Montana ‘governor's mansion' should be used by state, not remain empty, bill sponsor says
A postcard of the Montana's Governor Mansion which was built in 1959 and is located at 2 Carson Street in Helena.
If a Montana governor chooses not to live in the 'governor's mansion' owned by the state, Sen. Mary Ann Dunwell, D-Helena, believes it should be used by others that term, such as legislative workers with disabilities.
Dunwell presented a bill this week to create a policy for how the 12,000-square-foot house at 2 Carson Street is used if a governor opts to live in his own home, as Gov. Greg Gianforte does.
Dunwell said she was open to amendments on her bill, which would make the residence available for rent by temporary employees of the Legislature during the interim and legislative sessions, with preference to those with disabilities.
Generally, Dunwell said, her interest is in not having the building vacant, as it has been for at least three years.
Proponents of Senate Bill 496, including a beloved former Senate staff member who uses a wheelchair, said the space shouldn't sit empty given its potential, and state buildings shouldn't be wasted resources.
'It just baffles my mind, actually, that we would have a substantial, very nice residence that's not being used and sitting empty without plans as to what is supposed to happen to it,' said Ann Brodsky, a Helena resident in support of the bill.
But the house, however the state wants to use it, will require a lot of work, said Stephen Baiamonte, with the General Services Division of the Department of Administration. He described it as being in 'a tremendous state of disrepair,' and even sitting empty, he said it's costing the state an estimated $100,000 a year.
In 2019 and 2021, the Legislature appropriated $2.3 million for upgrades to the house, built in 1959, Dunwell said. But earlier bids came in at more than $1 million over budget, and the project stalled, according to earlier reporting by the Daily Montanan.
Dunwell told the committee she had met with Department of Administration Director Misty Ann Giles, who said said she would ask her engineering team to come up with some options to use the building and present them to the Legislature.
'I have not heard that that's been done,' Dunwell said.
The Department of Administration did not respond Tuesday to questions about the status of the request to engineers or options for the Legislature to consider by press time.
The longer the wait, the less that $2.3 million is worth, Dunwell said, and in the meantime, she argued a use policy is sensible because three years have gone by without a plan for the house.
'In my opinion, senators, it's a waste,' Dunwell said. 'It's an inefficiency in government. And it's up to us to make sure we do away with some of that waste and inefficiency.'
She said the property would work well for people who have disabilities because it has a lot of parking and plenty of space for people to handle medical equipment or navigate with wheelchairs.
Charles McKay, the CEO of Aspen Adult Services, agreed. McKay said when President Donald Trump took office and pointed out federal buildings weren't fully occupied, many civilians found it 'egregious.'
McKay said unused space still needs to be heated and maintained.
'The idea that that is happening in the city here, not two blocks over this way, is just really interesting to me,' McKay said.
McKay said his organization serves more than 100 disabled adults, and it houses 35 staff in office space that totals less than 6,000 square feet, half of the executive residence. He said the structure could accommodate six residents.
'As a representative for the disabled in Helena, I really would like you to consider utilizing that space to take care of the people who really do need it,' McKay said.
Jack Racicot, who worked as a Senate committee staff member and uses a wheelchair, said he had to commute last session from Whitehall to the Capitol because he couldn't find suitable options for accessible rentals in Helena.
'Meanwhile, the governor's residence sat vacant, an underutilized asset that could be put to far better use,' Racicot said.
He said the bill is 'a commonsense solution.'
'If the governor isn't living in the executive residence, why not use it as short-term housing for legislative employees?' Racicot said. 'Its proximity to the Capitol makes it for an ideal location, and instead of letting a valuable state property sit empty, this bill ensures it benefits both taxpayers and those who serve our great state.'
SB 496 states the Department of Administration, in consultation with the Legislative Services Division, shall adopt rules to set the occupancy limits, rental fees, and other details to implement the bill.
Sen. Denise Hayman, D-Bozeman, wanted to know if the building was even safe, and Baiamonte, with General Services Division, said getting the house up to snuff again would take time and money.
He said it needs a new electrical system, roofing, plumbing, potentially work on ADA compliance, and repairs to a failing front porch.
In response to a question from Sen. Jacinda Morigeau, D-Arlee, Baiamonte said mothballing the structure would cost less than the estimated $100,000 the state spends now.
However, he said the state of Montana wants to be a 'good neighbor,' so it maintains the grounds and ensures the casual observer can't tell it's vacant. He also said it would be expensive to take down.
Morigeau also requested the bill's fiscal note, but it hadn't been posted with the bill at the time of the hearing. It was not yet posted by early Tuesday afternoon.
In response to a question, Brodsky said Gianforte owns a couple of mansions in Helena, including one he said he would donate, but she didn't know if any contracts had been drawn up for such a donation.
In January 2024, the Governor's Office announced the Gianfortes had purchased the historic Hauser Mansion and planned to donate it to the state 'following my service.' Gianforte won re-election in November 2024, and his second term runs through the end of 2028.
Chairing the meeting, Sen. Wendy McKamey, R-Great Falls, wanted to confirm there had been no discussions to date about any contracts about building exchanges or donations.
Baiamonte said he didn't know the status of any donation, and no plan was in the works for the official executive residence.
'We don't have any plan right now for the residence until we see what happens in the session,' Baiamonte said.
McKamey also wanted to know how long it would take to get the building into shape, and Baiamonte estimated it would take about two years, but it would depend on the scope of work.
The only opponent of the bill, Mickie Imberi, said it was a bad idea because it raised questions about who would process applications, do maintenance, and manage the property.
'It doesn't sound like it's a good idea from a landlord's point of view,' Imberi said.
Sen. Janet Ellis, D-Helena, suggested a study bill might be in order given all the interest, and McKamey said it was a good idea, but the timeline might be too tight for the current session.
'But one thing I really do value is that that building be used,' McKamey said. '… I think it's a real shame that it isn't used. It's not simply because it's a large area, but because it's the CEO's residence that needs to be occupied. When residences are not occupied, they just deteriorate.'
Committee members asked many questions about the proposal Monday but did not take immediate action on the bill.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

14 minutes ago
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'

34 minutes ago
North Carolina GOP sends immigration-crackdown bills to Democratic Gov. Stein
RALEIGH, N.C. -- Republicans at the North Carolina legislature gave final approval Tuesday to two pieces of legislation that would compel state agencies to participate in President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and would toughen a recent law that required sheriffs to help federal agents seeking criminal defendants. The series of House and Senate votes on the measures could mean an early showdown between the GOP-controlled General Assembly and new Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, who since taking office in January has tried to build rapport with lawmakers on consensus issues like Hurricane Helene aid. Stein has yet to a veto a bill, and pressure will build on him to use his stamp on one or both of the bills that were sent to him late Tuesday given the overwhelming Democratic opposition to the measures during floor votes. The GOP's legislative maneuvers happened as National Guard troops have been deployed by Trump to Los Angeles to confront protesters angry with federal conducting sweeps that led to immigrant arrests. Should Stein issue vetoes, Republicans in the ninth-largest state could face challenges in overriding them, since the GOP is currently one seat shy of a veto-proof majority. Republican leaders would need at least one Democrat for their side during an override vote or hope some Democrats are absent. Republicans say the measures are needed to assist the Trump administration's efforts to remove immigrants unlawfully in the country who are committing crimes and or accessing limited taxpayer resources that are needed for U.S. citizens or lawful immigrants. 'North Carolina is one step closer to increasing the safety of every citizen in the state,' said Senate Leader Phil Berger, a primary sponsor of one of the bills. 'The Republican-led General Assembly made it clear that harboring criminal illegal aliens will not be tolerated in our state." But Democrats and social justice advocates of immigrants say the bills vilify immigrants who work and pay taxes, leading residents to feel intimidated and fear law enforcement, which will ultimately make communities less safe. Demonstrators opposed to GOP action filled the Senate gallery during debate. Republicans are spending their time 'trying to sell a lie that immigrants are the source of our problems,' Democratic Sen. Sophia Chitlik of Durham County said, telling colleagues that their constituents 'didn't send us here to round up their neighbors. They sent us here to make their lives better.' Stein spokesperson Morgan Hopkins said late Tuesday that the governor "will continue to review the bills. He has made clear that if someone commits a crime and they are here illegally; they should be deported.' One measure receiving final approval in part would direct heads of several state law enforcement agencies, like the State Highway Patrol and State Bureau of Investigation, to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That would include having to officially participate in the 287(g) program, which trains officers to interrogate defendants and determine their immigration status. A Trump executive order urged his administration to maximize the use of 287(g) agreements. The measure also would direct state agencies to ensure noncitizens don't access state-funded benefits and publicly funded housing benefits to which they are otherwise ineligible. The same applies to unemployment benefits for those aren't legally authorized to live in the U.S. And the bill also prohibits University of North Carolina system campus policies that prevent law enforcement agencies from accessing school information about a students' citizenship or immigration status. Thousands of international students attending college in the U.S. had their study permissions canceled this spring, only for ICE to later reverse decisions and restore their legal status. The other approved bill Tuesday builds on the 2024 law that lawmakers enacted over then-Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper's veto that directed jails hold temporarily certain defendants whom ICE believe are in the country illegally, allowing time for immigration agents to pick them up. The law was a response by Republicans unhappy with Democratic sheriffs in several counties who declined to help immigration agents with offenders subject to federal immigration detainers and administrative warrants. The proposed changes expands the list of crimes that a defendant is charged with that would require the jail administrator — expanding in the bill to magistrates — to attempt to determine the defendant's legal residency or citizenship. A defendant with an apparent detainer or administrative warrant would still have to go before a judicial official before a defendant could be released to agents. A jail also would have to tell ICE promptly that they are holding someone and essentially extends the time agents have to pick up the person.

an hour ago
Arizona governor vetoes bill banning teaching antisemitism, calls it an attack on educators
PHOENIX -- Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and exposed educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. The proposal would have prohibited teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would have barred public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Educators would have personally been responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules. Hobbs, a Democrat, said Tuesday that the bill was not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. "Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." Hobbs described antisemitism as a very troubling issue in the U.S., but said students and parents can go through the state's Board of Education to report antisemitism. The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, called the veto 'disgraceful,' saying on the social media platform X that the legislation was meant to keep 'egregious and blatant antisemitic content' out of the classroom. 'To suggest that it threatened the speech of most Arizona teachers is disingenuous at best,' he added. Opponents said the bill aimed to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opened up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would have been able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote in a letter to Hobbs that if the bill were approved it would threaten teachers' ability to provide students with a full account of the holocaust. Under the bill, 'those discussions could be deemed 'antisemitic' depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context,' she said. The bill would have created a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a second offense to a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate and a third offense to a revocation of the certificate. At colleges and universities, violators would have faced a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would have required colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.