
US Congressman Ro Khanna Condemns Trump's Harvard Foreign Students Ban
Following the Donald Trump administration's decision to bar Harvard University from enrolling international students, US Congressman Ro Khanna criticised the move and challenged prominent tech figures including Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen, David Sacks, Chamath Palihapitiya, Vinod Khosla, and Reid Hoffman to defend the ban, stating that it cannot be justified on merit.
Sharing a post on X, Khanna said, "Anyone from Silicon Valley willing to speak out against the Trump @JDVance ban on current and future international students at Harvard? I know @elonmusk, @DavidSacks, @pmarca, @chamath, @vkhosla, @reidhoffman that there is not a single tech leader who can defend this on the merits."
Anyone from Silicon Valley willing to speak out against the Trump @JDVance ban on current and future international students at Harvard? I know @elonmusk @DavidSacks @pmarca @chamath @vkhosla @reidhoffman that there is not a single tech leader who can defend this on the merits.
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) May 23, 2025
Following Trump's order, Harvard University condemned the decision as unlawful and unwarranted and said that the decision "imperils the futures of thousands of students and scholars."
The university has filed a legal complaint and announced plans to seek a temporary restraining order as it pursues all available remedies.
In a statement released on Friday, the Ofice of the President of the Harvard University said, "Yesterday, the federal government announced that it has revoked Harvard's certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) and stripped the University of its authority to sponsor F- and J- visas for international students and scholars for the 2025-26 academic year. The revocation continues a series of government actions to retaliate against Harvard for our refusal to surrender our academic independence and to submit to the federal government's illegal assertion of control over our curriculum, our faculty, and our student body."
Reassuring its international community, Harvard emphasised its commitment to defending academic freedom and pledged support to those impacted by the decision.
It added, "We condemn this unlawful and unwarranted action. It imperils the futures of thousands of students and scholars across Harvard and serves as a warning to countless others at colleges and universities throughout the country who have come to America to pursue their education and fulfill their dreams. We have just filed a complaint, and a motion for a temporary restraining order will follow. As we pursue legal remedies, we will do everything in our power to support our students and scholars. The Harvard International Office will provide periodic updates as new information becomes available."
Earlier on Thursday, the White House said, "Enrolling foreign students is a privilege, not a right." It accused Harvard leadership of turning "their once-great institution into a hot-bed of anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators."
In a statement to CNN, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said, "They have repeatedly failed to take action to address the widespread problems negatively impacting American students and now they must face the consequences of their actions."
Harvard and the Trump administration have been engaged in a conflict for months as the administration demands the university make changes to the programming of the institution, hiring and administration to remove on-campus antisemitism and remove what it termed "racist 'diversity, equity and inclusion' practices." The administration has targeted foreign students and employees, whom it believes were part of the contentious campus protests over the Israel-Hamas war.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump says US could get involved in Israel-Iran conflict, he's open to serve as a mediator
Trump said US could get involved in Israel-Iran conflict. President Donald Trump said Sunday the United States is not involved in Israel's military strikes against Iran at this moment, but "it's possible we could be involved". In an interview with ABC News, Trump declined to comment on whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked him to get the US more involved. "We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved," the president said. Trump also shared that he had a lengthy call with Russian President Vladimir Putin Saturday to discuss, in large part, the conflict in the Middle East. He said he would be open to Putin's idea to serve as a mediator between Israel and Iran. "I would be open to it. [Putin] is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation. This is something I believe is going to get resolved," Trump stated. The president, who stated he gave Iran a "60-day ultimatum" to "make a deal," told ABC News he is not setting a new deadline. "No, there's no deadline. But they are talking. They'd like to make a deal. They're talking. They continue to talk," the president said. His special envoy Steve Witkoff was set to travel to Oman on Sunday for another round of nuclear talks with Iranian officials. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo But following Israel's strikes, Iran called off the meeting. "Something like this had to happen because I think even from both sides, but something like this had to happen. They want to talk, and they will be talking," Trump said. Meanwhile, reports claimed that Trump vetoed an Israeli plan in recent days to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. "Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do, we're not even talking about going after the political leadership," a senior US administration official told Reuters.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Macron Offers Aid For Greenland Security Amid Trump Threats
President Emmanuel Macron said France would be available to conduct joint exercises to improve security in Greenland, the Danish territory coveted by US President Donald Trump. 'Greenland is subject to preying ambitions,' Macron told reporters in Nuuk, Greenland, Sunday alongside Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen. 'Everyone thinks — in France and in the EU — that Greenland shall neither be sold nor taken.' The French President said a US annexation would be a 'crazy' scenario and called for joint exercises in the Arctic region, including Baltic and Nordic states, with Canada and even with the US. The US president has cited national security as a reason to acquire the semi-autonomous island and criticized Denmark for not investing enough in its defense of the territory, which has a strategic location straddling the North Atlantic and the Arctic. It's already home to a US air base and radar station used to detect missile threats and monitor space. Trump recently said he would '100%' get the island — rekindling an idea he first floated in 2019. Macron and Trump are set to cross paths at a meeting of Group of Seven leaders in Canada, which begins Monday. There, leaders are expected to discuss the conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, but also to issue a statement about critical minerals, which are believed to exist in vast quantities in Greenland. Macron said he would bring the issue up with Trump at the G-7 meeting. Macron, who often casts himself as a defender of European sovereignty, is joining a chorus of leaders on the continent who have opposed Trump's ambitions on island. Trump's comments on acquiring the island have been criticized by Greenlanders and Danes and also by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. While Merz didn't travel with Macron on Sunday, he met Danish leader Mette Frederiksen earlier this week in Berlin and said he stood by the side of Denmark. Macron has been seeking to capitalize on his long relationship with his US counterpart, while also criticizing some of Trump's policies. Earlier this year, Macron urged US-based scientists hit by cost cuts to relocate to Europe. Last week, he said Greenland, the Arctic and deep seas were 'not for sale' — a veiled jab at Trump, whose administration is promoting deep sea mining in international waters. 'The situation in Greenland is clearly a wakeup call for all Europeans,' said Macron, who also suggested opening a French consulate on the territory. 'You are not alone.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Australians Equally Distrust Both Trump and Xi, Survey Finds
Australians are equally distrustful of both US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, according to a new survey, complicating Canberra's task of managing ties with its key security ally and biggest trading partner. A new survey released by the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney showed that 72% of respondents said they didn't trust Trump to act responsibly in global affairs, just edging out the 71% who said they didn't trust China's Xi. When asked whether Trump or Xi would be a better partner for Australia, the two leaders were tied at 45% apiece. The results come as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese attends a Group of Seven meeting in Canada, where he could hold his first face-to-face meeting with the US president. Albanese will be hoping to negotiate an exemption on US steel and aluminum tariffs for Australia, as well as trying to secure Trump's support for Aukus following the announcement in Washington of a review of the security accord. Albanese's balancing act with Trump is a difficult one. Australians' faith in the US has deteriorated following the president's return to the White House. Trust in America as a global player has fallen to just 36%, by far the lowest result in the Lowy survey's 20-year history. Yet despite an aversion to Trump, Australians aren't ready to move away from the US as the nation's primary security partner. The survey showed consistent support for the US alliance, with 80% of respondents saying America was important for Australia's security. Meanwhile, attitudes to China have slightly improved, although Beijing is generally considered less reliable than the US across most metrics. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.