
SNP rebels ‘plot to oust leader' after by-election defeat
SNP rebels are plotting to oust their leader after the party's by-election defeat last week.
Twenty-five senior SNP figures are said to have held a meeting on Monday night to discuss removing John Swinney, the First Minister of Scotland, as party leader, barely a year after he succeeded Humza Yousaf.
The Herald newspaper suggested Mr Swinney might face a leadership challenge at the SNP conference in October if he did not come up with a new strategy to achieve Scottish independence in the next two weeks.
The row erupted as Mr Swinney conducted a mini-reshuffle of his front-bench team following the death of Christine McKelvie, the drugs minister, which triggered a Scottish Parliament by-election in her Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse constituency.
The SNP were hot favourites to win the contest, but Labour pulled off a surprise victory.
The defeat followed Labour's rout of the SNP in last year's general election, also under Mr Swinney's leadership.
Alex Neil, a former SNP health secretary, said Mr Swinney should be replaced. Labour criticised the First Minister for running a 'dishonest' by-election by claiming voters faced a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform UK .
Paul McLennan, the SNP housing minister before the reshuffle, also attacked the party's 'negative' campaign, saying it should have been focused on 'giving people reasons to vote for the SNP, not against Reform'.
Mr Swinney initially won praise for overseeing a recovery in the SNP's fortunes, following the troubled final months of Nicola Sturgeon's premiership and Mr Yousaf's chaotic tenure.
However, he angered hard-line Nationalists by warning that support for independence would have to increase to more than 60 per cent to force the UK Government to allow another referendum.
The Herald said there was a unanimous view at the rebels' meeting that the First Minister had 'no intention of putting independence anywhere near the party's narrative whatsoever'.
'If there is nothing in the next couple of weeks from the leadership, then conference will be a bloodbath,' a source said.
Under SNP rules, any member who can secure 100 nominations from 20 different branches ahead of party conference can trigger a leadership vote.
Rank-and-file challenger?
Although the source doubted that an MP or MSP would challenge Mr Swinney for the leadership, they said a rank-and-file activist could come forward and any contest would be 'hugely damning and damaging, and make the party look utterly ridiculous'.
They also warned that the rebel faction could attempt to use internal elections to seize key positions on the SNP's ruling national executive committee (NEC) such as depute leader and national secretary.
An SNP insider said: 'NEC members better start looking for new hobbies unless the leadership announces a change of direction soon – because at this rate we are heading for a mass clear-out.'
They said Mr Swinney had 'dropped independence' during his first ill-fated stint as party leader, between 2000 and 2004, and that had ended in 'a bruising defeat' at the ballot box.
'The ability to make the case for independence is not a desirable part of the job description – it is essential – and he has failed on probation,' they said.
'The Presbyterian schoolmaster might fly in Perthshire – but in the rest of Scotland it just does not land. Stabilising the party only works for a short time. There is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision.'
Starmer: Scots want change
In the House of Commons, Joani Reid, the Labour MP for East Kilbride and Strathaven, raised the SNP's by-election defeat and the reports of plotting against Mr Swinney at Prime Minister's Questions.
To laughter, she asked Sir Keir Starmer: 'Does he agree with me that a leader who has only ever lost elections to the Labour Party should stay put?'
The Prime Minister said: 'After nearly two decades in power, the SNP got their verdict last Thursday. Scotland wants change, and they know the SNP are completely out of ideas. That is why they want a Labour Government to deliver real change.'
An SNP spokesman said: 'Since John Swinney became leader last year he has brought the SNP back together and the party is back to doing what it does best – standing up for the people of Scotland.
'In the run-up to next year's Scottish Parliament election, the SNP will continue to deliver for people across the country, while setting out a clear and hopeful vision for their future as an independent country.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
an hour ago
- The National
SNP are in desperate need of a leader with fire in their belly
We agreed that hopefully they would still win despite their completely stupid, pointless, campaign message. We have to ask why John Swinney put all his time and effort into arranging the truly ludicrous 'Stop Reform' event when, if he had all this time and energy, he should surely have been arranging a 'We Demand to Save Grangemouth' event to be followed by a citizens' assembly for independence. READ MORE: Mairi McAllan: I'm back and I want quick progress on housing emergency Perhaps, though, it simply tells us everything we need to know about his and his party's priorities these days? With the SNP completely failing the people in regards to independence despite promising it, is it any wonder everyone is fed up to the back teeth with the whole bloody lot of these parties north and south of the Border, who simply lie through their teeth come election time promising us the world and then deliver Sweet Fanny Adams? This is the real reason why Reform UK are making such gains, and woe betide any of the political parties of the status quo who for decades have let us all down so badly, and who ignore this at their peril. People have genuinely had enough of being completely trampled on, lied to and abused by both Tory parties, both red and blue, and the SNP, as we in this enormously resource-rich nation have to sit back and watch it being systematically destroyed. We should be even madder at the way we are being abused! READ MORE: SNP leadership challenge would not be a good idea, says John Swinney We simply have to ask if there is anyone with even a modicum of intellect in the SNP to advise John Swinney. Perhaps there is no-one to hit the 'avoid making a fool of the party' button and this is why the SNP since 2014 have missed one open goal after another when it comes to demanding independence for the people who voted them in for just this reason. John Swinney seems a decent enough guy, but he is never in a month of Sundays the leader needed to take this country to its rightful goal of independence. Unless the people in the SNP wake up and realise indy supporters are every bit as intelligent as they are, the SNP will almost certainly go down in history as the biggest political failures of all time. Just take a look at the chasm between Yes support and the SNP, who for the last four years or so have been an embarrassment to indy supporters and who seem to now have a built-in self-destruct button. READ MORE: John Swinney and Anas Sarwar clash over reports of SNP secret meeting For every decent thing they do, the SNP then come out with ideas that ruin any credibility they may have just earned with caring, damage-reducing policies to try protect people from Westminster's idiotic, ill-thought-out rulings. The SNP need to wake up, or the man who was very much the instigator in bringing us all the financial calamity and life-ruining Brexit – the wee ex-Tory, City spiv with his very own property empire who incredibly pretends he is 'anti-establishment' as he counts his millions, yes, Nigel Farage – may very well be the next prime minister. So let's hope we somehow miraculously find a leader with fire in their belly, who will not accept any rulings that damage our lives here in Scotland, who will not accept 'no' when it comes to independence and who has the vision and intellect to set the foundations in place for an independent Scotland with its own currency and proper land reforms. We badly need both of those things right now but have to sit back and watch the SNP elect one dud after another as leader when far more capable people are right under their noses. Iain K Dunoon


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
A leadership plot? It's not a good idea, says 'increasingly desperate' John Swinney
An 'increasingly desperate' John Swinney has tried to head off an SNP leadership challenge by warning rebels: 'I don't think that would be a good idea.' The First Minister also sought to calm angry activists by vowing to ramp up a push for independence at next year's Holyrood election. He said he 'always' planned to make breaking up the UK 'phase two' of his leadership, after moving on from the turmoil of the Humza Yousaf and Nicola Sturgeon era. Scottish Tory deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'John Swinney is looking increasingly desperate as he strives to stave off growing frustrations within the SNP ranks. 'It is typical that to try and appease die-hard nationalists he has made it clear that his obsession with independence will once again be at the heart of an SNP election campaign. 'He is only interested in protecting his party's interests, rather than focusing on the issues that are really impacting the lives of Scots.' Mr Swinney, who was ousted as SNP leader in 2004 after a string of election losses, is facing calls to quit after defeat in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse byelection. He insisted it was a two-horse race between his party and Reform - only for Labour to gain the once-safe SNP seat by 602 votes. The Herald reported a plot to topple him at the party conference in Aberdeen in October. Under SNP rules, any member can trigger a leadership vote at conference with the backing of 2.5 per cent of the party, meaning around 1500 signatures. On BBC Radio Scotland yesterday morning, Finance Secretary Shona Robison, dismissed the idea of a challenge, saying Mr Swinney's position was 'absolutely' safe. But at Holyrood later, Mr Swinney said he had 'absolutely no idea' if he would face a challenger. 'I don't think that would be a good idea,' he stressed. 'I came into office to help the SNP to recover from a very, very difficult situation in the spring of 2024 and I'm very focused on making sure we make that recovery, to be ready for the 2026 elections. 'We got ourselves into contention in [Hamilton], whereas a year ago, I don't think the SNP would have been anywhere near to contention in that byelection.' He said he was not worried 'in the slightest' about the briefing against him, and tried to reassure party members unhappy about stalled progress on independence. 'The SNP was not getting a hearing from the public in Scotland. 'I had to make sure we could get a hearing [by] addressing the issues that people are immediately preoccupied by - the cost of living and the performance of public services. 'The second part of what I was going to do was to open up a conversation about independence. I'm now confident we can get a hearing because of what I've done in the last 12 months. 'We just need to take forward phase two of the preparations for 2026.' The Guardian reported that after a 'fractious' meeting of his MSPs on Tuesday, Mr Swinney faces a grilling from the SNP's ruling body on Sunday. Anas Sarwar taunted Mr Swinney over the infighting at First Minister's Questions. The Scottish Labour leader said: 'Even his own MSPs are now openly rebelling against him. One SNP MSP said about John Swinney 'There is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision'. They're right, aren't they?' An angry Mr Swinney said: 'Listen, Mr Sarwar can conjure up a' the stuff he wants. While Mr Sarwar postures, I'm going to deliver for the workers of Scotland.' Activist Graeme McCormick threatened to stand against Mr Swinney for the SNP leadership a year ago, to avoid a coronation, but backed down under intense pressure.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN DAISLEY: With 'business friends' like the SNP, who needs liquidators?
Here's a brainteaser for you. What do you have to add to £1.7 billion to get £600 million? The answer is the SNP. According to independent analysis from the Scottish Fiscal Commission, Scotland's higher income tax rates ought to pull in an extra £1.7 billion a year in revenue. Unfortunately, Holyrood's coffers are only bringing in around one third of that, in a phenomenon the commission calls 'economic performance gap' and I call 'Shona Robison'. Russell Findlay was very exercised about the matter at First Minister's Questions. John Swinney, on the other hand, was less worked up. 'The important point to consider,' the FM said, was that higher taxes meant more money to spend on public services. There is no tell like: 'The important point to consider…' It invariably means: 'This subject is politically awkward for me, and it'd be jolly good of you to move on.' Let's talk about all the dosh raised rather than the dubious efficacy with which it's spent. Swinney preferred to think of it as 'differences in policy outcomes' as a result of 'people on higher incomes paying slightly more in taxation'. The outcomes are different, all right. Findlay brushed this aside as 'more smoke and mirrors' and noted that 'economic performance gap' had cost Scotland £5.4 billion over the last decade. Thank goodness this isn't a government that constantly complains about a lack of funding, otherwise this would be embarrassing. Swinney boasted that 'we take a number of steps to invest in the economy', which would be fair enough if they didn't keep taking the same steps over and over. The Ferguson Marine yard can attest to ministers' flushness with the cash, the islanders not so much. The FM boasted that his was a 'business-friendly SNP government'. With business friends like this, who needs liquidators? Findlay couldn't stifle a titter, and who could blame him with material like this? 'I will try to stop laughing for a minute,' he chuckled, before accusing the Nationalists of 'throwing all the money away'. Miffed that Findlay had alluded to the cost of welfare spending, Swinney growled: 'What benefits would he cut?' For good measure, he charged Findlay with wanting to 'consign more children to poverty'. I knew it was a bad idea for Findlay to unveil his Reopening the Workhouses (Scotland) Bill before thinking it through properly. The Tory leader remarked that he wanted people out of poverty, which is why he didn't want them dependent on benefits. Swinney replied: 'This government will do what it always does.' Blame it all on Westminster? Anas Sarwar, his new Hamilton MSP Davy Russell perched proudly behind him, raised the plight of workers at Alexander Dennis, the Scottish bus manufacturer which is relocating south of the border, with job losses on the cards. Sarwar snarled: 'The Scottish Government is procuring more buses from China than it is from Scotland. The Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, has bought almost four times as many buses from Alexander Dennis.' Things have come to a pretty pass when Labour is doing business with capitalists and the SNP is taking its custom to the Chinese Communist Party. No wonder capitalism remains stubbornly un-overthrown. The award for the most heroic attempt to crowbar independence into an entirely unrelated question must go to Lorna Slater. She got to her feet to press the FM to roll out free school meals across more local authorities but, some-where along the way, she segued into a spot of separatist sabre-rattling. 'Now is the time to demand that Keir Starmer set out exactly what conditions he believes need to be met to trigger an independence referendum for Scot-land, so that we can get out of this unequal union,' she demanded. The Prime Minister should have some fun with these conditions. Brechin City beats Celtic on penalties to win the treble. A leap-year blood moon when Mars is in retrograde and the Wurzels are back in the charts. The Scottish Greens take a collective vow of silence and move to Micronesia.