logo
2019 anti-CAA violence in U.P.'s Rampur: Over ₹11 lakh recovery from 195 rioters ordered

2019 anti-CAA violence in U.P.'s Rampur: Over ₹11 lakh recovery from 195 rioters ordered

Hindustan Times15-05-2025

The Uttar Pradesh Public and Private Property Damage Recovery Claims Tribunal in Meerut has directed for the recovery of ₹11,08,901 from 195 individuals involved in the 2019 violence against Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) in Rampur.
The three-member tribunal, chaired by Dr Ashok Kumar Singh, and comprising members Garima Singh and Alok Pandey, on Wednesday delivered the order after three years of hearing in the case titled 'State Government vs Islam & Others'.
The violence, which erupted on December 21, 2019, caused extensive damage to public and private property in Rampur. According to the tribunal's records, a mob of 400–500 people, led by one Islam and others, gathered after raising inflammatory slogans during a protest against the CAA. The crowd marched from Hamid Inter College towards Eidgah Shahbad Gate, breaking barricades, and attacking security forces with gunfire and stones at Hathi Khana Crossing.
According to the tribunal order accessed by HT, the damages included a government jeep, wireless equipment, multicoloured lights, sirens, motorcycles, fibre batons, helmets, body protectors, tear gas cans, barricading materials, iron barriers and folding barriers.
Additionally, five private motorcycles, a scooter, and a mobile phone were also destroyed, with the total loss assessed at ₹11,08,901.
In 2022, Rampur police filed a claim with the Meerut tribunal, seeking recovery from 197 accused. After issuing notices and conducting hearings, the tribunal found 195 of the accused guilty, ordering them to pay a fine of ₹5,687 each.
The Rampur DM has been tasked with recovering the total amount within 30 days as per Section 23 of the Public and Private Property Damage Recovery Act, 2020. The recovered sum will be deposited in the government treasury.
If the guilty fail to pay the fine within the stipulated period, the DM will treat the amount as arrears of land revenue with an additional 6% simple interest and recovery expenses applied until the fine is settled, the order mentioned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tirupati temple body issues legal notice to vendors for misuse of GI tag for laddu
Tirupati temple body issues legal notice to vendors for misuse of GI tag for laddu

India Today

time35 minutes ago

  • India Today

Tirupati temple body issues legal notice to vendors for misuse of GI tag for laddu

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) launched legal action against several entities unlawfully using the "Tirupati Laddu" name. The move comes after unauthorised vendors and online platforms were found selling or promoting products under the protected Geographical Indication (GI) tag without through Sahadeva Law Chambers, served legal notices to multiple offenders, including major online retailers PushMyCart (Mahita LLC) and Transact Foods notices pointed out the violation of the GI registration under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, which protects the exclusive rights to the Tirupati Laddu name and its preparation process. The legal communication emphasised that the Tirupati Laddu is prepared solely within the Tirumala temple premises under TTD's strict supervision, following a traditional and sanctified method. Unauthorised use not only breaches legal protections but also diminishes the spiritual value of this revered prasadam, response, PushMyCart acknowledged the notice and suspended the infringing listings while conducting a legal review. Several other vendors have also voluntarily removed their listings after receiving TTD's Officer of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, J Shymala Rao, said, The Tirupati Laddu is not just a product, but a sacred prasadam with deep spiritual and cultural value. We are committed to taking all necessary legal steps to prevent its misuse and to protect the trust of crores of devotees worldwide.'advertisementThis action marks one of the first times in India that a temple prasadam protected under GI law has been defended through formal legal channels, including on international tag is a mark of regional specialty that signifies that a product originates from a specific geographic location and possesses qualities, characteristics, or reputation due to its origin. IN THIS STORY#Andhra Pradesh

Emu farm MD gets 10 years rigorous imprisonment for cheating investors Rs 7.61 crore
Emu farm MD gets 10 years rigorous imprisonment for cheating investors Rs 7.61 crore

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Emu farm MD gets 10 years rigorous imprisonment for cheating investors Rs 7.61 crore

COIMBATORE: A special court for the trial of cases under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (TNPID) Act in Coimbatore on Friday awarded 10 years rigorous imprisonment to the managing director of an emu farm for cheating 385 investors of Rs 7.61 crore. The court imposed a fine of Rs 7.89 crore on him. Guru alias Gurusamy, 46, was functioning as managing director of Susi Emu Farms (India) Private Limited at Perundurai in Erode district. The farm had opened branch offices in Salem, Coimbatore, Namakkal and a few other places in the state. In 2012, the firm offered various ponzi schemes to lure investors. It received investments of Rs 7.61 crore from 385 investors in Salem district, said K Muthu Vijayan, special public prosecutor for the TNPID court. The Salem economic offences wing (EOW) police registered a case against Gurusamy and two managers of the firm, Kathirvel and Suresh, under sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5 of the TNPID Act in 2012. After hearing the prosecution and defence counsel arguments, special court judge M N Senthil Kumar delivered the verdict on Friday evening. The court awarded ten years rigorous imprisonment to Gurusamy and imposed a fine of Rs 7.89 crore. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The two managers of the firm were acquitted. Gurusamy was spending his days behind bars in connection with three cases registered in Namakkal, Erode, and Coimbatore district. The EOW police in Erode district froze his property worth Rs 35 crore. The properties were auctioned. The amount of Rs 35 crore has been kept in the district revenue officer's bank account. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !

Nirmal Krishna deposit fraud: Home department directs Kinfra to return land to woman entrepreneur
Nirmal Krishna deposit fraud: Home department directs Kinfra to return land to woman entrepreneur

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Nirmal Krishna deposit fraud: Home department directs Kinfra to return land to woman entrepreneur

Thiruvananthapuram: The home department by an order on Friday directed Kinfra to return the 50-cent land to a woman entrepreneur Usha Umesh, 53, from whom the land was seized by the key accused in the Nirmal Krishna deposit fraud. Until a few years ago, Umesh was operating Pooja Garments on the land at Kinfra Park, but the accused K Nirmalan evicted her using fraudulent methods. He then took over the land and the 54,000 sq ft building at the park by flouting all norms. The accused then reportedly paid Rs 89 lakh as a lease premium for the land to Kinfra. The land and factory are currently owned by one Sreejith, a close aide of Nirmalan and an accused in the deposit fraud. The order issued by the home department also directs Kinfra to remit the lease premium of Rs 89 lakh to Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (Buds) Act, Authority, which initiated recovery proceedings against the accused. The fraud came to light when the authority legally attached the land and factory owned by the accused in the Nirmal Krishna fraud, as the woman submitted proof of ownership of land and factory. As per the Buds Act, the authority has no power to attach a third-party property. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Azioni USA fino a 1€ BG SAXO Scopri di più Undo Buds Authority later revoked the attachments, directing Kinfra to pay the lease premium paid by the accused to reimburse the depositors who lost money in the deposit fraud. "Kinfra leased out the land to Nirmalan when it was already owned by me. Kinfra could not produce the pact when it was sought through an RTI query. Now I am happy that the department directed Kinfra to give my land back," said Umesh. She may need to pay some premium amount to enter into a new pact with Kinfra, it was learned. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store