Belfast: Consultants called to resolve street 'optical illusion'
Stormont officials have commissioned consultants to help address an "optical illusion" along a Belfast footpath that has caused pedestrians to trip and fall.The kerb on Castle Place in the city centre has been blocked off with a temporary barrier for more than two years.Businesses and politicians have branded it an "eyesore" and expressed frustration at delays in finding a permanent solution.Consultancy fees for the project were £11,021 in 2023-24, the Department of Infrastructure (DFI) said in response to a Freedom of Information request.It also said it was "progressing" plans and would be "engaging with key stakeholders to discuss design proposals".
The streetscape was changed in recent years to add a cycle lane as part of a £52,000 scheme involving the city council and DfI.But concerns emerged that the drop between the edge of the pavement and the cycle lane was difficult for some people to see.A temporary barrier was placed along the kerb in January 2023 after an elderly woman suffered facial injuries in a fall.
Roads officials said an "optical illusion appeared to have been created when the footway was extended next to the cycle lane"."This resulted in members of the public falling and injuring themselves," they said in correspondence seen by BBC News NI.DfI commissioned consultants to draw up proposals to redevelop the streetscape and resolve the issues.
'No clear resolution'
Property manager Adam Goligher, from Little Feather Management, described the temporary barrier as "such an eyesore"."It's a 100m-long reflective orange barrier. It doesn't look nice, and it should be an easy fix," he said.He said they have put "on hold" plans to install new lighting at nearby Castle Buildings as a result."Investing in enhancements feels less effective when such a prominent temporary structure remains in place," he said."We encourage the department to engage with local businesses and work towards a prompt resolution, as this issue impacts the overall efforts to improve the area."
Belfast councillor Gary McKeown, of the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP), said there has been a "complete lack of urgency"."It's unbelievable that after two years and over £11,000 of public money being splashed out by the Department for Infrastructure to get some ideas about what to do, still we are stuck with big orange plastic barriers in the heart of our city centre," he said.
The councillor added that with efforts to encourage people into the city centre, it was "not acceptable that this location still looks like a building site"."It's an absolute mess, especially when there's wind and the barriers collapse like dominos, creating even more risk," he added.In a statement a DfI spokeswoman said: "The department placed temporary barriers at this location in response to concerns over pedestrian and cyclist safety."We are currently progressing plans to enable a permanent cycle lane to be installed at this location and will be engaging with key stakeholders to discuss design proposals."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Council secrecy over Christmas events casts a shadow
Edinburgh's Christmas Market and Hogmanay celebrations have never been far from controversy. Yet again concerns are bubbling away over procurement rules and the council's ability to recover funds from operators. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... At last month's full council my Conservative colleague Phil Doggart asked the council leader a simple question. He prefaced it by indicating he had been asking officers similar questions for six weeks without an answer. Phil said: 'Can the council leader confirm that Unique Assembly has complied with all the terms of the winter festivals contract and is not in breach of any terms of the contract, and the council has received all monies due to it.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The council leader read a prepared statement that didn't answer the question, deflected onto the cancellation of events because of weather and puffed up the benefit of the winter and summer festivals. What she did say was that work was ongoing and reporting would go to two council committees. She then used the pretext of allowing local companies who are suppliers to the contractor to be reimbursed first. The second committee met yesterday with the only reporting being a short cryptic reference to the committee having 'received correspondence' and that a legal review of issues raised was under way. Equally cryptic was the noting of the response to two Freedom of Information requests which seem to admit the funds due have not been paid. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Councillors clearly aren't happy with the secrecy as another political party added to the tension by lodging an amendment calling for a lot more information to be released to councillors, even if this must happen in private. Loved by many and loathed by others, the market's use of public space by private operators for profit causes a public debate. Reinstatement of public areas causes annoyance. Seeming flouting of planning rules has, in the past, led to allegations of preferential treatment. There is then the issue of whether this helps all year-round local businesses who pay rates and property costs by bringing footfall. Or whether it draws business away to short term market operators imported from elsewhere. Given this, you would think the council would be making sure that the procurement of these events was squeaky clean. Yet the correspondence seems to be linked to other potential operators who failed to get the contract. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If the council wants the controversy to go away it will have to openly show it is acting in the best interests of the taxpayer and local businesses and has complied with all the legal rules. The disinfectant of sunlight is required here but watch this space as it may take some time.
Wales Online
2 days ago
- Wales Online
Rachel Reeves pledges millions to help make Wales' coal tips safe
Rachel Reeves pledges millions to help make Wales' coal tips safe The total cost of repairing coal tips in Wales is currently estimated to be more than £500m The site of the Tylorstown landslide in February 2020 (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) The UK Government has said it will give more money to help make Wales' coal tips safe. After months of requests from Welsh Government, an additional £118m of money to help with repairing the legacy of coal tips in Wales has been pledged. There had already been a pledge for £25m in the autumn by chancellor Rachel Reeves, but today she announced £118m over the three years of this spending review period. The total cost of repairing coal tips in Wales is currently estimated to be more than £500m. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here In an answer to the Freedom of Information request about coal tips in January this year, the Welsh Government said the previously quoted sum of £500-600m to deliver all the repairs needed was being reassessed. The explanation given was: "It is important to note that the range of £500-£600m was a provisional estimate based on the limited information available at the time, following the impact of Storm Dennis. "Since the initial estimated figure was produced, Welsh Government has done a considerable amount of work mapping recorded coal tips. The categorisation of these tips has also evolved in this timeframe as intelligence has been gained through the ongoing tip inspection and maintenance regime. Article continues below "With an improved information base now available an up-to-date figure for the total cost of managing Wales' coal tips is currently being worked through. Welsh Government will publicise the updated figure in due course, once it has been calculated." A spokesperson confirmed today that no revised figure is yet available. The UK Government has now committed £25m in the autumn budget and £118m over this three-year spending review period. The Welsh Government has given £44.4 million in capital funding for coal tip maintenance between 2022 and 2024. and £34m to 10 impacted councils and Natural Resources Wales. Adding together the UK and Welsh Government money, the total is currently £221m. Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan however explained that the amount pledged by the UK Government was the maximum they had asked for from their UK Labour counterparts. "That is particularly good because we got every penny we asked for in relation to coal tips. You've got to be able to absorb this money in the time frame, have people to do the work, and they've really come up with the goods," she said. Article continues below Mrs Morgan said they had assessed the expertise and resources available which would avoid overcommitting and potentially having to return money. Earlier in the day, representatives from three Welsh councils said there will more than likely never be enough funding for the risk posed by disused coal tips in Wales to be taken away. They told the Commons' Welsh affairs committee that funding will only "scratch the surface" of the problem.
Glasgow Times
3 days ago
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow faces higher inheritance tax bills in coming years
A report by Wright, Johnston & Mackenzie and Irwin Mitchell predicts a 29% increase in liable estates, growing from 210 in 2015/16 to approximately 270 by the end of 2026/27. The city's IHT liability is forecast to more than double, from £32 million to £69 million. Roddy Harrison, a private client partner at Wright, Johnston & Mackenzie in Edinburgh (Image: Supplied) The average IHT bill per estate in Glasgow could reach £253,000, which is above the Scottish average of £211,000. The report's findings are based on a Freedom of Information request to HMRC, forming part of a broader analysis covering 177,000 estates across 121 UK postcode areas. Read more: 'Established' & popular retailer announces closure of Glasgow Fort store Greggs store closes temporarily - here's why Popular Grammy-award-winning singer announces Glasgow gig Across the whole of Scotland, the total number of IHT-liable estates is projected to reach 1,800 by the end of 2026/27, with a combined tax liability of £389 million. Roddy Harrison, a private client partner at Wright, Johnston & Mackenzie in Edinburgh, said: "These figures show that families in Edinburgh and Glasgow are increasingly being drawn into the inheritance tax net. "With liabilities rising sharply and average bills now well above the Scottish average, it's vital that individuals seek tailored advice. "At Wright, Johnston & Mackenzie, we're helping more clients navigate these changes and protect their estates for future generations." From April 6, 2026, significant reforms to Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR) will take effect. Full 100% relief will be capped at £1 million for combined qualifying assets, with amounts above this threshold receiving only 50 per cent relief. AIM-listed shares will also see reduced BPR eligibility. The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that 130 estates will be impacted by APR changes and 1,440 by BPR, generating an additional £200 million in tax revenue in 2026/27. The analysis reflects a broader trend throughout Scotland, where rising property values and frozen thresholds are pushing more families into the IHT net.
