North Carolina Supreme Court 2024 race finally over: Republican concedes to Democrat
May 7 (UPI) -- The Republican candidate for North Carolina's state Supreme Court on Wednesday ended his six-month effort to overturn the election result against a Democrat.
On Tuesday, the state elections board will certify the election's result, which shows Associate Justice Allison Riggs won by 734 votes over Court of Appeals Judge Jefferson Griffin out of more than 5.5 million cast and after two recounts.
Griffin conceded two days after Richard E. Myers II, the federal chief judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected his legal challenges in a 68-page ruling.
"As a judge, I believe everybody, myself included, has a right to their day in court," Griffin said in a statement. "This effort has always been about upholding the rule of law and making sure that every legal vote in an election is counted.
"While I do not fully agree with the District Court's analysis, I respect the court's holding -- just as I have respected every judicial tribunal that has heard this case. I will not appeal the court's decision."
Riggs will serve an eight-year term on the 7-2 Republican-majority court after being appointed in 2023 by North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper to fill a vacancy after serving on the court of appeals. She continued to serve as a justice during the challenge.
Griffin's seat on the court of appeals is through 2029.
Griffin and the state Republican Party had challenged more than 65,000 votes in six Democratic-leaning counties, saying they were unlawfully cast.
"After millions of dollars spent, more than 68,000 voters at risk of losing their votes, thousands of volunteers mobilized, hundreds of legal documents filed and immeasurable damage done to our democracy, I'm glad the will of the voters was finally heard, six months and two days after Election Day," Riggs said Wednesday. "It's been my honor to lead this fight -- even though it should never have happened -- and I'm in awe of the North Carolinians whose courage reminds us all that we can use our voices to hold accountable any politician who seeks to take power out of the hands of the people."
Riggs' campaign and fund spent nearly $100,000 in legal fees , according to independent North Carolina journalist Bryan Anderson, citing election data.
Griffin appealed before the state elections board, throughout the state system and then in federal court.
The state high court in a 4-2 decision upheld the validity of more than 60,000 ballots cast in race, required thousands of others to be cured and almost 300 ballots to be discarded.
The federal judge had delayed implementing his order in case Griffin wanted to ask the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review his decision.
"You establish the rules before the game," Myers said in his ruling. "You don't change them after the game is done."
There were two categories of contested ballots.
Most ballots were from military or overseas voters who didn't provide copies of photo identification or an ID exception form with their absentee ballots. The appeals courts gave them a 30-day "cure" process.
The other one was overseas voters who have never lived in the United States but whose parents were declared North Carolina residents. State law allows them to vote in state elections, but state appeals courts said it violated the state Constitution.
It was the last election decided in the United States. North Carolina is considered a battleground state with Republicans Ted Budd and Thom Tillis holding both U.S. Senate seats, but Democrat Josh Stein was elected governor in November.
Democrats and voting rights groups called the challenges an attack on democracy.
"For 200 days, Republicans in North Carolina sought to overturn the will of the people, hijack a state Supreme Court seat, and systematically undermine basic faith in our elections," Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement.
"May this saga be a lesson to Republicans everywhere: If you try to undermine the will of the voters, you will lose."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
Shirley Madigan, wife of former House Speaker Mike Madigan, makes video plea to federal judge before his sentencing
The wife of former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan is pleading with a federal judge before his sentencing next week. Shirley Madigan sent a video about her husband, who was convicted on corruption charges, that she hopes will be played in open court. In the video, she explained that she wouldn't know what to do without him around. "I really don't exist without him. I wish I could say that I do, but I don't know what I will do without Michael. I would probably have to find some place to live, and I probably would have to find care," she said. Mike Madigan was convicted of bribery conspiracy, bribery, and wire fraud charges in February, but was acquitted of several other charges after a four-month trial accusing him of running a years-long criminal enterprise to enrich himself and his political allies. He was convicted on 10 counts and acquitted on seven others, while jurors were deadlocked on six other counts against him. The jury also was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on all six charges against his co-defendant, Michael McClain. The verdict was reached after more than 60 hours of deliberations over 11 days. Madigan and McClain faced a 23-count indictment in federal court in Chicago on charges of racketeering conspiracy, bribery, wire fraud, and attempted extortion. They were accused of conspiring with utility companies ComEd and AT&T to provide no-show jobs to Madigan's allies in exchange for the speaker's help on legislation. Prosecutors also accused Madigan of pressuring real estate developers to hire his private law firm, which specializes in property tax appeals. His sentencing is scheduled for June 13.


Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Vance Says He Hopes Musk Will 'Come Back Into the Fold'
In a podcast interview with Theo Von "This Past Weekend", Vice President JD Vance share his thoughts Musk's exit from the Trump administration and that he hopes Musk will 'Come Back Into the Fold". (Source: Bloomberg)


Gizmodo
27 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Musk Deletes His ‘Really Big Bomb' Claiming Trump Appears in Epstein Files
In the middle of their very public breakup, a scorned Elon Musk decided to drop a 'really big bomb' on Donald Trump, accusing the president of appearing in the Epstein files. Sometime Saturday, it seems the billionaire decided he wanted to try to disarm that bomb, as he deleted his posts claiming that Trump has links to the famous child sex trafficker. Musk and Trump had been acting catty for a couple of days by the time Musk went nuclear, going back and forth over Musk's opposition to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'—a proposal that includes the largest cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs in history. Musk objected to the bill, but not because it would be devastating to low- and middle-income households, but seemingly rather because it was going to hurt his own bottom line by ending electric vehicle tax credits that Tesla benefits from. Musk tried to kill the bill by posting incessantly about it, creating a rift among Republicans who will essentially need everyone in the party to be on board in order to get the thing passed. Trump, annoyed, took some shots at Musk for his dissent, which led to Musk just blowing the whole thing up. He said Trump appeared in the Epstein files and 'That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Funnily, he also doubled down by saying, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Those posts are now deleted—though have, of course, been archived, screenshotted, and quoted many times over. So, too, has a post in which Musk supported the idea that Trump should be impeached. He hasn't gotten around to taking down his post claiming that Trump's tariffs will cause a recession, so, it's clear the two aren't fully ready to make up, even if there is a de-escalation. We're also starting to get more of a picture of what has been happening behind the scenes while these two air out each other in public. A report published Saturday by the Washington Post claims that Trump was 'dejected' during Musk's crash out, and tried to rationalize Musk's behavior by calling him 'a big-time drug addict.' Musk had apparently been acting erratically for quite some time (not exactly a shock if you've scrolled through his posts on Twitter for like, 30 seconds), and a reported physical conflict with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that saw Musk supposedly throw his shoulder into Bessent was the breaking point where the billionaire started to get pushed out, per the Post. Trump opted not to pour gasoline on the situation—a shocking decision from a guy not exactly known for his restraint—but also is apparently not interested in reconciling with Musk. An official within the administration told the Post that even if they do make up, 'It'll never be the same.'