NATO set to boost ground-based air defences by five times
NATO
is asking European member states to expand ground-based air-defence capabilities fivefold as the alliance races to fill a key gap in response to the threat of Russian aggression, people familiar with the matter said.
The ramp-up will be discussed at a gathering of North Atlantic Treaty Organization defence ministers in Brussels on Thursday, the people said on condition of anonymity as deliberations take place behind closed doors. The fivefold target would be collective for the alliance's European member states, with individual levels varying at the end, the people said. A timeframe for the air-defense effort wasn't clear.
Ministers this week are already set to approve one of the most ambitious commitments to raising weapons stocks since the Cold War as part of European and Canadian efforts to re-arm and scale back their dependence on US defence systems.
The boost in weaponry is part of broader ambitions to raise defense spending across the alliance. Spurred by US President
Donald Trump
, NATO members are coalescing around a target of spending 5% of economic output-3.5% on core defense and another 1.5% in defence-related outlays on areas including infrastructure, cyber defense and civilian preparedness. "We are not at war, but we're not at peace either," NATO secretary General Mark Rutte said at a meeting in Vilnius on Monday. "We must continue to strengthen our deterrence and defense and that means pivoting toward a full war-fighting readiness."
Ukraine Invited to Summit
Live Events
Meanwhile, Ukraine has been invited to a NATO summit later in June, said President
Volodymyr Zelenskyy
. The heads of NATO states will gather in The
Hague
, Netherlands, from June 24-26. "We were invited to the NATO summit. I think this is important," Zelenskyy said late on Monday after meeting Rutte in Vilnius.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
A new paradigm in Russia-Ukraine war
On Sunday, Ukraine executed one of the most extraordinary asymmetric operations in modern military history. Using domestically built first-person-view (FPV) drones deployed from deep inside Russian territory, Kyiv launched a coordinated assault against several military airbases as far as eastern Siberia, the border with Mongolia, and the Arctic. Known as Operation Spiderweb, the attacks destroyed or severely damaged as many as 20 strategic aircraft, including nuclear-capable bombers and early-warning planes; Kyiv claims the true toll could reach 41. Only two days later, on Tuesday, the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) struck again – this time detonating underwater explosives and damaging the Kerch Bridge, the critical rail and road artery connecting Russia to occupied Crimea. The combined message from Kyiv could not have been clearer: We may be far smaller and — on paper at least — weaker, but we can strike hard and reach far into Russia. Using drones produced indigenously for less than the cost of an iPhone, Ukraine took out strategic bombers worth upward of $100 million each — many of which are nearly impossible to replace due to sanctions and Russia's degraded industrial base. At a 300,000-to-one return on investment, this is the kind of asymmetric operation that can upend the rules of modern warfare. Just as significant as the material damage is what the attacks revealed: That a small but determined and innovative nation can deploy cheap, scalable, and decentralised tech to challenge a much larger, conventionally superior foe – and even degrade elements of a nuclear superpower's second-strike capacity. The lessons will reverberate globally, from Taipei to Islamabad. Perhaps the biggest impact of Ukraine's battlefield coup may be to challenge the core strategic presumption that has guided Vladimir Putin's thinking for over three years — that time is on his side. Since the invasion began, Putin has bet on outlasting Ukraine — grinding down its defences, draining Western support, and waiting for the political winds in Washington and Europe to shift. That assumption has underpinned his refusal to negotiate seriously. But the success of Ukraine's drone and sabotage operations challenges that theory of victory. It shows that Ukraine is not simply holding the line or surviving a war of attrition; it is shifting the battlefield and expanding the costs of continued war for Russia in ways the Kremlin has not anticipated. That shift matters, especially in the diplomatic context. The timing of the drone campaign — just 24 hours before a direct round of talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul — was hardly coincidental. Kyiv's actions were designed to signal that Ukraine is not negotiating from a position of weakness and won't be coerced into a bad deal. Though the Istanbul meeting itself was predictably fruitless — lasting just over an hour and reinforcing the irreconcilability of the two sides' positions— the fact that the Kremlin showed up fresh off such a high-profile embarrassment suggests it may be starting to realise that Ukraine has cards to play and continuing the war carries risks for Russia. This may not be enough to bring Russia to the negotiating table in good faith, but it could make it more open to limited agreements. To be sure, a permanent peace settlement remains as distant as ever. Kyiv continues to push for an unconditional ceasefire that Russia rejects out of hand. In Istanbul, Moscow proposed two equally unacceptable alternatives: Either Kyiv retreats from Russian-claimed territories or accepts limits on its ability to rearm, including a halt to Western military aid. But the right kind of pressure from the US, coordinated with European allies, could now stand a better chance of extracting a first-phase deal — whether that's a 30-day ceasefire, a humanitarian corridor, or a prisoner swap — that could then potentially turn into something bigger and more durable. At the same time, Ukraine's gains increase the tail risks of dangerous escalation. Russia's deterrent posture has been eroded. Putin's red lines – on Nato enlargement, Western weapons use, attacks inside Russia – have been crossed repeatedly without serious consequence. That makes him look weak but also increases the risk that he will feel compelled to escalate the conflict more dramatically to restore his credibility at home and abroad. Russia's immediate response to the recent attacks will be more of the same: heavier indiscriminate bombing of Ukrainian cities and infrastructure. But a darker possibility is that, boxed in and humiliated, Putin might consider a tactical nuclear strike. The threshold for such an extreme step is high — not least because China, Russia's most important global partner, strongly opposes nuclear use. That scenario remains unlikely, but less so than before June 1. And Putin is emboldened by the belief that the West — particularly Donald Trump's US — fears direct military confrontation more than anything. If he assesses that Russia's position in the war is becoming untenable or its conventional deterrence is crumbling, his calculus could change. Ukraine has just reminded the Kremlin — and the world — that it can shape events, not just react to them. This doesn't put it on a path to victory or bring the war to an end. But by showing that it has leverage and that Moscow has more to lose than it thought, Ukraine has altered the strategic equation and opened a narrow window for diplomacy — even if the endgame remains as elusive as ever. The alternative is a deeper and more unpredictable conflict that grows more dangerous the longer it drags on. Ian Bremmer is the founder and board president of Eurasia Group Foundation. The views expressed.
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kremlin Reveals Date Of Putin's Revenge Attack On Kyiv Over Op Spiderweb
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Russian military will respond to Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb at a time it deems appropriate. His comments came as Russian deputy foreign minister claimed that Russian bombers were not destroyed but damaged by Ukraine's drone blitz on June 1 and that they will be restored soon. Watch for more details.
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
ECB's Lagarde says foreign investors are confident about Europe
European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on Thursday that the euro zone appeared to be attracting more foreign investment recently, in a sign that investors are increasingly confident in Europe's economic outlook. "I would say that the economy is responding quite well to our monetary policy , and is delivering on that front," Lagarde told reporters at her regular press conference after the bank's latest rate-setting meeting. "We perceive a serious momentum to improve, to change, to simplify, to streamline, and to encourage and .. welcome capital into Europe. And we are seeing it: The reverse Yankee bonds, significant increase that we have seen in the last few weeks, is a clear indication that there is trust in our system," she said. A reverse Yankee bond is a debt security issued by a U.S. company in a foreign market denominated in another currency, such as the euro. "The capital flow that we are seeing as well - whether it is European investment returning to Europe or a bit of non-European investment coming to Europe - all that is an indication that at least market forces, investors, those who move real money around, actually see value and have confidence in Europe." Live Events
