Is it dangerous? AZ drivers could be fined for having pet on their lap with proposed bill
Flagstaff resident and retired Marine pilot Larry Larkin started noticing a trend in the 45 years he's lived in Flagstaff — more and more people drove with their pets in their laps.
"I yelled at one gentleman one day with a dog in his lap, and he said, 'That's a seeing-eye dog,'" he laughed as he spoke with the state Senate Public Safety Committee on Feb. 19. He likened driving with a pet in your lap to driving while on your phone.
Larkin went to the local police and the Coconino County Sheriff's Office to see if there were any rules against it and quickly found out that there weren't. He set out to change that with his Senate representative, Wendy Rogers, R-Flagstaff.
Rogers introduced Senate Bill 1270 which would fine motorists for driving with pets in their laps.
The measure passed with bipartisan support in the Public Safety Committee. Sen. David Gowan, R-Sierra Vista, was the only one on the seven-person committee who opposed, saying the wording needed some work because "animals will just do what they do in a vehicle sometimes."
If passed by the Legislature, SB 1270 aims to increase roadway safety by prohibiting motorists from driving with an animal on their lap. Those who violate the rule could face a fine of up to $150, with repeat offenders facing upwards of $250. The fines would begin Jan. 1, 2026.
A violation of this rule would not be considered for a license suspension or revocation, according to the bill.
"This simple but key step will help prevent distractions, reduce accidents and ultimately protect both drivers and animals. With civil penalties for violations, this bill takes a sensible approach to addressing a growing concern," Rosanna Gabaldón, D-Green Valley, said in a statement to The Arizona Republic.
She voted in favor of the bill during the committee session.
Other bills are impacting roadways: Here's slow drivers could procure a hefty fine under this proposed bill
Two animal welfare groups, the Humane Voters of Arizona and the Animal Defense League of Arizona, have publicly given their support for this bill, along with 13 people.
"Driving with an animal on your lap is a danger to the animal, it's a danger to the driver, and it's a danger to other drivers," said Karen Michael, who spoke on behalf of the Humane Voters of Arizona and the Animal Defense League of Arizona. She is a board member of both organizations.
An LGBTQ+ organization, the Stonewall Democrats of Arizona, and three people have opposed. The Stonewall Democrats of Arizona could not be reached for comment.
A previous bill was introduced by Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, in 2018. Senate Bill 1116 created a $100 fine for drivers with an animal on their lap. The bill was on the agenda of the Senate Transportation and Technology Committee but did not receive a hearing.
Hawaii bans a motorist having a pet on their lap, and other states may be able to charge drivers under distracted driving laws, animal cruelty laws, or laws against unrestrained pets in a moving vehicle.
According to AAA, an unrestrained 10-pound dog in a crash at only 30 mph will exert roughly 300 pounds of pressure.
"It wouldn't take a major collision to be deadly," Michael said, noting that an airbag deployment could also hurt or kill the animal.
Distracted driving due to an animal is another concern for lawmakers and lobbyists. Over 3,000 people died in 2022 across the U.S. from distracted driving, according to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety doesn't specifically track incidents related to pets in a vehicle, DPS spokesperson Bart Graves said, and there's not much existing data nationwide that relates distracted driving to pets in the car.
However, it takes less than five seconds to be considered a "distracted driver," the NHTSA said. Distracted driving can include anything from phone use to a pet jumping around in the car.
There's no law against having a pet loose in the car in Arizona, but Graves emphasized to keep your pet properly secured to ensure they're not a distraction. Arizona Humane Society spokesperson Joe Casados also recommended a pet seatbelt to help secure your pet.
The Arizona Humane Society could not comment on the content of SB 1270.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: AZ Senate committee advances bill prohibiting pets in drivers' laps
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
12 hours ago
- Miami Herald
State Senators Overwhelmingly Vote to Raise Car Dealership Fees 488%
California's state Senate has approved legislation allowing car dealers to charge buyers up to 1% of a vehicle's purchase price in document processing fees, with a $500 cap. This $500 limit represents an increase of nearly 500% from the current cap of $85, and the average starting price of a new car in May was $48,656, Cox Automotive reports. The bill passed with only one Senator voting against it, and its supporters, including California's New Car Dealers Association, say the fee is necessary since the $85 cap hasn't kept pace with the state's rising business costs over the decades. Processing paperwork that the added costs would help pay for includes loan documents, fraud protection forms, and Department of Motor Vehicles registration. Anthony Samson, the California New Car Dealers Association's lobbyist, said in April that other businesses can recoup similar costs through service charges, but dealers can't. "If we believed we could simply recover our costs and the price of the vehicle, I assure you that we would not be here today asking for your support on this measure," Samson said, according to Cal Matters. However, Senator Dave Cortese said he's working with the California New Car Dealers Association to lower the fee's ceiling when it's heard in the Assembly. Senator Henry Stern was the only Senator who voted against the bill, noting he feels that car sellers have undermined the state's efforts to protect consumers and the environment with actions like lobbying for the U.S. Senate to pass federal legislation blocking California's electric vehicle mandates. "The car dealers haven't earned the trust to justify this major increase in junk fees," Stern said, according to Cal Matters. Ray Shefska, CarEdge Co-Founder, added that "This bill reinforces that in America, whether it be national, state, or local, we have the best politicians money can buy. When things are already barely affordable, let's by all means make it even more difficult for people buying cars in California." The California New Car Dealers Association has donated $2.9 million to the state's lawmakers since 2015, according to Digital Democracy's database. One California Senator, Carolyn Menjivar, didn't vote on Tuesday but stated: "If we're looking to help everyday Californians with affordability, why are we looking at helping an industry that is making a healthy profit?" California is one of the most expensive states to buy a car since it charges the highest sales tax rate at 7.25% and imposes significant registration fees. The document processing fees vote occurred amid reports of auto dealers using incentive strategies to sustain profits without raising vehicle prices in reaction to Trump's tariffs. State government vehicle purchases are exempt from the document charge. House Assembly members still have to vote on the car dealer fees bill before it heads to California's Governor for approval or veto. If the House Assembly approves the legislation in its current form, a $500 cap could increase Governor Newsom's chances of vetoing it. Florida has the highest car dealer document fees in the U.S., with its $999 cap, followed by Virginia at $799, and Colorado registering third at $699. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump is expected to sign resolution this week reversing California's ban on gas-powered cars, GOP congressman says
President Donald Trump is expected to sign a set of resolutions this week to reverse California's 2035 ban on the sale of new gas-powered cars, a Republican co-sponsor said Tuesday. 'On Thursday, President Trump will sign my Resolution to reverse California's absurd ban on gas-powered cars,' California GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley said in a Tuesday post on X. Several Biden-era waivers allowed California to set its own vehicle emissions, and a reversal would be another blow to the state's effort to regulate pollution from cars and trucks. California has had authority to set its own emissions for decades; Trump reversed it in his first term before the Biden administration reinstated it. The move could also have broad environmental impacts for the rest of the country, as more than a dozen states are following California's emissions rules. The Republican-led Senate overturned the three Biden-era emissions waivers in May, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom claiming last month the vote was illegal. To do so, Republicans bypassed the 60-vote threshold typically needed to approve such a measure. Democrats charged that move would weaken the long-established legislative filibuster, besides its environmental impact. CNN has reached out to California Attorney General Rob Bonta's office and the White House for comment. Trump signed an executive order his first day in office to end the 'electric vehicle mandate.' But despite his use of that term during the campaign and since taking office, there have never been any federal rules requiring consumers to buy only EVs. But California does have emission rules that would ban the sale of gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035. Trump already tried to limit the power of California to regulate its own air pollution during his first term in office. The issue ended up in the courts, but that legal battle was put on hold after he left office and the state's authority was restored by President Joe Biden. CNN's Ella Nilsen and Annie Grayer contributed to this report.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stock Investors Got a Double Dose of Bad News After the Feud Between President Trump and Elon Musk
Tesla deliveries declined sharply in the first quarter, and the company has continued to lose market share in the second quarter. Analysts have downgraded Tesla stock and reduced earnings estimates in response to the Trump-Musk feud and the probable impact of tariffs. Elon Musk still believes Tesla could be the most valuable company in the world as it leans into autonomous driving and humanoid robots. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) stock has tumbled 22% year to date amid a myriad of business and political headwinds, and Wall Street anticipates further declines. The average target price among 55 analysts is $289 per share, which implies 8% downside from the current share price of $316. One reason for the pessimism is the recent falling out between CEO Elon Musk and President Trump. Their relationship unraveled in a heated exchange of threats and insults earlier this month after Musk criticized the tax and spending bill currently in the Senate. But Tesla shareholders recently got some more bad news. Tesla has struggled with weak demand for several quarters. The company last year reported its first decline in annual vehicle deliveries in over a decade despite 13% sales growth in the global battery electric vehicle (BEV) market. Tesla deliveries dropped even more sharply in the first quarter despite 38% sales growth in the broader BEV market. To elaborate, Tesla lost about 10 percentage points of market share in the U.S. and Europe, and 3 points of market share in China in Q1. Management blamed the factory updates that limited Model Y production and backlash against the brand as consumers reacted to CEO Elon Musk involving himself in the Trump administration. However, Tesla finished updating its factory production lines in Q1, and Musk has stepped back from his responsibilities with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). So, with those problems resolved, several analysts expected demand to rebound in Q2, but a resurgence in buying activity has so far failed to materialize. Instead, Tesla continued to struggle in April. It lost 6 percentage points of market share in the U.S., 5 points of market share in Europe, and 3 points of market share in China. That is bad news for shareholders because it suggests brand damage caused by Musk's polarizing foray into politics may be more persistent than expected. Elon Musk was the largest donor in the November election. He spent nearly $300 million to support various Republican candidates, and most of those contributions went to President Trump. In the aftermath, Tesla stock soared as investors assumed their relationship would benefit the company. Dan Ives at Wedbush even called Musk backing Trump a "bet for the ages." Unfortunately, that bet has backfired spectacularly. Musk not only hurt the Tesla brand and pushed away potential buyers by supporting the Trump administration but also managed to upset the president (who has threatened "serious consequences" if Musk throws support behind Democratic candidates in the 2026 midterms) by publicly criticizing his fiscal and trade policies. So, the idea that Tesla could benefit from their relationship has gone up in smoke. Consequently, analysts at Baird and Argus Research earlier this week downgraded shares to hold. "We are concerned that the war of words between President Trump and Elon Musk, along with the expiration of EV credits, could further weaken demand for new Teslas," wrote Bill Selesky at Argus. He also called Musk a "lightning rod for criticism." Additionally, several analysts have revised their earnings forecasts lower to account for market-share losses and the probable impact of tariffs. The consensus estimate for 2025 has been cut 29% such that earnings are now expected to decline 20% this year. Here is the bottom line: Tesla's electric vehicle (EV) business is struggling, and the company is likely to report poor financial results in the coming quarters. However, Musk still thinks Tesla could be the most valuable company in the world as it leans into autonomous driving and humanoid robots. For investors who believe in his vision, the investment thesis has not changed. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $369,876!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,243!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $660,341!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Trevor Jennewine has positions in Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Tesla Stock Investors Got a Double Dose of Bad News After the Feud Between President Trump and Elon Musk was originally published by The Motley Fool