Bill weakening Nebraska paid sick leave passes, but Dems stall effort to slow minimum wage growth
State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln, center, talks with State Sens. Paul Strommen of Sidney and Kathleen Kauth of the Millard area on May 28, 2025. Raybould sponsored a measure to slow voter-approved minimum wage increases while Strommen sponsored a measure to weaken voter-approved paid sick leave. Kauth chairs the Legislature's Business and Labor Committee. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — A majority of Nebraska Democrats and one Republican in the officially nonpartisan Legislature successfully blocked an attempt to add a proposal to slow the state's voter-approved minimum wage increases to a bill weakening voter-passed paid sick leave.
State Sen. Jane Raybould filed her once-defeated minimum wage proposal as an amendment to Lincoln State Sen. Beau Ballard's Legislative Bill 415 after Speaker John Arch decided not to reschedule her stand-alone bill due to time constraints.
Lawmakers were unable to consider the amendment — which was likely to pass — because Democratic-aligned lawmakers had already filed several motions to filibuster Ballard's original proposal.
Raybould said her reason for wanting to act now had to do with the political dynamics facing her bill if the lawmakers wait. She said it would be harder to reduce pay for young people after the fact.
Raybould's revived proposal, in its current form, would shrink the wage increases by setting the annual increase at 1.75%. It also would create a youth minimum wage and amend a separate state training wage.
Raybould and supporters of her measure said her changes would protect small businesses that could not afford to pay more. Lawmakers against the legislative effort to slow wage growth said they were defending the people's will.
'Despite continued efforts to walk back the voice of the people, I'm glad that we were at least able to fight for everyday working Nebraskans by stopping this attack on minimum wage.' State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln said after the vote.
Raybould pushed back by saying Nebraska lawmakers aren't trying to undermine what voters approved the way Missouri and some other state Legislatures have done in recent months. Missouri recently repealed a paid sick leave law that voters approved just months before.
'We care about our working families,' Raybould said during the LB 415 debate. 'These two bills help our Nebraska families.'
Worker advocates and union leaders have spoken out against the paid sick leave and mimmutin wage changes as attempts to undermine voters. Ballard had previously said he didn't consider Raybould's amendment unfriendly and would have supported it.
'It was worth a swing,' Ballard told the Examiner.
Even though Democratic-aligned lawmakers blocked Raybould's amendment from being considered the GOP majority passed Ballard's proposal 33-15. It adds new restrictions to the paid sick leave law Nebraska voters approved last year, which has yet to be implemented.
LB 415 would remove the voter-approved law's blanket sick leave requirements, letting employers offer no paid sick leave to young teens, ages 14 and 15, and none to temporary workers, seasonal agricultural workers and workers at the state's smallest businesses, those with 10 or fewer employees.
Ballard said the proposal intends to clarify and make the ballot measure 'more feasible' and workable for businesses.
Passage of LB 415 is the latest part of a trend of the GOP-led Legislature pushing back against a handful of ballot measures passed by Nebraska voters. Targets this year include voter efforts to require paid sick leave, raise the minimum wage, repeal school vouchers and legalize and regulate medical marijuana.
Raybould's stand-alone bill will most likely be voted on next session. Though highly unlikely, Arch could change his mind about scheduling it.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senator Flummoxed By Trump Adviser's Response To Tariff Question
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Republican senator was stumped on Wednesday when Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said the U.S. would not lift tariffs on another country even if that country agreed to a reciprocal trade deal with the U.S. Why It Matters Lutnick's response appeared to fly in the face of President Donald Trump's claim that the U.S. is seeking trade "reciprocity" with its partners around the world. Trump has repeatedly accused other countries, including some of the U.S.'s closest trading partners, of taking advantage of the U.S. and in April levied steep tariffs against almost every country around the world in an effort to renegotiate more balanced trading relationships. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, left, speaks, as President Donald Trump, right, and Vice President JD Vance, center, listening as a trade deal with United Kingdom in announced in the Oval Office of the White House,... Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, left, speaks, as President Donald Trump, right, and Vice President JD Vance, center, listening as a trade deal with United Kingdom in announced in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, May 8, 2025, in Washington. More Evan Vucci/AP What To Know Lutnick got into a back-and-forth with Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana on Wednesday while testifying on Capitol Hill. Kennedy asked Lutnick if the U.S. would accept a zero-to-zero trade deal with Vietnam, saying, "If Vietnam, for example, came to you tomorrow and said, 'Okay, Mr. Secretary, you win, we're going to remove all tariffs and all trade barriers.' Would the United States please do the same? Would you accept that deal?" "Absolutely not," Lutnick said while smirking. "Absolutely not. That would be the silliest thing we could do." "Why is that?" Kennedy asked. "Vietnam has $125 billion of exports to us and imports from us $12.5 million ... Where do they get it from? They buy 90 billion [dollars worth] from China, then they mark it up and send it to us. It's just a pathway of China to us," Lutnick said. "So you wouldn't accept that deal?" Kennedy pressed. "It's a terrible deal," Lutnick replied. "We're the ones with money, we're the one with the stores. Of course, they want us to take it down." "What's the purpose of reciprocity then?" Kennedy shot back. "Is reciprocity not one of your goals? Are you telling the president that we shouldn't seek reciprocity? If that's what you're telling him, why are you trying to do these trade deals?" Lutnick began to say the U.S. wants to "encourage" Vietnam to produce more, but Kennedy cut him off, saying, "I want to get back to reciprocity." "You just said you don't ... accept reciprocity as a goal. What are you negotiating in these trade deals?" Lutnick pushed back: "Why would we open our bank account—" "But why are you negotiating trade deals?" Kennedy said, speaking over him. "You're trying to get other countries to lower their tariffs and trade barriers in return for us lowering ours. That's called reciprocity." "Of course," Lutnick said. "So are you or are you not seeking reciprocity in these trade deals?" Kennedy pressed. "We are absolutely seeking reciprocity with respect to things that can be reciprocal, but when you're importing from China and sending it to us, they're not—" Lutnick said, before Kennedy again cut him off. "But you just said that if a country came to you and offered you the ultimate reciprocity—no tariffs, no trade barriers, in return for us doing the same—you would reject that?" the Louisiana Republican said. "Of course, because they buy from China and send it to us," Lutnick said. Kennedy asked him how the U.S. would respond if a trade partner pledged that they wouldn't buy products from China and resell them to the U.S., to which Lutnick replied, "Now we're talking." "Would you accept that deal?" Kennedy said. "We would consider it," Lutnick said. This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available. Update 06/04/25 2:40 p.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional information.


Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Bernie Sanders Agrees With Elon Musk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Progressive Senator Bernie Sanders, who has held rallies for months as part of his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour, echoed billionaire Elon Musk on President Donald Trump's spending proposal, saying on social media the so-called "big, beautiful bill" is a "disgusting abomination." Newsweek has reached out to Sanders' press team and X's press team on behalf of Musk via email for comment on Wednesday. Newsweek has also reached out to Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune via email on Wednesday. Why It Matters Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with the Democrats, has been outspoken against billionaires like Musk and their political influence, calling it a "shadow government," thus the convergence between Sanders and Musk is notable. Although Sanders has been actively campaigning against the influence of billionaires in American politics, he has at times sided with Musk on a handful of topics, including reducing Pentagon funding. The Trump-backed reconciliation package passed the House last month following weeks of negotiations in which House Speaker Mike Johnson wrangled votes from the ultraconservative and more centrist factions of the GOP. While Trump praised the measure in its current form, Senate Republicans have made it clear that they plan to make significant changes to it before it passes the upper chamber. What To Know On Tuesday, Sanders shared Musk's X, formerly Twitter, post, adding: "Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination.'" His post continued: "We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination." The bill, which is the centerpiece of Trump's domestic agenda, including wide-ranging tax cuts and extra money for the military and border security, has been labeled by Musk as a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled," and a "disgusting abomination." Musk served as one of Trump's top advisors, previously leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cost-cutting task force. On Tuesday, he took to his social media outlet X to denounce the spending bill in a series of posts. (L):Elon Musk attends news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (R): Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is seen during the Senate Health, Education,... (L):Elon Musk attends news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (R): Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is seen during the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing titled "FY2026 Department of Health and Human Services Budget," in Dirksen building on Wednesday, May 14, 2025. More AP Photo/Evan VucciTom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images He said the bill undermines DOGE's efforts to cut federal spending and warned that it leaves "American taxpayers saddled with crushingly unsustainable debt." The bill is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt, according to analysis published by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on Wednesday. Musk previously estimated DOGE would save $2 trillion in federal spending. It has achieved $160 billion in cuts and eliminated 20,000 federal jobs—roughly 1 percent of the workforce. In another post on his social media account, Sanders voiced his agreement with Musk's stance, touching on its social and programmatic implications, saying: "When Mr. Musk, the wealthiest man alive & major campaign contributor, expresses strong distaste for Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, Republicans will listen & obey. That means more cuts to Medicaid, nutrition & education. The oligarchs want it ALL. We're not going to let that happen." Other lawmakers have offered partial support to Musk's stance on the bill, such as Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and staunch supporter of President Trump. She did vote for the bill but said later that had she known about a section that "strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years...I would have voted NO..." What People Are Saying White House Press Secretary Karolina Leavitt said during a Tuesday briefing when asked about Musk's response: "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." Bernie Sanders in a Wednesday X post: "If Musk & his pals are so concerned about increasing the national debt in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, why don't they cut the $664 billion in tax breaks for the 1%; the $420 billion in tax breaks for large profitable corporations; & the $150 billion in increased military spending?" Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene told reporters on Tuesday: "Well, you know, I have to agree with him [Musk] on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it. I think that should've been happening for years now. I mean, we're $36 trillion in debt for a reason." Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters on Tuesday: "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of opinion ... he's entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead." Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, in a tweet this afternoon in reference to Musk's comments: "He's right." What Happens Next Trump recently gave Senate Republicans a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and get it to his desk.


CNBC
31 minutes ago
- CNBC
Republican FCC commissioner Simington will step down this week
Republican Federal Communications Commission member Nathan Simington said Wednesday he plans to resign this week after more than four years in office. Simington was confirmed in December 2020 to the five-member FCC after he lead a regulatory effort during President Donald Trump's first term in office seeking to rein in social media companies. Democratic FCC Commissioner Geoffrey Starks said last month he plans to step down in June.