sourced from Zillow Home Value Index and by assuming a 10% down payment and using the national average 30-year fixed mortgage rate, as sourced from the Federal Reserve Economic Data, the average mortgage can be calculated. Using the average mortgage and expenditure cost, the total cost of living can be calculated. Using data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' SNAP State-by-State fact sheets, SNAP participation can be analyzed to find the percentages of families receiving SNAP benefits, average amount of SNAP benefits by household members, poverty level of households receiving SNAP benefits, the households dynamic of households that receive SNAP benefits, and average amounts per person. The states were sorted to show the highest percentage of recipients who receive SNAP benefits. All data was collected on and is up to date as of May 20th, 2025. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 10 States With the Highest Percentage of Families on SNAP