logo
Major change coming to how Clovis residents decide City Council races. Here are the details

Major change coming to how Clovis residents decide City Council races. Here are the details

Yahoo06-03-2025

Starting in 2026, Clovis residents will vote for City Council members who live in their neighborhoods based on a map that divides the city into five districts bordered by major roads and riverways.
The creation of new districts marks a major step in Clovis' reluctant shift from at-large to district-based elections. The five-person City Council selected the map at a public hearing Tuesday night out of more than dozen options.
Map 502, as it's called, mostly keeps neighborhoods intact and resembles the Clovis Unified School District's trustee areas, said Jeff Tilton, senior consultant for National Demographics Corporation.
Besides District 1 in southwest Clovis, which has the largest Latino population at 44%, the remaining four areas each comprise about 50% white residents. District 3, located in the southeast, has a larger proportion of the city's Asian-American population, at about 22%.
Most council members favored options that had clear boundaries along main roads and did not separate neighborhoods. With strong support from Mayor Vong Mouanoutoua, the council chose Map 502 since Districts 1 and 2 are divided at Clovis Avenue, where Old Town Clovis is situated.
'I think it gives two council members to our most struggling areas, and more is better when it comes to representation,' said Councilmember Drew Bessinger.
Mouanoutoua said Map 502 put Old Town and southern Clovis in the same districts, and 'Old Town keeps the south alive and valuable,' he said.
Mayor Pro Tem Diane Pearce cast the lone vote in favor of Map 508 because it maintained an 'at-large feel' for the city, with each of the areas having a boundary at or near Shaw Avenue. 'The core of Clovis is met in every single piece of those districts,' she said.
The current members of the City Council will complete their full terms serving the community at-large. In future elections, candidates must reside in the district they run to represent.
No incumbent council members live in District 1, Mouanoutoua told The Bee. Two council members, Matt Basgall and Pearce, live in District 4, according to their 2022 election forms.
With roughly 125,000 residents, Clovis is one of the last California cities of its size to change to a district voting system. The transition started after Malibu-based law firm Shenkman & Hughes threatened in August to sue the city for its at-large system, alleging it potentially discriminated against communities of color by denying them an equal opportunity to elect officials to represent them.
The five-member council reluctantly voted last October to replace the voting system, saying they would not spend millions of dollars on a lawsuit they were likely to lose.
'All of us as council members didn't like the idea of having to go to districts, but this is where we're at, and let's make the best of it,' Basgall said last week. 'The concern is that it becomes territorial, 'I just concentrate on my area,' as opposed to the entire city.'
Bessinger told The Bee that he thinks the district voting will make it easier for candidates to win because they only need to focus on one geographic area rather than the whole city.
'When I ran for City Council in 2017, I didn't have any development money, I didn't have any union money. I got out there, I knocked on probably 2,500 doors city-wide, and I got 68% of the vote,' said Bessinger. 'Assuming that this is the case, the districts will be obviously smaller. Somebody could run a one-person campaign out of their garage.'
At the early stages of the mapping process, the council also considered dividing the city into four districts with a mayor elected by voters from the whole city. Council members ultimately abandoned the idea and retained the mayor rotation within the City Council.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump
Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

Time​ Magazine

time23 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

The breakdown in relations between President Donald Trump and his one-time ally Elon Musk has played out over social media in spectacular fashion, with the two engaging in a tit-for-tat spat. The row initially started over politics. Musk expressed his vehement disapproval of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and encouraging people to 'kill the bill.' Meanwhile, Trump maintained that the fall-out was prompted by Musk being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies —a provision that made Tesla vehicles more affordable. But the fight has since taken a far more personal turn, bolstered by Musk's allegation that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in a post shared via his social media platform, X. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. The accusation has spurred Democrats to chase the full unsealing of the Epstein files. California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch—Democratic members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—sent a letter on June 5 to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' read the letter titled 'Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?' The White House responded, saying that the move by the Oversight Committee members was 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' Here's what to know about the Epstein files and the renewed push to declassify them following Musk's allegation. What do we know about the Epstein files so far? On Feb. 27, Bondi released more than 100 pages of declassified documents related to Epstein—as part of the Trump Administration's vow to be more transparent regarding the high-profile case. During the presidential election, Trump promised to appease the clamoring for the alleged 'client list' of Epstein's since his arrest and subsequent death by suicide in 2019. Though Bondi called this the 'first phase' of declassified files, people were underwhelmed by the published pages, as much of the text had been redacted. Bondi's release included Epstein's 'black book,' which had previously been published. It featured names like Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but as the New York Times reported, there were people in the book with whom Epstein had never even met, and thus listed names are not necessarily connected to Epstein's activities. One of the only never-before-seen documents included in the release was an 'Evidence List' of catalogued evidence obtained by investigators. Bondi blamed the FBI for the fact that the report was incomplete, suggesting in a published letter to Patel that the FBI had more information related to Epstein. Bondi ordered Patel to deliver the rest of the investigation documents and 'conduct an immediate investigation' to understand why she had only received parts of the files. There is much discussion as to whether a fully-fledged 'Epstein client list' even exists. Jacob Shamsian, Business Insider's legal correspondent who has covered the Epstein case for years, said via social media on Feb. 27: 'I should also point out that the 'Jeffrey Epstein client list' does not exist and makes no sense on multiple levels (you think he made a list???). But if Pam Bondi wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.' Will the Musk allegations prompt the release of further Epstein files? Musks' allegations have brought the Epstein files back into the spotlight, but there were already calls for them to be published in full. In April, Trump was asked by a reporter about when the next phase of the files are due to be released, to which he responded: 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know.' Since then, Democrats have continued to push for more documents to be released. Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York released a statement in May, 'demanding that [Bondi] promptly release the Jeffrey Epstein Files in full.' Spurred by Musk's allegation, Democrats including Garcia, Goldman, and Lynch are now renewing these calls for more transparency. But it remains to be seen whether or not the pressure will be enough for Bondi, Patel, or Trump to provide more answers. What do we know about Trump's relationship with Epstein? Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, he famously said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released unearthed video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump greeting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The two men could be seen laughing as they engaged in conversation. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made strides to distance himself. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.'

Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility
Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing heightened volatility amid an escalating feud between President Donald Trump and his former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, over the state of the U.S. economy. Cardano's ADA ADA has also seen extreme price swings amid market uncertainties. After dropping from $0.688 to $0.621, ADA found strong support and rebounded, forming an ascending channel with resistance at $0.644, according to CoinDesk Research's technical analysis model. The technical indicators suggest a potential renewed bullish momentum as the cryptocurrency reclaims the $0.640 level with decreasing volatility. At press time, ADA is trading at $0.66, down about 1.8% over the past 24 hours, while the broader market gauge CoinDesk 20 Index fell 1%. Some recent news within the ADA ecosystem has provided the market with potential catalysts for the token. Institutional interest in the Cardano blockchain continues to grow, with Franklin Templeton, a $1.6 trillion asset manager, now running Cardano nodes. Additionally, Norway's NBX has recently partnered with Cardano to build Bitcoin-based DeFi, highlighting the blockchain's secure design for institutional adoption. The successful execution of the first Bitcoin-to-Cardano transaction involving Ordinals marks a significant milestone that could potentially unlock $1.5 trillion in cross-chain trading opportunities. Technical Analysis Highlights Sharp decline from $0.688 to $0.621 (10.29% drop) occurred on exceptionally high volume. Strong support zone established at $0.620-$0.623 where buyers aggressively stepped in. Recovery formed an ascending channel with resistance at $0.644. Overall range of $0.070 (10.29%) highlights the extreme market conditions. Potential renewed bullish momentum as ADA reclaimed the $0.640 level with decreasing volatility. Hourly price action showed a possible recovery pattern from $0.641 to $0.643. Short-term resistance level established at $0.643-$0.644. Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans
3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

In the last days of the Biden administration, the Energy Department dolled out billions of dollars for politically favored green energy projects. The Trump administration is looking to claw this funding back. The Energy Department is getting ready to "cancel seven major loans and loan guarantees that had been conditionally approved under the Biden administration," reports Semafor. This action will cancel approximately $5 billion worth of funding for a transmission project by a New Jersey utility company, a loan program for low-income homeowners to install rooftop solar panels by Sunnova, and a Monolith Nebraska factory to produce low-carbon ammonia. The remaining four projects, which collectively received over $3 billion, include three battery factories and a plastics and recycling facility, which "were already previously cancelled by their companies because of other various headwinds," according to Semafor. The three active projects that will have their federal loans axed have faced their own share of problems. In September 2023, Sunnova received a $3 billion partial loan guarantee from the Energy Department's Loan Programs Office (LPO) for Project Hestia—a program that would make residential rooftop solar, battery storage, and virtual power plants "available to more American homeowners." Hestia was expected to provide loans to as many as 115,000 homeowners in the United States and Puerto Rico for these technologies, while creating "3,400 good-paying, high-quality American jobs." After receiving the federal loan, Sunnova came under fire for its alleged history of predatory practices and scamming elderly clients, which led to subsequent congressional scrutiny. In April, Sunnova began filing for bankruptcy. The company recently said it was no longer planning to use the programming funding and was working with the Energy Department to return the remaining guarantees. Monolith received a $953 million conditional loan guarantee from the LPO to accelerate its clean hydrogen and carbon utilization project in Nebraska. The company, which has received backing from BlackRock and NextEra Energy and was valued at over $1 billion in 2022, creates hydrogen fuel with renewable energy (which can be used to make ammonia in fertilizers) and carbon black. Despite the federal funding and private sector support, The Wall Street Journal reported in September 2024 that the company was "running short on cash and facing project delays." The third project facing the ax is New Jersey's Clean Energy Corridor, "a project to upgrade and expand transmission infrastructure to accommodate planned generation in New Jersey to meet growing electricity demand." Run by Jersey Central Power & Light Company, the project received a conditional loan guarantee of up to $716 million in January to support the state's goal of "introducing 11,000 MW of offshore wind-generated electricity by 2035." When First Energy, which owns Jersey Central, first announced the project in 2022, Danish energy company Orsted was planning two large wind projects off New Jersey's coast. The projects were canceled in 2023. Another New Jersey offshore wind project was recently halted after the Environmental Protection Agency rescinded the project's environmental permits. Despite these project cancellations and the LPO's history of questionable and risky investments, it does not appear that the office is going away soon; Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently told lawmakers that his agency would use the LPO to advance nuclear energy projects. Assuming Wright fully cuts billions of dollars worth of wasteful projects and narrows the agency's scope to only fund nuclear power projects, it's possible that the LPO's budget—which ballooned to over $400 billion under the Biden administration—could meaningfully shrink. Still, a meaningfully reduced budget is not enough. With the national deficit climbing to over $28 trillion in debt held by the public, taxpayers can no longer afford to support the federal government's fantasy that it should be a green bank. The post 3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans appeared first on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store