
Tracking low-level cannabis use wastes police time, former London chief says
Police hunting for people who use small amounts of cannabis is a waste of scarce resources, and diverts officers from tackling much more serious criminals, a former police chief has said.
Brian Paddick was a senior Metropolitan police officer who in 2001 pioneered the limited decriminalisation of cannabis in a pilot scheme in Lambeth, south London. His comments come after the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, backed calls for the partial decriminalisation of cannabis possession.
Critics of Paddick's scheme said it was dangerous, while Paddick and his supporters said it was a success.
A former Liberal Democrat candidate to be mayor of London, Paddick was speaking in a personal capacity about his time as a Met officer trying a new approach on dealing with drugs.
Now a member of the House of Lords, he told the Guardian the scheme had helped ease community tensions in the borough, which included areas such as Brixton: 'When I was the police commander in Brixton I was very concerned about the impact of the policing of possession of small amounts of cannabis was having on police and community relations.
'It was diverting scarce resources away from issues that were a priority for the community. In particular, street robberies, burglary and hard drugs such as crack cocaine and heroin.'
Under the scheme, those caught with small amounts of cannabis for personal use were given a warning and their drugs were confiscated.
Paddick said officers would spend hours processing cannabis arrests that would result in minor punishment, such as a caution or conditional discharge: 'We were wasting a lot of money for something that was not a priority at the time.
He added: '80% of local people were in favour of the effective decriminalisation of cannabis for personal use.'
Paddick is now a non-executive director of the Metropolitan police, and in such a role is an adviser to the commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, and his senior management team.
Paddick said: 'Any change is clearly going to be led by the government and not the police.'
He denied that limited decriminalisation amounted to going soft on drugs: 'When I was in Lambeth there were a lot more important things police needed to spend their time on and it was doing a lot of damage to police community relations.
'The policing of small amounts of cannabis is disproportionately focused on young Black men. I think the argument that cannabis is a gateway drug is no longer considered to be a credible theory.'
Paddick said he didn't understand the distinction drawn by the report released on Wednesday for Khan, between natural cannabis and other forms: 'If they are trying to differentiate between herbal cannabis and skunk, it is going to place the police in an impossible position. How do they tell the difference?'
A report on the Paddick pilot scheme, which ran from 2001 to 2002, found support among police officers, which surfaced during a consultation: 'During this consultation officers complained that they spent a considerable amount of time dealing with arrests for possession of cannabis and this detracted from their ability to deal with high priority crime such as street crime, tackle class A drugs and respond to emergency calls.'
The report on the scheme by the then Metropolitan Police Authority, which oversaw the Met, said: 'The main practical difficulty in enforcing the scheme was that there is no legal definition of what constitutes a 'small amount' of cannabis. This created practical difficulties for officers … In practice, officers regularly consulted their supervisors when difficult cases arose. Even if a legal definition had been provided, there was a widespread belief among many officers that drug dealers would exploit the situation by possessing small quantities and hiding larger quantities nearby.'
The report concluded: 'The Lambeth Cannabis Warning Scheme was an innovative project which achieved its primary objective of saving officers' time.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
British firms shrug off US tariffs, BoE survey shows
LONDON, June 5 (Reuters) - Few British businesses expect to be directly affected by recent changes in U.S. trade policy, with only 12% naming it as one of their top three sources of uncertainty, a Bank of England survey showed on Thursday. The BoE said 70% of businesses surveyed in May expected that U.S. tariffs would have no impact on their sales, prices or investment plans. Twenty-two percent expected sales to fall over the year ahead, 20% said they would invest less, 15% expected to lower prices and 7% expected to raise prices, the BoE said. The survey took place from May 9-23 and covered 2,129 firms.


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Car finance claims dubbed the new PPI must not break the market, warns FCA
Britain's financial regulator has warned that any compensation paid out in the wake of motor finance commissions scandal can not be allowed to result in corporate bankruptcies. It comes ahead of closely watched Supreme Court decision on discretionary commission payments due next month that could see lenders shouldering a collective bill of £44billion. The court will decide whether to uphold a previous ruling that several such payments were unlawful, which could lead to consumer redress at the scale of the notorious PPI scandal. Announcing a consultation on potential redress, the Financial Conduct Authority said on Thursday that any compensation plan must 'ensure the integrity of the motor finance market, so it works well for future consumers'. The car finance sector is concerend it might be left with a massive bill for individuals who bought vehicles using loans that involved a discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) before January 2021. Barclays has set aside £90million in potential redress payments, while Santander has reserved £295million, and Lloyds Banking Group a whopping £1.2billion. Ratings agency Moody's has predicted that the industry might fork out £30billion, while the FCA has warned it could total £44billion. 'We've seen a range of redress rates suggested,' said the FCA. 'This includes some highly speculative figures by some CMCs (claims management companies) and law firms.' It added: 'If many firms were to go out of business or withdraw from the market, this could reduce competition and could make it more expensive for consumers to borrow money to buy a car in the future. 'Where firms fail, customers may not get any redress, as motor finance isn't covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.' DCAs allowed car dealerships and brokers to determine the interest rate on a vehicle buyer's finance deal, which incentivised them to charge more expensive loans. High volumes of motor finance customers have since complained they did not receive sufficient information on DCAs before they were banned. A landmark Court of Appeal ruling last October declared it was unlawful for lenders to give car sellers commissions without a customer's informed consent. The Supreme Court heard an appeal against this court decision in early April and is set to deliver a final judgement on the matter sometime during the summer. Within six weeks of a verdict, the FCA will confirm whether to introduce a consumer redress scheme, as well as the timings for issuing a consultation on how such a plan would work. Among the concerns would be whether to have an opt-in scheme, where customers must actively confirm to their firm that they want to be included, or an opt-out scheme, with consumers automatically included unless they intentionally withdraw. Darren Richards, head of Broadstone's insurance, regulatory and risk advisory division, said: 'It is clear that the decisions behind the design of a redress scheme are complex and need to balance fairness for consumers and the integrity of the motor finance market.'


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lions trio Ellis Genge, Tommy Freeman and Henry Pollock on rugby's new rebel R360 competition - and what impact lucrative league can have on their future England careers
England and Lions star Ellis Genge has admitted the country's top players will have a big decision to make on their contractual futures if the money on offer from rugby's proposed breakaway league proves too good to turn down in years to come. But Genge and his fellow Test stars Tommy Freeman and Henry Pollock have insisted that representing Steve Borthwick 's national side remains the primary driver when it comes to their ambitions. The new rebel R360 competition - being led by ex-England World Cup winner Mike Tindall - wants to create 'generational change in rugby' by creating 12 new franchise teams made up of the best players from around the world. While plans for the new concept would retain the importance and prestige of the international game and organisers are understood to have left gaps for existing club structures to continue, it is clear R360 could prove to be a potential game changer and significantly shake-up the established order. 'I'd never want to leave England behind, but I would say 90 per cent of rugby players have to work for the rest of their lives after rugby,' said Genge. 'If they reached the echelons they have in this sport in others, I'd say they probably wouldn't. I think if the money is that lucrative, then people have decisions to make don't they? I wouldn't hold it against them.' Genge revealed he had discussed the R360 proposal with the competition's organisers but had not signed any agreement to join given he is under contract with his club Bristol. 'I don't know if it's actually got legs to get off the ground, but I think anything that stirs the pot and makes people start asking questions and think of new ideas is positive for the game,' Genge said of R360, which would involve a 16-match season that would be played in two separate windows in spring and summer. 'There is no smoke without fire. I'm glad something is happening in rugby rather than it just stagnating and everyone moaning. 'But I'm sure now people want to put money into it, everyone will moan.' MailSport understands leading figures at both the Rugby Football Union and Premiership Rugby are relaxed about R360's plans to disrupt the game, while welcoming the competition Tindall's enterprise looks likely to provide. In September last year, the two parties signed the professional game partnership - the system by which English rugby is now run. As part of the deal - which runs for the next eight years - it is stipulated that to continue to represent England in that time, players must be primarily employed by Premiership clubs. 'At some point, money probably does talk but playing for England is my main concern. You never want to jeopardise that situation,' said Northampton wing Freeman. 'If I'm out the loop of the England set-up for a number of years, then maybe it's different.' Freeman confirmed the money on offer from R360 for him to stop playing for England would have to be 'off the charts.' He added: 'Running out at Twickenham, there is no feeling like it.' Genge, Freeman and Pollock will all be part of Andy Farrell's Lions squad in Australia this summer and were winners at Tuesday night's Premiership awards evening. 'We're very focussed on playing for our country,' breakthrough player of the season Pollock said. 'As Tommy said, it would be a lot to give that up. 'I've not experienced playing multiple times for my country, so that's something I'm working towards.' Genge is set to return for Bristol for their crunch Premiership play-off clash at Bath on Friday after missing last weekend's win over Harlequins. Another England man in Tom Curry will also be fit for Sale who face Leicester in the other semi-final on Saturday.