The FURRIES Act would ban Texas students from using litter boxes in school. Critics say it targets a problem that doesn't exist.
A new Texas bill is gaining attention for seeking to ban 'animal behavior' in public schools. It's called the Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education Act, aka the FURRIES Act — and it seeks to stop students from 'using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine, or other human byproducts.'
The bill, named after the 'furry' subculture, which broadly refers to people with a particular interest in animal characters with humanlike qualities, bans dressing up like an animal (such as by wearing tails, collars, ears or leashes) in schools, and bars hissing, meowing and other animallike tendencies. It also prohibits 'surgical' interventions that would make a student appear more animallike.
But according to some lawmakers, educators and members of the public, the act is seeking to solve problems that don't actually exist — particularly when it comes to where students are, or are not, using the bathroom. Here's what to know.
The FURRIES Act was first introduced on March 13 by Stan Gerdes, a Republican Texas state representative. He claimed that an unspecified 'furry-related incident' happened in the Smithville Independent School District outside of Austin, prompting him to file a formal piece of legislation.
That same day, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott referenced the act at the 2025 Texas Pastors Policy Conference in Austin in a speech promoting school choice, where he stated that some students were using litter boxes at school.
In a Tuesday hearing about the bill, Texas state Rep. James Talarico, a Democrat, pushed back and asked Gerdes to confirm the claims that inspired the FURRIES Act. Gerdes was unable to provide specifics.
'This is all part of Abbott's smear campaign against our public schools,' Talarico wrote in a post on X.
In fact, none of the claims about litter box usage in schools have ever been verified — and the idea that students are forgoing toilets in favor of cat litter boxes has been debunked time and time again.
Rumors about kids using litter boxes in schools have circulated since at least January 2022, per a New York Times article that explained how a Midland County, Mich., school district was accused of supplying feline-friendly accommodations for students before it denied having litter boxes.
Meanwhile, in March 2022, Republican Nebraska state Sen. Bruce Bostelman apologized after repeating the debunked rumor — which was circulating in Facebook groups for parents in both Nebraska and Iowa — during a televised debate.
But by the fall of 2022, at least 20 conservative candidates and elected officials falsely claimed that year that schools were accommodating students who identified as cats, according to a review by NBC News.
That includes New Hampshire Republican Senate candidate Don Bolduc, who claimed at a campaign event that students were using litter boxes, as well as exhibiting other animal behaviors like licking one another, at Pinkerton Academy in Derry, N.H. A spokesperson for the school denied this, stating the boxes were used for their pre-veterinary and animal management classes.
In October 2022, podcaster Joe Rogan told guest Tulsi Gabbard that his friend's wife 'works at a school that had to install a litter box in the girls' room because there is a girl who was a furry, who identifies as an animal' — further giving fuel to the rumors. But weeks later, Rogan walked back the comments, admitting on his podcast that there 'doesn't seem that there's any proof that they put a litter box in there.' Reuters Fact Check also separately confirmed in October 2022 that there are no schools providing litter boxes for students.
And it's not just (not) happening in America, either: In May 2023, CBC reported that a school in Quebec, Canada, also had to debunk its own kitty litter rumor.
So far, there is only one piece of evidence that says some schools are supplying kitty litter for student use: Colorado's Jefferson County school district, which includes Columbine High School, previously stated that it keeps litter in classrooms in case students need to relieve themselves during an emergency lockdown.
Some people, such as Talarico, a vocal school voucher critic, see the litter box rumors as a way to incite a moral panic where none exists to stoke distrust in public education.
Grand Forks, N.D., Superintendent Terry Brenner told Education Week in November 2022 that the kitty litter hoax is part of an agenda 'started by a small minority group and a political wing' who are 'trying to dismantle public education as we know it.'
'By starting all of this disinformation, they can say, 'public schools aren't the answer,'' he explained. ''Students aren't achieving academically, socially, behaviorally, or emotionally. So, let's get the voucher system going.''
President Trump has made it a mission to radically change education in the United States, indicating his intent to dismantle the Department of Education earlier this year. Some critics of that plan say that doing so will give more power to private and religious institutions, furthering the class and education divide.
The litter box rumors also come amid another ongoing bathroom battle in public schools over the rights of trans students to use the restroom that aligns with their gender identity.
Scott Ellis, executive director of Great Lakes Bay Pride, which services the Midland LGBTQ community in Michigan, spoke to Michigan Advance in February 2022 about the ways in which the litter box panic harms children.
'We've gotten to a place where in order to put down those who are either exploring their gender identity or identify maybe differently than their sex assigned at birth, we start equating these things — like in this particular case, 'furries' being a role-play versus somebody's identity,' he said. 'Those are not the same thing.'
While furries are not inherently a part of the LGBTQ community, despite common misconception, self-described 'gay furries' did take credit for hacking into anti-trans government websites in 2023.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
JPMorgan raised its forecast for municipal bond sales in 2025 to $560 billion as US lawmakers deliberate over President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill in the Senate. Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX). Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meet the candidates in the runoff for the Board of Supervisors District 1 seat
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — Two candidates remain in the special election race for the vacant seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors representing South County, and voting is already underway. The runoff for the empty District 1 seat, which was set after no candidate received enough votes to win outright earlier this year, pits two South Bay mayors against each other: Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre and Chula Vista Mayor John McCann. Both are vying to serve the remainder of the term former Board of Supervisors Chair Nora Vargas abruptly vacated in the weeks after winning re-election. D1 Special Election: What to know | The Candidates | How to vote | More Stories Moreover, the race is going to be decisive in shaping majority control of the technically nonpartisan body the next few years. Republicans have the opportunity with McCann to take back the reins just four years after Democrats became the majority party at the county. Ballots were distributed to registered voters in District 1 last Monday, June 3 with early voting beginning via mail and drop-box shortly after. In-person vote centers will begin opening up on Saturday, June 21, ahead of the final day to vote on Tuesday, July 1. For those looking for more information on the race for a seat on the Board of Supervisors, here is an introduction to both remaining candidates. The Board of Supervisors has a wide array of responsibilities in presiding over the county, spanning executive, legislative and judicial powers. Its primary duty is to set policies for most county departments, which largely encompass public health and safety, and unincorporated areas. The board can also direct litigation on behalf of the county, appoint people to certain roles and commissions, and approve contracts for services. Similarly to other legislative offices, voting is based on districts, meaning residents are only able to vote for the candidate hoping to represent their area. To find out which district you live in, the county has a map showing the supervisorial district boundaries available on its website. Here are the candidates, listed in alphabetical order by last name: Paloma Aguirre is the current mayor of Imperial Beach. Since assuming the role in 2022, the Democrat's public profile as grown significantly, specifically for her stalwart advocacy on the Tijuana River sewage crisis. A first-generation Mexican American, Aguirre was born in San Francisco before her family returned to Mexico. In 2001, she moved back to the U.S. to attend University of San Diego, receiving a B.A. in Psychology. She also holds a Master of Advanced Studies in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation from Scripps Institution of Oceanography. After graduating, she worked as a community organizer in south San Diego, focusing on issues tied to immigration, foreclosure and predatory lending. She also worked with the marine conservation nonprofit, WILDCOAST, before her election to Imperial Beach City Council. These issues that defined her pre-politics career are at the center of her campaign for higher office on the Board of Supervisors. Her priorities include addressing the sewage crisis, preventing rent gouging, bringing down homelessness, and 'holding the line on utility costs.' During a community forum earlier this year, Aguirre says she wants to work to ensure the county is carrying its weight on these issues, especially as it relates to the Tijuana River sewage crisis and homelessness. 'It's time we get our fair share from the county,' she said. According to her campaign, Aguirre has been endorsed by a number of major actors in local politics like the San Diego County Democratic Party, San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council, the Sierra Club, Equality California and a number of local union chapters. A coalition of several of these unions — like SEIU and the California Labor Federation AFL-CIO —have set up an independent political action committee in support of her campaign. County records show more than $590,000 has been raised by the PAC for outside spending, largely on mailers. Aguirre has also received a number of endorsements from elected officials, including: Senator Adam Schiff, Reps. Juan Vargas and Sara Jacobs, State Senator Steve Padilla, National City Mayor Ron Morrison, and San Diego County Supervisors Monica Montgomery Steppe and Terra Lawson Remer. Chula Vista City Councilmember Carolina Chavez, one of the other Democrats who ran for the District 1 seat, similarly endorsed her. John McCann is the current mayor of Chula Vista. The self-identified moderate Republican has been a fixture of Chula Vista local politics for more than two decades, having held various roles over the years since he first became an elected official in 2002. Born and raised in Chula Vista, McCann holds a bachelor's and master's in economics from San Diego State University. Prior to entering politics, McCann served in the U.S. Navy, deploying during the Iraq War. He also worked for the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. In a conversation with KUSI earlier this year, McCann touted his record throughout his tenure in Chula Vista city governance, describing his approach to issues like public safety, neighborhood improvements, traffic decongestion and small business growth as 'common sense.' Specifically, he points to the city's reduction in crime under changes to the police department like its new drone system and doubling of officer patrols, successes of its Homeless Outreach Team, and work to eventually remove the toll on State Route 125. Should be be elected to the District 1 seat, McCann says he would bring this pragmatic approach to the county, pursuing policies that expand wraparound services for unhoused people, tackle immigration, accelerate construction of for-sale, market-rate homes in unincorporated areas and steward its resources in a fiscally responsible way. 'We need to be able to look at what are important to us, preserve those, and look at other things that are 'nice to haves' and look at how we can cut those instead,' McCann said. McCann has been endorsed by a number of groups like the San Diego County Republican Party, Deputy Sheriffs' Association of San Diego, San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce, Lincoln Club of San Diego and the San Diego Association of Realtors, according to his campaign. He has also received the endorsement of a number of former and current elected officials, including Greg Cox, who held District 1 seat before Vargas; Supervisors Jim Desmond and Joel Anderson; County Assessor Jordan Marks; and State Senator Brian Jones, among others. As far as outside spending goes, two independent political action committees have been set up to expressly support McCann's candidacy, county campaign finance records show. Collectively, these committees have raised over $456,500 with donations mostly coming from organizations in and around real estate spaces, like the Southern California Housing Association and Building Industry Association of San Diego County, as well as the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and California Alliance of Family Owned Businesses. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump admin is struggling to hire staff for this key official
The Trump administration is reportedly having trouble hiring aides and top advisors to work for U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to NBC News. The Republican White House has been searching for a new chief of staff and several other senior advisors for Hegseth following 'a series of missteps that have shaken confidence in his leadership,' NBC News reported. Vice President JD Vance and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles have been involved in the search for staff members. But so far, three people have already turned down potential jobs, according to the report. To further complicate matters, the White House has also rejected some individuals that Hegseth wants to hire, while Hegseth has rejected some of the White House's candidates, according to NBC News. Last April, members of Hegseth's staff were either put on leave or had left their positions at the Pentagon. Hegseth placed two senior aides on leave in April amid an investigation into a leak of sensitive information from the Pentagon, according to USA Today. It was also revealed in April that Hegseth's Chief of Staff, Joe Kasper, would leave his position, according to Politico. John Ullyot, a former spokesperson for the Pentagon under Hegseth, wrote in an April Politico op-ed that his former boss is leading a department that is in disarray. 'It's been a month of total chaos at the Pentagon,' Ullyot wrote. 'From leaks of sensitive operational plans to mass firings, the dysfunction is now a major distraction for the president — who deserves better from his senior leadership." The New York Times also reported in April that Hegseth created a group chat on Signal with his wife and brother. There, he shared details of a military strike in March against Yemen's Houthi militants, according to the Times. It was previously reported that the details of the strike were shared in a separate Signal chat group featuring Hegseth, other top Trump officials and the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic. The stories of the Signal chats were referred to as 'SignalGate.' The Pentagon's watchdog is investigating whether any of Hegseth's aides were asked to delete messages from Signal that may have shared sensitive military information with the editor-in-chief, according to The Associated Press. U.S. House committee demands Harvard send them hiring policies for review ICE detains most-followed TikTok star amid Trump immigration crackdown Mass. doctor ousted by RFK Jr. as part of purge to CDC vaccine advisory committee Williams College stops accepting federal grants, opposing new policy What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Read the original article on MassLive.