Anti-Maoist strike force in Chhattisgarh DRG counters multiple challenges during intensified operations
BASTAR: This year, 21 May emerged as an epoch-making day marked by exceptional operational efficiency in the ongoing battle against India's single biggest internal security challenge, the CPI (Maoist).
On that day, the valiant District Reserve Guard (DRG) in south Chhattisgarh's Bastar eliminated the dreaded supreme commander of the Naxals, Nambala Keshava Rao alias Basavaraju, who was the general secretary of the banned outfit.
The DRGs are well-trained forces with combat capabilities raised in the strife-torn Bastar zone with a mission, to take on the Maoist challenge that has persisted as a virtual war against the state for over four decades.
The DRG, a special combat team of the Chhattisgarh police force, came into existence in 2012 in Narayanpur and Kanker.
Witnessing its effective and successful outcome, it was later established in the remaining five districts, Bijapur, Jagdalpur, Sukma, Kondagaon, and Dantewada, across the Bastar range. They operate under the command of the respective district police chiefs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Kerala slams Centre over foreign aid approval to Maharashtra, cites bias
The CPI(M)-led Kerala government on Sunday accused the BJP-ruled Centre of political bias after it permitted Maharashtra to accept foreign contributions for disaster relief while denying similar requests from Kerala during its devastating 2018 Finance Minister K N Balagopal stated that the state welcomed the Centre's approval for Maharashtra but called out what he described as 'discriminatory treatment' between support the decision to give permission to Maharashtra, but there shouldn't be differential treatment towards states. It shows that centre sees the states differently and that is based on politics. It is not right for the administrators to show that their criteria is not the disaster but politics. This is not right for the relation between state and centre,' said Balagopal. His remarks came after the Maharashtra Chief Minister's Relief Fund was granted registration under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA), making it eligible to receive foreign aid. This contrasts sharply with the Centre's earlier refusal to allow Kerala to accept foreign assistance during the 2018 floods, despite offers from countries including the Balagopal's concerns, CPI MP P Sandosh Kumar also criticised the Centre, accusing it of showing 'step-motherly treatment' toward Union Government's recent approval allowing foreign contributions to the Maharashtra Chief Minister's Relief Fund starkly highlights the injustice done to Kerala during the devastating 2018 floods, when foreign aid was blocked and contributions to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund were disallowed,' he said.'At the time of the 2018 floods that devastated the state of Kerala, many international organisations including the Government of UAE expressed their willingness to extend a helping hand to Kerala but such requests were outrightly denied by the BJP government,' Kumar InTrending Reel IN THIS STORY#Kerala#Maharashtra
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh CM Vishnudeo Sai sees turning point in war on Maoists
File photo: Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai applying 'tilak' to a security personnel as he congratulated them on the fight against naxals (Picture credit: ANI) RAIPUR: Chhattisgarh CM Vishnudeo Sai said targeted welfare programmes and sustained security ops have dismantled Maoist networks across Bastar and laid the groundwork for enduring peace. In an interview with TOI, Sai declared a turning point after 18 months of intense counter-insurgency efforts. "Our approach combines robust security measures with a strong emphasis on addressing root causes through development & inclusive policies. We aim to achieve a Naxal-free Chhattisgarh by March 31, '26." Not only eliminating Maoists but also Naxalism's roots: CM A combination of targeted welfare programmes and sustained security operations has dismantled Maoist networks across Bastar and laid groundwork for enduring peace, Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai told TOI. Sai declared a turning point after 18 months of intense counter-insurgency efforts, which included the killing of CPI (Maoist) general secretary Basavaraju on May 21. "Our approach combines robust security measures with a strong emphasis on addressing root causes through development and inclusive policies," he said. "We aim to achieve a Naxal-free Chhattisgarh by March 31, 2026." The CM said his government plans to transform tribal-majority Bastar as well as the state through education, skilling, welfare projects, and inclusive policies. Government forces have penetrated deep into forested terrain long considered inaccessible, setting up security camps that now act as outposts of governance. These camps are enabling the spread of basic services and infrastructure in isolated tribal areas. The CM said these camps will remain as long as necessary. "Security has improved dramatically, there's a sharp decline in violence and 1,355 Maoists have surrendered," Sai said. "Our surrender and rehabilitation policy has successfully reintegrated former Naxals, while initiatives like Niyad Nella Nar Yojana are promoting growth and stability in villages within a 10km radius of security camps." Asked about public protests against blanket amnesty for hardcore Maoists, Sai struck a conciliatory tone. "I understand the pain and anger of families who have lost loved ones. Their suffering is immeasurable," he said. "The government is committed to ensuring justice and addressing their concerns with utmost sensitivity. The surrender policy is constantly under review. We are committed to finding the right balance between encouraging surrender and ensuring accountability. " Critics have alleged that anti-Maoist operations are paving the way for mining interests. Sai dismissed these concerns. "Such allegations are unfounded. Our government's primary focus is the development and well-being of Bastar and its people," he said. Addressing controversy over mining in the Hasdeo forest, Sai acknowledged the complexities in balancing development with indigenous rights. "We are committed to a path of responsible and inclusive development. This involves engaging with tribal communities, respecting their traditional rights over land and resources, and ensuring they benefit from development projects." He credited the "double engine government" - a term often used to describe BJP-led governments at both state and central levels - for accelerating Bastar's transformation. "Under the guidance of PM Narendra Modi and Union home minister Amit Shah, Bastar is witnessing transformative development," he said. "Effective policy implementation and better resource allocation are possible because of this synergy." Sai emphasised a broader vision for the state beyond mining. "Chhattisgarh is more than just a mineral-rich state," he said. "Recently, we conducted bhoomi pujan for a semiconductor manufacturing unit and an AI data centre in Nava Raipur. Many IT companies have shown interest in investing here."He said Chhattisgarh ranks among the most progressive states in governance and innovation. "Even Bastar, once overshadowed by conflict, has begun attracting investment. We are witnessing a revival of cultural pride and local economic activity, marking a new era of hope. "
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Wrong call: On Assam and arming civilians
The decision by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led Assam government to issue arms licences to 'eligible' indigenous communities in remote and vulnerable areas in the State is fraught with danger. The State government seems to suggest that indigenous communities living in the border areas abutting Bangladesh are vulnerable and that armed licences would be a deterrent and improve their personal safety and confidence. Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has also insisted that these grants would not be for people near inter-State borders in Assam. But these caveats still do not take away from the fact that arming specific civilian groups is liable to be rampantly misused for acts such as vigilantism and inter-community rivalry, as the lines between law enforcement — which carries legal authority and has a monopoly over armed instruments — and private citizens are blurred. In a State that has been beset with insurgent violence and where the threat from groups such as the ULFA (Independent) remains, introducing more arms into civilian hands risks propagating further violence and arms proliferation rather than ensuring enhanced security. Instead of arming civilians, ostensibly for self-defence — a move akin to abdicating its core responsibility — the State government has the clear alternative of enhancing its own law enforcement and security presence in these 'vulnerable areas'. It is well understood that in modern states, the monopoly over instruments of violence will remain with the government and its law enforcement agencies. In India, arms licences are issued in a restricted manner as a delegated and a limited right to self-preservation to select individuals through a stringent licensing process under the Arms Act, 1959 and the Arms Rules, 2016. These rules under the law preclude the provision of such licences to larger, identified groups — where identification itself could be fraught with the risk of conflicts — as they not only present administrative challenges but also make it difficult for the government to license, monitor and recover firearms as the law requires it to. Arming civilian groups, even with an intention to do so with some stringent implementation, runs the risks of having these weapons entering grey markets and falling into the wrong hands, besides designating those groups with an authority that could backfire on the state. This was evident when security forces in Chhattisgarh arming civilian groups for protection against the Maoist threat — in the Salwa Judum campaign in the late 2000s — led to severe human rights violations and lawlessness, before the Supreme Court of India intervened to deem the policy to be illegal. Considering these problems, Assam must reverse its decision.
