
Race and politics distract us from the issue of inequality
The black middle class in South Africa has grown, but much of the inequality in the country remains the same. (File photo)
In a recent conversation on the
It sparked the question of whether South Africa is having a class struggle framed as a race one. Exploring the idea of deception and false victories, requires unpacking how the issue might be incorrectly diagnosed.
One apparent fact in South Africa is that the memory of apartheid is disappearing for many in the new generation — Born Frees — who only know the country as a democracy in the hands of the ANC.
Nelson Mandela is transformed into a myth, taught to young children, a man with a greater dream and vision for South Africa — derailed by ANC factionalism, corruption and state capture. The feel-good moments of hosting the 2010 Soccer World Cup and embodying the Rainbow Nation have been shut out.
The question is: what has become of South Africa?
So-called radical politics returned, initially in the form of Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema, claiming to want to transform the economy and return the wealth of this country to the black majority — a narrative that intertwined race and the economy in ways the ANC had done before.
But what has become known as black economic empowerment (BEE) and broad-based black economic empowerment, is seen to uplift only an elite few. It is a recognition of the potential stagnation of policies many had believed in during the ANC's early years in government. Second, it highlighted South Africa's inability to shake off inequality.
Looking forward to the current state of politics, uMkhonto weSizwe party, led by former president and member of the ANC, Jacob Zuma, has styled itself as a strongly 'black party', aiming to unite black 'leftist' forces in the country.
It wanted many of the same things as the EFF — nationalisation and pushing for the abolishment of the Constitution and the implementation of a constitution without codified law, according to their manifesto.
The aim was to end the system as a whole, as well as implement the same expropriation aims introduced by the EFF.
Have these parties muddled the lies of capital and race? At the core of the fight for South Africa, and the question of how to move forward after 30 years of liberation, it raises the question: has race been the distraction the whole time?
It is important to highlight that 1994 marked liberation and victory for the ANC. The next task was to govern. Walking with the legacy of Mandela and the power of liberation in South Africa, governance and economic management fell to the wayside.
With the implementation of the Growth, Employment and Redistribution policy and BEE in the Mbeki administration, questions were being raised about ways to redress inequality. With a slow system of wealth transfer, it was expanded to broad-based BEE, further widening the social net for beneficiaries and participation in South Africa.
The black middle class in South Africa grew but much of the inequality in the country remains the same. Particularly looking at recent data — two ANC presidents after the policies were at the peak of their effectiveness — while black people have outnumbered white people in the richest 10% of the population for about seven years, the gap between South Africa's richest and poorest hasn't narrowed.
The decline in racial inequality has been driven almost entirely by a surge in top incomes by black people, rather than increased wealth for the poorest, according to World Inequality Lab data. BEE, according to estimates, benefits about 15% of the black population in South Africa — a small group. Although progress, is it progress enough?
Even exploring the land transfers since 1994, academics Wandile Sihlobo and Johann Kirsten, both experts on agriculture, have estimated that about 20% of freehold farmland owned by white farmers in 1994 has passed into black hands, either through government programmes or private purchases. This shows progress, yet not at the rate other constituents would deem necessary.
What is true is that progress has been made in South Africa and that there are black South Africans occupying top management positions. There are many who are beneficiaries of BEE schemes but the systemic inequality in South Africa remains the same. Instead of it being a class issue, it has become a race and political issue.
Politicians disagreed about the mechanism and speed at which transformation was to take place in the country. No different from the Azanian People's Organisation and the Pan Africanist Congress pre-1994, which argued for reclamation of the land in many of the same ways that are spoken about now.
The messaging has been lost in claims and attacks on white capital, arguments over struggle anthems and disagreement about legislation deemed to be race-based, distracting from the core issue — South Africa is an unequal country.
Holding the highest Gini coefficient in the world at 0.67, and with unemployment standing at 32.9%, it is apparent that there is a drastic need for a solution. There is no forgetting human suffering.
Everyone is quick to cite the Covid-19 pandemic, but quick to forget the shared humanity that was needed to carry a world that was lost, confused and frightened through this dark time. South Africans cannot be oblivious to our growing problem.
Soon, politicians face the need for pragmatic solutions. Personal politics undermines the problem on the ground. Similarly, the fights in the government — through legal disagreements and calculated use of the media — continue to throw the country into disillusionment. Politicians fight over a shrinking economy and hone in on race politics and the history of the past; they get distracted. They over-explain themselves time and time again without offering solutions.
The issue in South Africa is silently growing under the noise of political infighting and politicians competing for airtime. South Africa's problem lies in the fact that liberation might have been announced but the inequality has gone unaddressed.
Remember Morrison's words: 'The very serious function of racism is distraction. It keeps you from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and over again, your reason for being.'
Suddenly, race in South Africa seems more prevalent than ever. What work is being done?
Khumo Kumalo is the founder of the website Misunderstood, which unpacks social, identity and economic issues in South Africa, and a student at Morehouse College, studying political science. He is the host of the Born Free podcast. He is also a
Mail & Guardian
200 Young
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Joburg Mayor Dada Morero survives no-confidence motion
JOHANNESBURG - Johannesburg Mayor and African National Congress (ANC) councillor Dada Morero lives to see another day in office, after a motion of no confidence against him failed to pass. Councillors voted on the Democratic Alliance's (DA) motion on Wednesday, with a majority backing Morero to stay put. The DA had tabled the motion, accusing the mayor of failing to address service delivery challenges in the city. Morero secured backing from the majority of parties in council, most of whom are part of the ANC-led coalition government. Council Speaker and ActionSA councillor Nobuhle Mthembu announced the results. "The results are as follows: forty-three councillors abstained. Seventy-five voted in support of the motion and 144 voted against it. Therefore, the motion does not pass." The Speaker, who was deployed to the council by ActionSA, will also to face a no-confidence motion on Wednesday afternoon. The bid for Mthembu's ousting was filed by the Al-Jama-Ah Party, accusing her of incompetence. Whip of council and ANC member Sthembiso Zungu will also face a no vote on Wednesday. DA EXPRESSES DISAPPOINTMENT Meanwhile, the DA in Johannesburg has expressed disappointment after its motion of no confidence in Morero was unsuccessful. While ActionSA abstained from the vote, the ANC-led coalition still had enough numbers to keep Morero in the position. The DA's regional leader, Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku, says it's unfortunate that Morero will continue as mayor. "While parties in council chose positions over principles today [Wednesday], the DA can proudly say that it brought forward a motion to dismiss the man presiding over Johannesburg's decay. No amount of spin by a failing executive can conceal Johannesburg's rot and decay, but the residents of Johannesburg will not forget."

TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
We will scale down the cost of the national dialogue: Ramaphosa
President Cyril Ramaphosa has assured parliament that the government will drive down the cost of the national dialogue over the public backlash over the estimated R700m price tag. Speaking at the National Council of Provinces during a question-and-answer session on Wednesday, Ramaphosa said people had been fixated over the cost of the dialogue. Earlier this month, Ramaphosa announced the national dialogue would be convened in August with eminent people from different groups expected to lead discussions. The dialogue was agreed upon after the elections which saw the ANC losing its majority and forming a government of national unity with various parties including the DA. After the announcement of the date for the national dialogue, it emerged that the engagement would cost the country R700m. This led to various parties including the EFF taking issue with the government's decision to convene the dialogue. EFF leader Julius Malema penned a letter rejecting the cost as a 'grotesque and wasteful plan by the so-called national dialogue preparatory task team'. He said national dialogue has no bearing on the lives of ordinary South Africans.


Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Process to appoint Shamila Batohi's successor must be handled with great care and expertise
The Government of National Unity has promised to fight corruption and restore trust in state institutions. That pledge will ring hollow if it fails to act boldly on one of the most important appointments of the next five years. In January next year, National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi will reach the mandatory retirement age and vacate her office. This moment presents South Africa with a crucial opportunity — not only to appoint a mission-critical leader, but to restore credibility to a deeply damaged institution: the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). If we are serious about rooting out corruption, prosecuting State Capture and re-establishing the rule of law, then we must recognise that, as it stands, the NPA is failing to execute its constitutional mandate. This is not a criticism of one individual, but a reflection of a systemic crisis. Unless the appointment of Batohi's successor is handled with great care and expertise, we risk entrenching the dysfunction that has made justice so elusive for the perpetrators of State Capture. The Centre for Development and Enterprise recently released a report outlining two urgent, interlinked interventions: the creation of a robust and transparent appointment process for the new National Director of Public Prosecutions; and the establishment of an inquiry into the NPA's performance, led by a retired senior judge. Neither step can wait. And both, if implemented correctly, could help revitalise one of the most important institutions in South Africa's democracy. The NPA is the constitutional bulwark against the abuse of power. Yet it has been weakened by decades of political interference, flawed appointments, and institutional mismanagement. Since its establishment in 1998, no National Director of Public Prosecutions has completed a full term. Several were removed by court rulings that found their appointments to be unlawful or irrational. That revolving door at the top has undermined stability, effectiveness, and morale. Turmoil of the Zuma years Shamila Batohi has brought a measure of steadiness to the role after the turmoil of the Jacob Zuma years. But the structural damage done during the State Capture era has proved hard to reverse. Even Batohi recently acknowledged that the prosecuting authority was 'not out of the woods yet', and admitted that — despite progress with general conviction rates — the NPA had failed to successfully prosecute any major State Capture cases involving high-level political actors. This is a devastating admission. The Zondo Commission and investigations by various journalists have laid out, in painstaking detail, the networks of corruption and abuse that hollowed out the state. But far too many implicated individuals are still at large. The withdrawal of charges in the case of Moroadi Cholota, a former assistant of former Free State premier Ace Magashule, is the latest reminder that something is fundamentally wrong with how high-level cases are being pursued. These failures embolden wrongdoers and erode public confidence in the state's ability to hold the powerful to account. That is why the Centre for Development and Enterprise is calling on the president to act swiftly and decisively. Reformed process Our first proposal is that the president should reform the process for appointing the National Director of Public Prosecutions. The current practice, governed by the NPA Act, gives the president broad discretion with little built-in transparency or accountability. This has led, time and again, to poor outcomes. President Jacob Zuma's disastrous appointments of Menzi Simelane and Shaun Abrahams — both ultimately declared invalid by the Constitutional Court — still cast a long shadow. We need to do better. The Centre for Development and Enterprise recommends a two-stage appointment process, modelled on the one used in 2019 to appoint the current Commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (SARS), Edward Kieswetter. That process emerged from the Commission of Inquiry into Tax Administration and Governance by SARS, headed by a retired senior judge, which exposed deep dysfunction and offered actionable recommendations to restore good governance. Its impact is evident in SARS's turnaround since then. We believe a similar approach can rescue the NPA. In terms of our proposal, the president would begin by identifying candidates who meet clearly defined criteria: they would have to be legal practitioners qualified to appear in all courts, as well as individuals with significant prosecutorial and managerial experience, unblemished integrity, and a demonstrable commitment to the NPA's independence and constitutional role. These candidates would then be assessed by a high-level, independent panel. This panel should comprise individuals with high credibility across sectors: a retired judge, a senior advocate or attorney, a former National Director of Public Prosecutions or experienced prosecutor, a respected civil society leader, a retired senior public servant, and a business leader with considerable turn-around managerial experience. This diverse and balanced composition would ensure that legal, managerial, ethical, and governance expertise are all represented in the evaluation process. Importantly, while the panel's membership, criteria, and final recommendations should be made public, the actual interviews and deliberations should remain confidential. As we have seen with the Judicial Service Commission, public interviews can dissuade good candidates, encourage superficial discussions, and turn serious assessments into media spectacles. A more discreet approach fosters thoughtful deliberation and single-minded focus on finding the best person for this vital job. Shortlist Once the panel has concluded its work, it should submit a reasoned recommendation — or shortlist — to the president, who retains the final decision but must publish both the panel's advice and the rationale for his choice (even if it is different from that of the panel). This process would significantly enhance public trust and reduce the risk of political manipulation. Legally, the president has the option of extending Batohi's term by up to two years. The Centre for Development and Enterprise believes this would be a mistake. The NPA needs new leadership and a reinvigorated mandate. Extending the status quo would squander a rare opportunity to introduce fresh energy into a flailing organisation. To ensure a smooth transition, the next National Director of Public Prosecutions should be named by December 2025. That provides enough time for a meaningful appointment process and ensures there is no leadership vacuum at the top. Appointing a capable National Director of Public Prosecutions alone will not solve the NPA's challenges. The incoming leader must know what they are up against. That is why the Centre for Development and Enterprise's second recommendation is equally urgent: the establishment of an inquiry, led by a retired senior judge, into the structure, leadership, independence, and performance of the NPA. This inquiry — ideally completed by the end of 2025 — would provide a detailed, independent diagnosis of the challenges facing the prosecuting authority. Like the Nugent Commission did for SARS, it would offer a roadmap for reform based on facts, not speculation. The inquiry should deliver an interim report to the president and minister of justice before the new National Director of Public Prosecutions takes office, with a final report tabled in Parliament within eight weeks of its completion. Where the state decides not to adopt a recommendation, it must provide reasons publicly. Transparency and accountability must be central throughout the process. Political test Reviving the NPA is not just a legal necessity — it is a political test. The Government of National Unity has promised to fight corruption and restore trust in state institutions. That pledge will ring hollow if it fails to act boldly on one of the most important appointments of the next five years. The office of the National Director of Public Prosecutions is not merely another job; it is a vital instrument in the defence of democracy. It must be filled by someone of real capability and independence, chosen through a process that inspires confidence rather than suspicion. Done right, this appointment could mark the beginning of a new chapter for the NPA. Done wrong, it will confirm the worst fears of a public that has waited far too long for justice. DM