logo
RTO Creep: Why More Companies Are Reinstating The 9-To-5 Workday

RTO Creep: Why More Companies Are Reinstating The 9-To-5 Workday

Forbes21-03-2025

After years of embracing hybrid and remote work, companies are reversing course—reinstating traditional office structures in ways that proves they've 'won the war' that will permanently redefine the future of work.
The Rise and Fall of Remote Work Dominance
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, companies scrambled to adapt to a world where remote work became the default. Employees had newfound leverage in a tight labor market, pushing for flexible work arrangements, while organizations touted early gains in productivity and cost savings from reduced office expenses.
Yet, despite this initial enthusiasm, a counter-trend has emerged: RTO (Return-to-Office) Creep—a slow but steady push by companies to bring workers back into the office full-time. What started as hybrid work experiments is increasingly morphing into rigid, pre-pandemic work structures.
Why is this happening? What does it mean for employees, businesses, and the economy? And how should leaders and workers prepare for the changing landscape of work?
Why Companies Embraced Remote Work (and Why That's Changing)
In the early days of remote work, businesses saw clear financial and operational benefits. Many organizations reduced their real estate footprints, slashing expenses on office leases, utilities, and perks like free lunches. Early studies suggested workers were equally or more productive outside the office, avoiding commutes and structuring their own time. At the same time, companies that embraced remote work had a competitive advantage in the labor market, able to recruit from a broader talent pool and retain employees who valued flexibility.
However, cracks in this model have begun to show. The same executives who once championed remote work are now citing new challenges that justify bringing employees back. Productivity, once assumed to be equal or better at home, has shown mixed results in more recent research. While individual tasks may be completed efficiently, studies indicate that in-person teams tend to be more collaborative, creative, and innovative—factors critical for long-term business success. A 2023 report from Visier found that while employees felt productive at home, managers often struggled to measure true output, leading to concerns about 'productivity theater' rather than meaningful work.
Beyond efficiency, there are concerns about distractions and burnout. Remote workers, while freed from long commutes, often juggle household responsibilities that fragment their focus. Many report working longer hours, blurring the boundaries between work and personal life. At the same time, companies worry about the erosion of workplace culture. Mentorship, professional development, and spontaneous idea-sharing are harder to replicate in virtual settings. McKinsey found that younger employees, in particular, struggled to build professional networks remotely, leading to long-term career stagnation.
Another unexpected force accelerating RTO creep is government influence. The Biden administration had allowed for flexible federal workforce policies, but recent policy directives from Republican lawmakers and the Trump administration indicate a renewed push for strict return-to-office mandates for federal employees. Such orders and policies are setting a tone for the private sector, as large corporations often follow government workforce trends.
These forces are converging to accelerate RTO creep--pushing businesses back toward the traditional 9-to-5 model. Below are five implications for the creep effect.
5 Implications of the RTO Trend
1. Workplace flexibility will be more limited. While hybrid work will persist, fully remote roles will become less common, with more companies shifting to structured in-office requirements. Employees who once had complete autonomy over their schedules may find themselves required to commute several days a week, whether or not their job function necessitates it.
2. Office real estate is expected to rebound, at least partially. Many companies downsized their office spaces over the past few years, but with more employees returning, businesses are reconsidering long-term leases and investments in workplace infrastructure. The commercial real estate market, particularly in major cities, may see stabilization after years of uncertainty.
3. Employee turnover may rise, at least temporarily. Workers who prioritize flexibility will resist strict RTO mandates and may look for employers that still offer remote options. However, as more businesses standardize their policies, the number of remote-friendly companies will shrink, leaving fewer options for workers who refuse to return. Over time, employees may have to accept that in-office work is becoming the norm again.
4. Talent pools are likely to become more localized. During the peak of remote work, companies could hire talent from anywhere, leading to more diverse teams and access to specialized skills. With a shift back to in-office work, hiring will once again be restricted to employees near physical office locations. This could have unintended consequences for diversity and inclusion efforts, as remote work had allowed many companies to expand beyond their traditional talent networks.
5. Leadership and management styles will need to evolve. Managers accustomed to overseeing remote teams must relearn how to lead in-person workplaces effectively. Simply mandating office attendance without a clear purpose could lead to resentment and disengagement. Companies will need to justify in-person work with meaningful collaboration, rather than rigid policies based on outdated notions of productivity.
Recommendations for Business Leaders & Workers
For Business Leaders:
The key to a successful RTO transition lies in balancing structure with flexibility. If returning to full in-office work, consider gradual transitions rather than abrupt mandates. Use data to determine the right mix—some roles may thrive in-office, while others remain effective remotely. Simply demanding attendance without purpose will backfire.
Another critical step is improving the in-office experience. Employees won't return just because they're told to. Businesses must make in-person work meaningful by fostering collaboration, mentorship, and engagement. A well-designed office environment, intentional team-building efforts, and access to leaders can help make the return feel like an opportunity rather than a burden.
Above all, RTO policies should align with business goals. If a company's greatest need is innovation, then collaboration-driven in-office policies make sense. However, if a role is primarily independent, forcing employees to commute unnecessarily could hurt morale and retention. Leaders should focus on outcomes, not hours, ensuring that in-office mandates drive tangible benefits rather than fulfilling outdated management preferences.
For Employees:
As workplace flexibility declines, workers should be proactive about adapting to the new environment. This means identifying in-person work skills—such as leadership, client relations, and cross-functional collaboration—that will make them more valuable in an office setting. Instead of resisting change, employees can use the return to the office as a chance to strengthen professional networks, find mentors, and position themselves for promotions.
For those unwilling to give up flexibility, researching remote-friendly employers is still an option, but the available pool is shrinking. Workers should prepare for the possibility that fully remote opportunities may become increasingly rare, requiring either career shifts or new strategies for negotiating hybrid work arrangements.
Action Steps
RTO creep signals a recalibration of the workplace after the extreme disruptions of the pandemic. While remote work isn't disappearing, the era of full-time remote freedom may be ending for many workers. The companies that succeed in this transition will be those that balance structure with flexibility, making in-office work valuable, not just mandatory.
For workers, adapting to these changes will be key—whether by embracing in-person opportunities or strategically seeking out remaining remote options. The next era of work is taking shape, and both businesses and employees will need to navigate it with intention.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.
Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.

Politico

time6 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.

President Donald Trump is vowing to spark a manufacturing boom with tariffs to protect American workers and industry. So far, it's manufacturers that have borne the brunt of the pain. The president's surprise decision to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50 percent will hit domestic manufacturing just as a new report shows the industry is already contracting. Uncertainty about where tariff rates will ultimately land — or where they'll be applied — has forced businesses to make hard decisions that could cut into both profits and hiring. And a leading trade group on Thursday called on Trump to give the companies a break on the tariffs. 'For a president who is intent on building U.S. manufacturing, the tariff strategy he's laid out is remarkably short-sighted,' said Gordon Hanson, a Harvard Kennedy School professor whose groundbreaking 2016 research work, 'The China Shock,' was among the first to sound the alarm about the threat to American industry. 'It fails to recognize what modern supply chains look like.' 'Even if you're intent on reshoring parts of manufacturing, you can't do it all,' he said. 'Steel and aluminum are part of that.' If Trump's tariffs fail to result in a manufacturing renaissance — a central focus of his presidential campaign — it could weaken the prospects of a GOP coalition that's increasingly reliant on working-class voters who supported his protectionist trade policies. But as unanticipated tariffs continue to drive up input costs for companies that need steel and aluminum for production, the warning signs emanating from manufacturers are getting louder. An index published this week by the Institute for Supply Management, which tracks manufacturing, slipped for the third straight month in May as companies made plans to scale back production. A quarterly survey conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers reported the steepest drop in optimism since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, with trade uncertainty and raw material costs cited as top concerns. Federal Reserve data this month reported weaker manufacturing output. The manufacturers' association on Thursday urged Trump to develop a 'speed pass' that would allow companies to avoid costly new duties on imported raw materials and components that are essential to U.S. producers. 'The steel and aluminum tariffs are almost custom-made to hurt American manufacturing,' said Ernie Tedeschi, a former top Biden administration economist who's now with the Yale Budget Lab. Trump and top administration officials argue that tariffs will encourage investment in domestic manufacturers, which should lead to better-paying jobs, a more resilient economy and more secure supply chains. Exports climbed in April as the president's tariffs took hold, which contributed to an eye-popping decline in the U.S. trade deficit. Indeed, the overall economy remains solid, and businesses are continuing to hire, according to Friday's jobs report for May. Despite the trade headwinds, employment in the manufacturing sector has remained steady since Trump took office. 'As the president says, if you don't make steel, you can't fight a war. He's protecting that industry and bringing it back,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Senate lawmakers this week. 'You're going to see more steel and aluminum furnaces and mills in the history of this country get built over the next three years.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump welcomed the monthly jobs report, posting on Truth Social: 'AMERICA IS HOT! SIX MONTHS AGO IT WAS COLD AS ICE! BORDER IS CLOSED, PRICES ARE DOWN. WAGES ARE UP!' Still, domestic manufacturers who rely on international supply chains for critical steel and aluminum inputs will face tough choices if they want to maintain their profits while keeping output steady. 'Higher costs are expected. Higher input prices. The question is, what do you do with those costs? How much can you pass along to the consumer? How much can you negotiate with your suppliers?' said Andrew Siciliano, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's trade and customs practice. The challenges posed by the increase in steel and aluminum tariffs are particularly acute because it's far from clear whether domestic suppliers will be able to meet the demands of domestic manufacturers. Almost half the aluminum used in the U.S. last year came from foreign sources, according to federal data, and roughly a quarter of all steel is imported. Either way, 'input costs are going to be higher,' Siciliano said. 'If they pass it on, it could affect demand. If they don't pass it on, it could affect profitability.' That isn't to say manufacturers won't benefit from tariffs in the long term. To the extent that Trump's overall tariff regime limits imports, U.S.-based industrial production could expand to address unmet demand. The Budget Lab's analysis of Trump's tariff regime — which includes the 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum — projects that manufacturing output could grow by 1.3 percent over the next five years if existing import duties are left in place. But Tedeschi cautioned that growth may exclude segments like electronic and semiconductor production — which tend to generate higher incomes for workers. Meanwhile, output in other sectors like construction or agriculture would likely contract. Julia Coronado, founder of MacroPolicy Perspectives, also said the flurry of new import duties may prompt some manufacturers to actually move their manufacturing facilities offshore rather than subject their supply chains and production processes to multiple tariffs. 'If I have to assemble a bunch of parts and inputs, why don't I just don't do that on the Canadian or Mexican side of the border and then pay the tariff on the final good?' she said. An even bigger challenge may involve finding and training workers who can staff up any facilities that reshore. Most Americans work in the service sector and, to the extent tariffs lead to reshoring, those facilities will likely rely heavily on automation, according to economists at the Bank of America Institute. Finding qualified workers in the U.S. is either too difficult or too expensive. 'Whatever manufacturing production comes back to the U.S. will require far fewer jobs than 30 or 40 years ago,' Hanson said. 'It's just the way the world has gone.'

Automotive Tariffs are Dramatically Shifting Buyer Habits, Study Says
Automotive Tariffs are Dramatically Shifting Buyer Habits, Study Says

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Automotive Tariffs are Dramatically Shifting Buyer Habits, Study Says

The fixation on international trade tariffs during President Trump's second term has created significant pressure for automakers and buyers alike, just as the auto industry was rebounding after the COVID-19 pandemic. In the past few months, some automakers have adjusted their pricing and/or limited the availability of some foreign-produced models, but there haven't been any major widespread disruptions regarding specific brands or models. Nonetheless, car shoppers are still anxious about any surprises or significant changes regarding their ability to get a new set of wheels. According to a recent survey by Edmunds, 44% of in-market shoppers said that tariffs would "definitely influence their purchase decisions," while 31% indicated they would have some influence. Only 17% said that tariffs would have no impact at all on their buying decisions. Actual data recorded by Edmunds shows that the impact of tariffs on the automotive market has had a far less significant effect on new car prices than expected, as the average transaction price (ATP) for new vehicles remained stable year-over-year. In April 2025, the ATP was $48,422, just a 2.2% increase from the exact figure in 2024. Despite this, some buyers strategically time their purchases in response to the ever-changing tariff situation. About 37% of buyers in the market for new cars told Edmunds that they plan to buy sooner to avoid potential tariff-based pricing issues, while 25% say they're waiting out their big purchases. At the same time, most new car buyers that Edmunds surveyed believe that they understand how tariffs will affect the market. Edmunds's survey data shows that 55% of buyers said they're either somewhat or very confident in knowing how tariffs affect vehicle prices, while 21% said that they weren't confident. With all the hubbub regarding new models, Edmunds observed that some buyers are opting to hit the tariff-free used market to get their fix of new-to-them sets of wheels. Alongside observing a surge in visitors to the used cars section of their website, 58% of respondents shared with Edmunds that they have developed a heightened interest in purchasing used vehicles. Within this group, 46% indicated they are particularly drawn to certified pre-owned (CPO) vehicles, highlighting a growing preference for these thoroughly inspected and warranty-backed options in the used car market. Despite this trend, Edmunds warns that there is a limited number of near-new used vehicles, which is a consequence of the reduced leasing and new inventory volumes that occurred as a result of the microchip shortage just three years ago. According to Edmunds's data released on May 22, the average price for a 3-year-old used vehicle was $30,522 during the first quarter of 2025, a 2.3% year-over-year increase from $29,844 in 2024. They also observe that used cars are taking longer to sell at dealerships. Currently, used vehicles sit on lots for an average of 38 days, four days longer than last year and tied with the record for the longest wait time since the first quarter of 2021. Although Edmunds' data only shows a 2.2% increase in new car prices from 2024, I believe a significant portion of this is due to automakers' efforts to maintain steady prices. Price guarantee programs like Hyundai and Genesis's Customer Assurance and Ford's Employee pricing programs have helped automakers keep punching a dent in sales. For instance, Ford saw a 16% surge in year-over-year sales in May 2025, while Hyundai saw an 8% increase during the prior month. However, time will tell when it comes to the response to auto tariffs and any developments regarding trade deals that could bring down potential duties on imported cars from specific countries. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Popular Latin American chain closes restaurants, files bankruptcy
Popular Latin American chain closes restaurants, files bankruptcy

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Popular Latin American chain closes restaurants, files bankruptcy

The casual dining sector has faced a number of economic issues over the last two years that have led to several restaurant chains closing hundreds of locations, and in some cases, filing for bankruptcy. The major challenges include huge debt obligations that have become unmanageable, as interest rates increased after the Covid-19 pandemic. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Also, rising inflation over the last three years has resulted in higher costs of labor and food products, which in turn forced restaurants to raise their prices to the dismay of consumers. Related: Iconic San Francisco restaurant closes permanently after 40 years Changing attitudes of customers toward spending on restaurant meals, as prices have risen, have also taken a toll on the restaurant industry. The most significant distressed restaurant chain to close locations was seafood chain Red Lobster, which filed for bankruptcy in May 2024, closing about 187 restaurants. The dining chain emerged from Chapter 11 in September 2024 and now operates about 478 locations in 44 states. Italian restaurant chain Buca di Beppo closed 18 locations last year before it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Aug. 4, 2025, to reorganize its business with the support of its lenders. The restaurant chain on Nov. 4 won approval to sell its 44 remaining corporate-owned restaurants to its lender Main Street Capital Corp., with a credit bid of $27 million. Bar and grill chain TGI Fridays had 161 U.S. locations when it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Nov. 2, 2024, to reorganize and closed 76 locations. The restaurant chain listed 85 U.S. locations on its website in April. Mexican restaurant chain On The Border Mexican Grill & Cantina had about 120 locations at the beginning of this year and closed or vacated 40 non-performing stores on Feb. 24 because of problems with rent and/or financial performance. On The Border filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 4, 2025, with plans to sell its assets to its prepetition bridge loan lender. Miami Beach-based CHG US Holdings, which operates 18 Planta restaurant locations across the country in cities such as New York, Chicago, and the Los Angeles area, filed its petition on May 12 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The debtor has closed restaurants in West Palm Beach, Fla., South Beach, Fla., and Brooklyn, N.Y., since filing for bankruptcy. Finally, popular New York-based Peruvian restaurant chain Tu Casa has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and closed half of its locations. Related: Another popular pizza dining chain files Chapter 11 bankruptcy The restaurant chain's affiliate, Don Kew Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 4 for a restaurant, Hangar Bar & Grill, in Kew Gardens, Queens. More bankruptcy: Iconic auto repair chain franchise files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular beer brand closes down and files Chapter 7 bankruptcyPopular vodka and gin brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The debtor listed up to $50,000 in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities, which include tax obligations owed to the New York State Department of Taxation that prompted the bankruptcy filing. Tu Casa Restaurant Corp. and two affiliates, Tu Casa #3 Restaurant Corp. and Tu Casa #4 Restaurant Corp., filed for Chapter 11 protection on May 30 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, seeking to reorganize. Tu Casa, which was established in 2004, expanded its chain to four restaurants in the Queens, N.Y., communities of Kew Gardens, Forest Hills, Richmond Hill, and Astoria, before closing the Richmond Hill and Astoria locations. The restaurant specializes in Peruvian rotisserie chicken, Peruvian fried rice, Peruvian linguini, and various seafood dishes featuring salmon, sea trout, red snapper, and shrimp. Related: Popular casual restaurant chain files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store