logo
Veterans are divided over the Army's big parade, being held on Trump's birthday

Veterans are divided over the Army's big parade, being held on Trump's birthday

Independenta day ago

James McDonough served in the U.S. Army for 27 years, fighting in Vietnam and delivering humanitarian aid to Rwanda. For him, Saturday's military parade in Washington for the Army's 250th anniversary — coinciding with President Donald Trump 's birthday — is about the resilience of a vital institution and the nation it serves.
'The soldiers marching that day represent all of that history,' said McDonough, 78, of Crofton, Maryland. 'They don't represent a single day. They don't represent a single person. It's the American Army still standing straight, walking tall, ready to defend our country.'
Christopher Purdy, an Army veteran who served in Iraq, called the parade a facade that paints over some of the Republican president's policies that have targeted military veterans and current service members, including cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs and a ban on transgender troops.
Purdy said the parade, long sought by Trump, will needlessly display U.S. military might on the president's 79th birthday.
'It's embarrassing,' said Purdy, 40, of Atlanta. 'It's expensive. And whatever his reasons are for doing it, I think it's entirely unnecessary.'
Until recently, the Army's long-planned birthday celebration did not include a big parade. Added under the Trump administration, the event, featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, has divided veterans.
Some liken it to the military chest-pounding commonly seen in North Korea, a step toward authoritarianism or a perverse birthday party for Trump.
Others see it as a once-in-a-lifetime accounting of the Army's achievements and the military service of millions of soldiers over centuries. The parade is not about Trump, they say, but the public seeing the faces of soldiers when so few Americans serve.
The Army expects up to 200,000 people could attend and says the parade will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million.
Trump, speaking at Fort Bragg this week, said Saturday would be 'a big day" and noted "we want to show off a little bit."
'We're going to celebrate our greatness and our achievements," he said. "This week, we honor 250 years of valor and glory and triumph by the greatest fighting force ever to walk the face of the Earth: the United States Army.'
'Divisive politics have ruined it'
For Edmundo Eugenio Martinez Jr., an Army veteran who fought in Iraq, the parade is a missed opportunity to honor generations of veterans, many of whom paid a steep price and came home to little fanfare.
'Sadly, the timing and the optics and divisive politics have ruined it,' said Martinez, 48, of Katy, Texas. 'And I'm not picking one side or the other. Both sides are guilty.'
'It's just suspicious'
Joe Plenzler, a retired Marine who fought in Iraq, said Trump wants to see troops saluting him on his birthday as tanks roll past.
'It's just suspicious," the 53-year-old from Middletown, Virginia, said of the timing.
'I absolutely love the Army from the bottom of my cold black Marine heart,' he said. 'But if the Army's birthday was a day later, we probably wouldn't be doing it. I'd rather see that $50 million take care of the men and women who went off to war and came back with missing arms, legs and eyeballs, and with damaged brains.'
'Part of American culture'
Joe Kmiech, who served in the Army and Minnesota National Guard from 1989 to 1998, supports the parade because the Army is "part of American culture and our fabric.'
He notes the Army's pioneering contributions to engineering and medicine, from dams to new surgical techniques. Like many veterans, he has a strong familial connection: His father served in the Army, and so did his maternal grandfather, who fought in World War II.
'I didn't vote for President Trump, but the commander in chief is going to be part of that celebration,' said Kmiech, 54, of Roberts, Wisconsin. 'The distinction needs to be made that the parade is a celebration of our Army, not of a person.'
'Stroking Trump's ego'
For Gulf War Army veteran Paul Sullivan, Trump and the parade are inextricably linked.
'This Trump tank travesty is all about stroking Trump's ego,' said Sullivan, 62, who lives outside Charlottesville, Virginia. 'If Trump truly cared about our service members, he would sit down with them quietly and say, 'What can we do with $50 million or $100 million to make your lives better?' He's not.'
'We are a great nation'
McDonough, the veteran from Crofton, Maryland, disagrees that the parade is about Trump or too costly. He said the U.S. held a grand celebration in New York after World War II when the nation was deeply in debt.
'We certainly need to bring our debt down, and we certainly need to take care of our veterans,' he said. 'But it's a false dichotomy. It's like saying if we bought two less aircraft carriers, we could do so much better to take care of our poor.'
And McDonough said soldiers' oath is to the Constitution, not to Trump.
The president 'understands the importance of doing this, not only for the Army, but for the nation,' McDonough said.
'A real dark turn'
Purdy, the veteran from Atlanta, said the parade's brazen flex of military strength is not an American tradition, particularly absent a recent victory.
'I'm not saying we shouldn't celebrate the country," he said. 'But for us to be projecting this type of hard power, in such a real in-your-face way, that's just not who we are.'
Trump is brushing aside old alliances and foreign aid that have helped maintain peace for decades, Purdy asserted.
'It signals a real dark turn if we're just going to roll out the tanks," Purdy said.
'People are the Army'
Michael Nardotti, an Army veteran who served in Vietnam, said military hardware has long been in American parades, which can help recruitment.
More important, he said, is the tremendous value in the public seeing soldiers' faces in a parade when active-duty troops make up less than 1% of the population.
''People are the Army,'' said Nardotti, 78, of Aldie, Virginia, quoting a former Army chief of staff.
Nardotti said he'll listen carefully to Trump's speech.
'I hope it sends the right message,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tax-cut bill could hold back US critical minerals projects
Trump's tax-cut bill could hold back US critical minerals projects

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump's tax-cut bill could hold back US critical minerals projects

WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill would make it harder for American critical minerals companies to compete with China because it eliminates a tax credit for boosting domestic production of nickel, rare earths and other materials used in advanced electronics and weaponry. With Trump and Republican lawmakers aiming to cut government support for green energy projects, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a version of his "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" last month that eliminates the so-called 45X credit. The Senate is now debating the bill. Former President Joe Biden's 2022 climate change law, the Inflation Reduction Act, created the 10% production credit - a reduction in corporate taxes for critical minerals extraction and processing. The tax break also covers solar, battery and wind projects. The version of the bill that passed the House treats government incentives for wind turbines the same as those for mining projects that many view as crucial for national security. Critical minerals companies now say their projects are collateral damage to the political feud over renewable energy. The tax credit is already law and part of the current federal budget. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which scores the cost of legislative proposals when asked by Congress, has not studied how much would be saved by removing the credit. The Republican majority in Congress is seeking savings to fund other priorities such as tax cuts, defense and balancing the budget. This month, the hard-right House Freedom Caucus said it "will not accept", opens new tab attempts to "water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation." Miners, though, say they need the credit to compete with China. Beijing has halted exports of some critical minerals, used its control of rare earths to strike a trade agreement with Washington, and flooded global markets with cheap supply of nickel, cobalt and lithium. The traditionally conservative mining industry now finds itself in the unusual position of needing Washington's support to grow and, in some cases, survive. The owner of the only U.S. cobalt mine went bankrupt this year after Chinese miners depressed global prices of that metal. "If we do not have that tax credit, critical minerals producers in the U.S. are at risk of succumbing to closures," said KaLeigh Long, founder and CEO of Westwin Elements, which is building the country's only commercial nickel refinery. Westwin might not be able to service its debt without the tax credit, Long said, noting the company's loans were modeled using the expectation it would be permanent. Last month, Long wrote a letter asking the Senate to keep the credit. It was co-signed by 30 industry executives. Any changes the Senate makes to the bill must be reconciled with the House version before being sent to Trump. Several House members have admitted they did not read the entire bill before voting for it, including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green, a Georgia Republican, and Congressman Mike Flood, a Nebraska Republican. House Democrats unanimously voted against the bill but their criticism has focused on tax cuts they say will widen the deficit while requiring cuts in health care, food assistance, education, scientific research and other programs. "There's so many issues right now under consideration in Congress and this one isn't breaking through, but it will certainly break through when we have a shortage of minerals in five years," said Jeff Green, a critical minerals industry consultant. Senator John Hickenlooper, a Colorado Democrat who voted for the IRA in 2022, said in a statement to Reuters that cutting the credit would "kill jobs ... just to fund tax breaks for the ultra-weathy" and would be a "bad deal" for the country. Trump, who has issued several executive orders aimed at boosting U.S. minerals production, has not commented publicly on the 45x debate. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. "The tax credit just adds a phenomenal bump to a project's economics and gives us advantages that China already gives its own companies," said Alex Grant, CEO of magnesium processing startup Magrathea, who signed the letter. China controls most of the world's production of the metal, used in alloys for steel and aluminum. Abigail Hunter, executive director of SAFE's Center for Critical Minerals Strategy, described the tax credit as the "only tool currently available to support industry exposed to market manipulation." The House version also removes any remaining IRA funding for the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO), which under Biden awarded billions of dollars in loans to Nevada lithium projects from ioneer ( opens new tab and Lithium Americas ( opens new tab. Potential for the LPO's closure led miners to rush to finalize loans last year, as Reuters reported in August. Republican senators this week said they were in discussions about how to extend some green energy tax credits, especially for businesses with large capital investments. No firm commitments have been made. For Mahesh Konduru, CEO of minerals processing startup Momentum Technologies, the credit is one way for Washington to show industry support. "We need to have the appropriate tools to build, nurture and grow that supply chain inside the United States," he said.

Dollar slides to three-year low after Trump repeats tariff threats
Dollar slides to three-year low after Trump repeats tariff threats

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Dollar slides to three-year low after Trump repeats tariff threats

The dollar sank to its lowest in more than three years on Thursday as Donald Trump's latest trade threats and the weakening economy appeared to bring forward interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. Foreign exchange traders sold the dollar in favour of the yen and the euro, which both climbed by about 1% against the US currency to leave it almost 10% down on its value against a basket of currencies since the beginning of the year. Analysts said there was little appetite to buy dollars at a time when recent data showed the jobs market weakening and while erratic White House policies clouded the outlook for the US economy. The slide came after the US president revived last month's threat to unilaterally impose country-specific tariff rates within the next two weeks. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' Trump told an event in Washington on Wednesday. Markets were also unsettled by growing speculation that the Federal Reserve would begin to cut the cost of borrowing more quickly than expected after consumer inflation came in lower than expected and producer inflation dropped. Weaker job hiring was another factor after the four-week average number of initial applications for unemployment support rose by 5,000 to 240,250 in May, the highest since August 2023. 'There's clearly solid dollar selling,' said Kit Juckes, the chief foreign exchange strategist at Société Générale. Talks between India and the US over tariffs on steel and aluminium imports imposed by Washington – and the threat of import duties on Indian pharmaceuticals – were also reported to be at loggerheads, leading to speculation that if talks break down, New Delhi may retaliate with tariffs on US imports. Bloomberg reported that India's negotiators had objected to a long list of US demands that included allowing genetically modified crops to be imported and the easing of price controls on medical devices. However, the UK is expected to get a trade boost after Trump indicated that he would put into force the bilateral trade deal signed with Keir Starmer last month, allowing the UK to avoid the extra import duties on cars in return for more relaxed quotas on US beef and ethanol exports to the UK. However, the pound's rise against the dollar to almost $1.36 was choked off by concerns that the UK economy was also suffering more than expected, and that an earlier intervention by the Bank of England to cut interest rates would reduce the demand for sterling. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The UK economy slumped by 0.3% in April, potentially bringing forward the date when the Bank of England cuts interest rates again. Policymakers meet next week, but are not expected to reduce the cost of borrowing from its 4.25% level until August at the earliest. Vasileios Gkionakis, a senior economist at Aviva Investors, said the consistent depreciation of the dollar since Trump's inauguration was probably due to a lack of faith in the US economy under Trump to grow at an exceptional pace, as it had in recent years. He said higher US government debts, which Trump has signalled will escalate once his tax bill passes both houses of Congress, was another deterrent to buying dollars. 'All this is agitating markets, who in order to lend to the US would require a combination of higher [interest rates] and a weaker exchange rate,' he said.

Abrego Garcia seeks sanctions against Trump administration in wrongful deportation case
Abrego Garcia seeks sanctions against Trump administration in wrongful deportation case

Reuters

time26 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Abrego Garcia seeks sanctions against Trump administration in wrongful deportation case

WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man wrongly deported from Maryland to El Salvador before being returned to the United States on migrant smuggling charges, is seeking sanctions against the Trump administration for allegedly stonewalling an inquiry into efforts to secure his return. The case has become a flashpoint over President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policies. Critics have held it up as an example of the administration's willingness to deny due process and evade court orders in its push to deport migrants. Lawyers for Abrego Garcia argued in a court filing late on Wednesday that a judge should punish the federal government for failing to provide meaningful information about steps U.S. agencies took to comply with court orders to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. 'The Government's defiance has not been subtle. It has been vocal and sustained and flagrant,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers wrote in the filing. The filing asked U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis to conclude that the Trump administration did not take all available steps to bring about his return. It also seeks an unspecified sum in fines and to compel U.S. officials to turn over documents they have previously withheld, citing legal privileges. Spokespeople from the U.S. Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the filing. The Trump administration has argued it satisfied court orders by bringing Abrego Garcia to Tennessee last week to face a federal criminal indictment accusing him of transporting migrants living in the U.S. illegally to destinations around the country. Abrego Garcia's lawyers have denounced the charges as 'fantastical' and argued that the indictment should not end a separate lawsuit over his wrongful deportation in March. Abrego Garcia is set to appear for a detention hearing in the criminal case on Friday. The Trump administration has accused Abrego Garcia of being a member of the MS-13 street gang, a charge his lawyers deny. The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return after U.S. officials conceded he was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador despite a prior court order barring him from being returned there. Administration officials initially said they had no way to compel El Salvador to return Abrego Garcia, who had been held in a Salvadorian prison, to U.S. custody. Xinis, who is presiding over the lawsuit, rejected those arguments and in April allowed Abrego Garcia's lawyers to question U.S. officials and seek documents on any steps the Trump administration had taken to secure his return. The Trump administration raised several legal privileges, arguing it did not have to divulge information that could impact U.S. national security or complicate diplomatic negotiations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store