M23 accused of possible ‘war crimes' in eastern DRC: Rights group
M23 rebels in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have committed serious abuses against civilians, 'including torture, killings and enforced disappearances', in areas under their control, according to Amnesty International.
'These acts violate international humanitarian law and may amount to war crimes,' Amnesty said in a statement on Tuesday.
The allegations come amid a renewed surge in violence that erupted in January, when the Rwandan-backed M23 group captured the strategic city of Goma in North Kivu province. The rebels went on to seize Bukavu in South Kivu in February, escalating a conflict that has displaced hundreds of thousands.
Between February and April, Amnesty researchers spoke to 18 people who had been detained by M23 in Goma and Bukavu. Many said they were held on accusations of supporting the Congolese army or government – claims for which no proof was presented. Several were not told why they were being held.
According to Amnesty, detainees were crammed into overcrowded, unhygienic cells, lacking adequate food, water, sanitation and medical care. Some of those interviewed said they saw fellow prisoners die due to these conditions or from acts of torture.
Witnesses described gruesome scenes, including two detainees being bludgeoned to death with hammers and another shot dead on the spot.
All of the former detainees said they were either tortured or saw others being tortured with wooden sticks, electric cables or engine belts, the rights group said.
Relatives searching for the missing were often turned away by M23 fighters, who denied the detainees were being held – actions Amnesty says amount to enforced disappearances.
'M23's public statements about bringing order to eastern DRC mask their horrific treatment of detainees. They brutally punish those who they believe oppose them and intimidate others, so no one dares to challenge them,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's regional director for East and Southern Africa.
'Regional and international actors must pressure Rwanda to cease its support for M23,' added Chagutah.
The United Nations and DRC's government say Rwanda has supported M23 by providing arms and sending troops – an accusation Kigali denies.
The UN estimates that about 4,000 Rwandan soldiers support M23.
M23 is among roughly 100 armed groups fighting for control in eastern DRC, a region rich in minerals and bordering Rwanda. The ongoing conflict has driven more than seven million people from their homes, including 100,000 who fled this year alone.
Despite recent pledges by the Congolese army and the rebels to seek a truce, clashes have continued. M23 previously threatened to advance as far as the capital, Kinshasa, more than 1,600km (1,000 miles) away.
In April, Rwanda and DRC agreed to draft a peace deal by May 2, committing to respect each other's sovereignty and refraining from providing military support to armed groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The Rwanda-DRC peace deal must include the voices of the voiceless
More than three decades after the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda plunged the African Great Lakes region into unprecedented turmoil, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) continue to struggle in establishing collaborative and neighbourly relations for the collective benefit of their peoples. Following the genocide, in which approximately 800,000 people were killed in just 100 days, hundreds of thousands of Rwandans – including some members of the defeated Rwandan armed forces and militias responsible for the genocide – crossed into the DRC and settled in refugee camps in the country's east, close to the Rwanda border. This became a security concern for the new government in Rwanda. The eastern DRC has not seen peace since. In 1996, the Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Congo-Zaire (AFDL), a coalition of Rwandan, Ugandan, Burundian, and some Congolese dissidents, launched a war against the government of Zaire. The AFDL, primarily a Congolese movement against the Zaire leadership but receiving significant support from the governments of Rwanda and Uganda, ousted President Mobutu Sese Seko and brought Laurent-Desire Kabila to power. However, this change in government and the brutal dismantling of Hutu refugee camps that accompanied it did not usher in meaningful intra-governmental collaboration or an end to Rwanda's security concerns. Over the subsequent decades, Rwanda's government continued to monitor the perpetual conflict in the eastern DRC, citing concerns about dissidents based there. According to United Nations reports, since 2012, this involvement has included direct support for the M23 rebel group waging an uprising against the DRC government. In January 2025, following numerous UN reports confirming Rwanda's support for M23, the DRC government severed diplomatic ties with Rwanda. Subsequently, Rwanda's development partners imposed sanctions on the country, some of its officials, and the Gasabo Gold Refinery, requesting Rwanda to halt support for M23 immediately and withdraw its troops from DRC territory. For the benefit of Rwanda, the DRC, and the entire region, the conflict in the eastern DRC and the decades-old tensions between the two neighbouring governments need to come to an end. As someone deeply invested in delivering democracy and development to all Rwandans, I have long called on the Rwandan government to engage in positive diplomacy to resolve its differences with the DRC government. Rwanda must engage in such diplomacy to overcome its structural constraints to development as a small, landlocked country with limited natural resources. If it resolves its issues with its neighbour, Rwanda could finally achieve true regional integration, participate in lucrative regional supply chains, and become a dependable partner to the wider international community. The peace deal the United States is currently attempting to broker between Rwanda and the DRC could put Kigali on the path to achieving all these gains. However, certain conditions are necessary for any peace deal between the DRC and Rwanda to be effective. As many have suggested, I agree that only a peace deal supported by a bilateral mineral cooperation incentive, guaranteed by a global power like the US – which would help control competition for natural resources – has a chance of succeeding. After all, there is little doubt that illicit trading of minerals has been used to finance the conflict in the eastern DRC. Yet this dark trade is not the fundamental cause of the conflict, and its cessation alone cannot resolve the issues between the two neighbours. The root cause of the eastern DRC conflict is, in fact, a lack of good governance and robust democracy across the African Great Lakes region. Lack of democracy, justice, and respect for human rights, coupled with social and economic exclusion, has caused Rwandans who survived the brutal dismantling of Hutu refugee camps not to return to Rwanda, and others to leave the country to seek refuge in regional states. Some Congolese have also made their way to Rwanda, escaping war, persecution and exclusion. According to the most recent figures by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, there are still more than 200,000 Rwandan refugees in the DRC and close to 83,000 Congolese refugees in Rwanda. There are more Congolese refugees in other regional states, such as Uganda, which hosts more than 600,000 of them. Some of these refugees have been enrolled in armed groups. All this has enabled power holders to abuse their authority and create chaos in the eastern DRC. While illicit trading of minerals has financed the conflict, the fundamental cause of the violence remains the lack of good governance and the inability or unwillingness of authorities to address the core concerns of refugees – the reasons why they sought refuge in either Rwanda or the DRC, and why they do not want to return to their countries of origin. The US can help address this problem and bring sustainable calm to the region by including a condition in the peace deal it is currently brokering that requires the Rwandan and Congolese governments to engage in direct dialogue with their respective opposition – both within and outside their borders – as well as with refugees, and commit to achieving good governance based on political inclusiveness, respect for human rights, and the rule of law. This would enable the voluntary and dignified return of refugees to their countries of origin and could finally put an end to the decades of chaos in the eastern DRC. Rwanda does not even need US pressure to embark on the path of positive diplomacy and dialogue, as a continuous quest for solutions through dialogue is one of the fundamental requirements of its constitution. The Rwandan opposition has already expressed its eagerness to enter into such constructive dialogue with the government. Four years ago, in June 2021, we submitted to the Rwandan government a roadmap for a promising future, officially requesting an inter-Rwandan dialogue to be organised. Similar efforts are under way in the DRC. Opposition figures in the country have recently called for an inter-Congolese dialogue to resolve internal governance issues. It is high time for Rwanda and the DRC to engage in dialogue with their respective refugees and opposition members, both within and outside their countries. This will ensure not only the long-term success of a Washington-brokered peace deal but also lead to trust-building between state officials on both sides and pave the way for true regional cooperation, which will help both nations prosper after finally achieving peace. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Ex-Biden official says ‘without doubt' Israel committed war crimes in Gaza
Matthew Miller, the former spokesperson of the US State Department who spent months defending Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza, has acknowledged that the Israeli military has 'without a doubt' committed war crimes in the Palestinian territory. Miller told the Sky News Trump100 podcast on Monday, however, that he did not believe genocide was being carried out in Gaza. The ex-spokesperson served as one of the public faces of former President Joe Biden's staunch support for Israel as it killed tens of thousands of Palestinians and flattened much of the enclave. United Nations experts and leading rights groups have accused Israel of genocidal acts – an effort to destroy the Palestinian people in full or in part. Miller's comments raise questions on why the Biden administration continued to arm Israel despite US laws that restrict military aid to countries that commit violations of human rights and international law. The former US president's aides repeatedly certified that they could not conclude that Israel is violation the laws of war or restricting humanitarian aid to Palestinians, despite the ample evidence documenting Israeli abuses. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, at least 54,381 Palestinians have been killed and 124,054 wounded. Almost all of the enclave's 2.3 million people have been displaced, while an Israeli blockade threatens famine. During his time with the State Department, Miller regularly clashed with journalists who questioned the US response to Israel's handling of Gaza, including bombings of medical facilities and camps sheltering Palestinian civilians. In one incident last November, Miller was rebuked for laughing during a question about Israel blocking aid to Gaza. US law specifically prohibits security assistance for state that restrict US-backed humanitarian aid in conflict zones. When asked about particular atrocities, including – for example – the killing of six-year-old Palestinian girl Hind Rajab last year, Miller would often say the the US officials brought up the incident with their Israeli counterparts, who are investigating. The spokesperson would then keep invoking these alleged contacts and probes – sometimes months after the incident – to dismiss questions about suspected war crimes by Israel. On the Sky News podcast, Miller appeared to criticise his own pattern of answering questions when he served as spokesperson. 'We do know that Israel has opened investigations. But, look, we are many months into those investigations. And we're not seeing as really soldiers held accountable,' he said. Miller stressed in the interview on Monday that, as spokesman, he was not advocating his own opinion but expressing the official stance of Biden's administration. 'You are a spokesperson for the president, the administration, and you espouse the positions of the administration,' he said. 'And when you're not in the administration, you can just give your own opinions.' Asked about his experience handling the issue, Miller said there were 'small and big' disagreements within the Biden administration over how to deal with Israel. 'There were disagreements all along the way about how to handle policy. Some of those were big disagreements, some of those were little disagreements,' he said. In particular, he hinted at tensions between Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken. He admitted that 'there probably was' more that the US could have done to pressure Israel to stop the war and prevent the killing of 'thousands of … innocent civilians who didn't want this war'. On Tuesday, the Palestinian group Hamas said Miller's comments further confirm Israel's crimes and underscores Washington's 'direct responsibility as a true partner' in the genocide against Palestinians. 'We call on the international community and international judicial institutions to turn these dangerous confessions into investigations and immediate legal action,' Hamas said in a statement. Raed Jarrar, the advocacy director at DAWN, a US-based advocacy group, said it was 'outrageous' that Miller waited until he was out of office to admit that Israel committed war crimes in Gaza. 'US officials who know atrocities are being committed and continue defending them from behind the podium are not neutral, they are complicit. Miller's silence while in government helped Israel with its genocide. He has Palestinian blood on his hands,' Jarrar told Al Jazeera in an email. 'Anyone guilty of aiding and abetting genocide should be held accountable by the International Criminal Court or other international mechanisms.'
Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Outrage after Matthew Miller says Israel committed war crimes in Gaza
NewsFeed Outrage after Matthew Miller says Israel committed war crimes in Gaza Former US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller has sparked outrage after saying he believed that Israeli forces have committed war crimes in Gaza, despite years of publicly defending Israel's conduct at press briefings.
