logo
Colorado attack comes amid record incidents of antisemitic and Islamophic hate crimes

Colorado attack comes amid record incidents of antisemitic and Islamophic hate crimes

Yahoo2 days ago

As law enforcement agents investigate Sunday's fiery attack on a group of pro-Israel demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, crime data shows the rampage came amid a dramatic increase in antisemitic and Islamophobic hate crimes across the nation, suggesting further that the war between Israel and Hamas terrorists continues to spill into the U.S.
The suspect in the Boulder attack, 45-year-old Mohamed Soliman, allegedly yelled "Free Palestine" while targeting the pro-Israel demonstrators with a "flamethrower" fashioned from a commercial backpack weed sprayer and Molotov cocktails at a pedestrian mall, authorities said.
Soliman entered the United States in August 2022 on a B2 tourist visa, which expired in February 2023, according to Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security. He filed for asylum in September 2022, McLaughlin said.
Court documents made public in the case allege Soliman, who was born in Egypt and lived in Kuwait for 17 years before moving to Colorado Springs, Colorado, three years ago, "wanted to kill all Zionist people and wish they were all dead."
While some politicians and pro-Israel activists have used antisemitism as a catchall word for an alleged motive in the attack, the suspect told investigators, "This had nothing to do with the Jewish community and was specific in the Zionist group supporting the killings of people on his land (Palestine)," according to state court documents.
But Ted Deutch, chief executive officer of the American Jewish Committee, noted that the attack came less than two weeks after a gunman shouting "Free Palestine" killed two Israeli embassy staff members outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C.
"These are not isolated incidents," Deutch told ABC News. "This is a war against people who support Israel, it's a war against the Jewish people and nobody should tolerate it."
Deutch added, "We have to acknowledge that the incitement that we've seen from the language that's being used, the lies about genocide, the calls for globalizing the Intifada, resistance by any means necessary, all of this language contributes to an environment in which violence will, and now twice in two weeks, has taken place."
Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, told ABC News that while there has been a spike in attacks on the American Jewish community since the Oct. 7, 2023, surprise assault on Israel by Hamas terrorists, antisemitic attacks in the United States have been steadily climbing for the last decade.
"The last few months have put a fine point on the fact that there are those who are using the guise of protesting Israel to target and violently attack Jews," Spitalnick said.
The statements of the Boulder suspect underscore that the definition of the term Zionism is "woefully misunderstood," Spitalnick said.
"What Zionism means to me is generally the belief that Jews should have a homeland somewhere in this world where we have deep historical connections. And it actually goes hand-in-hand with the belief in Palestinian self-determination and dignity for me and many others," she said.
"When the term is used in this pejorative as we have seen it particularly over the last few years, but long before that as well, it effectively says that 80% to 90% of Jews should be discriminated against, or cast out of spaces, or in extreme case violently targeted as we saw this weekend. That is antisemitism when you're saying the majority of American Jews are fair game," Spitalnick added.
She said the majority of American Jews have a relationship with Israel.
'That doesn't mean that we agree with its government,' Spitalnick said. 'In fact, many of us, and many Israelis, don't agree with the government and don't necessarily support what's happening in Gaza right now."
According to an audit issued in April by the Anti-Defamation League, antisemitic incidents, including assaults and vandalism, has jumped 344% over the past five years and increased 893% over the past 10 years.
"For the first time in the history of the Audit, a majority (58%) of all incidents contained elements related to Israel or Zionism," according to the ADL.
Since the Oct. 7, 2023, surprise attack on Israel by Hamas terrorists, more than 10,000 antisemitic incidents have been reported in the United States alone, according to the ADL.
In addition to the Washington, D.C., and Boulder attacks, a 38-year-old man was arrested in April and charged with firebombing the Pennsylvania governor's residence in Harrisburg, while Gov. Josh Shapiro, who is Jewish, and his family were asleep inside, officials said. According to a search warrant affidavit, the suspect allegedly targeted Shapiro "based upon perceived injustices to the people of Palestine."
Islamophobic attack have also been on the rise, according to a report issued in March by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation's largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization. CAIR reported that it received more than 8,650 complaints in 2024, the highest number the group has ever gotten.
Among the anti-Muslim incidents reported was the fatal Oct. 14, 2023, stabbing of 6-year-old Palestinian American boy, Wadea Al-Fayoume, by his Illinois landlord, 73-year-old Joseph Czuba, who prosecutors said killed the child and attacked his mother in response to the Israel-Hamas war. Czuba was convicted of murder and hate crime charges in February and was sentenced in May to 53 years in prison.
On Nov. 25, 2023, three college students of Palestinian descent were shot, including one who was paralyzed, in Burlington, Vermont, when they were allegedly targeted by 48-year-old Jason J. Eaton, a former Boy Scout leader, as the students, who were visiting the city during the Thanksgiving holiday, were walking in his neighborhood speaking a mix of Arabic and English, authorities said. Two of the students were wearing keffiyehs, traditional Palestinian scarves. Eaton has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempted murder and is awaiting a trial.
While there were widespread calls for a hate crime charge against Eaton, prosecutors said they did not have enough evidence to support such a charge.
Following the deadly May 21 Washington, D.C., rampage, the Department of Homeland Security issued a bulletin warning law enforcement that "violent extremist messaging continues to highlight major sporting and cultural events and venues as potential targets."
"The May attack that killed two Israeli Embassy staff members at an event in Washington, D.C., underscores how the Israel-Hamas conflict continue to inspire violence and could spur radicalization or mobilization to violence against targets perceived as supporting Israel," according to the DHS, adding that some online users were sharing the suspect's alleged writings and "praising the shooter and generally calling for more violence."
The increase in antisemitic and Islamophobic attacks have come against the backdrop of the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The administration has also threatened to withhold federal funding to universities, including Harvard and Columbia, for not doing enough to tackle antisemitism on campuses. The administration has attempted to deport or revoke visas of foreign students who have engaged in pro-Palestinian protests and activism on college campuses.
In April, five Democratic Senators, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, sent a letter to Trump accusing his administration of weaponizing antisemitism.
"We are extremely troubled and disturbed by your broad and extra-legal attacks against universities and higher education institutions as well as members of their communities, which seem to go far beyond combatting antisemitism, using what is a real crisis as a pretext to attack people and institutions who do not agree with you," the Democratic senators wrote, urging Trump to "reverse course immediately."
Within hours of the Boulder attack on Sunday, FBI Director Kash Patel was quick to say the case is being investigated as "an act of terrorism."
Twelve people, including members of the group Run for Their Lives, an organization that regularly holds demonstrations in Boulder to bring attention to the Israeli hostages still being held in Gaza, were injured in the attack, which unfolded around 1:26 p.m. local time at Boulder's outdoor Pearl Street Mall, directly across the street from the Boulder County Courthouse, authorities said.
Video taken of the incident showed a shirtless Soliman allegedly holding his makeshift weapons prior to the attack. Soliman was immediately taken into custody without incident. Soliman, who is being held on $10 million bond, made his first court appearance on Monday afternoon. He did not enter a plea to the charges.
Unlike previous high-profile hate-crime investigations, the Boulder attack was immediately described as an act of terrorism, signaling a change in the approach federal investigators have taken in such incidents under the new Trump administration.
"Back when I was in [the FBI], so before 2016, everything was terrorism until it wasn't terrorism. We still were working off the 9/11 response," said retired FBI special agent Rich Frankel, an ABC News contributor. "And after that, it appeared that they started calling it hate crime."
Holocaust survivor among the Boulder attack victims
Frankel said the FBI's decision to immediately labeling such attacks as the Boulder incident as an act of terrorism is apparently because it allows investigators to use additional laws and investigative techniques, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which establishes the legal framework for the gathering of intelligence, electronic surveillance and physical searches. He said it also enables prosecutors to file additional enhanced charges.
"If you think there might be an international angle naming a group or a country, it is terrorism and that gives you a whole host of different laws that you can use and also investigative techniques because now you're under the FISA system, you're under the secret system. Instead of getting search warrants, you can get a FISA," Frankel said. "The new administration might want that more than a hate crime."
Trump responds to Boulder attack in social media post, seizes on suspect's immigration status
President Donald Trump has also used the word terrorism to describe the Boulder case, saying in a post Monday on his Truth Social platform that the suspect "came through Biden's ridiculous Open Border Policy, which has hurt our Country so badly."
"He must go out under 'TRUMP' POLICY," Trump added. "Acts of Terrorism will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. This is yet another example of why we must keep our Borders SECURE, and deport illegal, Anti-American Radicals from our Homeland."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Columbia Or An Accreditor The Real Target In Trump's Latest Salvo?
Is Columbia Or An Accreditor The Real Target In Trump's Latest Salvo?

Forbes

time36 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Is Columbia Or An Accreditor The Real Target In Trump's Latest Salvo?

Is the Trump administration's threat to Columbia University's accreditation the real target, or is ... More it the accreditation process itself? The U.S. Department of Education has notified Columbia University's accreditor that it believes the university has violated federal anti-discrimination laws and 'therefore fails to meet the standards for accreditation.' Wednesday's notice to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education has made big news and been widely interpreted to be an escalation of the Trump administration's pressure campaign against elite universities. Columbia has been in those crosshairs for weeks, starting with the administration announcement in March that it was canceling $400 million in federal grants and contracts because of what it said was 'the school's continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.' While this latest threat to Columbia opens a new front in the administration's attacks on the university, it's important to be clear-eyed about all of what could be at stake here. First, the federal government cannot remove a university's accreditation. That's an action that only can be taken — although it rarely is — by one of the seven nationally recognized accrediting agencies that oversee most of the nation's colleges and universities and are responsible for determining whether they meet certain standards of quality. The gate-keeping role of accreditation is important for several reasons, not the least of which is that in order for an institution's students to receive federal financial aid, it must be accredited by a "nationally recognized" accrediting agency. Columbia is not likely to lose its accreditation despite the administration's charges. Typically, these matters result in the institution agreeing to continued monitoring and an action plan, often in response to a warning or less commonly being put on probation. Whatever action an accreditor takes regarding an institution's status, it comes as a result of a deliberate process, as acknowledged by MSCHE president Heather Perfetti. 'We are aware of the press release issued today by the United States Department of Education (USDE) regarding Columbia University and can confirm that we received a letter regarding this matter this afternoon,' Perfetti said, according to Inside Higher Education. "Consistent with our Commission's management of investigative findings, we will process these in accordance with our policies and procedures,' she added. In fact, MSCHE began investigating Columbia's response to the department's allegations of antisemitism last month. In an online statement, Columbia said it was "aware of the concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights today to our accreditor, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, and we have addressed those concerns directly with Middle States. Columbia is deeply committed to combatting antisemitism on our campus. We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it.' As challenging as the situation has become for Columbia, the administration appears to be setting up an additional target with its latest announcement — the accreditation process itself. The notice to Columbia is likely a proxy for ramping up President Trump's long-standing and frequent attacks on accreditors. 'When I return to the White House, I will fire the radical Left accreditors that have allowed our colleges to become dominated by Marxist maniacs and lunatics,' Trump said in a July 2023 campaign video. 'We will then accept applications for new accreditors who will impose real standards on colleges once again and once and for all,' he added. Trump has referred to accreditation as his 'secret weapon,' which critics fear he could use to force accreditors to apply criteria that are aligned with his political ideology. In April, he issued an Executive Order, Reforming Accreditation to Strengthen Higher Education, that claimed that accreditors 'routinely approve institutions that are low-quality by the most important measures.' That order also railed against accreditors setting standards for diversity, equity, and inclusion. And it called for 'recognizing new accreditors to increase competition and accountability in promoting high-quality, high-value academic programs focused on student outcomes.' Perhaps it's no co-incidence that MSCHE president Perfetti was one of the individuals who raised pointed concerns about that order at the time. She said that accreditors 'firmly reject President Trump's mischaracterization of accreditors' role,' and she noted legal obstacles to the administration's threats to not recognize an accreditor, writing that "the Higher Education Act, along with corresponding regulations and case law, establishes a clear system of due process for the recognition of an accreditor. Ultimately, concerns about accreditor recognition can be escalated to federal court.' In the Education Department's notice, Secretary Linda McMahon emphasized that her department has 'an obligation to promptly provide accreditors with any noncompliance findings related to member institutions,' and that it believes 'Columbia University no longer appears to meet the Commission's accreditation standards.' She added that accreditors 'have an obligation to ensure member institutions abide by their standards,' and said, 'we look forward to the Commission keeping the Department fully informed of actions taken to ensure Columbia's compliance with accreditation standards including compliance with federal civil rights laws.' Finally, citing 34 C.F.R. § 602.20(a), the Education Department warned that 'accreditors are required to notify any member institution about a federal noncompliance finding and establish a plan to come into compliance. If a university fails to come into compliance within a specified period, an accreditor must take appropriate action against its member institution.' 'Accreditors are in an impossible situation as they face two choices that both lead to existential crises,' Robert Kelchen, head of the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Tennessee, told me. 'If they comply with the administration's request, they risk losing members and the trust of the higher education community. But if they do not comply, it is likely that the federal government will attempt to strip their ability to be a gatekeeper for federal financial aid. Accreditors may win that fight in court, but it's far from a guarantee and is expensive for a membership organization to pursue.' It's true that Columbia University once again finds itself in the hot seat, but stripping away its accreditation may not be the administration's ultimate aim. Instead, the goal may be a larger one — putting an accreditor on trial and punishing it for what the federal government believes is a failure to do its job, thereby sending a message to other agencies that they could be next.

What we know about the countries on Trump's travel ban list, and how many people will be impacted
What we know about the countries on Trump's travel ban list, and how many people will be impacted

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

What we know about the countries on Trump's travel ban list, and how many people will be impacted

A sweeping new travel ban on citizens from a dozen nations was announced by the White House on Wednesday, reviving a defining effort from the first Trump administration to crack down on entries from specific countries. Trump said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' The 12 countries targeted – plus seven more, which face partial restrictions – are mostly nations with frosty, adversarial or outwardly antagonistic relations with Washington. Many are either failed states or in the throes of repressive rule, and some are governed by groups that took control after years of US involvement in their affairs. For all but four of the 19 countries hit with restrictions, the administration pointed to high rates of their nationals overstaying their visas after entering the US. Visa overstays have received renewed scrutiny since the Boulder, Colorado, attack last weekend against a group campaigning in solidarity with the Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. The suspect in that attack was originally from Egypt, which was not on Wednesday's travel ban list. He obtained a two-year work authorization that expired in March, a Homeland Security (DHS) official said. Seven countries were included because the administration deemed they pose a 'high level of risk' to the US: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The travel ban does not target existing visa or green card holders, and it also features carve-outs for some visa categories and for people whose entry serves US interests. Its impact will vary greatly from country to country; some nations only receive a few hundred nonimmigrant visas per year, while others have seen hundreds of thousands of people enter the US in the past decade. Travel to the US has been fully restricted for citizens from Chad, Sudan, Libya, Eritrea, the Republic of Congo, Somalia and Equatorial Guinea. Meanwhile, a partial restriction has been imposed on nationals from Burundi, Togo and Sierra Leone. The US does not issue a high number of visas to most of those countries – only a few hundred or a few thousand people per year were granted immigrant and nonimmigrant visas in 2023, according to State Department data. The White House said Somalia had been identified as a 'terrorist safe haven,' led by a government that lacks 'command and control of its territory.' This year, the US carried out airstrikes in Somalia against ISIS and affiliated targets, in a joint counterterrorism effort with the nation. Relations with Sudan have soured; last month, the Trump administration said it would impose sanctions on the military-led Sudanese government after finding that it used chemical weapons last year during its ongoing war with a rival military faction. The US has been unable to broker a ceasefire to end the conflict that has raged on for two years, leaving tens of thousands dead. The White House has also had a frosty relationship with Chad, which demanded the removal of American troops from its territory last year, as well as with Eritrea, whose military the Biden administration accused in 2023 of committing war crimes during a conflict in northern Ethiopia. Similar reprimands have been made by the US State Department against state and non-state actors in Libya, which it accused of committing crimes against humanity. Chad had one of the highest rates of visa overstays of any country included in the ban; around half of the people admitted to the US from the central African nation overstayed their visa in the 2023 financial year, according to the DHS, though the numbers of Chadians granted such visas was relatively small. The White House said Wednesday that Chad's overstay rate is 'unacceptable and indicates a blatant disregard for U.S. immigration laws.' The African Union Commission said in a Thursday statement it was 'concerned' about the impact of bans 'on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades.' 'While recognising the sovereign right of all nations to protect their borders and ensure the security of their citizens, the African Union Commission respectfully appeals to the United States to exercise this right in a manner that is balanced, evidence-based, and reflective of the long-standing partnership between the United States and Africa,' its statement read. The ban targeted three Middle Eastern adversaries with which the US has limited or no diplomatic ties. The US does not formally recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's official government. The militant group reclaimed power in 2021 amid a chaotic and deadly withdrawal of US forces under the Biden administration. Afghans who helped the US government during Washington's two-decade involvement in the country are exempt from the ban; they fall under a Special Immigrant Visa program that has allocated more than 50,000 visas since 2009. The Trump administration targeted Yemen's Houthi rebels with airstrikes for several weeks earlier this year, in response to the group attacking ships and disrupting trade routes in the Red Sea. The Houthis control much of western Yemen, including the capital Sanaa. Haiti has been in the grips of violent unrest for years. Gangs control at least 85% of its capital, Port-au-Prince, and have launched attacks in the country's central region in recent years. The violence has left more than one million Haitians internally displaced. Two other Latin American nations – Cuba and Venezuela – also face restrictions, though Trump stopped short of implementing a full ban. The move comes a week after the Supreme Court allowed Trump's administration to suspend a Biden-era humanitarian parole program that let half a million people from the two countries, plus Nicaragua, temporarily live and work in the US each year. Trump in March revoked temporary humanitarian parole for about 300,000 Cubans, amid a record number of arrivals of migrants from the Caribbean island. Of all the countries targeted, the new restrictions may impact Venezuelans the most. More than 55,000 people from Venezuela received nonimmigrant visas to enter the US in 2023, and nearly 800,000 Venezuelans in total were granted such visas over the preceding decade, according to the State Department. The White House said both Laos and Myanmar, also known as Burma, have failed to co-operate with the US over the return of their nationals. Myanmar's ruling military junta has spent the past four years waging a brutal civil war across the Southeast Asian country, sending columns of troops on bloody rampages, torching and bombing villages, massacring residents, jailing opponents and forcing young men and women to join the army. The junta is headed by a widely reviled army chief who overthrew the democratically elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi and installed himself as leader, and the nation was thrown into further turmoil by a devastating earthquake in March. The US and Laos meanwhile have a complicated history, hampered by the US bombing of the country during its war in Vietnam. But relations have improved dramatically this century, and the US-Laos partnership is one of the most stable and productive of all 19 countries targeted by Wednesday's ban. Egypt was spared inclusion in the travel ban, even though the restrictions were expedited after an Egyptian national was charged with attempted murder after the Molotov cocktail attack in Boulder, Colorado. Egypt has long been a key US partner in the Middle East. Relations between Cairo and Washington date back to 1922, when Egypt gained independence from the United Kingdom, and have continued ever since. According to the US embassy in Egypt, some 450 Egyptians travel to the United States annually on professional and academic exchange programs. The Arab nation has also historically been the second biggest recipient of US military aid, following Israel. Since 1978, the US has contributed more than $50 billion in military assistance to Egypt, according to the American embassy, though some of this aid has been occasionally withheld on account of the country's human rights record. 'Egypt is a valued U.S. partner in counterterrorism, anti-trafficking, and regional security operations, which advance both U.S. and Egyptian security,' the US embassy said in 2023. CNN's Helen Regan contributed to this report.

Who is exempt from Trump's new travel ban?
Who is exempt from Trump's new travel ban?

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Who is exempt from Trump's new travel ban?

Green Card Holders People with green cards -- individuals who have a pathway to US citizenship -- are exempted from the ban. When a travel ban was introduced by Trump during his first term in 2017, chaos and confusion ensued at airports. The Department of Homeland Security had to put out a statement clarifying that green card holders could enter the country. This time, the administration is making that exemption clear in the order itself. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Dual Citizens Advertisement People who are American citizens but also hold citizenship with a banned country are exempt under the order. Those Seeking Visas Through Connections to US Family Members Immigrants from the banned countries who seek visas through connections to their spouses, children, or parents who are American citizens will still be able to apply for them. Certain Athletes Athletes and coaches traveling to the United States to play in major sporting events, along with their families, will still be allowed into the country, despite the ban. The United States is one of the hosts of the World Cup in 2026, and Los Angeles is the site of the Summer Olympics in 2028. This exception will allow soccer players from targeted countries, like Iran, to enter the United States for the World Cup. Advertisement Refugees Granted Asylum Those who have been admitted as refugees or were granted asylum are exempted under the order. Afghans who Helped the US The order exempts Afghans who seek to enter the US under a special visa program for those helped the US government during the two decades of war after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Iranians Fleeing Religious Persecution Iranians who are escaping the country because they belong to a religious minority, like Christianity, are also exempted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store