UK overtures to China worry Hongkongers
As a Hongkonger with a British national (overseas) – BNO – passport who is now living in Britain, I read your editorial about the UK's evolving position on China with both personal and political weight (The Guardian view on UK-China relations: a dilemma made sharper by Brexit, 16 April). For many of us who left Hong Kong following the imposition of the national security law, the threat from the ruling regime was not abstract – it was immediate, personal and existential.
Our migration was not simply a search for better opportunities but a necessary departure from a city whose freedoms were being rapidly dismantled.
The UK's cautious recalibration of its relationship with Beijing raises complex emotions. On one hand, I understand the economic pressures that compel governments to engage with China. On the other hand, I worry about the signals that renewed cooperation might send to Hongkongers resisting repression and to the authoritarian regime. When British ministers visit Beijing or soften their stance, it sometimes feels like the struggle and suffering of Hongkongers is being quietly sidelined for trade and investment.
As part of a growing diaspora, we are rebuilding our lives here – finding community, raising children, contributing to society. But we remain deeply connected to Hong Kong. We are not passive observers. We organise, advocate and speak out, because what happens in UK-China relations affects how safe and heard we feel.
The UK's commitment to human rights and democratic values cannot be selective. Hongkongers with BNO passports are a living reminder of what is at stake when authoritarianism goes unchecked. A pragmatic China policy should not ignore the lived experience of people like us. Economic strategy must be balanced with moral clarity or the very values that once drew us to Britain will be compromised. This is not just about geopolitics, it is about people's lives, voices and futures.Sum KungCambridge
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Allies and Adversaries Are Dodging Trump's Tariff Threats
Donald Trump has a clear, uncomplicated notion of how things should work. He tells everyone what to do, and they do it. In this world, law firms stop representing his accusers. Universities cede him control of admissions and curriculum. Europe and China swallow his tariffs. Corporations move their factories to the US. Ukraine surrenders to Russia. Denmark hands him Greenland. Panama hands him the canal. To the president's daily fury, the world outside his head isn't always cooperating. Harvard University has forcefully fought back against his attempt to take charge of the school. After some major law firms buckled under his threats, others are now resisting. Trump has whipsawed between escalation and retreat on tariffs when other nations have refused to go along. Russian President Vladimir Putin has ignored his demands to end the bloodshed in Ukraine, and for months Chinese President Xi Jinping all but gave him the silent treatment. Fired federal workers, immigrants targeted for deportation without due process and others who've sued to challenge his actions are winning support from courts, including some presided over by Trump-appointed judges.
New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: As G7 Meets in Canada, U.S. Rift With Allies Deepens
White House officials have said little about goals for the summit, but they are facing a self-imposed deadline of early July to reach trade deals. When President Trump last attended a Group of 7 meeting in Canada, he was in many ways the odd man out. At that meeting, in 2018, Mr. Trump called for the alliance of Western countries to embrace Russia, antagonized allies and ultimately stormed out of the summit over a trade battle he began by imposing metals tariffs on Canada. As he returns on Sunday for the Group of 7 meeting in Alberta, those fissures have only deepened. Since retaking office, the president has sought to shrink America's military role abroad and made threats to annex the summit's host after embarking on a much more expansive trade war. Mr. Trump is now facing a self-imposed deadline of early July to reach trade deals. His trade adviser even promised in April that the tariffs would lead to '90 deals in 90 days.' Despite reaching framework agreements with Britain and China, the administration has shown scant progress on deals with other major trading partners. The future of the president's favored negotiating tool is uncertain as a legal battle over his tariffs plays out in the courts. But a failure to reach accords could lead the Trump administration to once again ratchet up tariffs and send markets roiling. 'I think we'll have a few new trade deals,' Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House on Sunday as he left for the summit. The gathering also comes amid fears of a broader, regional war in the Middle East after Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran's leadership and nuclear facilities last week, prompting both nations to trade strikes. 'Sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens,' Mr. Trump said when asked what he was doing to de-escalate the conflict between Israel and Iran. 'I think there's a good chance there will be a deal.' Image The Group of 7 summit will convene in Kananaskis, Alberta, a remote town west of Calgary. Credit... Jeff Mcintosh/The Canadian Press, via Associated Press Mr. Trump's aides say he will discuss a range of topics, including fairness in global trade, critical minerals, illegal migration, drug smuggling and international security. World leaders will also be focused on surging oil prices and Russia's war against Ukraine. Leaders of the Group of 7 nations — Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States — will convene in Kananaskis, a remote town west of Calgary. The summit this week, the 50th such meeting, is usually a forum for the U.S. president to leverage allies and partners to further its agenda and assert its leadership on global issues of consequence. But world leaders appear to be bracing for Mr. Trump's shift away from global partnerships. Canadian officials have said that they were scrapping hopes of issuing a joint communiqué, the traditional statement leaders put out at the end of such meetings. Mr. Trump refused to endorse the joint statement moments after it was released at the end of the 2018 summit. 'One thing that the G7 represents just beyond the world's largest economies is a community of shared values — shared values that Trump doesn't necessarily share or subscribe to,' said Rachel Rizzo, a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Europe Center. Beyond trade, the war in Ukraine is likely to be a point of contention at the summit. While Mr. Trump has signaled reluctance to stay engaged in the war and derided multilateral organizations like NATO, European allies have rallied around Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine is expected to be in attendance. François-Philippe Champagne, Canada's finance minister, said the presence of Ukraine was meant to 'send a strong message to the world,' that the Group of 7 was recommitting to support Kyiv and hold Moscow accountable. At the 2018 summit in Canada, one of the biggest disputes between Mr. Trump and allies was when he demanded Russia's readmission to the Group of 7 nations. The country was ousted from the diplomatic forum after Mr. Putin violated international norms by seizing parts of Ukraine in 2014. Image Mr. Trump refused to endorse a joint statement moments after it was released at the end of the 2018 summit. Credit... Doug Mills/The New York Times Since returning to office, Mr. Trump has boasted about his close relationship with Mr. Putin, and has repeatedly taken his side in the war — even falsely accusing Ukraine of starting it. Thus far, his embrace of Mr. Putin has not helped broker peace in the war. 'Given Trump's ongoing conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the prospect of any meaningful new G7 action to promote a durable resolution of the three-year-old conflict is highly uncertain,' Matthew P. Goodman, the director of the Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote last week. He said Mr. Trump's attendance at the summit and his decision to impose tariffs on the other members had 'cast a deep shadow over the gathering in Canada.' Mr. Trump's increased hostility toward U.S. allies is perhaps most exemplified by the relationship with the host country. The relationship between the neighbors and top trading partners has been at a historical low since Mr. Trump's re-election because of his decision to impose tariffs on Canadian goods and his continuing to threaten its sovereignty by asserting that Canada should be a part of the United States. Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada has sought a cordial relationship with Mr. Trump, but during a meeting in the Oval Office last month delivered a stern response to Mr. Trump's suggestions: Canada 'won't be for sale, ever.' 'Never say never,' Mr. Trump replied. Kori Schake, a former defense official in the George W. Bush administration who directs foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, said that Mr. Trump's treatment of Canada was 'emblematic of the bullying Trump considers appropriate.' 'If this is the behavior toward a country with which we share a 5,500-mile border and a common air defense, it's sure to be similarly antagonistic to other allies,' Dr. Schake said. Image During a meeting in the Oval Office last month, Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada told Mr. Trump that his country 'won't be for sale, ever.' Credit... Eric Lee/The New York Times A May poll showed that Canadian sentiment toward the United States was at a historical low. Nine out of 10 Canadians rejected Mr. Trump's idea of making their country the '51st state.' And recent travel data showed that Canadians were canceling or changing plans to visit the United States. Canadians have been so galvanized against Mr. Trump that the rift appeared to have swung national elections. After Canada seemed poised to elect a conservative as prime minister in its April elections, the pendulum swung in favor of Mr. Carney, a liberal, by 30 percentage points, because the conservative candidate was seen as too close to Mr. Trump. Still, while protests are expected during the summit, Alberta is a conservative stronghold within Canada, so Mr. Trump will find some friendly welcome there. Sometimes referred to as 'Canada's Texas' on account of its oil riches and conservative politics, Alberta is in the middle of a push to hold a secession referendum. Mr. Carney, who this year holds the Group of 7 presidency, has invited the leaders of several nonmember countries: India, Brazil, South Africa, Mexico, Ukraine, Australia and South Korea, and the head of NATO. In his second term, Mr. Trump has had explosive clashes in the Oval Office with Mr. Zelensky and Cyril Ramaphosa, the president of South Africa. Michael Froman, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, said that while the United States had historically played a role as a consensus builder at Group of 7 summits, it had often come to the table with a different perspective than its allies. Mr. Froman argued that Mr. Trump was engaging the world, just under different terms than his predecessors. 'On some of these issues, we are currently alone,' Mr. Froman said. 'But I think one of the goals will be to bring other countries in our direction,' he added, 'whether that's through careful diplomacy' or 'the threat of tariffs and sanctions.' Matina Stevis-Gridneff contributed reporting.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Winter fuel payment in Scotland to match UK benefit
The Scottish Government's devolved version of the winter fuel payment will match the value of the UK benefit, John Swinney has announced. Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed last week that the payment would be reinstated to the majority of pensioners. Following the initial decision to cut the universal benefit, the Scottish Government was forced to delay its plans for the pension age winter heating payment, but in December it announced pensioners north of the border would receive at least £100 every year. Speaking in Glasgow on Monday, the First Minister confirmed the Scottish Government's benefit would at least match that proposed by the UK Government. Pensioners south of the border who earn under £35,000 will receive either £200 or £300. 'I'm very happy to confirm today that no pensioner in Scotland will receive less than they would under the new UK scheme,' he said. 'Details will be set out in due course by my Government, but the Scottish Government will always seek to do what is best for Scotland's pensioners.' The changes announced last week will result in further increases in funding for the Scottish Government, which the First Minister later told journalists is expected to be around £120 million. Speaking at an event on public sector reform on Monday, the First Minister hit out at the initial decision to cut the benefit. 'To be quite blunt about it, I don't believe cutting this winter lifeline was ever going to save a penny,' he said. 'Making millions of pensioners poorer makes them also colder and makes them also sicker, and that in turn puts up the bill for our social services and our NHS.' He added: 'It's one of the reasons we were so quick to step in to protect pensioners in Scotland as best as we could from that wrong decision by the UK Government. 'But now that they've seen the error of their ways, my Government will once again to the right thing by Scotland's pensioners.' The power over the payment was devolved to Social Security Scotland in time for it to be paid out last winter. When asked if he regretted not offering it to older Scots, the First Minister said: 'I might have had the power, but I didn't have the money and I can't spend money I don't have. 'If the UK Government cuts a budget, I can't spend it, and what we've done is we've taken a series of hard decisions to allow us, before the Labour Government came anywhere near doing a U-turn on this, to restore winter fuel payments to pensioners because of other hard decisions that I've made. 'So the SNP has kept faith with pensioners in Scotland when the Labour Party has deserted them.'
