Tariff crossfire hits Toyota, Nissan, Ford suppliers in Japan
By Maki Shiraki, Daniel Leussink
TAKASAKI, Japan (Reuters) -Four decades ago, Hiroko Suzuki's father threaded the needle of a U.S. trade war by pushing the family auto-parts business into newer niche products. Now, tariffs imposed by the Trump administration are so sweeping they threaten her own attempt to diversify the 78-year-old company into medical devices.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has called the U.S. tariffs, including 25% on automobiles, a "national crisis" for the world's fourth-largest economy. Japan's top trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, headed to Washington on Friday for a third round of talks.
The worry is evident at companies like Kyowa Industrial, a maker of prototype parts and race-car components based in Takasaki, north of Tokyo. Kyowa, which employs 120 people, was among six auto suppliers that told Reuters they were concerned about their ability to withstand the tariff pressure on Japan's car industry.
"What in the world are we going to do?" Suzuki, Kyowa's third-generation president, recalled thinking when the tariffs were announced. "This is going to be bad."
The problems Kyowa and other auto suppliers face illustrate a decades-long shift in Japan, which no longer floods the world with chips and consumer electronics and is reliant on an auto industry threatened by intense Chinese competition. That marks a contrast with the 1980s, when the U.S. slapped trade barriers on a rising Japan and its then-barnstorming exports.
This report, which is based on interviews with a dozen people, including industry executives, bankers and senior government officials, provides a first-hand account of how one firm is grappling with the uncertainty, and details the deepening squeeze on the automotive supply chain at a time of profound disruption.
Kyowa and thousands of other small manufacturers comprise an auto-supply network that has for decades pursued a "monozukuri" (literally, "making things") approach to production. That culture of incremental improvement and assembly-line efficiency, based on methods developed by Toyota, helped make Japan a juggernaut.
But the shift to battery-powered smart cars has meant software, in which EV makers such as Tesla and China's BYD excel, has become a bigger selling point.
Kyowa started developing neurosurgery instruments in 2016 after Suzuki, now 65, realised the rise of EVs would eventually hammer demand for engine components. It began selling the instruments in the U.S. last year, only to find that Trump's tariffs also applied to medical devices.
Kyowa doesn't export auto components to the U.S., but Suzuki worries automakers will force suppliers to cut prices to offset tariffs. So far, that hasn't happened to her.
One Subaru Corp supplier said his company may have to start looking for partners expanding outside the U.S.
Major automakers have largely offered muted support for suppliers since Trump's tariff announcements. Last month, Toyota, Nissan and Ford sent letters to the U.S. arms of some Japanese suppliers asking for cooperation in the face of tariffs, according to copies reviewed by Reuters, without offering specifics.
The letters haven't been previously reported.
Nissan told suppliers they should stick to previously agreed prices. It said it was "not obliged" to bear the costs of tariffs but that it would shoulder some of the hit for up to four weeks to help secure its supply chain. It added that it could later seek to recover any support payments to suppliers.
Reuters couldn't determine how much support, if any, Nissan extended. The automakers haven't sent follow-up letters, according to two suppliers, who allowed Reuters to review the correspondence on condition of anonymity.
Nissan told Reuters it was working with suppliers to mitigate the tariff impact and contain costs, including through localisation.
Toyota said it would seek to protect its suppliers, dealers, and employees while maintaining customers' trust as it navigated the uncertainty created by the tariffs. Ford told Reuters it was working with suppliers to assess their exposure and potentially reconfigure processes and sourcing.
In its letter, Toyota said it understood the "complexity and financial burden some suppliers are facing" and asked suppliers to identify and share mitigation measures. Toyota would work with suppliers "in good faith", it said.
Some Toyota suppliers, including Denso, have not given earnings forecasts for the coming year, citing uncertainty.
Julie Boote, an analyst at research firm Pelham Smithers Associates, said the trade war posed an "emergency" for Japan's auto industry that would hasten consolidation.
"In order to survive, these automakers will have to work together," she said.
SQUEEZED ON COST
Japanese manufacturers traditionally put pressure on smaller suppliers to lower prices, said Sayuri Shirai, a former Bank of Japan board member who is now a professor at Keio University.
If the tariffs remain in place in the longer term, it would spell more damage for regional economies hollowed out by demographic decline, she said.
The risks for Japan are already clear. The economy shrank in the first quarter, and Tokyo has compiled emergency economic measures to ease the pain of tariffs.
"Automobile exports are just too important to Japan for a 25% tariff to stay in place," said David Boling, a former U.S. trade official who is now a director at consulting firm Eurasia Group.
Boling said the U.S. is unlikely to go below the 10% it agreed with Britain.
Trump introduced a 25% tariff on automobiles and later a 24% tariff on all Japanese goods. The latter was slashed to 10% for 90 days, which runs out in July.
Akazawa, the trade envoy, on Tuesday said Japan was sticking to its guns and wanted tariffs eliminated. A White House spokesperson declined to comment on the negotiations.
A U.S. State Department spokesperson said the Trump administration wanted trading partners to align with U.S. efforts to achieve "fairness and balance in our trading relationships and protect U.S. economic and national security."
Two senior Japanese officials told Reuters Japan's auto industry was increasingly looking like a laggard and needed to use the tariffs as an opportunity to implement sweeping changes to catch up with EV rivals.
In a statement, the trade ministry said that regardless of U.S. tariffs, Japan's auto industry needed to respond to significant changes in the competitive environment.
Japan's top auto suppliers, called Tier 1, procure parts from Tier 2 suppliers, and so on down the chain. At the bottom are firms that can be little more than neighbourhood workshops grinding out a single part.
Government officials have previously urged smaller companies to innovate and consolidate, to gain scale.
At regional lender Ashikaga Bank, an automotive industry team supports some 200 companies, around 80% of which are Tier 2 or lower suppliers. A member of the team not authorised to speak publicly said they worried tariffs would lead to higher vehicle prices and a decline in Japanese car sales in the U.S., hitting the bank's clients.
Shinichi Iizuka, president of Toa Kogyo, a suspension maker in Subaru's hometown of Ota, near Takasaki, said the tariff burden will likely be shared by consumers, car dealers, automakers and suppliers.
Some 70% of Subaru's car sales are in the U.S., where it relies on both local manufacturing and imports. On Monday, Subaru said it would raise prices on several U.S. models.
Subaru CFO Shinsuke Toda this month said it was willing to talk with suppliers about sharing their burden, adding the situation remained unclear.
IT'S PERSONAL
Suzuki's drive to diversify Kyowa Industrial into medical devices mirrors the pivot made by her father during the 1980s trade friction, when Kyowa ditched mass production of less-profitable auto parts to focus on higher-margin prototypes and racing-engine components. Suzuki took over in 2000 and her father died in 2013.
Before Trump's tariffs, Suzuki had planned to build a U.S. track record in sales of medical equipment to smooth entry into other markets. With the advent of the U.S. trade barriers, she said her team considered moving production to the U.S., where costs are high, or shifting the sales focus to Asia.
Given the uncertainty around Trump's announcements, Kyowa is in talks with potential distributors in Singapore and Hong Kong, Suzuki said.
Around 70% of Kyowa's business still comes from automakers, while chip-equipment makers and Japan's space program contribute to the remainder. It supplies most Japanese car makers, General Motors and parts for Formula One race cars.
Annual sales are a modest 2 billion yen ($14 million). Still, Kyowa is larger than three-quarters of the roughly 68,000 companies that make up Japan's auto-supply chain, according to research firm Teikoku Databank.
For Suzuki, trade friction is also personal, given her deep affection for the U.S. She grew up listening to rock music on U.S. armed forces radio, learned English and went to university in America. She remembers seeing Aerosmith live at their first concert in Japan.
"Japan and America have a long history of friendship. I hope they can find a solution," she said.
($1 = 145.0700 yen)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Toyota Chairman Claims Hybrids Are Cleaner Than EVs
Toyota's chairman Akio Toyoda claims that one electric car causes as much emissions as three hybrids. Let's check this bold statement out. The question of whether electric cars are more environmentally friendly than cars with combustion engines has long been resolved by scientists, who have concluded that the answer is unquestionably yes. Studies show that air pollution has decreased in cities with high EV adoption rates. However, the same old 'hybrid vs EV' debate keeps coming up, sometimes even from the top executives of the world's biggest automaker. Akio Toyoda said that nine million electric cars have the same pollution impact as 27 million hybrids in an April interview with Automotive News that went viral recently. According to him, one EV pollutes as much as three hybrids. The chairman also stated Toyota's goal to lower emissions using what the company refers to as a "multi-pathway" approach, which includes a variety of vehicle powertrains, including hybrids and plug-in hybrids, hydrogen-powered fuel cells, more efficient petrol engines and of course, EVs. "We have sold some 27 million hybrids. Those hybrids had the same impact as 9 million BEVs [battery EVs] on the road," Toyoda commented. "But if we were to have made 9 million BEVs in Japan, it would have actually increased the carbon emissions, not reduced them. That is because Japan relies on the thermal power plants for electricity.' Given that fossil fuels have typically been used to generate energy in Japan, it appears that Toyoda was explicitly referring to the emissions produced during production and charging in the country. Nonetheless, the proportion of renewable energy sources in the nation's energy mix has also been increasing recently. However, Toyoda's remarks were seized upon by numerous media sites, who used them as a "damning admission" to disparage EVs in general. So do EVs actually produce more emissions than hybrids over the course of their lifetimes? To be sure, comparing EVs to hybrids and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) is more complex than comparing EVs to gas-powered vehicles. Battery consumption, driving habits, and the regional mix of electricity all play a part. But for clarity, let's dissect everything. Emissions produced during the extraction, refinement, and processing of the basic materials needed in high-voltage batteries are the main argument against EVs. Materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel, which are used to make EV batteries, must be mined using risky, expensive water-intensive procedures. Therefore, an EV is already said to be "dirtier" than the typical gasoline or hybrid car when it leaves the factory. It has a larger "carbon debt," which is a term used by researchers to quantify the emissions that cars accumulate before they are even driven. Depending on the vehicle category, the production of gasoline and hybrid automobiles emits 6 to 9 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide, according to a study published in the scientific journal IOP Science. In contrast, EVs emit between 11 and 14 metric tonnes of CO2 before they are delivered to consumers. However, that is just a portion of the story. Once EVs are on the road, their total "emissions" start to drop quickly and they begin to pay off that carbon debt. Conversely, gasoline and hybrid cars go in the other way, increasing their carbon emissions with time. An EV may be able to pay off the loan completely after a specific amount of miles, where as a gasoline car will not. Who you ask will determine how long that takes. According to a 2023 study by Argonne National Laboratory, an electric car can take 19,500 miles to mitigate the emissions created during the manufacturing process. Meanwhile, says that this figure is less than two years of average American driving. According to another study in the journal Nature, carbon reductions start at about 28,000 miles. In any case, EVs eventually become the far cleaner choice over time given how long Americans retain their automobiles. It is possible however, to come up with scenarios where hybrids are cleaner than electric cars in certain conditions—but those cases are limited. The electric 6,800-pound Ford F-150 Lightning driving on the open road could be dirtier than a Toyota Prius that's driving at low speed for short distances, frequently recharging its battery, which gets juiced up by the engine and regenerative braking. But when you do a back-to-back comparison, EVs are cleaner than hybrids even when the source of electricity is fossil fuel. If we look at the Department of Energy's emissions calculator, which weighs up exhaust and grid emissions, a Tesla Model Y produces lower greenhouse gas emissions—149 grams of CO2 per mile—than a Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid—177 grams of CO2 per mile. Looking at another comparison in California, the Model Y, which only produces 80 grams of CO2 per mile is far cleaner than a Prius plug-in hybrid with around 130 grams per mile. Further reinforcing the EV vs hybrid case, an Institute of Physics (IOP) study also states that EVs break even with their hybrid counterparts in terms of lifecycle CO2 emissions within 2.2 to 2.4 years of operation. When Akio Toyoda stated that hybrids generate fewer emissions than EVs, he was arguably talking about a set of data in which all these above-mentioned factors were not fully taken into account—where grids are powered by emission-rich fossil fuels and hybrids are driven mostly in low-speed traffic where regenerative braking and the smaller batteries are under heavy load. Whatever his stance, the evidence appears to be there that, over time at least, EVs are cleaner than hybrids.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Self-Driving Truck Startup Plus Goes Public In $1.2B SPAC Merger, Backed By Wall Street Titan Michael Klein And Hyundai
Plus Automation last week it would merge with special purpose acquisition company Churchill Capital Corp IX (NASDAQ:CCIX) that values the startup at $1.2 billion and brings $300 million in fresh capital for its push into autonomous trucking by 2027. According to Plus Automation, the merger provides the resources needed to scale its factory-integrated autonomous trucking model. After closing, the combined company will operate as PlusAI and prioritize deployment through its global original equipment manufacturer partnerships. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets – Plus Automation is led by a founding team of Stanford-trained PhD engineers and seasoned tech entrepreneurs, each with a history of building and scaling innovation-focused companies. CEO David Liu, now on his fourth startup, brings a consistent track record of growth across prior ventures, reinforcing investor confidence in the company's ability to execute, Plus Automation says. Launched in 2016 from Silicon Valley, Plus Automation designed SuperDrive as an AI-based virtual driver for heavy-duty trucks. The company says that its system has already accumulated more than 5 million miles across the U.S., Europe, and Asia, forming a robust real-world dataset that underpins its neural-network engine. In April, SuperDrive hit a crucial driver-out safety milestone, signaling readiness for commercial deployment. According to Plus Automation, public road trials are active in Texas and Sweden, with broader fleet testing slated for fall. Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Plus Automation's strategy leans heavily on factory integration rather than retrofitting existing trucks. That original equipment manufacturer-first model involves close collaboration with Hyundai, TRATON Group, and Iveco to produce SuperDrive-enabled trucks at scale, Plus Automation says. Churchill Capital Corp IX, led by veteran financier Michael Klein, will provide up to $300 million from its trust account to finance Plus Automation's next growth phase. Plus Automation says that this injection is expected to fully fund the startup through its 2027 commercial launch without requiring additional equity raises. The merger maintains a clean balance sheet for the combined entity and locks up existing Plus Automation shareholders for 180 to 360 days to reinforce long-term commitment. Plus Automation and its and Churchill IX's shareholders will hold one-vote shares to ensure governance European and U.S. trucking markets are valued at nearly $2 trillion, facing persistent shortages of around 300,000 drivers annually, the company says. Plus Automation plans to monetize via a per-mile "driver-as-a-service" model to generate high-margin recurring revenue. Physical AI solutions are gaining traction due to lighter regulations and growing demand for logistical efficiency. Dealer interest is rising as governments across the U.S. consider easing safety rules for heavy autonomous vehicles. California's Department of Motor Vehicles recently proposed testing heavy-duty self-driving trucks on public roads, marking an important regulatory shift. Closing is expected in the fourth quarter, pending shareholder approvals, Plus Automation says. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Self-Driving Truck Startup Plus Goes Public In $1.2B SPAC Merger, Backed By Wall Street Titan Michael Klein And Hyundai originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Ways Tariffs May Affect Your Budget If You Earn a Low Income
With tariffs wavering back and forth, it's critical to know how these changes can affect your budget. Especially if you're in a lower income bracket, even a small hike in prices can negatively impact your entire month's budget by putting more strain on the already expensive prices. Trending Now: Explore Next: Understanding those changes can help you plan accordingly and, ideally, avoid taking too big of a hit. To that end, GOBankingRates spoked to some experts on the economy for insight into what the future might hold regarding the effects of tariffs — below is what they had to say. There was once a time when people thought of imported goods as fine wine, art or high-end furniture. You may import a luxury vehicle. Of course, no one on a tight budget was thinking about these types of luxury imports. But today, virtually anything and everything can be imported and if it's imported, it will have a tariff. This means higher prices and less purchasing power for your budget. Read Next: 'Pretty much all goods manufactured today are to varying degrees important — there is, for example, no car made in the US and entirely of U.S.-origin parts,' said Dr. Brandon Parsons, economist at Pepperdine Graziadio Business School. 'The tariffs that are going to sneak up on lower-income Americans will be the ones on food — meat, fresh fruits and vegetables and specialty food items,' he added. 'And the most hidden tariff impact will be on processed foods that incorporate imported foodstuffs — think tomato sauce made with Mexican or Canadian tomatoes.' Some have assumed in recent months that companies distributing goods will absorb the cost of these tariffs. But nothing could be further from the truth. 'As Walmart and a growing number of retailers have made very clear, the cost of tariffs will be passed along to consumers,' Parsons said. This means you'll have less purchasing power with your budget. reported that only 10 percent of businesses did not intend to pass along any of the tariff costs to their consumers. What this means for the low-income budget, then, is that items people need to buy will now cost significantly more than they used to. Most people living on low incomes are already struggling to make ends meet, often living paycheck to paycheck. These tariffs will make budgeting for basic, everyday necessities hard. 'Another reason is lower-income families will often live paycheck to paycheck and have a smaller (potentially no) cushion to absorb these higher costs. Without the ability to cover the higher costs created by the tariffs, lower-income families will be forced to adjust what they can purchase to a greater extent than their higher-income counterparts,' said Dr. Wayne Winegarden, senior fellow of business and economics at the Free Market Pacific Research Institute and director of PRI's Center for Medical Economics and Innovation. 'Compounding these problems, the recent bout of inflation has created a huge affordability problem that harmed lower-income families to a greater extent than higher-income ones,' Winegarden added. 'The tariffs will worsen the current affordability problem and further destabilize the household budgets of lower-income and working families.' Of course, families still have to eat, put a roof over their heads, buy clothes and perhaps get gifts for their kids on birthdays and important holidays. So, if they don't have the budget on hand to make these purchases, you may choose to go into debt rather than cut out the necessities, which can turn bad really fast. 'If purchases are for essentials, forgoing them is not an option and debt can result. This can trigger a downward financial spiral, where persistent budget shortfalls lead to rising credit card balances, which in turn eat up more of a household's limited disposable income,' Parsons explained. 'Finally, tariffs are regressive, like sales tax, since individuals pay the same price for a product regardless of their income. This means tariffs carry a heavier burden on those with less income to spare.' It becomes a vicious cycle for low-income families who may end up in a spiral they cannot pull themselves out of and with no end in sight. There's no reason to expect incomes to rise or for tariffs to drop. And housing costs are not going anywhere but up for people in these situations. From there, the drop into homelessness is not far, according to a study by the University of California, San Fransisco. If you can't afford food and you can't pay your bills, you can't pay your rent with your low-income budget, the next natural step is eviction. The effects are serious, life-altering and can be devastating. 'From a legal perspective, tariffs are within the government's authority under the Commerce Clause, a portion of the Constitution that assigns to the federal government the power to regulate commerce, but they can spark lawsuits if misapplied,' said Seann Malloy, founder and managing partner of Malloy Law Offices. 'Low-income and working-class families that simply can't absorb a 15% price hike on imported groceries may be subject to evictions or ruined credit, clogging our courts with cases I frequently litigate,' Malloy added. 'Equal protection challenges could stem from relief programs that exclude some groups. It is important to push for transparent tariff impact assessments and the expansion of legal aid to protect vulnerable clients' The best thing working-class people can do right now is to cut spending as much as possible to live well below their means. It's also a good idea to take on a side gig or hustle that will increase their income, allowing them to start investing in themselves and growing their wealth. This can help create a more stable living situation that will help keep them in their homes and purchasing the necessities for their families. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money This article originally appeared on 5 Ways Tariffs May Affect Your Budget If You Earn a Low Income 登入存取你的投資組合