logo
Muslims rallying voters have a message for party leaders: avoiding important issues could cost you votes

Muslims rallying voters have a message for party leaders: avoiding important issues could cost you votes

CBC12-04-2025

Social Sharing
Every Friday afternoon, Mustapha Ramadan stands outside the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) mosque in Mississauga, Ont., organizing a long line of cars arriving for prayers.
He's one of many Muslims who say they plan on voting in the upcoming federal election, but haven't decided who will earn their ballot. One reason for this indecision is what many Muslims say is the lack of attention party leaders have been paying to the community and the issues that matter to them during this campaign.
As the chair of ISNA, Ramadan has welcomed many politicians to the mosque, which is one of the largest in Canada — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre attended their summer Eid festival in 2023, and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh was at the mosque in 2022, serving food for iftar, the fast-breaking evening meal during the holy month of Ramadan.
ISNA is a popular stop during election campaigns, but this time around, Ramadan says, things are different.
"We haven't seen anything yet," he said, noting none of the federal party leaders have visited the mosque during the campaign so far.
This lack of attention concerns Ramadan and other Muslim leaders who say they want politicians to engage with the community on issues that matter to them, like the ongoing war in Gaza, Islamaphobic attacks or Quebec's secularism law. One expert suggests that because these topics are often seen as controversial, politicians steer clear for fear it could cost them at the ballot box, but those working to mobilize Muslim voters warn that avoiding these issues could have the same effect.
Pushing Muslim issues to the forefront
More than 100 Muslim organizations across the country have signed a joint statement urging Muslims in Canada to vote in the upcoming election, make their voices heard and push politicians to address what they see as crucial issues.
Reem Sheet, with the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), says Muslims here have been watching the horror of war unfold in Gaza, as well as witnessing Islamophobia closer to home, like the 2021 truck attack that killed four members of the Afzaal family in London, Ont., and an unprovoked attack on a hijab-wearing woman at an Ajax, Ont., library late last month.
"I think our community just wants to see that Canada is taking the right steps forward to make sure that these horrors don't continue for our community," said Sheet.
CBC News reached out to the three main parties for comment. The Conservatives did not respond in time for publication.
The NDP said it has taken the strongest stance of any major party on defending human rights and international law by calling for a permanent ceasefire. Singh himself sponsored a motion in March 2024 calling for the federal government to recognize Palestinian statehood that passed after the Liberals introduced amendments.
In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for Liberal Leader Mark Carney said he has regularly met with Muslim communities, called for the completion of the ceasefire agreement, and "the return of all hostages, and a safe resumption of humanitarian aid at scale so that Palestinians in Gaza can rebuild their lives."
In a statement, NCCM acknowledged that Carney had met with their organization and many others to discuss issues that matter to Canadian Muslims, but they urged him to take more concrete actions to address their concerns.
Sheet says those concerns include the fact that Muslims are still waiting for federal leaders to present a national strategy on combating Islamophobia, and to make clear their stances on the war in Gaza.
WATCH | Muslim voters discuss their concerns during the federal election:
Some Muslim Canadians want a clearer idea of where the federal parties stand
2 days ago
Duration 2:01
More than 100 Muslim and Arab organizations signed a letter calling on political parties to take a principled stance on the conflict in the Middle East, among other things.
Aisha Sherazi, a community volunteer in Ottawa, says while voters want to hear from the party leaders on issues that matter to them as Muslims, there are other things that affect their daily lives, too.
"We're regular citizens," she said. "So of course, you know, affordable housing is important … what happens with the economy is going to impact everyone."
Balancing act
Many politicians view talking about the war in the Middle East as a divisive issue, especially during an election, according to Ruby Dagher, an assistant professor in international development at the University of Ottawa.
"I think if you're looking for votes, it is absolutely dangerous territory," said Dagher. "It's the need to win certain votes, but at the same time the fear of losing other votes that makes it … difficult to find that balance."
That balancing act was on full display at a Calgary rally for Carney on Tuesday, when a protester shouted, "Mr. Carney, there's a genocide happening in Palestine!" In the moment, Carney responded, "I'm aware, which is why we have an arms embargo."
Later, asked to clarify if he saw genocide in Gaza, he said it was noisy, so he "didn't hear that word," and said he meant he was aware of the situation in Gaza. On Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Carney's words "irresponsible" in a post on X.
Carney clarifies Gaza comments during recent rally
3 days ago
Duration 1:15
Liberal Leader Mark Carney, speaking from Calgary on Day 18 of the election campaign, is asked about his interaction with a protester at a recent rally who yelled, 'there's a genocide in Gaza' and Carney responded, 'I'm aware.' Carney said it was noisy at the rally and that he 'didn't hear that word,' referring to genocide.
Sherazi, who's already decided how she'll vote, says though the leaders naturally command a lot of attention, people should also focus on their MPs.
"A lot of the coverage is on the leaders themselves, and you're not really voting for them," she said. "When you vote, you've got to vote for your local individual whose responsibility is to advocate for you, and I think that people forget that."
Though the party leaders may not have visited ISNA, other politicians have turned out. Charles Sousa, the incumbent Liberal candidate for Mississauga-Lakeshore where ISNA is located, was at the mosque during Eid prayers this year.
Dalia Hashim, the mosque's public affairs manager, says he received a round of applause when he vowed to support the Muslim community.
The power of the Muslim vote
The power of the Muslim vote is not something that should be taken lightly, according to Umair Ashraf, the executive director of Canadian Muslim Votes, a nonpartisan organization that focuses on political education and civic engagement.
During the 2024 U.S. election campaign, many Arab American and Muslim voters in Michigan who helped Joe Biden win in 2020 told CBC News they wouldn't support Kamala Harris's election bid due to the administration's response to the crisis in the Middle East.
In the end, Michigan flipped for the Republicans and ultimately helped send Trump back to the White house.
Ashraf says that power exists in Canada as well.
"There are almost 1.8 million Muslims across Canada, and at times there can be anywhere between 60 to 80 ridings where there can be a Muslim swing," he said, referring to ridings where Muslim voters make up a significant portion of the population.
Dagher says that while that may be true, a Muslim voting block here may not be as powerful as those in the U.S., partly because issues like the war in Gaza have been overshadowed by Donald Trump's tariffs and threats to annex Canada, but also because Muslims don't all vote the same way.
She notes that the community's support appears to be spread out enough that Muslim voters are unlikely to tip the scales in any one direction.
"I'm not saying it's nothing, but I also don't see it as a major factor that's going to influence, given that each group has been able to attract some Arab electorate specifically."
When it comes to courting the Muslim vote, Sherazi suggests that politicians should take a strong stance about what's happening in the Middle East and be deliberate about using language that unifies rather than divides.
"It's incumbent upon our leaders to really speak up and kind of reassure people that as Canadians, we feel passionately about international law, that those things matter, that humanity matters," she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The end of a raucous legislature session
The end of a raucous legislature session

Winnipeg Free Press

time11 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

The end of a raucous legislature session

Opinion On June 2 at the end of the spring session of the Manitoba legislature, the two main parties issued duelling press releases, each claiming they were listening and responding to the needs and concerns of Manitobans. The NDP government boasted it had delivered 'a strong, ambitious legislative agenda' of 39 bills that would improve health care, remove interprovincial trade barriers, make groceries more affordable, enhance public safety, and act on many other matters. The Progressive Conservative (PC) opposition countered with the claim that several of the more important bills were based on ideas stolen from them. This credit claiming by the parties has become an annual ritual. Over the past five decades, the proceedings of the legislature have increasingly come to resemble a permanent election campaign in which the parties spend more time seeking to score political points against their opponent than using questions of the premier and ministers and debating bills for the constructive purpose of improving public policy. The just-finished session featured too much shouting and name calling across the aisle and several unfortunate episodes of disorderly conduct. It was not, however, the most raucous session that has happened in the modern era of Manitoba politics, which I date from the breakthrough victory of the NDP in 1969. For observers of my generation, it is impossible to forget the French language crisis of 1983-1984 during which then-PC leader Sterling Lyon and his MLAs ferociously fought a NDP government bill entrenching language rights by using prolonged bell-ringing which paralyzed the legislature and brought angry, screaming crowds into building. I recognize that partisan competition provides the motivation and energy which drives the institution. The clash between opposing philosophies and policy perspectives helps to define what actions are in the public interest. Criticism from the opposition is the main way that the government is made to answer and to be held accountable through the media to the electorate. It would be impossible, and wrong, to seek to drive disagreement, emotion and passion entirely out of the proceedings of the legislature. The legislature actually has two modes of operation: most often it is adversarial between the parties, occasionally it demonstrates the capacity for cross-party collaboration. Because media coverage focuses mainly on the partisan clashes in Question Period, many members of the public sees the legislative process as only games-playing by the parties. In my view partisanship has become excessive, unduly negative and personal in content. There is throughout the legislative process too much rude heckling, personal attacks, bullying, inflammatory rhetoric, defensiveness and feigned indignation. Women MLAs are targeted disproportionately. Two episodes in the past session illustrate the problem. On April 22, PC MLA Greg Nesbitt questioned the NDP government about a contract for mental health therapy, suggesting, without providing any evidence, that it may have been for the personal benefit of NDP Finance Minister Adrien Sala. Either this was a cheap ' gotcha' question or Nesbitt had failed to do his homework to learn that the contract was actually for mental health support to landfill searchers. It strained credulity for the PC interim leader Wayne Ewasko to claim that his MLA was simply seeking information. In the shouting match which ensued, the Speaker, Tom Lindsay lost his cool and threatened to toss Nesbitt from the chamber, a threat he apologized for the next day. He also expressed frustration with the lack of decorum and the refusal of MLAs to immediately obey his calls for the heckling to cease. There is only so much the Speaker can do under the rules to maintain civility and to curtail belligerent language. The deeper problem is the culture of the institution which is shaped by many factors, most importantly by the words and actions of the party leaders. This brings me to the second episode which happened in the committee of supply on May 21 when the spending estimates of the executive council (which includes the premier's office) were under review. Proceedings of the meeting can be found on a YouTube stream. Both Premier Wab Kinew and Opposition Leader Obby Khan were in attendance and the meeting turned ugly almost immediately with the two MLAs showing intense dislike and disrespect for one another. A backbench NDP MLA serving as committee chair was hard pressed to maintain order. During Khan's opening statement on economic indicators, he was constantly heckled by Kinew, who at one point described the opposition leader as 'a joke.' Khan responded by bringing up Kinew's encounters with the law as a young adult and described him as a 'toxic, bullying leader' (echoing allegations from a former NDP MLA banished from that caucus). Kinew fought back by accusing Khan of being part of the ethics scandal involving violations of the caretaker convention during the final days of the former Heather Stefanson government. Fostering a more respectful and constructive culture starts with the leaders who must model more responsible behaviour and encourage their MLAs to restrain their outbursts and personal attacks when emotions rise in the chamber and in the committees. Paul G. Thomas is professor emeritus of Political Studies at the University of Manitoba.

Albertans to start paying for COVID-19 vaccines after province changes immunization program
Albertans to start paying for COVID-19 vaccines after province changes immunization program

CTV News

timea day ago

  • CTV News

Albertans to start paying for COVID-19 vaccines after province changes immunization program

Many Albertans will have to start paying for a COVID-19 vaccine this year. In a press release Friday, the Government of Alberta said it was reducing eligibility for publicly-funded immunizations for the virus. The province said just over 1 million COVID-19 vaccines were wasted in the 2023-24 respiratory virus season, equating to 54 per cent of Alberta's order that year. It said the decision was made in response to changes to the federal vaccine procurement process earlier this year, which made provinces responsible for buying their own vaccines. 'Now that Alberta's government is responsible for procuring vaccines, it's important to better determine how many vaccines are needed to support efforts to minimize waste and control costs,' release said. The new vaccine program will roll out in four phases. During the first, only residents in senior's supportive living and home care will be able to get a vaccine for free. The second phase will open provincially-funded COVID-19 vaccines to people with underlying medical conditions or compromised immune systems, people living in congregate living accommodations, people on social programs like AISH or income support or people experiencing homelessness. In the third and fourth phases, all other Albertans starting with those 65 years old or older will be able to purchase a vaccine. Sarah Hoffman, Alberta NDP shadow minister for health, released a statement calling the decision 'callous' and 'anti-science.' 'It's cruel for the UCP government to put further financial burdens on Albertans who want to protect their health and their loved ones and not get COVID,' Hoffman said in the release. 'If the UCP government was really interested in eliminating waste and protecting the health of Albertans it would be promoting vaccines. That way the supply would get used and we would keep ourselves and our loved ones safe.' The province did not give a timeline for the rollout of the new program and did not specify when Albertans would stop being able to get a free COVID-19 vaccine or booster. Anyone who would like a COVID-19 vaccine can pre-order one starting Aug. 11. The province said it doesn't know yet exactly how much a dose will cost but estimates it will be about $110. CTV News Edmonton has reached out to the health minister's office for more information.

Liberals gear up for leadership race; sole MLA not interested
Liberals gear up for leadership race; sole MLA not interested

Winnipeg Free Press

timea day ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Liberals gear up for leadership race; sole MLA not interested

The hunt for a new Manitoba Liberal leader is set to begin this summer after the party's lone MLA confirmed Friday she doesn't want the job. 'After much consideration I have made the decision to not pursue the leadership,' Cindy Lamoureux, the member for Tyndall Park, said in a news release. Lamoureux has been interim leader since leader Dougald Lamont lost his St. Boniface seat in the 2023 election to NDP candidate Robert Loiselle. MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS FILES 'After much consideration I have made the decision to not pursue the leadership,' Cindy Lamoureux, the member for Tyndall Park, said in a news release. 'I will continue to focus my attention on serving the constituents of Tyndall Park and will remain on as the interim leader until a new leader has been elected by the party membership,' Lamoureux said. A leadership committee and convention team are being set up and the nomination period is expected to open early this summer, said party president Terry Hayward. 'That's my hope so that any potential candidates can get out there and start talking to people that they would like to support them in the campaign for leadership,' Hayward said. 'They will be reaching out as much as possible to liberals and potential liberals who would support them in the upcoming leadership campaign,' he said. It's been a long time since the Liberals were a force in Manitoba; under Sharon Carstairs'e leadership, the Grits won 20 seats and became official Opposition in 1988. 'We've had some rough times,' Hayward said Friday. 'We still are a viable party — a bit reduced, I would admit that,' he said. The party lost two of its three seats in 2023. 'I'm hoping that a leadership campaign will bring a few more people to the realization that there is a needed third voice here in Manitoba,' Hayward said. 'We've heard a lot of criticism from people saying that the current NDP party is presenting Progressive Conservative party ideas and policies.' He praised Lamoureux for providing 'excellent service' as the lone Grit in the legislature. MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS FILES Lamoureux has been interim leader since leader Dougald Lamont lost his St. Boniface seat in the 2023 election. 'She's been doing a great job bringing key things to the floor' said Hayward. 'There are more Cindys out there, more liberals like her out there, that we will work to get into the legislature and eventually get back to party status that we had,' he said. 'I think we've got a viable option for people.' The next election is expected in October 2027. Hayward said he expects a new leader should have at least 18 months in the role before Manitobans go to the polls. The committee in charge of the process will be unbiased in the search for a new leader, its president said. 'They will not be supporting any one candidate that might come forward — and that goes as well for our board of directors that are involved in this thing.' Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. Carol SandersLegislature reporter Carol Sanders is a reporter at the Free Press legislature bureau. The former general assignment reporter and copy editor joined the paper in 1997. Read more about Carol. Every piece of reporting Carol produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store