logo
‘The Supreme Court gender ruling had given us clarity. Now this Labour law will torpedo that'

‘The Supreme Court gender ruling had given us clarity. Now this Labour law will torpedo that'

Yahoo07-05-2025

Henrietta Freeman is a quadriplegic 31-year-old who cannot speak and relies on around-the-clock care to help with just about every aspect of her life. Perhaps understandably, given the nature of that care, she insists on her carers being female.
But now she fears that a Government bill days away from becoming law will undermine her ability to guarantee that she is only cared for by someone who is biologically female.
'I need this care to maintain my comfort, dignity and safety,' she says. To Freeman, who has a neuromuscular condition which continues to worsen, Labour's bill is a 'threat to disabled women who require same-sex care'.
She's not alone in her concerns.
Henrietta Freeman, who is quadriplegic, fears Labour's proposal will make it harder to ensure she is cared for by a biological woman
Women's rights campaigners have been warning ministers that the bill, which is intended to introduce a new digital ID system, will play havoc with the ability of companies such as gym chains and public bodies like the NHS and police to ascertain someone's sex – just after the Supreme Court ruling intended to bring much-needed clarity.
The bill will allow people to prove their identity and facts about themselves by using a new voluntary Government app that is linked to what the bill calls 'digital verification services' (DVS), backed by a government 'trustmark'. It will draw data from a number of sources but the bodies being presented with the app won't be able to tell which documents it is relying on.
That means that if the app states that the user is 'female', that information could, in theory, either be based on the sex stated on their passport or driving licence – which they could have arranged to have changed from their biological sex – or their birth certificate, which cannot be changed.
To worsen matters, says Helen Joyce, of the women's rights charity Sex Matters, under the new system the app will have to be 'treated as more authoritative than any pre-existing record – or the evidence of your own eyes.'
Helen Joyce warns the new legislation will make the gender listed on a Government app more authoritative than any pre-existing record or personal evidence - Jeff Gilbert
In practice, she says, 'if you have a man [seeking] gym membership and he has a digital ID saying he's female, you're going to have to accept that. Currently it's your choice what you would do with a passport with 'F' [for female] on it. It would be difficult to say no to him going into the ladies' changing rooms or toilets, but not impossible.
'But if you've signed up for the 'digital verification services' you will have to accept Government sources as authoritative.'
On Wednesday, the Conservatives attempted to amend the bill so that sex data would be taken solely from birth certificates. The amendment was defeated by 363 votes to 97, meaning the bill will now move onto its final stage – the third reading – before becoming law.
Tory MPs had previously warned that 'inaccurate data entrenched by the Bill' could 'pose a risk' to vulnerable people, but the MP for Walthamstow, Stella Creasy, was among many Labour MPs who criticised the Opposition amendment, calling it 'a targeting of the trans community which is deeply regressive.'
Heather Binning, chief executive of the Women's Rights Network, agrees with the Conservatives' concerns. She says that the new law will essentially introduce gender self-identification – a system which involves the state adopting whichever gender an individual chooses to be known by – 'through the back door'. 'It flies in the face of the Supreme Court ruling,' she says. 'It will be mayhem if it goes thorough as it is. If official documentation says a man is a female with the new system, employers and others will be inclined to accept it. This part of the Bill needs to be scrapped.'
Campaigners celebrate after the Supreme Court ruled that transgender women were not legally women - Reuters
One King's Counsel (KC) specialising in equality law agrees that the digital ID 'is in danger of becoming a de facto gender recognition certificate', which allows individuals to legally change their gender.
For example, it could lead to incorrect medical treatment being provided for a person whose biological sex is recorded inaccurately. One GP explained how she had witnessed a woman who identified as a man receiving an initial diagnosis for an appendectomy, but when the consultant and anaesthetist later saw the patient they decided to ask about her biological sex. Having established that she was a biological woman, the clinicians reassessed her and she was confirmed to have had a gynaecological problem. As such, this lack of correct data could also put trans people at greater risk in a medical emergency. It could also cause a care agency to send a male nurse or care worker who identifies as a woman to provide intimate care to a female patient at home.
'The proposed Data Bill will put disabled people, particularly women, at more risk than they are already,' says Freeman. 'Every instance of a disabled woman being made to feel uncomfortable, or even worse, will be the responsibility of those who voted it through as well as the disability charities who have stayed silent.'
Alice Sullivan, the University College London sociology professor who wrote the Government-commissioned review on errors in the state's handling of data on sex and gender, warns that 'the thing with data is, garbage in, garbage out'.
'This Bill could be a really good opportunity to correct all these problems at source. If they implemented the recommendations of my review they would be correcting the data on the sex variable. Any data that is not reliable simply shouldn't be going into this system, because it will lead to contradictions - people can have different documents saying different things about their sex and you only want correct information.'
The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology declined to comment.
The area this is likely to affect most acutely is healthcare. 'This feels potentially dangerous,' says Elaine Miller, a physiotherapist from Edinburgh and affiliate to ScotPAG, a health group of Scottish professionals advising on gender. 'It already happens that women require single-sex care and because care agencies are short staffed the women get sent a man. If the new rules mean biological men are recorded as women, that's still the same problem. If a woman asks for single-sex care it should be honoured and if a new system makes that more difficult to regulate then that's a new problem. If it's introduced as it is it could take years to fix.'
Many firms and public bodies might welcome the new ID system on the basis it is Government backed and therefore assumed to be trustworthy. But there are fears that some could use it to avoid any problematic decisions about single-sex care for vulnerable or elderly patients.
'There are plenty of areas in which sex matters – it goes far beyond toilets,' says the KC, who asked to remain anonymous. 'Of more concern is intimate care provision for people with disabilities, working in a rape crisis centre – people working in these fields need to know what the sex of the person wanting to work there is. They don't want to know what their gender identity is.
'It's preposterous to argue you can replace data about sex with gender identity. Gender is not a legal category so why would you need to record it? It would only be useful if you wanted to deceive someone about your biological sex and the whole point of having data and having this new ID app is to be able to prove things about yourself.'
Sandie Peggie was suspended from her job as an NHS nurse after objecting to sharing a changing room with a transgender nurse - PA Wire
Healthcare professions say that the recording of sex and gender have already become muddled within the NHS and that the bill is a recipe for worsening the problem. An employment tribunal in Scotland is currently hearing the case of Sandie Peggie, a nurse with 30 years' experience, who was suspended for alleged bullying and harassment after objecting to sharing a female changing room with a doctor who was born a biological man and identifies as a woman.
'The NHS needs to know which of its patients and staff are male and which are female in order to fulfil its public service equality duty,' says Samantha*, a director of service transformation at an NHS trust. 'If the data used for the digital ID is not accurate it drives a coach and horses through public bodies' duty of care. The law says this must be achieved via biological sex, but data sets that don't accurately record sex cut across all that. The same applies to chaperones for intimate care. That's unacceptable and potentially unlawful because the patient did not consent to it. The new ID scheme would make the operation of the NHS really difficult.'
Sally Wood, 57, an NHS therapist from Portsmouth, agrees. 'I work with very vulnerable people, including people with severe brain injuries,' she says. 'I became worried about how staff would present themselves as different to their biological sex because sex segregation is one of the primary forms of safeguarding we have. If we are lying to patients we are breaking our ethical principles. In the NHS they will record the sex as whatever an individual wants.'
The potential ramifications of the bill even extend as far as dating sites, on which it would be possible to create an account with Government-backed verification of a person's sex even though that would be the opposite of their biological sex. Campaigners say this could facilitate 'catfishing' – people online using deception to strike up relationships.
Those familiar with the Bill as it is currently written are concerned it paves the way for a scandal waiting to happen, akin to the SNP's endorsement of trans activism. In Scotland, Isla Bryson, a biologically male transgender rapist, was initially taken to a women's prison, and Nicola Sturgeon drew fierce criticism for refusing to call Bryson a man.
'There will be some kind of equivalent of the Nicola Sturgeon/Isla Bryson scandal where the whole country will go 'How did we get to this?',' says Samantha. 'And the politicians will just be left looking at their shoes. So let's not mess it up in the first place.'
'It will blow up in their faces eventually,' says Sullivan, 'It defeats the whole object if you just accept that some cases will be wrong.'
*Name has been changed
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years
Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years

Public sector employment has surged to the highest level in 14 years as Rachel Reeves prepares to unveil a £300bn spending spree this week. Almost 6.2m people were employed in the public sector in March, official figures show, 35,000 more than a year earlier. This is the highest number of public sector employees since December 2011. The figures from the Office for National Statistics came ahead of Ms Reeves's spending review on Wednesday, which is expected to offer big increases to defence and health while squeezing other departments. The Chancellor has raised departmental spending by nearly £400bn since Labour won the election. It comes as economists have warned more tax rises are 'inevitable' in autumn. The figures from the ONS also show that the number of civil servants is the highest since 2006, at 550,000, rising by 6,000 from a year earlier. This helped to push the total figure of central government workers to a record high of 4m, up by 93,000 from a year ago. The ONS said the rise was driven by the NHS, the Civil Service and some local authority schools becoming academies, which changes how their staff are classified in the numbers. While public sector hiring surged, the jobs downturn across the economy deepened as firms grappled with big tax and minimum wage hikes. The number of vacancies fell from 760,000 on average across February to April to 736,000 for the three months to May. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Hospital parking charges up 108% for consultants
Hospital parking charges up 108% for consultants

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hospital parking charges up 108% for consultants

Consultants and some doctors at a hospital have seen staff parking charges increase by more than 100%, a union says. Price rises accompanied the introduction of automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) at James Cook University Hospital in Middlesbrough. A University Hospitals Tees (UHT) spokesperson confirmed £1.8m would be invested in car park improvements over the coming year. The British Medical Association (BMA) has described the new charges as "shocking and unacceptable". Some members of staff on lower salaries would see a decrease in charges but consultants would pay a tariff for a dedicated car park for them, said the UHT. The BMA has said charges for consultants at the hospital have gone up by 108%, with some doctors on specific shift patterns seeing increases in excess of 125%. The price changes will bring the South Tees hospitals in line with the policy of the North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Trust, which has had varied prices for staff over the last 10 years. Dr Andy Thornley, representing the BMA, said: "Charging staff who are just trying to come to work to care for patients at the hospital to make financial gains for a struggling trust is wrong. "Worse still is the unfair charges that patients and their visitors are being forced to pay, with no choice in order to access the hospital. "This is just the latest in what can only be described as chaotic implementation of new parking measures at the hospital, impacting not only consultants but also resident doctors who are still unsure what the new charges will mean for them. "We want assurances that staff who are members of the parking scheme will not be fined additional charges for simply coming to work to care for patients." A UNISON spokesperson reinforced this message, stating that imposing higher parking charges on NHS staff and patients "shows a shocking lack of understanding" of the financial struggle many are facing. The trust has said it is the first increase in two years and that any surplus funds will be diverted into patient care. A spokesperson said: "We understand the price rise is not welcome news, but we have kept the increase as low as possible. "We would like to reassure all our patients and visitors that the income from car parking is used to maintain our car parks including the costs of repairs and maintenance, lighting, gritting and security, all of which helps us to retain our 'Park Mark' Safer Parking Scheme accreditation. "This coming year will see us invest £1.8m in improvements to our car parking." Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Hospital parking charges rise 'necessary' Hospital parking charges to increase Hospital staff protest over planned parking change The James Cook University Hospital

Cumbria Chamber urges Government to back business growth in spending review
Cumbria Chamber urges Government to back business growth in spending review

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Cumbria Chamber urges Government to back business growth in spending review

Fresh calls have been made for the Government to prioritise business growth ahead. Cumbria Chamber of Commerce has joined the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) and chambers across the UK to urge the Government to put business growth at the centre of its spending plans. The call comes ahead of Wednesday's Comprehensive Spending Review, which will set out the Government's budget priorities. Suzanne Caldwell, managing director of Cumbria Chamber of Commerce, said: "Wednesday's Comprehensive Spending Review will impact the future shape of our economy for years. "So the Government can't afford to get this wrong. "At the end of the day it's businesses that create wealth and growth in our economy. "So fundamentally the Government needs to put more time, money and effort into supporting business. "That's a downpayment on our future prosperity." The chambers have outlined a series of recommendations under three themes: Get Britain Thriving, Get Britain Working, and Get Britain Trading. These calls focus on improved investment in infrastructure, people, and international trade. Recommendations include funding for transport and energy projects, better grid connectivity, long-term support for Project Gigabit, and practical help for SMEs to adopt artificial intelligence (AI). When it comes to getting Britain working, the chambers want more Apprenticeship Levy funding redirected to the Department for Education to boost training, and a broader Youth Guarantee for 18- to 24-year-olds. The chambers want more employers to be involved in skills planning by extending investment in Local Skills Improvement Plans and addressing gaps in training provision. On trade, the chambers are calling for investment in 'digital trade', better export support for SMEs, and a stronger pipeline of overseas investment. The recommendations were developed through consultation between the 51 chambers across the UK, the BCC, and the BCC's Business Council. They are also backed by research from the BCC's Insights Unit, which gathered feedback from more than 5,000 businesses on the biggest barriers to growth. Ms Caldwell said: "If the Government wants strong and consistent economic growth, it has to look at three key areas. "It must promote consistent investment in people, in infrastructure and in trade. "If it provides the support businesses need to thrive, in an increasingly competitive and protectionist global market, then the future can still be bright."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store