Government 'lost touch', says long-serving Labour councillor
"Good Labour councillors who I've worked with over the years... all that experience has gone."Speaking earlier this week, John Clarke's frustration at the election results for Nottinghamshire County Council was plain to see.After Reform UK's decisive victory, other parties have started the inquest into what went wrong for them.The Conservatives lost control of the authority and have been left with 17 seats - a net loss of 20 compared to the last election - and will now be the main opposition group.
Labour, on the other hand, were reduced to just four seats - the party's worst ever performance in an election for Nottinghamshire County Council, at least in its current form.
Clarke was one of the few who held on to their seats, maintaining a decades-long personal winning streak.When he was first elected as a Gedling borough councillor in 1989, Neil Kinnock was Labour leader.He has won every election he has stood in ever since, joining the county council in 1997 and becoming Gedling's leader in 2011.He claims, however, that he has never been asked by his party what the secret to his success is, and he had considered not standing this year.Had the election come a year before, when Labour was performing far better in the opinion polls, he said the result would likely have been very different."We should've walked into this place, but we haven't," Clarke said."I thought we'd do a lot better than that, but I think the government - my government - have lost touch with ordinary people."He criticised the cutting of winter fuel payments for some pensioners, but stopped short of calling for a full U-turn."I think they need to look at it, and fairly obviously some people were taking it for a ride, but in most cases that was part of people's budget," he said."I represent a lot of vulnerable people, and they're very very angry. Lifelong Labour supporters who've said no."There have been similar calls from some Labour MPs, but on Tuesday the government insisted it will not reverse the cuts.
But Clarke claimed the electoral drubbing was not purely down to national factors.He is an outspoken opponent of plans that could see boroughs like Gedling combined with Nottingham city, and said his concerns were shared by voters in the election campaign."That came through loud and clear on the doorstep, on the bus, anywhere else, you could hear people chattering about it," he said."They do not want to be joined up with the city."No decisions have been made over the future configuration of Nottinghamshire councils, but ministers say merging some authorities will help streamline services.The city council's leader has previously argued the city is "significantly under-bounded" and said "we need to address that imbalance".There has been acknowledgment from government that the local election results were "disappointing", and earlier this week Health Secretary Wes Streeting told the BBC ministers were "reflecting on what the voters told us".Clarke, however, issued a stark warning."I think the next general election is up for grabs at the moment, unless they start steering in another way."The Labour Party was contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
20 minutes ago
- Sky News
Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn
The National Trust and RSPB have joined forces with farmers to warn the government that cutting the agricultural budget could be "catastrophic" for nature and rural businesses. In a letter to food security and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner, exclusively seen by Sky News, a dozen of the biggest rural industry organisations say they are "deeply concerned" about rumoured cuts that will be made to the agricultural budget in Wednesday's spending review. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out budgets for each government department for the rest of this parliament, set to end in 2029. The letter says cutting funding for existing and new environmental farming schemes will be "catastrophic" to the government's aims for the environment. "Many of the environmental features present in the countryside and enjoyed by the public will be under threat and will disappear," the letter says. "This would be a poor legacy for this government." Sir Keir Starmer's government has made getting to net zero by 2050 a key goal, already initiating several policies to restrict carbon emissions and make the UK greener since winning the election last July. However, the government shocked farmers in March when it shut down applications for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI), which rewards farmers for managing their land in environmentally sustainable ways, with just a few hours' notice as they said a cap had been reached for the year. The rural organisations say the Environmental Land Management (ELM) scheme payments are "critical to the government's statutory targets on environmental improvement", including the main goal of halting the decline of biodiversity. 3:26 The letter states farmers and landowners are fully committed to environmental schemes, with 77,000 live agri-environment scheme agreements, according to the latest government figures, "with millions of hectares under environmental land management". "So much good has been done by these agreements, the oldest of which has run for decades," the letter says. "The unprecedented engagement in the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) is testament to the appetite of farmers and land managers to rise to the challenge and do more." The letter finishes with: "The industry would like to have your assurances that this critical work will continue to be funded at the same level." David Wilson, a farmer for 53 years, told Sky News it took many years for farmers to get on board with the environmental schemes but they are now joined up, and reducing funding could damage years of work and be a backwards step for not just the UK's environment, but the world's. "This is ultimately about sustainability. To produce good food, you need good ecology and reducing this funding could damage the UK's ecology and our food security," he added. A return to intensive farming Alex Robinson, 39, a farmer from Gloucestershire with 424 hectares, said the schemes have been "a lifeline for nature", with birds, bees and wildflowers returning - including 14 red-listed bird species, many that had not been seen in decades. His farm's soil health is improving, which means he can grow more resilient nutrient dense crops for people to eat. If funding is cut he said he "may have no choice but to return to intensive farming methods sooner than the soils are ready for", with wildflowers and field margins becoming "difficult to justify", which will put the UK's climate, biodiversity and long-term food security "in real danger". Government will be abandoning nature Signatory Victoria Vyvyan, farmer and president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), said: "If sustainable farming contracts are cut, government won't just abandon nature - it will abandon its own environmental and legal commitments. "The Sustainable Farming Incentive is working - for farmers, for nature, for the public, and for the Treasury. It's bringing back wildlife, cleaning up rivers, and restoring the health of our soil. "Take away the funding for nature contracts, and farmers will be pushed back to intensive methods - forced to undo years of progress. Nature will suffer as well as farmers, and on the environment, it will go against everything government claims to agree with." The letter has been signed by the heads of The National Trust, the National Farmers' Union (NFU), the RSPB, the Soil Association, the CLA, the Tenant Farmers Association, the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, the Nature Friendly Farming Network, the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, the National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs, the British Institute of Agricultural Consultants and the Agricultural Industries Confederation.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Legal aid lawyers face chaos following cyber attack, says representative body
Legal aid lawyers are facing 'administrative chaos' in the aftermath of a cyber attack amid fears more providers will leave the sector, a representative body has said. The Legal Aid Agency's (LAA) digital services, which are used by legal aid providers to log their work and get paid by the Government, were taken offline following the data breach in April. Payments for the publicly funded work initially stopped and legal aid applications are not able to be formally granted at the moment. This has left legal aid law firms, often small businesses, to decide whether to take on the risk of cases and hope they will be approved and paid retrospectively. Chris Minnoch, chief executive of Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG), said that lawyers have called the representative body 'in tears' having 'sleepless nights' waiting on news and payments coming through from legal aid because of the cyber attack. 'They've been on the verge of collapse because they hadn't had payments for one or two weeks,' he told the PA news agency. 'What a cyber attack like this brings to the front of your mind is that the legal aid scheme is teetering on the precipice of collapse. 'If it goes and if lawyers just say, 'I can't do this anymore', it has profound consequences for almost every aspect of society, because we are talking about the law of everyday life.' Those eligible to apply for legal aid include domestic violence and modern slavery victims, people involved in care proceedings or at risk of homelessness, as well as people accused of criminal offences. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) previously said a 'significant amount of personal data' of people who applied to the LAA since 2010, including criminal records, was accessed and downloaded in the cyber attack. The Government became aware of the hack on April 23, but realised on May 16 that it was more extensive than originally thought, and took the system offline. Mr Minnoch said it was 'unforgivable' for an organisation of that size to not have a business continuity plan that anticipated this sort of fallout. 'You'll have a number of providers that, by the end of this digital disaster we're dealing with, won't be there anymore because they just couldn't afford to, and a number of others that just say, 'I just I can't take this anymore',' he said. 'Every time there is some sort of crisis that befalls the legal aid scheme, you end up with fewer lawyers willing to do it at the end of it.' An MoJ source had put the breach down to the 'neglect and mismanagement' of the previous government, saying vulnerabilities in the LAA's systems have been known for many years. The attack happened as the MoJ was working on replacing the internal system with a new version hoped to be up and running in the coming weeks. At the end of May, the LAA brought in a scheme for civil legal aid providers to be able to receive payments based on their average billing until the system is back online, when lawyers will then submit specific bills and applications. On June 4, payments were sent to more than 1,700 solicitors and barristers who took up the offer. Payments for criminal legal aid cases separately have also resumed, the MoJ said. Mr Minnoch added that while the civil legal aid payments should have been done two weeks earlier, they were an important step forward, effectively loaning providers cash while they cannot claim money owed to them. 'I think one of the ways they need to mitigate this is by being as flexible as possible with providers, once the situation is restored to some sort of business as usual, because they're going to be punch drunk by the end of this, they're already punch drunk,' he said. There are also concerns the move will create a backlog of providers trying to push through all their cases that need to be claimed in a short period of time when the system is back up and running, to effectively gain the income to repay the loan as quickly as possible. Jenny Beck KC, co-chair of the LAPG, said: 'There's administrative chaos in an already beleaguered and fragile supplier base. 'Nobody does it because it's a very sensible business proposition. People do it because they genuinely care about vulnerable people and they want to help them.' Ms Beck, who runs a family law practice, said her firm's workload is 60% legal aid work helping extremely vulnerable people such as domestic abuse survivors who need protection orders. She told PA a 'good proportion' of clients are reliant on legal aid to access their rights which is a 'massive access to justice issue'. Of the legal aid work, Ms Beck, who is also a member of the Law Society's access to justice committee, added: 'We'll have to supplement it with private income sources, because it's anxiety provoking to be working at risk on cases that we haven't an absolute guarantee that we're going to be paid.' 'I am going to continue to work at risk because I cannot leave my clients vulnerable. 'But I know that many other firms are very concerned about taking that risk.' Nicola Jones-King, Law Society council member for legal aid, said that while taking the risk for certain types of cases is 'okay' when it is known legal aid will be granted, there is more concern for means and merit tested applications for legal aid such as in housing or cases against police action. 'If it's a slightly more challenging or unusual case, or it's a case where you need to assess merits and means, that's more problematic obviously for the solicitor to take that on that risk,' she said. The risk also applies in cases that already have legal aid granted, but then need further approval to continue the funding at different stages in the proceedings. Stuart Nolan, managing director at DPP Law Ltd and chairman of the Law Society's criminal law committee, said his firm's criminal law department is made up of about 95% of legal aid cases and could sustain the current situation 'at a cost' for a couple of months before feeling the pinch. 'The impact is so far reaching, clogged criminal justice system, this is prospect of more delays,' he said. 'The quicker it's sorted out, the better for everyone.' A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'We understand the challenges this situation presents for legal aid providers – we are working as fast as possible to restore our online systems and have put in place contingencies to allow legal aid work to continue safely with confidence. 'These measures include setting up an average payment scheme for civil legal aid cases, resuming payments on criminal legal aid cases, putting in place processes for urgent civil application approvals and confirming that criminal applications made in this time will be backdated.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Sizewell C: Govt commits £14.2bn to new nuclear power station
Fifteen years after the Sizewell C nuclear power station was proposed, the government will announce a £14.2bn commitment to the Suffolk site. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is set to confirm the funding at the GMB union conference ahead of the spending review on Wednesday, which will set departmental budgets until 2029. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband will call it a "golden age" of nuclear to boost the UK's energy security. The funding will go towards creating 10,000 jobs, the government will say, including 1,500 apprenticeships, and will support thousands more jobs across the UK. On Monday, it was revealed Britain's nuclear power sector grew by a quarter in 2024 to £20bn compared with three years ago, underpinned by a record workforce which has increased by a third, according to research by the Nuclear Power Association. About 87,000 people now work in the industry, with the rise largely driven by new nuclear power projects at Sizewell C and Hinkley Point C in Somerset. Sizewell C was initially proposed by French energy company EDF and China General Nuclear Power Group, but in 2022 the Conservative government bought the Chinese company out and the state now owns 83.5% of the project with EDF. The green light for construction to begin was given in January 2024 under the Conservative government, and at last autumn's budget, Ms Reeves announced a £2.7bn commitment to Sizewell C and said a final commitment would be announced in the 2025 spending review. Construction is expected to take between nine and 12 years and when it is complete, it will provide around six million homes with nuclear energy. A total of £330m of contracts have been signed with local companies, with 70% of all contracts expected to go to 3,500 British suppliers. Ms Reeves said: "Today we are once again investing in Britain's renewal, with the biggest nuclear building programme in a generation. This landmark decision is our Plan for Change in action. "We are creating thousands of jobs, kickstarting economic growth and putting more money in people's pockets." HS2 all over again? Campaign group Stop Sizewell C called it "HS2 mark 2" after the high-speed train line that has faced high costs, delays and parts of it being axed. They questioned how much money the government will ultimately invest in the nuclear power station as they said no information has been provided about the expected total costs. 2:09 Alison Downes, from Stop Sizewell C, said: "Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? "Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2." Or vital step towards domestic clean energy? But the funding was called a "vital step toward delivering the secure, domestic clean energy" the UK needs by "pro-growth" campaign group Britain Remade. Sam Richards, CEO of the Conservative thinktank, added: "The government must go much further."
