logo
How Karen Read's second murder trial has differed from the first

How Karen Read's second murder trial has differed from the first

CNN05-05-2025

The retrial of Karen Read is shaping up to be altogether similar to her first murder trial, but there are several differences that could influence whether the jury reaches a verdict this time around.
After the first trial last year ended in a hung jury and mistrial, Read again pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death.
Prosecutors say Read, 45, drunkenly drove a Lexus vehicle into John O'Keefe, her off-duty Boston Police officer boyfriend, and then left him to die in a blizzard outside a home in Canton, Massachusetts, on the night of January 29, 2022. Her defense has argued that fellow law enforcement officers in that home killed O'Keefe, dumped his body on the lawn and conspired to pin the blame on Read in a vast cover-up.
Despite that familiar backdrop, several new attorneys, Read's media interviews and the firing of the lead investigator have combined to change the dynamics of the case.
Here's a closer look at how her retrial has differed from the first trial and what those changes could mean.
The lead prosecutor in the first trial was assistant district attorney Adam Lally, but the retrial has been led by special prosecutor Hank Brennan.
Brennan is best known for defending mob boss James 'Whitey' Bulger during his federal racketeering trial over 10 years ago. He was appointed to retry the Read case by Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey, who described Brennan as a 'highly respected and skilled former prosecutor and long-time defense attorney' who 'has expertise handling complex law enforcement matters.'
Lally remains on the prosecution team but did not deliver opening statements, as he did in the first trial, and has taken a backseat to Brennan.
The defense, too, has changed its legal team since the last trial.
Robert Alessi, a New York-based attorney who did not participate in the first trial, has handled the cross-examination of some expert witnesses and argued motions outside the presence of the jury. His website notes his 'scientific and technical background,' particularly in questioning experts.
Further, attorney Victoria George, who served as an alternate juror in the first trial, was added to Read's defense team. As an alternate, George did not participate in deliberations, but her perspective could help the defense better understand the jury's perspective.
One of the clearest differences from the first trial is Read's own words and commentary.
Read did not testify in the first trial, but she has since spoken publicly about her case in interviews with TV reporters, in Vanity Fair and in an Investigation Discovery documentary series. (Investigation Discovery, like CNN, is owned by Warner Bros. Discovery.)
'This is my version of testifying. Doing this film is my testimony,' she said in the documentary series, 'A Body in the Snow: The Trial of Karen Read.'
At her second trial, prosecutors have already presented some of that 'testimony' to the jury as evidence against her.
'You're gonna hear from her own lips, and many of her statements, her admissions to extraordinary intoxication, her admissions to driving the Lexus, her admissions to being angry at John that night, and I dare say, her admissions that she told (others) that she had hit him,' Brennan said in opening statements.
Brennan then played a video of Read speaking to 'Dateline' in which she raised the possibility that she hit O'Keefe with her vehicle.
'I didn't think I hit him hit him, but could I have clipped him, could I have tagged him in the knee and incapacitated him?' Read said in the clip from the October 2024 interview. 'He didn't look mortally wounded, as far as I could see – but could I have done something that knocked him out and in drunkenness and in the cold, he didn't come to again?'
Read's statement seemingly reinforced witnesses who say they heard her similarly wonder aloud whether she hit O'Keefe the morning his body was found.
Kerry Roberts and Jennifer McCabe, both of whom helped look for the victim, testified Read pointed out she had broken her SUV's taillight that night, and asked them, 'Could I have hit him?' and 'Do you think I hit him?'
Prosecutors during the retrial have used other clips of Read to bolster witness testimony and refute defense arguments.
For example, prosecutors played a clip from the documentary series in which Read said after O'Keefe's death, 'His mother leans over the kitchen island and says to me, 'I think it looks like he got hit by a car.'' However, Peggy O'Keefe testified she was never in the kitchen with Read that day.
In another instance, prosecutors played a clip of Read telling journalist Gretchen Voss in June 2023 that she personally picked pieces of the vehicle's broken taillight and dropped them onto O'Keefe's driveway. That appeared to contradict the defense's argument that this evidence was tampered with by corrupt investigators.
It's not clear if Read will testify in the second trial.
Another major change from the first trial is the employment status of Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator of Read's case.
In her first trial, Proctor admitted under oath that he sent a series of sexist and offensive texts about Read in a private group chat, calling her a 'whack job c*nt,' mocking her medical issues and commenting to coworkers that he had found 'no nudes' while searching her phone for evidence, according to CNN affiliate WCVB.
Proctor apologized for the 'unprofessional' comments on the stand, but the vulgar texts undermined his testimony and the prosecution's case.
Proctor was relieved of duty on the same day the mistrial was announced last July. He was then fired in March for violating four department policies, including for sending those messages.
In opening statements of the retrial, the defense announced plans to focus on Proctor, saying he lied and fabricated evidence in the case.
'You'll see from the evidence in this case that this case carries a malignancy … a cancer that cannot be cut out, a cancer that cannot be cured,' attorney Alan Jackson said. 'And that cancer has a name. His name is Michael Proctor.'
It's unclear if he will testify in this trial – but his name is included on a list of potential witnesses.
CNN's Elise Hammond, Dakin Andone and Jean Casarez contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meet the judge overseeing the Trump National Guard case: Justice Breyer's brother
Meet the judge overseeing the Trump National Guard case: Justice Breyer's brother

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Meet the judge overseeing the Trump National Guard case: Justice Breyer's brother

Gov. Gavin Newsom's lawsuit against President Donald Trump over the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles is in the hands of a federal judge who is the younger brother of retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, a former Watergate prosecutor nominated to the bench by Bill Clinton in 1997, was assigned to Newsom's case Tuesday, a day after California officials sued to reverse Trump's order. California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, citing the presence of his and other state offices in that city as justification for the choice of venue. Breyer is one of 13 judges in that courthouse and was assigned the case through a random process overseen by the court clerk. Breyer, who attended Harvard before getting his law degree from the University of California, Berkeley, was confirmed by unanimous consent in the Senate and has served as a judge in the San Francisco-based federal court since. Notably, Trump himself nominated Breyer in 2018 for a second term on the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Breyer, 83, will decide whether Trump had the legal authority to federalize 4,000 California National Guard troops amid street protests over the administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles. Newsom argues that the move was unlawful because Trump bypassed a requirement to coordinate with the governor's office and called up the troops over Newsom's objection. In a 2023 appearance at the Supreme Court alongside his brother, Breyer recalled that he was a local prosecutor during unrest in the Bay Area in the 1960s and 1970s but pressed on with his day-to-day work. 'I was an assistant district attorney. There were riots in San Francisco, over Vietnam over at San Francisco State, close it down,' Charles Breyer said. 'You did your task, which didn't mean that you weren't aware of what was going on or not sensitive to what was going on or tried to understand what was going on, but it meant you had a task.' In 2008, at a public talk alongside other former Watergate figures, Breyer said the Nixon-era scandal proved the value of the Constitution — and in particular, the First Amendment protections for those who 'speak out against the government.' 'We were told from Day One, why are you doing this? You're tearing down the presidency. You're making it very difficult for the president of the United States to discharge his obligations,' Breyer recalled. 'And our answer really was that the Constitution was set up … to allow an examination of the way our government operates. And that's what happened.'

Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report
Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report

The Telegram messaging app may have ties to Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB), according to an investigation. Independent Russian investigative outlet IStories said it has uncovered evidence suggesting that the platform's server infrastructure is maintained by companies who have collaborated with Russian intelligence services, raising significant concerns about potential government surveillance. Responding to a request for comment, Telegram's head of Press and Media Relations Remi Vaughn said in a statement to Newsweek: "As a global company, Telegram has contracts with dozens of different service providers around the world. However, none of these service providers have access to Telegram data or sensitive infrastructure. "All Telegram servers belong to Telegram and are maintained by Telegram employees. Unauthorized access is impossible. Throughout its entire history, Telegram never disclosed any private messages to a third party - and its encryption has never been breached." In another auto-message sent after reaching out for comment, Telegram said: "Telegram is committed to protecting user privacy and human rights such as freedom of speech and assembly. It has played a prominent role in pro-democracy movements around the world, including in Iran, Russia, Belarus, Myanmar and Hong Kong. "Pavel Durov is the founder, owner and CEO of Telegram. He left Russia in 2014, after losing control of his previous company for refusing to hand over the data of Ukrainian protesters to security agencies. Pavel Durov lives in Dubai and holds a dual citizenship of the United Arab Emirates and France." Telegram has long held a reputation as a secure messaging app, and it is used globally by journalists, activists, and ordinary users seeking privacy. Its founder, Russian-born Pavel Durov, who was detained by French authorities in August 2024, has cultivated an image that the platform protects digital privacy. The IStories report challenges that image by linking the platform to Russia's FSB, which jails individuals critical of the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Telegram's infrastructure is managed by Global Network Management (GNM), a small firm registered in Antigua and Barbuda, which provides the platform with over 10,000 IP addresses, according to IStories. GNM's owner, Russian national Vladimir Vedeneyev, previously testified in a U.S. court that he has employees based in Russia. IStories also found that Vedeneyev serves as Telegram's chief financial officer. Many of these IP addresses were previously owned by Globalnet, a St. Petersburg-based telecommunications operator. IStories reported that Globalnet has connections to the Kremlin and Russian intelligence services, including the FSB. Electrontelecom, a St. Petersburg-based company, also reportedly provided Telegram with another 5,000 IP addresses, according to IStories, which identified the firm as an FSB contractor. Electrontelecom has provided services for the installation and maintenance of "a complex system for transmitting classified information from fixed facilities operated by the FSB's Directorate for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region, which is used to carry out operational investigative activities," it said. The investigation comes days after Russian human rights NGO First Department warned that the FSB had gained access to Russians' communication with Ukrainian Telegram channels, which provide vital updates and reporting on Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. "We know that by the time the defendants in cases of 'state treason' are detained, the FSB is already in possession of their correspondence. And the fact that neither defendants nor a lawyer are named in the main case allows the FSB to hide how exactly it goes about gaining access to that correspondence," First Department said. First Department head Dmitry Zair-Bek said that material from Telegram had already been used as evidence in "a significant number of cases." "On most cases, they have been accessed due to compromised devices. ... However, there are also cases in which no credible technical explanations consistent with known access methods can be identified," he said, Novaya Gazeta reported. "This could indicate either the use of undisclosed cyber espionage tools or Telegram's cooperation with the Russian authorities, obvious signs of which we see in a number of other areas," Zair-Bek added. Cybersecurity expert Michał Woźniak told IStories that beyond storing decrypted messages, Telegram also attaches a unique device identifier to each message sent on the platform, known as auth_key_id, which can determine where a user is located and reveal their IP addresses. "If someone has access to Telegram traffic and cooperates with Russian intelligence services, this means that the device identifier becomes a really big problem-a tool for global surveillance of messenger users, regardless of where they are and what server they connect to," Woźniak said. Telegram has not commented publicly on the investigation or the allegations. The company is being paid $300 million to roll out Elon Musk's Grok chatbot on the messaging app. "This summer, Telegram users will gain access to the best AI technology on the market. @elonmusk and I have agreed to a 1-year partnership to bring xAI's @grok to our billion+ users and integrate it across all Telegram apps," Durov announced on May 28. Related Articles Russia Expands Military Cooperation with North KoreaIsrael Denies Envoy's Claim of Patriot Defenses Given to UkraineNATO Ally Scraps Purchase of US Black Hawk Helicopters'Trump Is Losing,' Putin's Top Propagandist Says 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Diddy Trial: Alleged Victim ‘Jane' Faces Cross-Examination
Diddy Trial: Alleged Victim ‘Jane' Faces Cross-Examination

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

Diddy Trial: Alleged Victim ‘Jane' Faces Cross-Examination

An ex-girlfriend of Sean 'Diddy' Combs and one of his alleged victims central to the prosecution's case faces cross-examination from the defense Tuesday following days of testimony, as prosecutors describe the woman using the pseudonym 'Jane' as one of the most important witnesses in Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial, alongside Cassie Ventura. 'Jane,' one of the alleged sex trafficking victims named in Combs' indictment, where she is referred to as 'Victim-2,' is fielding questions from Combs' lawyers Tuesday, where she has so far testified Combs coerced her into sexual performances similar to the 'freak-offs' Ventura described during her testimony. Jane, who said she was in a relationship with Combs from 2021 to 2024, testified Tuesday she 'resented' Combs for allegedly making her participate in what they called 'hotel nights,' in which Combs would hire a male escort to have sex with her, USA Today reported. Defense lawyers pressed Jane on whether she loved Combs, and she said on the stand she still loves him and participated in their 'hotel nights' out of love for him and because she enjoyed the attention he would give her during those encounters, NBC News reported. Combs' lawyers also questioned Jane about financial support Combs had given her, and Jane testified Combs wired her about $150,000 throughout their relationship, paid her rent and paid for a lawyer she retained amid Combs' legal problems. Jane told defense lawyers she was concerned about Combs' drug use and suggested he go to rehab, testifying she believed he was developing jaundice, graying gums and shaky hands from what she believed were alcohol withdrawals, USA Today reported. Jane testified during cross-examination Combs told her at the beginning of their relationship he was polyamorous, but Jane became jealous once he began publicly dating the rapper Yung Miami, and in a text shown to the court, Jane told Combs: 'I'm not Cassie, and I'll make your life hell.' During the prosecutor's direct questioning, which stretched from Thursday to Monday, Jane testified about various alleged physical altercations with Combs, described feeling coerced into and 'disgusted' by 'hotel night' sexual performances and alleged Combs made her transport drugs across state lines multiple times. Jane testified she typically took drugs to get through 'hotel nights' so they wouldn't feel 'too real,' and she said her longest encounter lasted three-and-a-half days, the Associated Press reported. Jane's testimony about 'hotel nights' mirrors Ventura's testimony about 'freak offs,' and once Ventura sued Combs in 2023, Jane said she 'fainted' and felt like she was 'reading my own story.' She testified she confronted Combs about the Ventura lawsuit and told him in a text: 'I feel like I'm reading my own sexual trauma,' NBC News reported. She testified she felt suicidal ideation during her relationship with Combs and told him in text messages in late 2023 that she wanted to die. Jane detailed a June 2024 fight she had with Combs, during which he punched and kicked her multiple times, she testified, after which he told her to put on makeup to cover her injuries because they were about to have another 'hotel night,' CNN reported. Jane also testified she was with Combs on the day CNN published surveillance footage depicting him assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel, during which time she gave him space to be with his family. Jane said she never heard him deny the video was authentic, and once they discussed the video weeks later, Jane testified Combs said that was the 'only time' he and Ventura 'had physical violence like that.' Ventura, considered the prosecution's star witness, testified for much of the trial's first week, telling the court Combs had forced her to participate in sexual encounters with male escorts and physically abused her throughout their decade-long relationship, also alleging he raped her in 2018. Rapper Kid Cudi also took the stand, testifying Combs broke into his house, shortly after which his car exploded in his driveway, after he found out Kid Cudi was dating Ventura in 2011. Another alleged victim testified under the pseudonym 'Mia,' alleging Combs repeatedly sexually assaulted her and physically abused her while she worked as his assistant. Jane's testimony is expected to last until Thursday, the Washington Post reported. Combs' trial is slated to wrap up by the July 4 weekend. Combs faces five federal charges: two counts of sex trafficking, two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and one count of racketeering conspiracy. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Separately, Combs faces dozens of civil lawsuits alleging sexual assault and sex trafficking, all of which Combs has denied. Sean 'Diddy' Combs Trial: Cassie Testifies About Alleged 2018 Rape As Cross-Examination Wraps Up (Forbes) Diddy Trial: Kid Cudi Testifies Sean Combs Broke Into His House Before His Car Was Firebombed (Forbes)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store