OPINION: Proteas captain Temba Bavuma has silenced his critics
The SA team have not lost a Test with Bavuma leading the side.
Temba Bavuma has always been lauded by his teammates for his leadership skills and he clearly brings more value to the squad than his performances as a top-order batter.
He has been repeatedly criticised by the public and the media, however, for not standing up when the national team needed the skipper most, particularly at the 2023 one-day World Cup in India (where South Africa reached the semifinals) after he scored just 122 runs in six matches at an average of 20.33.
In the Test format, however, he has shone as captain of the side.
In a total of 64 career Test matches, Bavuma has contributed 3 709 runs at an average of 38.22. As captain, he has racked up 911 runs in 10 matches at an average of 56.93.
Unbeaten run as skipper
Even more impressive is that the Proteas have gone unbeaten in all 10 of those games, winning nine and drawing one.
Though he was dismissed for two ducks in his first Test as captain against West Indies in Centurion in February 2023, Bavuma has since been a key member of the squad, hitting three centuries and five half-centuries.
In addition, the Proteas have won their last eight games on the trot (though Bavuma missed two of those fixtures against Bangladesh due to an elbow injury) on four different continents.
And while the national team were criticised for facing weaker opposition than other sides in qualifying for the World Test Championship final, Bavuma felt his squad had proved they deserved their spot by beating Australia by five wickets last week to lift the trophy.
'It feels worth it'
Despite all the criticism, the skipper said it had all been worthwhile after leading the national team to a historic title.
'It's not easy being captain of South Africa, and all the sacrifices, all the disappointment, in this moment it feels worth it,' he said.
Though he hasn't always been great, Bavuma's efforts both with the bat and as captain of the Test side over the last couple of years have ensured he will go down as a legend of the South African game.
And regardless of what else he achieves in his career, all the praise will be well deserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
37 minutes ago
- The South African
REVEALED: How Kaizer Chiefs have learned from their Billiat mistake
Kaizer Chiefs learned some hard lessons when they signed Khama Billiat to a massive contract, during which the Zimbabwean star failed to deliver. Billiat took home one of the biggest salaries in South Africa. He only scored 24 goals in 126 appearances for Amakhosi. Now, Chiefs are seemingly unwilling to make the same mistake with Percy Tau. FIVE Chiefs players are leaving the club The Glamour Boys aren't willing to hand another massive contract to a player over the age of 30. Percy Tau, now 31, is being fervently linked with a return to South Africa. 'The team feels that apparently they believe they have learnt a lesson from the signing of Khama Billiat and Keagan Dolly,' an inside source explained. 'They paid a lot of money, but the club believes those returns were not worth it. So that's why they are looking at other forward players apart from Percy Tau. So, for now, he is not one of the targets. But in football, you never know what will happen in future. But definitely not now.' REVEALED: Why Chiefs won't be signing Percy Tau Percy Tau during his short stint with Qatar SC. Images: percytau22/Instagram Speaking to Soccer Laduma , Mokeke Tsotsetsi has called for Given Msimango to get more minutes under Nasreddine Nabi. He only made 10 appearances across all competitions in 2024-2025. That's in stark contrast with prior campaigns where he made 30 and 26 appearances in the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 league campaigns, respectively. With Rushwin Dortley still on the long road to recovery after knee surgery, Chiefs will need Msimango at the start of 2025-2026. Click for the story Should Chiefs steer clear of Percy Tau? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Club World Cup exposes growing gap in global football
The matches have, for the most part, lacked intensity and quality, and the imbalance in standards is evident. The FIFA Club World Cup trophy on display in Dortmund, Germany, 20 April 2025. EPA/CHRISTOPHER NEUNDORF CONDITIONS – ATTENTION: The DFL regulations prohibit any use of photographs as image sequences and/or quasi-video. The idea to expand the FIFA Club World Cup to 32 teams may have been noble, but the early signs suggest the tournament is doing little to enhance football's status as a global spectacle. With 32 teams now involved, the competition has taken on the feel of the Olympic Games. It is more about participation than genuine competitiveness. ALSO READ: Empty seats as Chelsea win opener at Club World Cup While the idea of giving clubs from less prominent footballing nations a shot on the world stage is commendable, the reality has exposed the huge gap between football's elite and the rest of the world. The tournament was meant to promote inclusion and global growth, but it has instead laid bare the glaring inequalities. So far, the quality of football has also been underwhelming and for purists of the game, this is disappointing. Bayern Munich's 10-0 demolition of Auckland City was not only humiliating but a brutal reminder of the gulf in class. That kind of scoreline should not exist at a world cup level. The matches have, for the most part, lacked intensity and quality, and the imbalance in standards is evident. Even as someone who expected mismatches, Bayern's dismantling of Auckland felt excessive. It was more like a pre-season friendly than a world championship encounter. FIFA's ambitions to grow the game in America ahead of the 2026 World Cup are also being tested. Attendance so far has been poor, and if this is meant to be a dress rehearsal, there's still much work to do. That said, there's still hope that the knockout stages will deliver more drama and competitiveness. That's where we might finally get high-level football this tournament is supposed to showcase. It would be refreshing to see a smaller club make a deep run into the latter part of the competition, but realistically, I think the heavyweights will dominate. Until then, this edition feels less like a festival of champions and more like a reminder of the game's uneven playing field. ALSO READ: Sundowns' Modiba anticipates a tough test from Ulsan in CWC opener The tournament has so far resembled a soft launch rather than the blockbuster spectacle it was billed to be. There's little evidence that it has truly captured the imagination of football fans around the globe.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
URC report card: How South Africa's franchises fared in 2024
It was a fairly solid showing for most of South Africa's franchises as three of them reached the URC knockouts, and kept their final appearance run going. The Bulls go over for a try during the URC final against Leinster at Croke Park in Dublin over the past weekend. Picture: Seb Daly/Gallo Images The fourth edition of the United Rugby Championship (URC) came to a conclusion last weekend when Irish giants, Leinster, outplayed Highveld juggernauts, the Bulls, in the Grand Final at Croke Park in Dublin, to lift the trophy for the first time. It has been a relatively successful four seasons in the URC for South African teams, with them being represented in every single final, while the Stormers won the inaugural edition, but the Bulls will be distraught having now lost in three finals. Overall it was a decent past campaign for the South African sides, with three making the competition knockouts, two making it to the semis and the Bulls playing in the final. Here is our report card on each team: Bulls: 8 out of 10 It was an impressive season for the Bulls, with them undoubtedly the strongest SA team in the competition. A superb pool phase saw them finish second on the log with 14 wins and four losses, while they only lost once against foreign opposition in pool play, by a solitary point away against Scarlets in Wales. Their one blip was their struggles against local sides, losing twice, home and away, to the Sharks while they were also beaten by the Stormers in Pretoria, and escaped from Cape Town with a single point win thanks to a late missed conversion from the hosts. But they bounced back from that by clinching a solid semifinal win over the Sharks to reach the final. The Bulls could have received a 9 out of 10 if it wasn't for their effort in the final, as their poor mistake-riddled performance, particularly in the first half, was very unfortunate and allowed the hosts to cruise to the title without much trouble. Sharks: 6.5 out of 10 It is hard not to feel underwhelmed when you look at the talent that the Sharks have at their disposal and compare it to their results. Even with a plethora of Springbok World Cup winners in the mix, it was not a surprise when they were unable to make the final. On paper they should arguably only be second to Leinster in the URC. Obviously due to international commitments and resting protocols the Sharks do have to do without their star players at various stages of the season, but it is when those star players are available and they still underperform that it becomes disappointing. Despite all of that the Sharks did still enjoy their best season in the URC to date. They finished third on the log with 13 wins and five losses, hosted a quarterfinal for the first time, which they won in an historic and dramatic penalty shootout, and made it to their first ever URC semifinal. But with the star power in their ranks, which they continue to bolster every season, it is hard to not expect more from them. Stormers: 6 out of 10 It was another tough season for the Stormers as they struggled with injuries and depth, while stalwart Steven Kitshoff was forced into an early retirement. It was also a Jekyll and Hyde campaign, with the Cape side starting off poorly, but finishing off strongly, although they saved arguably their worst game of the season for the playoffs. After 11 games the Stormers were languishing in the bottom half of the log, with four wins against seven losses, putting them in a massive scrap for the top eight. But a superb finish to the pool phase, which saw them win six of their last seven games, lifted them up the table to finish comfortably fifth and send them over to Glasgow for a second consecutive season for their quarterfinal. Despite them being full of confidence due to their top form and Glasgow going into the quarterfinal off the back of three straight pool defeats it was the defending champions and hosts who turned up for the knockout game and powered to an impressive win, which ended the Stormers' season on a very low note. Lions: 2 out of 10 It isn't unfair to call the Lions season an unmitigated disaster, after they failed to reach the competition knockouts for the fourth consecutive season. Although they don't have the depth or star power of the other South African franchises, the Lions had a solid mix of exciting youngsters and experienced veterans in their ranks and were expected to qualify for the playoffs. In fact Lions coach Ivan van Rooyen was so confident of his team's ability that he made the bold declaration that his team were targeting a place in the URC top four come the end of the season. And that might have been the problem. Instead of trying to break into the top eight, which they had never managed to do before, they were arguably aiming too high. The Lions did start brilliantly though, winning their opening four matches of the competition which saw them sitting pretty near the top of the log, but that was as good as it got for their Lions as just four wins against 10 losses in their next 14 games tells the story of their season. Late season home defeats against Benetton and Scarlets, with their season and playoff hopes on the line, were hugely disappointing.
