Transgender track athlete wins gold in California state championships despite Trump threat
Transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed for Jurupa Valley High School in the long jump at the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships at Buchanan High School in Clovis. (Tomas Ovalle / for The Times)
Overcoming intense pressure to quit from President Trump, dozens of local protesters and other prominent critics of transgender athletes in girls' sports, 16-year-old AB Hernandez bounded past many of her peers to win multiple gold medals at California's high school track and field championships Saturday.
The transgender junior from Jurupa Valley High School — who competed despite a directive from Trump that she be barred from doing so — won state titles in the girls' triple jump and the girl's high jump and took second place in the girls' long jump.
Advertisement
Hernandez's success at the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships in Clovis came amid high heat — with temperatures above 100 degrees for much of the day — and under an intense spotlight.
Earlier in the week, Trump had said on social media that he was "ordering local authorities, if necessary, to not allow" Hernandez to compete, wrongly alleging she had won "everything" in a prior meet and calling her "practically unbeatable." Protesters gathered outside the meet both Friday and Saturday to denounce her inclusion and the LGBTQ+-friendly state laws allowing it.
Despite all that, Hernandez appeared calm and focused as she competed. When her name was announced for the long jump, she waved to the crowd. When she was announced for the high jump, she smiled.
Hernandez beat out all other competitors in the triple jump, though the runner-up was also awarded 1st place under new rules established by the California Interscholastic Federation after Trump issued his threats.
Advertisement
Hernandez tied with two other girls in the high jump, with the three of them all clearing the same height and sharing the gold.
Hernandez's mother, Nereyda Hernandez, heaped praise on her after the events in a statement provided to The Times, saying, "As your mother, I cannot fully express how PROUD I am of you."
"Watching you rise above months of being targeted, misunderstood, and judged not by peers, but by adults who should've known better, has left me in awe of your strength," her mother said. "Despite it all, you stayed focused. You kept training, you kept showing up, and now you're bringing THE GOLD HOME!!!
During some of Hernandez's jumps, a protester could be heard on a bullhorn from outside the Buchanan High School stadium chanting "No boys in girls' sports!" California Interscholastic Federation officials banned protest signs inside the facility, but outside protesters held a range of them — including ones that read "No Child Is Born in the Wrong Body," "Trans Girls Are Boys: CIF Do Better," and "She Trains to Win. He takes the trophy?"
Advertisement
Josh Fulfer, a 46-year-old father and conservative online influencer who lives near the stadium, said he was the protester on the bullhorn. He said Hernandez should not have been competing — regardless of how she placed — because her presence in the competition had a negative "psychological effect" on her cisgender competitors.
"I stand with truth," he said. "Males should not be pretending to be females, and they shouldn't be competing against female athletes."
Loren Webster, a senior from Wilson High School in Long Beach who beat Hernandez in the long jump, said she wasn't giving Hernandez much thought — instead, she was focused on her own performance.
"It wasn't any other person I was worried about. I knew what I was capable of," Webster said. "I can't control the uncontrollable."
A child holds a protest sign alongside a family member and others opposed to transgender athlete AB Hernandez competing in the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships, at Veterans Memorial Stadium at Buchanan High School in Clovis.
(Tomas Ovalle / For The Times)
The intense focus on Hernandez over two days of competition Friday and Saturday reflected a broad rise in conservative outrage over transgender girls competing in sporting events nationwide, despite their representing a tiny fraction of competitors. It also reflected a concerted effort by Trump and other prominent conservative figures to single out Hernandez, individually, as an unwitting poster child for such concerns.
Advertisement
Recent polls, including one conducted by The Times last year, have shown that many Americans support transgender rights, but a majority oppose transgender girls participating in youth sports. California has long defended transgender kids and their right to participate in youth athletics, but other states have increasingly moved to limit or remove such rights entirely.
Marci Strange supports protestors as they protest against transgender athlete AB Hernandez competing In the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships, at Veterans Memorial Stadium In the campus of Buchanan High School in Clovis.
(Tomas Ovalle / For The Times)
Trump first latched onto transgender issues with fervor during his presidential campaign, spending millions of dollars on anti-transgender political ads. Since being elected, he has issued a wave of executive orders and other policies aimed at rolling back transgender rights and protections.
Again and again, Hernandez has been singled out in that discussion.
Advertisement
Earlier this week, Trump referenced Hernandez in a social media post in which he said his administration would cut federal funding to California if it didn't block her from competing in this weekend's state finals and more broadly get in line with his executive order purporting to ban transgender youth from participating in school sports nationwide.
The following day, U.S. Justice Department officials referenced Hernandez again, announcing the launch of an investigation into whether California, its interscholastic sports federation and the Jurupa Unified School District are violating the civil rights of cisgender girls by allowing transgender students such as Hernandez to compete in sports.
Transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed for Jurupa Valley High School in the high jump at the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships at Buchanan High School in Clovis.
(Tomas Ovalle / For The Times)
At the meet Friday and Saturday, Hernandez often blended in with the hundreds of other athletes, hardly drawing attention. She was less conspicuous by far than the protesters there to denounce her for competing.
Advertisement
Hernandez's mother has pleaded with Trump and other adults in recent days to show her daughter compassion, calling it heartbreaking "every time I see my child being attacked, not for a wrongdoing, but simply for being who they are."
She has said her daughter "is not a threat," while the harassment directed at her is "not just cruel, it's dangerous."
Local protesters — some with ties to national conservative organizations — cast Hernandez's competing in girls' events in starkly different terms.
Before being escorted out by police, Sophia Lorey, outreach director for the conservative California Family Council, walked around the stadium Saturday wearing a hat reading, "Women's Sports, Women Only." She told members of the crowd that Hernandez was a boy and handed out pink "Save Girls' Sports" bracelets and fliers directing people to an online petition calling on the California Interscholastic Federation to change its policies to bar transgender athletes from competition.
Advertisement
Trump administration officials have taken a similar stance.
In a letter Wednesday to interscholastic federation executive director Ronald W. Nocetti, Assistant Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon, who was appointed by Trump to head the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, called Hernandez's success in recent track and field events "alarming." And she said the California policies allowing Hernandez to compete are a potential violation of Title IX, the 1972 federal civil rights law prohibiting sex discrimination in educational programs and other activities that receive federal funding.
Dhillon also noted Gov. Gavin Newsom's own recent remark to conservative activist Charlie Kirk that transgender girls competing in sports is "deeply unfair."
Transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed in three events including the high jump, triple jump and long jump at the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships at Buchanan High School in Clovis.
(Tomas Ovalle / For The Times)
The remark came in a conversation on Newsom's podcast in March, in which Hernandez was also singled out.
Advertisement
Kirk, a co-founder of the conservative organization Turning Point USA, asked Newsom whether he would voice his opposition to Hernandez competing in girls' track and field events. Newsom said he agreed such situations were "unfair" but that he also took issue with "the way that people talk down to vulnerable communities," including transgender people.
When Kirk suggested Newsom could say that he has "a heart for" Hernandez but still thinks her competing is unfair, Newsom again said he agreed.
Newsom has issued no such statement since. But, the playing field has shifted in California for transgender athletes since Trump started talking about Hernandez.
On Wednesday, the CIF announced a change in its rules for this weekend's championships. Under the new rules, a cisgender girl who is bumped from qualifying for an event final by a transgender athlete will still advance to compete in the finals. In addition, the federation said, any cisgender girl who is beaten by a transgender competitor will be awarded whichever medal she would have claimed had the transgender athlete not been competing.
Transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed for Jurupa Valley High School in the high jump at the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships at Buchanan High School in Clovis.
(Tomas Ovalle / For The Times)
The CIF did not mention Hernandez by name in announcing its policy change, but it did make direct reference to the high jump, triple jump and long jump — the three events in which she was to compete.
Advertisement
Under the new rules, Hernandez shared her place on each of the event podiums with other girls.
The CIF did not respond to a list of questions about its new policy. A spokesman for Newsom applauded the change, but others were unimpressed.
Critics of transgender athletes rejected it as insufficient and demanded a full ban on transgender athletes. Fulfer, the protester on the bullhorn, said the CIF was "admitting that they've got it wrong for a long time" while still not doing enough to fix it — which Trump would see clearly.
"I hope Donald Trump sees what happens this weekend, and I hope he pulls the funding away from California," Fulfer said.
Advertisement
LGBTQ+ advocates also criticized the rule change, but for different reasons, calling it a crass capitulation that singled out a teenager to appease a crowd of bullies picking a political fight.
"The fact that these same political players continue to bully and harass one child, even after CIF changed its policy, shows this was never about sports or fairness," said Kristi Hirst, co-founder of the public education advocacy group Our Schools USA.
"It was simply about using a child, while compromising their personal safety on a national scale, to score political points and distract from the serious issues families and communities in this country are actually concerned about," Hirst said, "affording groceries, the loss of health care, and access to quality teachers and resources in their public schools."
Transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed for Jurupa Valley High School in the long jump at the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships at Buchanan High School in Clovis.
(Tomas Ovalle / For The Times)
Nereyda Hernandez said she hoped AB's wins would serve as inspiration for other kids who feel "unseen."
Advertisement
"To every young person watching, especially those who feel unseen or unheard, let AB be your reminder that authenticity, courage, and resilience shine BRIGHTER than hate," she said. "It won't be easy, but definitely worth it."
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss
The Trump administration is fighting to pause a second court ruling that blocked President Donald Trump's sweeping and so-called reciprocal tariffs, the signature economic policy of his second term. The administration's new appeal, filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, comes less than a week after a very similar court challenge played out in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) in New York, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington. At issue in both cases is Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to enact his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariff plan. The plan, which Trump announced on April 2, invokes IEEPA for both his 10% baseline tariff on most U.S. trading partners and a so-called "reciprocal tariff" against other countries. Trump's use of the emergency law to invoke widespread tariffs was struck down unanimously last week by the three-judge CIT panel, which said the statute does not give Trump "unbounded" power to implement tariffs. However, the decision was almost immediately stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, allowing Trump's tariffs to continue. But in a lesser-discussed ruling on the very same day, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee, determined that Trump's tariffs were unlawful under IEEPA. Since the case before him had more limited reach than the case heard by the CIT – plaintiffs in the suit focused on harm to two small businesses, versus harm from the broader tariff plan – it went almost unnoticed in news headlines. But that changed on Monday. Lawyers for the Justice Department asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – a Washington-based but still separate court than the Federal Court of Appeals – to immediately stay the judge's ruling. They argued in their appeal that the judge's ruling against Trump's use of IEEPA undercuts his ability to use tariffs as a "credible threat" in trade talks, at a time when such negotiations "currently stand at a delicate juncture." "By holding the tariffs invalid, the district court's ruling usurps the President's authority and threatens to disrupt sensitive, ongoing negotiations with virtually every trading partner by undercutting the premise of those negotiations – that the tariffs are a credible threat," Trump lawyers said in the filing. Economists also seemed to share this view that the steep tariffs were more a negotiating tactic than an espousal of actual policy, which they noted in a series of interviews last week with Fox News Digital. The bottom line for the Trump administration "is that they need to get back to a place [where] they are using these huge reciprocal tariffs and all of that as a negotiating tactic," William Cline, an economist and senior fellow emeritus at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said in an interview. Cline noted that this was the framework previously laid out by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who had embraced the tariffs as more of an opening salvo for future trade talks, including between the U.S. and China. "I think the thing to keep in mind there is that Trump and Vance have this view that tariffs are beautiful because they will restore America's Rust Belt jobs and that they'll collect money while they're doing it, which will contribute to fiscal growth," said Cline, the former deputy managing director and chief economist of the Institute of International Finance. "Those are both fantasies." What comes next in the case remains to be seen. The White House said it will take its tariff fight to the Supreme Court if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiffs echoed that view in an interview with Fox News. But it's unclear if the Supreme Court would choose to take up the case, which comes at a time when Trump's relationship with the judiciary has come under increasing strain. In the 20 weeks since the start of his second White House term, lawyers for the Trump administration have filed 18 emergency appeals to the high court, indicating both the pace and breadth of the tense court battles.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Begins Putting Its Stamp on Giant Trump Tax, Debt Limit Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Significant changes are in store for President Donald Trump's signature $3.9 trillion tax-cut bill as the Senate begins closed-door talks this week on legislation that squeaked through the House by a single vote. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access Senate Republican leaders are aiming to make permanent many of the temporary tax cuts in the House bill, a move that would increase the bill's more than $2.5 trillion deficit impact. But doing so risks alienating fiscal hawks already at war with party moderates over the bill's safety-net cuts. It amounts to a game of chess further complicated by the top Senate rules-keeper, who will decide whether some key provisions violate the chamber's strict rules. Jettisoning those provisions — which include gun silencer regulations and artificial intelligence policy — could sink the bill in the House. House Republicans' top tax writer, Representative Jason Smith, on Friday said that senators need to leave most of the bill untouched in order to ensure it can pass the House in the end. 'I would encourage my counterparts, don't be too drastic, be very balanced,' he said. Trump worked the phone as Republican senators returned to work in Washington Monday after a one-week holiday break. Josh Hawley of Missouri said in a mid-afternoon social media post that he 'just had a great talk' with the president on the legislation and they agreed no Medicaid benefits would be cut. Hawley, who has been a vocal supporter of preserving Medicaid benefits, didn't specify if he believes the House bill — projected to cut health care coverage coverage for about 7.7 million people by changing eligibility requirements — reduces benefits. GOP wrangling imperils Republicans' goal of sending the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' to Trump's desk by July 4. But the real deadline is sometime in August or September, when the Treasury Department estimates the US will run out of borrowing authority. The House bill would raise the government's legal debt ceiling by $4 trillion, which the Senate wants to increase to $5 trillion in order to push off the next fiscal cliff until after the 2026 congressional elections. That's just one of the major changes the Senate will weigh in the coming weeks. Here are others: Permanent Business Breaks Senate Finance Chairman Mike Crapo's top priority is making permanent the temporary business tax cuts that the House bill sunsets after 2029. These are the research and development tax deduction, the ability to use depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) as the basis for interest expensing, and 100% bonus depreciation of certain property, including most machinery and factories. Senate Republicans plan to use a budget gimmick that counts the extension of the individual provisions in the 2017 Trump tax bill as having no cost. That gives them room to make the additional business tax cuts and possibly extend some of the new four-year individual cuts in the House bill like those on tips and overtime. Deficit hawks could demand new offsets, however, either in the form of spending cuts or ending tax breaks like one on carried interest used by private equity. SALT The House expanded the state and local tax deduction limit from $10,000 to $40,000 to get blue-state Republicans behind the bill. But SALT isn't an issue in the Senate, where high-tax states like California, New York and New Jersey are represented by Democrats. 'I can't think of any Senate Republicans who think more than $10,000 is needed and I can think of several who think the number should be zero,' said Rohit Kumar, a former top Senate staffer now with PWC. That includes deficit hawks like Louisiana's John Kennedy, who has balked at the House's SALT boost. Senators could propose keeping the current $10,000 SALT cap as a low-ball counter, forcing the House to settle from something in the ballpark of a $30,000 cap, Kumar said. The Senate could also change new limits on the abilities of passthrough service businesses to claim SALT deductions. Green Energy Moderate Republicans in the Senate are pushing back on provisions in the House bill that gut tax credits for solar, wind, battery makers and several other clean energy sectors. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she's seeking to soften aggressive phaseouts of tax credits for clean electricity production and nuclear power. She has the backing of at least three other Republicans, giving her enough leverage to make demands in a chamber where opposition from four GOP senators would kill the bill. Their demands will run headlong into ultraconservatives, who already think the House bill doesn't get rid of tax benefits for clean energy fast enough. Medicaid, Food Stamps Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin say they're willing to sink the bill if it doesn't cut more spending. 'I think we have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about reductions,' Johnson said recently on CNN. They haven't made specific demands yet, but they could start off where the House Freedom Caucus fell short — cutting the federal matching payment for Medicaid for those enrolled under Obamacare and further limiting federal reimbursement for Medicaid provider taxes charged by states. Conservatives' demands are in stark contrast to Republican senators already uncomfortable with the new Medicaid co-pays and state cost-sharing for Medicaid and food stamps in the House bill. Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Jim Justice and Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Hawley join Murkowski in this camp. Boosting their case is Trump, who told the Freedom Caucus to stop 'grandstanding' on more Medicaid cuts. Regulatory Matters There's an extensive list of regulatory matters in the House bill that could be struck if they are found to break Senate rules for averting a filibuster and passing the legislation by a simple majority. Provisions likely to be challenged for not being primarily budgetary in nature include a repeal of gun silencer regulations, preemption of state artificial intelligence regulations, staffing regulations for nursing homes and abolishing the Direct File program at the Internal Revenue Service. The House bill's provisions limiting the ability of federal judges to hold administration officials in contempt, ending funding for Planned Parenthood, requiring congressional review of new regulations and easing permitting of fossil fuel projects are also vulnerable. The biggest Senate rules fight will be over using the 'current policy' budget gimmick to lower the cost of the bill. Senate Republican leaders could explore bypassing rules keeper Elizabeth MacDonough if she finds the accounting move breaks the rules. Battles over these provisions could take weeks. 'I think it would be very difficult to get it out of the Senate quickly,' said Bill Hoagland, a former top Republican Senate budget staffer now with the Bipartisan Policy Center. Spectrum Sales A major auction of government radio spectrum that would generate an estimated $88 billion in revenue is another unresolved fight. Ted Cruz of Texas, the Senate Commerce chair, backs the spectrum sale but Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota has vowed to protect the Defense Department, which has warned auctioning off its spectrum would degrade its capabilities and cost hundreds of billions for retrofits. The proposal would free up key spectrum for wireless broadband giants like Verizon and Elon Musk's Starlink. Estate Tax Majority Leader John Thune and 46 other Republican senators back a total repeal of the estate tax, which would likely cost several hundred billion dollars over a decade, benefiting the heirs of the richest 0.1%. That could make it too pricey for the Senate to include. The House bill permanently increases the estate tax exemption to $15 million for individuals and $30 million for married couples, with future increases tied to inflation. --With assistance from Emily Birnbaum. (Updates with Trump phone call to Hawle in sixth paragraph.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kidnapping suspect wanted in Jefferson, St. Charles parish's
METAIRIE, La. (WGNO) — The Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, in partnership with the St. Charles Parish Sheriff's Office, are asking for the public's help in finding a kidnapping suspect. According to deputies, on May 12 they were alerted to an aggravated kidnapping and armed robbery at a Harahan business in the 5100 block of Citrus Boulevard. 2020 French Quarter shootout suspects, accused killer of ex-girlfriend among those arrested by US Marshals in June The investigation revealed the suspect approached the victim asking for a ride to which they agreed. Deputies said the suspect and a second person, who pulled out an alleged handgun got into the vehicle. They two robbed the victim of cash by forcing them to drive to a St. Charles Parish bank and withdraw money from the ATM. New Orleans man sentenced in series of Jefferson Parish robberies The suspects demanded a ride back to Jefferson Parish where the two got away. Anyone with information in the incident can call the Special Victim's Section at 504-364-5300 or St. Charles Parish deputies at 985-783-1135.'King of the Hill' voice actor fatally shot: Reports Kidnapping suspect wanted in Jefferson, St. Charles parish's New Orleans man sentenced in series of Jefferson Parish robberies Fetterman claims media trying to 'smear' him over missed votes, absences Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift judge's new block on mass layoffs Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
