NCP demands stern action against Abu Azmi's ‘wari‘ remark
The Nationalist Congress Party's (NCP) Chief Spokesperson Anand Paranjpe on Monday (June 23, 2025) slammed Maharashtra Samajwadi Party president Abu Azmi for his remarks over 'wari', the foot march by devotees of Lord Vitthal to the temple town of Pandharpur and demanded stringent action against him.
Speaking to journalists on Monday, Mr. Paranjpe said, 'Abu Azmi has become a toxic element in Maharashtra, repeatedly making inflammatory statements to disrupt communal harmony. The government must act decisively against him.'
On Sunday, Mr. Azmi said that Muslims have never complained about 'wari', though some leaders like Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath keep opposing namaz on the streets. 'I was coming from Pune and was told to leave early as the roads will be blocked for wari towards Pandharpur. But we (Muslims) have never complained (about it). Muslims and Hindus walk shoulder to shoulder like brothers. But deliberate attempts are made to create a divide. There are times when mosques are full during prayers so people offer namaz on the roads, which take 5-10 minutes, but the UP CM says those who indulge in such acts will lose their passports and driving licences. Muslims have never asked why festivals are celebrated on the roads.'
Since Sunday, his remark has drawn criticism from the ruling Mahayuti coalition in the State.
Mr. Paranjpe said that Azmi needs to be reminded that Ashadhi Wadi is a 800-year-old spiritual, religious and cultural tradition and pilgrimage of Maharashtra. 'The palkhis of Sant Dnyaneshwar and Sant Tukaram start from Alandi and Dehu, and lakhs of Warkaris walk to Pandharpur to seek Lord Vitthal's darshan. Several Muslim brothers also participate in this Wari and offer their services. Azmi repeatedly uses Hindu-Muslim politics to divide people. His words incite tension, and such behaviour should not be tolerated,' he said.
Maharashtra Ports Minister and BJP leader Nitesh Rane warned Mr. Azmi and said, 'These people criticise Mahakumbh and 'wari', but these processions don't happen all year round. Should we raise questions about the Hajj pilgrimage? No one should dare to speak about Hindu culture and festivals.'
On Sunday, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said that political leaders like Azmi seek publicity by making controversial statements. 'Azmi is known to make controversial remarks to get publicity. I don't give any importance to this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
4 held for blast at TMC's Kaliganj 'victory parade': Bomb killed 9-year-old; political tensions surge
NADIA: The Krishnanagar police have arrested four people in connection with the bomb blast that claimed the life of a minor girl in Molandi, Borochandghar under the Kaliganj police station limits, officials said on Tuesday. The arrested have been identified as Adar Sk, Manowar Sk, Kalu Sk, and Anwar Sk, police confirmed. "In incident of explosion at Molandi, Borochandghar under Kaliganj police station area, which led to death of a minor girl, 4 prime accused persons were arrested yesterday- Adar Sk, Manowar Sk, Kalu Sk and Anwar Sk. Kaliganj PS Case No. 534/25 dt 23.06.25 u/s 191(2)/191(3)/190/118(2)/109/305/103 BNS & 3/4 ES Act is registered. Investigation and legal proceedings are underway," said the police in a post on X. The incident has sparked widespread political condemnation. Earlier on Monday, Union minister Sukanta Majumdar launched a scathing attack on the Trinamool Congress (TMC)-led West Bengal government following the death of a minor girl in a bomb blast during post-poll celebrations. Calling the incident a sign of deteriorating law and order, Majumdar remarked, 'There is no democracy left here.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Paras Sector 59 Gurgaon | Luxury Awaits at Paras Floret Birla Book Now Undo The blast occurred during victory celebrations after TMC candidate Alifa Ahmed won the Kaliganj Assembly bypoll. During the festivities, a bomb reportedly exploded, critically injuring a 13-year-old girl, who later succumbed to her injuries. Majumdar accused TMC workers of 'hurling bombs' at Communist Party of India (Marxist) supporters amid the celebrations. West Bengal Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari also condemned the incident, alleging that a TMC supporter 'dropped a bomb' at a CPI(M)-backed residence in an effort to make the 'Muslim booth free of opposition.' The Congress party joined the chorus of condemnation, staging protests across the state. State Congress President Subhankar Sarkar called the incident a 'blot on the history of West Bengal elections,' demanding strict action against those responsible. "What we saw today was a blot on the history of West Bengal assembly elections. By-elections were held throughout the country, but we saw no bloodshed anywhere else," Sarkar said during the protest. The National Commission for Women (NCW) has taken suo motu cognisance of the Kaliganj bomb blast incident that claimed the life of a minor girl. According to NCW member Archana Majumdar, the commission has asked the police to submit a detailed report within two days. Earlier, West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee expressed shock over the incident and directed law enforcement authorities to take "strong and decisive legal action" against those responsible. Mamata Banerjee wrote on X, "I am shocked and deeply saddened at the death of a young girl in an explosion at Barochandgar in Krishnanagar police district. My prayers and thoughts are with the family in their hour of grief. Police shall take strong and decisive legal action against the culprits at the earliest."
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
India Strongly Refutes Islamic Organization's Comments On Domestic Affairs
India delivered a sharp diplomatic rebuke on Monday in response to criticism from the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, dismissing the Islamic bloc's comments as baseless and politically motivated. The strong reaction followed a two-day foreign ministerial gathering in Turkey where the OIC raised concerns about various Indian policies. The Ministry of External Affairs issued a comprehensive statement rejecting what it characterized as "unwarranted and factually incorrect" references made during the OIC council meeting. New Delhi particularly took exception to the organization's commentary on the treatment of Muslims within India and other domestic matters. According to Indian officials, the OIC's criticism stemmed from what they described as Pakistan's influence over the organization's agenda. The ministry accused Pakistan of systematically weaponizing terrorism as a tool of statecraft while simultaneously manipulating international forums to advance its political objectives against India. During the Istanbul conclave, the Islamic organization had expressed concerns about what it termed the social marginalization of Indian Muslims and called for adherence to existing bilateral agreements between India and Pakistan, including the Indus Waters Treaty. The bloc also advocated for comprehensive dialogue to resolve outstanding disputes between the neighboring nations. India's foreign ministry responded by asserting that the OIC lacked the authority to comment on India's internal affairs, particularly regarding Jammu and Kashmir. Officials emphasized that Kashmir constitutes an integral and sovereign part of India, a status they described as constitutionally enshrined and permanently settled. The Indian government specifically addressed Pakistan's allegations regarding recent military operations, defending Operation Sindoor as a legitimate act of self-defense. The ministry characterized the operation as a precise response to terrorist attacks launched from Pakistani territory, particularly referencing the Pahalgam incident that resulted in significant casualties. New Delhi highlighted what it described as the irony of Pakistan raising concerns about counter-terrorism measures, given what India characterized as Pakistan's history of harboring and supporting terrorist organizations. The ministry pointed to Pakistan's track record on human rights and minority protection as undermining its credibility to criticize other nations. The statement also addressed Pakistan's claims about targeting military installations, noting that Pakistan's retaliatory attempts had failed while endangering civilian populations and resulting in civilian casualties. This response aimed to counter narratives about proportionality and precision in military operations. Indian officials expressed frustration with what they perceived as the OIC's consistent failure to acknowledge documented threats posed by terrorism originating from Pakistani territory. They argued that this selective approach reflected a willful disregard for factual evidence, particularly in light of recent terrorist incidents. The ministry warned that allowing Pakistan's influence to shape the OIC's agenda could undermine the organization's credibility and international relevance. This cautionary message appeared designed to encourage other OIC members to consider the implications of Pakistan's role in shaping the bloc's positions. India's response emphasized its rejection of what it termed Pakistan's "baseless allegations" regarding unprovoked military aggression. The government maintained that its operations were defensive in nature and targeted specific terrorist infrastructure rather than constituting broader military campaigns. The diplomatic exchange reflects ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan, with both nations continuing to use international forums to present their respective narratives. The OIC's position demonstrates the continued relevance of Islamic solidarity in shaping organizational stances on conflicts involving Muslim populations. New Delhi's firm response indicates its unwillingness to accept international criticism of domestic policies, particularly when such criticism is perceived as being influenced by adversarial nations. The statement reinforces India's position that external organizations should not interfere in what it considers internal constitutional matters. The incident highlights the complex dynamics of multilateral diplomacy, where regional conflicts often play out in international forums through competing narratives and influence campaigns. Both India and Pakistan continue to seek validation for their positions through engagement with various international organizations and their member states.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Ex-Union Minister Anantkumar Hegde booked in Karnataka
Senior BJP leader and former Union Minister Anantkumar Hegde has been booked for allegedly assaulting a family, including an elderly woman, and using communal slurs in Karnataka, police said on Tuesday. The Deputy Superintendent of Police has questioned Hegde. According to police sources, Hegde responded by stating that the incident occurred after the complainant's car touched his vehicle while overtaking. Hegde claimed that although he was present in the vehicle, he did not assault the complainant or his family. The FIR has been registered against Hegde by the Dobbaspet police under Sections 117(2) (voluntarily causing grievous hurt), 126(2) (wrongful restraint), 74 (assault or criminal force against a woman), 351(3) (criminal intimidation), and 352(3)(5) (intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of peace) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act. The incident reportedly occurred on Monday night on the Bengaluru–Pune National Highway (NH-48) near Shuttaria College in Halenijagal, Sompura Hobli, Bengaluru district. The FIR was filed based on a complaint by Saif Khan, a businessman from Halenahalli in Nelamangala town. Hegde is named as the first accused in the FIR. His gunman is listed as the second accused, the vehicle driver as the third, and an unidentified individual as the fourth accused. According to the FIR, Khan was travelling in a car with three members of his family, including his mother, on the way to a wedding. Another vehicle overtook them, and one of the occupants later signalled Khan to stop, claiming to be from the department, the complainant said. "When Khan stopped the vehicle, a man claiming to be a gunman allegedly punched him in the face and body. Another person allegedly dragged Salman Khan, who sat next to him, out of the car and hit him on the face, knocking out three of his teeth," it said. "Then another person came out of the vehicle, and upon seeing us, said, 'They are Muslims', and began assaulting us. I recognised him as former MP Anantkumar Hegde. When he arrived, the other three surrounded our vehicle. When I asked why they were attacking my family, Anantkumar Hegde used abusive language and communal slurs, grabbed my mother by the neck, dragged her by her clothes, hit her with his hands, and she fell to the ground," the complainant said. "The gunman then flashed a pistol and threatened to shoot us. Anantkumar Hegde also punched my father-in-law, breaking two of his teeth," the complainant said. BJP MLA from Tumakuru Rural, Suresh Gowda, also rushed to the spot. MLA Gowda said, "Hegde, who has served five terms as MP from Karwar Lok Sabha constituency, was travelling from Hubballi to Bengaluru. The complainant was driving rashly and negligently. Later, Hegde asked them to drive carefully. At that point, a confrontation took place, and they tried to attack him. The gunmen intervened to prevent this. I have spoken with the Muslim family involved." "I told them that such incidents of road rage are common while travelling, and that politics should not be dragged into this. I urged them to resolve the issue through dialogue. But local leaders seem to be politicising the matter. The Congress government always indulges in appeasement politics. We suspected that they might arrest Anantkumar Hegde. A conspiracy is underway," MLA Gowda alleged. Meanwhile, the complainant's family and relatives staged a protest over the delay in arresting Hegde.
