Why the White House decided even the conservative Federalist Society isn't good enough
Donald Trump's agenda on trade tariffs has long rested on a shaky legal foundation, predicated in part on the idea that there's an 'emergency' that allows the president to unilaterally impose economic penalties based on nothing but his whims.
This week, that dubious foundation started to shake when two separate courts — a three-judge panel of the Court of International Trade and a U.S. district court judge — ruled that the White House's gambit is illegal. Those rulings were soon after paused by an appeals court, but Trump's back-to-back defeats represented an important embarrassment on one of his top policy priorities.
As is usually the case, the president and his team responded to the legal setbacks by lashing out, with varying degrees of hysterics, at the country's judicial system, as if there were something inherently outrageous about independent courts adjudicating cases involving the president's agenda.
But one nagging detail got in the way: One of the judges that ruled against the White House was appointed by Trump and confirmed by Senate Republicans. The political problem was obvious.
And so, as Politico reported, the president has opened up a new line of attack.
President Donald Trump leveled unusually pointed criticism of a prominent conservative legal activist and organization Thursday as he railed against a ruling that struck down his sweeping tariffs. The president, in a post on his social media platform, slammed Leonard Leo, the former chair of the Federalist Society, calling him a 'sleazebag' who 'probably hates America.'
As part of an odd and meandering online rant, the Republican wrote, 'I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations. This is something that cannot be forgotten!'
For those unfamiliar with the Federalist Society, it is a conservative organization that has long been seen as one of the most successful projects of the conservative movement. Indeed, throughout Trump's first term, the group was a key part of a brutally efficient assembly-line process: The Federalist Society would vet and recommend far-right ideologues for the federal bench; the White House would use the organization's lists for judicial nominations; Senate Republicans would rubber-stamp the president's choices; and Americans would watch the judiciary lurch to the right to a degree unseen in generations.
But for Trump and some close to him, that victory wasn't good enough — because some of the jurists backed by the Federalist Society have occasionally ruled in ways the Republican Party hasn't liked. Sure, they were conservative, but not enough of them were mindless, knee-jerk conservatives who were willing to abandon free thought altogether. Some even had the nerve to take the rule of law seriously.
In fact, a year before Election Day 2024, The New York Times reported that Team Trump had begun looking at Federalist Society members as 'squishes.' The article quoted Russell Vought, 15 months before he'd begin his latest tenure as the director of the White House's Office of Management and Budget, saying, 'The Federalist Society doesn't know what time it is.'
That was in late 2023. Now, midway through 2025, as several Trump-appointed federal judges rule in ways the president does not like, he won't blame himself, and he's won't blame Senate Republicans for confirming his picks — but he can blame the Federalist Society for recommending jurists who sometimes see themselves as neutral arbiters of a separate and coequal branch of government.
That's precisely why Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff, appeared on CNN the morning after Trump's online rant and accused the Federalist Society of creating 'a broken system.' He added, 'We're not going to be using the Federalist Society to make judicial nominations at all going forward.'
As for what Team Trump might replace it with, watch this space.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ASX-listed James Hardie secures $3.5 billion credit to fund AZEK deal
(Reuters) -ASX-listed James Hardie said on Monday it had secured new senior credit facilities for a total of $3.5 billion with broad support, including 30 participating banks to support its operations and acquisition of U.S.-listed AZEK. The multi-billion dollar loan facility can be broken down into a $1 billion revolving credit facility and a $2.5 billion senior secured term loan A, split into two tranches. The fibre-cement maker had offered to buy the U.S. artificial decking maker for $8.75 billion in March, while markets were concerned about a slowdown in the U.S. housing sector. With the new credit facilities, bridge facility commitments with certain lenders in connection with the pending acquisition were reduced from $4.3 billion to $1.7 billion. New housing stock in the U.S. is near a two-decade high and tariffs and an immigration crackdown under President Donald Trump are seen as likely to slow construction further. In May, the building material firm forecast tepid earnings growth for its North American business, the company's biggest market and profit engine, while reporting a drop in annual profit. Back in Australia, market scrutiny has also increased on such large corporate buyouts after investors raised questions about the AZEK deal. In a separate announcement, James Hardie terminated its American depositary shares (ADS) program, believing it will become unnecessary after the company lists its share on the New York Stock Exchange. James Hardie's ASX-listed shares jumped as much as 3.2% to A$36.57, their highest level in over a week, and were last trading up 2.9%. The stock has lost more than 8% in value since the buyout deal was announced in March. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US dollar declines as traders assess tariff outlook
By Kevin Buckland TOKYO (Reuters) -The U.S. dollar edged lower on Monday, giving back some of its gains from last week, as markets weighed the outlook for President Donald Trump's tariff policy and its potential to constrict growth and unleash inflation. The greenback starts the week on the back foot after Trump said late on Friday that he plans to double duties on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from Wednesday. The U.S. currency has been whipsawed for weeks by Trump's on-again-off-again trade war, falling when a flare up in tensions stokes worries of a potential U.S. recession. The dollar witnessed weekly tumbles of 3% against major peers in the days after the April 2 "Liberation Day" tariffs and 1.9% two weeks ago, when Trump threatened 50% levies on Europe. Last week, the greenback got a bit of respite, rising 0.3% after talks with the European Union got back on track and a U.S. trade court blocked the bulk of Trump's tariffs on the grounds that he overstepped his authority. Although an appeals court reinstated the duties a day later as it considers the case, and Trump's administration said it had other avenues to implement the levies if it loses in court, many analysts said it shows there are still checks in place on the President's power. The dollar dropped 0.3% to 143.57 yen as of 0023 GMT, giving back some of its more than 1% rally from last week. The euro gained 0.2% to $1.1372, and sterling advanced 0.3% to $1.3489. The Australian dollar added 0.3% to $0.6454. The U.S. dollar index, which measures the currency against six major peers, eased 0.2% to 99.214. The dollar has also been weighed down by fiscal worries in recent weeks, amid a broad "Sell America" theme that has seen dollar assets from stocks to Treasury bonds dropping. Those concerns come into particular focus this week as the Senate starts considering Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill, which will add an estimated $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade. Many senators have already said the bill will need major revisions, and Trump said he welcomes changes. The fate of section 899 of the bill could be crucial, according to Barclays analysts. "S899 would give the U.S. free rein to tax companies and investors from countries deemed to have 'unfair foreign taxes' (and) could be seen as a tax on the U.S. capital account at a time when investor nervousness towards U.S. assets has grown," they said in a research report. "Actively reducing foreigners' total return on their U.S. investments would dent inflows and weigh on the dollar, all else equal," they added. "While dollar sentiment/positioning remains close to extreme negativity, the path ahead is by no means clear cut."
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does SIA Engineering (SGX:S59) Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' While a well funded company may sustain losses for years, it will need to generate a profit eventually, or else investors will move on and the company will wither away. So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like SIA Engineering (SGX:S59). Now this is not to say that the company presents the best investment opportunity around, but profitability is a key component to success in business. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If you believe that markets are even vaguely efficient, then over the long term you'd expect a company's share price to follow its earnings per share (EPS) outcomes. Therefore, there are plenty of investors who like to buy shares in companies that are growing EPS. It certainly is nice to see that SIA Engineering has managed to grow EPS by 27% per year over three years. If growth like this continues on into the future, then shareholders will have plenty to smile about. Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. EBIT margins for SIA Engineering remained fairly unchanged over the last year, however the company should be pleased to report its revenue growth for the period of 14% to S$1.2b. That's encouraging news for the company! In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. To see the actual numbers, click on the chart. See our latest analysis for SIA Engineering You don't drive with your eyes on the rear-view mirror, so you might be more interested in this free report showing analyst forecasts for SIA Engineering's future profits. It's a good habit to check into a company's remuneration policies to ensure that the CEO and management team aren't putting their own interests before that of the shareholder with excessive salary packages. Our analysis has discovered that the median total compensation for the CEOs of companies like SIA Engineering with market caps between S$1.3b and S$4.1b is about S$1.8m. SIA Engineering's CEO took home a total compensation package worth S$1.4m in the year leading up to March 2024. That is actually below the median for CEO's of similarly sized companies. CEO remuneration levels are not the most important metric for investors, but when the pay is modest, that does support enhanced alignment between the CEO and the ordinary shareholders. It can also be a sign of good governance, more generally. For growth investors, SIA Engineering's raw rate of earnings growth is a beacon in the night. The fast growth bodes well while the very reasonable CEO pay assists builds some confidence in the board. Based on these factors, this stock may well deserve a spot on your watchlist, or even a little further research. What about risks? Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for SIA Engineering you should know about. There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of Singaporean companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
