Former HHS Secretary Reacts To RFK Jr.'s Confirmation Hearing: 'Very, Very Dangerous'
A former secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday suggested that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been nominated for 'the wrong Cabinet post' after how President Donald Trump's pick for her old job performed in his confirmation hearing.
'He doesn't understand this Cabinet post very well and the positions that he has are terrifying,' said Kathleen Sebelius in an interview with MSNBC host Joy Reid.
Sebelius, who served under Barack Obama and oversaw the Affordable Care Act's implementation, has previously called Kennedy's history of peddling false claims about vaccines 'totally disqualifying for anyone' seeking the post and warned that his possible HHS leadership is a matter of 'life or death.'
On Wednesday, she told Reid that Kennedy demonstrated that 'he has very strong opinions about a lot things he knows very little about' in the hearing.
'That doesn't stop him from announcing him opinions as fact. It doesn't stop him from making recommendations that are widely disputed by scientific evidence,' Sebelius said.
She continued, 'And that makes him very, very dangerous in the position as the major health minister of the United States.'
Kennedy made false statements to senators on Wednesday including those related to Medicaid as well as Medicare and was pressed over anti-vaccine clothing sold by an organization he started.
Sebelius declared that Kennedy has made 'his fame and his fortune on being a vaccine denier' by repeatedly saying there's no 'safe and effective vaccine.'
She added that while Kennedy has withdrawn his name from his old organization, Children's Health Defense, it's suing vaccine makers and he's making referral fees from those lawsuits.
She went on to warn of a growing number of adults who are questioning and withholding vaccines from their children which could subject people to diseases that have 'long' been abolished in America.
'So this is not just about individual parents making individual choices, it's about us as society looking at potential new cases of polio, potential new cases of whooping cough, disease, measles outbreaks that we haven't seen in a very long time,' Sebelius said.
She continued, 'Largely due to, I think, misinformation, disinformation promoted by his organization since 2016.'
Later in the interview, Sebelius slammed Kennedy for not answering 'basic' questions about Medicare and Medicaid, knocked his understanding of the ACA and questioned his focus on food/food supplements while pushing for the HHS post.
Bernie Sanders Grills RFK Jr. On 'Unvaxxed, Unafraid' Baby Onesies
RFK Jr. Says Trump Gave Him 1 Directive On The Abortion Pill
JFK's Grandson Trolls RFK Jr.'s Hearing As The Family Feud Heats Up
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
21 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Kennedy's vaccine committee to vote on flu vaccines and controversial preservative
ATLANTA (AP) — U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy's new vaccine advisory committee returned to work Thursday, and the panel may vote on proposals about fall flu vaccines and a preservative in some flu shots that antivaccine groups have falsely tied to autism. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, meeting in Atlanta, also is expected to vote on whether to recommend a second version of a lab-made antibody that protects newborns against a childhood menace called respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. The ACIP, created more than 60 years ago, helps the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determine who should be vaccinated against a long list of diseases, and when. Those recommendations have a big impact on whether insurance covers vaccinations and where they're available. Kennedy was a leading voice in the antivaccine movement before becoming the nation's top health official. He fired the previous 17-member panel this month and replaced it with a seven-member group that includes several vaccine skeptics. At its June meetings, the committee usually refreshes guidance for Americans 6 months and older to get a flu shot, and helps propel the annual fall vaccination campaign. Presentations prepared for Thursday's meeting suggest that the panel may do much the same this year. But there's also a flu-related vote that promises controversy. It concerns thimerosal, a form of mercury that's been added to vaccines since the early 20th century to preventing bacterial contamination in multi-dose vials. Kennedy has long held there was a tie between thimerosal and autism, and also accused the government of hiding the danger. Study after study has found no evidence that thimerosal causes autism. But since 2001, vaccines manufactured for the U.S. market and routinely recommended for children 6 years or younger have contained no thimerosal or only trace amounts, with limited exceptions. Thimerosal was placed on the meeting agenda shortly after Kennedy's new vaccine advisory was named last week. Before the vote, the committee will hear from Lyn Redwood, the former president of what is now known as Children's Health Defense — an antivaccine group founded by Kennedy. Some public health experts contend the thimerosal discussion will unnecessarily raise doubt in vaccines while possibly also making them more expensive and harder to get this fall. At the panel's meeting Wednesday, Chrissie Juliano, executive director of the Big Cities Health Coalition, lamented the ouster of the former ACIP panel and the agenda of the new one. Her organization, which represents large city health departments, 'is deeply concerned that many routine vaccines may soon become inaccessible or unaffordable for millions of Americans if ACIP makes changes based on ideology rather than science,' she said. 'The stakes are simply too high to let that happen.' ___ Neergaard reported from Washington. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
MetroHealth ranks among nation's most socially responsible hospitals
MetroHealth is ranked as one of the nation's most socially responsible hospitals, per a new report from the nonprofit Lown Institute. Why it matters: Though Cleveland Clinic remains the region's premier private health care system, Metro ranks far higher (No. 2 in Ohio) when measured by health equity, value, and patient outcomes. By the numbers: Metro ranks 36th out of more than 2,700 hospital systems nationwide, earning "A" grades across the three main categories surveyed. Only East Liverpool City Hospital ranks higher in Ohio. Zoom in: It's No. 1 statewide in two categories: "community benefit" and "avoiding overuse." The first metric measures a hospital's spending on financial assistance, Medicaid revenue and community programs. The second measures its ability to avoid tests and procedures that offer little or no clinical benefit. What they're saying: "No other hospital in America has a more dedicated and passionate staff of caregivers," said MetroHealth president and CEO Christine Alexander-Rager in a statement. "This recognition is a direct result of their devotion to our community." The other side: Cleveland Clinic, long pinged for its lack of community spending, ranks in the middle of the pack statewide and nationally across social responsibility metrics. Yes, but: While the Clinic earns top marks for its value and outcomes, it still trails in equity rankings.
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
Report: Cuts To Public Health Will Increase Illness And Raise Costs
Optometry students administer vision tests to patients at a Remote Area Medical (RAM) mobile dental ... More and medical clinic on October 07, 2023 in Grundy, Virginia. Programs like these will be hard hit by Medicaid cuts (Photo by) Yesterday, the Common Health Coalition issued a major report that 'analyzes how cuts to public health infrastructure will ripple through the U.S. health care system – leading to sicker patients, higher costs of care, and added operational burden.' Cognizant of current events, the Coalition noted that 'the proposed disinvestment in Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) now under debate in Congress would compound these effects.' In my opinion, every American and their members of Congress should take note. A Long-Needed Alliance For most of our nation's history, public health and health care worked in parallel. There was little conflict between the fields, but limited cooperation as well. It took the hard lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic to convince both groups to strengthen teamwork and collaboration. In the spring of 2024, five major health-related organizations: AHIP, the Alliance of Community Health Plans, the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, and Kaiser Permanente, founded the Common Health Coalition to 'convince and equip U.S. health care organizations to partner with public health systems.' In 18 months, it has grown to more than 250 national and regional organizations. The Coalition is chairedby Dave A. Chokshi, MD, MSc, FACP, a primary care internist who previously held leadership roles at NYC Health + Hospitals and served as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene during the pandemic. 'People have been talking about unifying medicine and public health for decades and frankly, have failed. I've inhabited both sides. I've been a leader in health care and had the privilege to lead in public health as well. This [role]Dr. Dave A. Chokshi, Chair of The Common Health Coalition being interviewed about the fifth ... More anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic on NY1 Common Health's Priorities The Coalition is committed to action in four priority areas: 1) Coordination between health care and public health; 2) Always-on emergency preparedness; 3) Real-time disease detection; 4) Exchange of actionable data, particularly to advance health equity. J. Nadine Gracia, M.D., MSCE, president and CEO of Trust for America's Health and co-chair of the Coalition's advisory council, explained why these priorities were selected. 'As the nation's health risks – from infectious disease outbreaks to rising rates of chronic diseases to extreme weather – increase, now is the time to strengthen partnerships between the healthcare and public health systems. A healthy community is a more resilient community. Through strengthened collaboration, healthcare and public health practitioners can bring each sector's experience and expertise to bear to protect health during future emergencies.' Initial Success In its first 3 months, the Coalition grew from 5 members to 50, adding organizations as diverse as the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Trust for America's Health and the Yale School of Public Health to Geisinger Health Plan, Ochsner Health and Parkland Health. Its leaders laid out the organization's vision in an editorial published in NEJM Catalyst and took active steps in a range of public forums to promote collaboration between members and engage in outreach to the public. In December, the Coalition launched its inaugural Common Health Challenge – 'Community Health Workers: Catalysts for a Reimagined Health System.' Two months ago, it awarded eleven $40,000 grants to organizations to fund work that demonstrates the integration of CHWs in ways that strengthen partnerships between health care and public health. An Unexpected Challenge When President Trump returned to the Oval Office on Jan. 20, the federal government's approach to public health and healthcare abruptly turned. Two weeks later, Elon Musk tweeted that his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) 'spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper.' DOGE followed this with draconian budget and manpower cuts to the CDC, the NIH and several other HHS agencies. Since much of these agencies' funding flows to state health departments and universities, the cuts sent shockwaves throughout the country. Newly appointed HHS Secretary, RFK Jr., closed entire divisions, shifted the department's priorities, and pushed world-renowned experts out the door. If narrow majorities of the House and Senate enact Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' funding for Medicaidand several other health-related programs will be slashed. Collectively, these actions represent a 'perfect storm' for America's health system and all who depend on it. The Coalition's Warning Yesterday, the Common Health Coalition released a major report that shows these and other cuts to public health infrastructure will ripple through the U.S. health care system, leading to sicker patients, higher costs and operational burdens that will affect everyone's access to care. Impact of public health cuts on community health and access to health care The report, 'More Illness, Greater Cost: the consequences of public health cuts for the health care system,' outlines three primary categories of impact: 'We are trying to shine a spotlight on the ways in which cuts to public health affect us all, because they affect the healthcare systems that we all rely on,' Dr. Choski explained. 'And I want to be clear, public health cuts have very direct impacts on people and communities. We've seen some dialogue around that, but what is less appreciated are the downstream implications these cuts will have for emergency room care, hospitals, and clinics, as well as the doctors and nurses all of us depend upon, regardless of our insurance coverage or ability to pay.' Although everyone's access to care will be affected, the burden of increasing illness and higher costs will fall heavily on rural areas and underserved communities. As grim as this sounds, Choski warns that it will be even worse if Congress enacts big cuts to Medicaid and the ACA. Millions of Americans will lose coverage, many rural and inner-city hospitals and clinics will be forced to close or cut services, and tens of thousands of scarce health care providers could be laid off or forced to retire. The Coalition's report concludes with a plea: 'Now is the time to align around shared priorities, act quickly to close urgent gaps, and invest in bold, collaborative solutions to improve and save lives.'
