'Threat To Life, But Not Scared': Tej Pratap's Explosive Revelation, Throws Challenge to RJD Leaders
In a dramatic twist to Bihar politics, Tej Pratap Yadav breaks his silence after being expelled from the RJD and Yadav family by his father Lalu Prasad Yadav. Tej Pratap claims a 'conspiracy by 4–5 people' within the party and vows to expose them publicly. In a defiant address, he says, 'I will not be scared. I will go to the public, to the court—and I demand increased security from the Bihar government.' Despite this fallout, Tej Pratap expresses support for his younger brother Tejashwi Yadav, blessing him to become CM. This explosive political drama could shake the very core of RJD. Who are the 4–5 insiders Tej Pratap is referring to? Is this the beginning of a larger family and party rift? Watch now to know the full story.Tej Pratap Yadav, RJD, RJD Crisis, Lalu Yadav, Bihar Politics, Tejashwi Yadav, Political Drama, RJD Expulsion, Yadav Family Rift, Bihar News, Bihar Assembly Elections 2025, Breaking News, toi, bharat, TOI Bharat, breaking news, india news
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court's 3-year Bar experience rule for judge exam triggers concern among aspirants
Last month's Supreme Court's landmark ruling reinstating the requirement that candidates must have at least three years of litigation experience before they can sit for the judicial service examination for entry-level judgeships has prompted concerns over the challenges it may pose for recent graduates. The court's decision was rooted in the belief that judicial officers must have practical exposure to the courtroom before donning the robe. 'The judges from the very day on which they assume office have to deal with the questions of life, liberty, property and reputation of litigants,' the apex court said in the May 20 judgment. It observed that, 'neither knowledge derived from books nor pre-service training can be an adequate substitute for the first-hand experience of the working of the court system and the administration of justice. This is possible only when a candidate is exposed to the atmosphere in the court by assisting the seniors and observing how the lawyers and the judges function in the court'. Fundamental rights The ruling has triggered concerns among law graduates and aspirants. A review petition filed by Chandrasen Yadav, a young advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, argues that the mandatory three-year requirement infringes on his fundamental rights. Mr. Yadav submitted that the mandatory three-year practice rule should be implemented only from 2027 onwards to avoid unjust exclusion of recent graduates (2023–2025) who prepared under the previous eligibility criteria. 'Immediate enforcement causes retrospective hardship, violating principles of fairness, legitimate expectation, and equal opportunity under Article 14 of the Constitution,' he said. Another petitioner, Chandra Sharma, who comes from an Army background, highlighted the requirement to obtain a practice certificate from a lawyer with 10 years of standing. 'Lawyers I have worked with had 5–7 years of experience. The new norms will make it more difficult for me to get a certificate,' she said. Pawan, a first-generation lawyer, echoed similar frustrations. 'I started my career under a senior advocate, but I couldn't sustain myself financially. I joined a law firm. Now that experience won't count. Why should I be penalised for taking a corporate job to survive?' Robust training The review petition argues that the apex court has overlooked key aspects of the very report it cited — the Shetty Commission. While the 1999 report had recommended a three-year practice period, it also noted that due to practical court training being integrated into modern legal education, such a requirement may not be necessary if robust training is provided post-selection. It highlighted Clause 8.35 of the Shetty Commission's Recommendations, which explicitly stated that if young and meritorious law graduates are imparted intensive training, it may not be necessary to prescribe three years of practice at the Bar as a precondition for entry into judicial service. Additionally, the review petition contended that the court failed to cite any 'data, statistics, or studies which establish that fresh law graduates perform poorly as judges, or that three years of practice necessarily correlates with better judicial competence and that past recruitments from among freshers have resulted in any systemic inefficiencies or failures'. The review petition, filed through advocate Kunal Yadav, argued that, 'a candidate selected for judicial service is not 'raw,' but one who has undergone a rigorous and multi-tiered selection process comprising a comprehensive preliminary examination, mains examination testing knowledge of substantive and procedural laws, and a final viva-voce conducted by senior judges or experienced legal professionals'. The plea additionally argued that the three-year requirement may discourage women, first-generation lawyers, and economically weaker candidates who may not have the means to sustain an uncertain legal practice before securing a stable judicial post.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Tej Pratap's "Conspiracy" Claim After Party Exit, A "Personal Life" Remark
New Delhi: A month after his expulsion from Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) over a Facebook post, Bihar MLA and former minister Tej Pratap Yadav has alleged that four to five party colleagues conspired to ensure his exit from the party. The 37-year-old said he would "face the situation" and stressed "no one would tolerate interference in their personal life." Tej Pratap Yadav was expelled last month after a row over a photograph shared on his Facebook account. In the photograph, he was seen with a woman. The post identified the woman as Anushka Yadav and said she and Tej Pratap were in a relationship for 12 years. "I am Tej Pratap Yadav and the girl seen with me in this picture is Anushka Yadav. We have known each other for the last 12 years and love each other deeply. We have been in a relationship throughout these years. I wanted to share this with all of you for a long time, but couldn't find the right words. Today, through this post, I am opening my heart to you. I hope you all will understand," it read. The post started a chatter, as people asked why Tej Pratap married in 2018 if he was in a relationship. The RJD leader married Aishwarya Rai, daughter of political heavyweight Chandrika Rai, in 2018. The couple separated months later and a divorce case is on. Amid this chatter, Tej Pratap claimed his profile had been hacked. "My social media platform was hacked and my photographs were edited wrongfully," he wrote on X. The next day, Tej Pratap's father and RJD patriarch Lalu Yadav announced the decision to expel him from the party. He said "ignoring moral values" in personal life weakens the community's struggle for social justice. "The elder son's activities, public behaviour and irresponsible conduct are not in line with our family's values. In the current circumstances, I remove him from the party and the family. From now on, he will have no role in the party and the family. He has been expelled from the party for six years," he said. #WATCH | On Lalu Prasad Yadav expelling him from RJD & Yadav family, Tej Pratap Yadav says, " I'm not the one to get scared...I will face the situation...I will reveal the names of those 4-5 people who have done this to me..." "The people of Bihar have seen how I have been… — ANI (@ANI) June 23, 2025 Speaking to news agency ANI, Tej Pratap said the people of Bihar have seen how he was expelled. "The people of Bihar have seen how I was expelled from the party due to a conspiracy by some 4-5 people. The people know my nature and how I mingle with everyone. Taking advantage of this, some 4-5 people in RJD think they will suppress me once I am alone. Tej Pratap Yadav will not be suppressed. I will go to the people. The people will do justice. Four-five people are sitting, I won't take their names," he said. Mr Yadav said questions were raised on his personal life. "No one will tolerate this. If people try to suppress me, I will approach the court." The RJD leader urged the Bihar government to enhance his security cover and claimed a threat to his life. "I demand that the Bihar government increase my security as I feel there is a danger to my life." The remarks come amid political heat in Bihar, where elections are due in a few months. While the Nitish Kumar-led alliance of the BJP and JDU is looking to return to power, the RJD-Congress block is going all out to secure a win. Tej Pratap said that as an elder brother, he wants RJD's Tejashwi Yadav to become Bihar's Chief Minister. Earlier, when Lalu Yadav decided to expel Tej Pratap, Tejashwi had said some things "cannot be tolerated". "He (Tej Pratap) has the right to make his personal decisions. He is an adult and free to make decisions. Our party's chief has made it clear."
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Lalu files papers for 13th term as RJD president
1 2 Patna: Former CM Lalu Prasad on Monday filed his nomination papers for the post of Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) national president. Having held the position since the party's inception in 1997, he is set to take charge for a 13th term (2025-2028). RJD national assistant election officer Chitranjan Gagan said the nomination papers would be formally scrutinised on Tuesday. "If the name is not withdrawn, a notification will be issued on Tuesday itself regarding the unopposed election of Lalu to the post of RJD national president," he said. However, the official certificate will be presented to Lalu at the RJD national council meeting in Patna on July 5, Gagan added. Lalu arrived at the party headquarters accompanied by his wife Rabri Devi, daughter Misa Bharti and son Tejashwi Prasad Yadav, who is also the leader of the opposition in the Bihar legislative assembly. He submitted his nomination papers to election officer Ramchandra Purbe. Expressing satisfaction over his father's candidature, Tejashwi said, "Laluji has filed nomination for the post of the party's national president to the happiness of all the RJD workers. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You Reportingly Undo We are hopeful of winning the coming assembly elections under his leadership." The move, however, drew sharp criticism from political opponents. JD(U)'s state chief spokesperson Neeraj Kumar said a convicted person becoming the national president of a registered political party is the "ninth wonder". He added, "He is not eligible to contest elections. He is ill and may God keep him healthy. But no Dalit, backward or minority community person has the courage to stake his claim in the party." Nikhil Anand, national general secretary of the BJP OBC Morcha, said, "No democratic political party will continue to have the same president for the last 28 years. It proves that RJD is a family-promoted political party which exists in the pocket of Lalu." Taking a swipe at the RJD, Jan Suraaj Party founder Prashant Kishor said, "RJD is a pocket organisation of Lalu's family. After Lalu, his son will be the RJD president."
