Watch: UFC fighter Khabib refuses to shake hands with Kate Scott over ‘Muslim beliefs'
Credit: CBS Sports Golazo / Paramount+
CBS presenter Kate Scott apologised live on air after UFC Champion Khabib Nurmagomedov refused to shake her hand during their Champions League final coverage.
As the team of Scott, known as Kate Abdo before marriage, Jamie Carragher, Micah Richards and Theirry Henry were providing post-match punditry on Paris Saint-Germain's 5-0 victory in Munich they were joined by the former fighter and streamer IShowSpeed live on air.
Advertisement
Nurmagomedov, who famously beat Conor McGregor in 2018, shook the hand of every member of the panel before awkwardly rejecting the outstretched hand of Scott.
The 36-year-old clarified his position to Scott who then apologised for her attempt on air, by saying: 'I apologise, thank you so much. Khabib, UFC fighter, it's a pleasure to have you. We didn't know you were here!'
Scott then moved the conversation to asking Nurmagomedov about his love for Paris Saint-Germain before he admitted he was also a Real Madrid man as he joked with Henry about 'breaking his heart' in 2006 after he scored the winner at the Bernabeu in the knockout stages.
Nurmagomedov watched PSG win the Champions League alongside Islam Makhachev (right) - Getty Images/Michel Regan
It is believed that Nurmagomedov's decision to refuse Scott's hand is because he is a devout Sunni Muslim from the Russian Republic of Dagestan.
Advertisement
In Islam, it is forbidden for a man to touch any part of a woman whether she is Muslim or non-Muslim unless they are related or married.
Scott has been praised for navigating a potential awkward situation with excellent professionalism but it is not the first time the unbeaten former UFC fighter has refused to train with females in the gym because of their beliefs.
Speaking about her experience, fellow UFC fighter Cynthia Calvillo said she found their decision 'weird'.
She told theScore: 'It's a little bit weird because of their religion ... they won't train with women.
'[Nurmagomedov] is still showing technique and stuff like that. So I still get to watch it. But it doesn't bother me because they're not really being directly rude to me.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chael Sonnen marvels at the Jon Jones vs. Tom Aspinall saga: 'This fight is getting smaller, not bigger'
Every day that passes, Jon Jones vs. Tom Aspinall is feeling like more of a "what if." The UFC heavyweight division's two champions are existing in entirely different types of breaks as 2025 reached its halfway mark. Jones has been living it up in Thailand after recently filming a Russian reality show, while Aspinall continues to train and hope for his long-awaited unification bout against Jones. Advertisement While Jones' future in the Octagon remains uncertain, what is certain is that Aspinall has plenty of fights left in him at age 32. The interim champion spoke to Chael Sonnen earlier this week and gave Sonnen further indications of how this saga may play out, which Sonnen shared Monday on Uncrowned's "The Ariel Helwani Show." "Tom's going to fight, and he will get his request that the undisputed belt will be up," Sonnen said. "I have a hard time believing that Jon's done anything wrong. I don't believe that Jon did hold up the company. I don't believe that Jon did tell them $40 million over the phone and put a gun in their face. I don't believe that. I cannot believe that if Jon Jones picks up a phone and [the UFC] goes, 'Here's the date and venue, you already know the rules and the weight class,' I struggle as a person to believe Jon says no and puts the phone down. "I have a very hard time imagining that Jon is going to walk away from [$40 million]. I know publicly he likes to have some fun. I know that you can hurt his feelings on Twitter, and he'll change his whole outlook just for those 10 people that did it. But the real guy in there, that's a dirty, grimy competitor. That's the same guy who busted his toe against yours truly. That's the same guy who had his arm extended against Vitor [Belfort]. He finds a way, and I just don't think that fire has burned out." Jones' heavyweight run has been anticlimactic compared to expectation upon his light heavyweight departure in 2020. The former two-time champion took three years off to build mass for his new division. Advertisement At the time, a mega-fight with lineal UFC heavyweight champion Francis Ngannou was the target that had the entire combat world salivating. But the relationship between the UFC and Ngannou broke down, which led to the latter moving on to boxing and the PFL while Jones made his heavyweight debut against top contender Ciryl Gane in March 2023, winning with a first-round guillotine choke. Jones, 37, has made it clear he's looking only for legacy fights to close out his career. His most recent appearance — a third-round stoppage of retired former champion Stipe Miocic — fit that bill. "When you're Jon, you jump in this business and you're like Roy Jones," Sonnen said. "You're looking around like, 'How come I don't have the big fights? How come I'm not the big money fight. I'm the best guy here.' Well, [it's] because you were so dominant. But you do it anyway ... you make the walk. You do it over and over again, hoping to get that one night — the highest paid, biggest check ever written by WME. "Jon took three years off to put on some size, and he's going to move to heavyweight and spot an opponent 30 or 40 pounds. Right then, he thought that was going to be Francis. He was building his body for Francis. He knew, 'I can spot this guy 30, 40 pounds, and I can finally create an idea in the audience's mind that the guy has an advantage.' That's what we've got." Jon Jones doesn't appear close to fighting again. (Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC) (Jeff Bottari via Getty Images) Nearly flawless across his 30-fight in-cage career, Jones fought all comers throughout the majority of his 205-pound run, including Sonnen. However, he's found himself fending off accusations of ducking Aspinall in 2025 — and has played into the sentiment since each of their respective last fights. Advertisement Sonnen's not buying it though. "Jon Jones is in the position — everything he's ever said he wanted, everything he's proved to us, shown us in sincerity, set out to do," Sonnen said, "it's all right in front of him. And so many times this will happen in greatness. So many times, these guys will feel the pressure. So many times, guys will go and have an opportunity to have everything they've ever said they wanted, and right when it's there at the doorstep, they start to realize, 'I don't want it.' I just don't think Jon's that kind of guy. I think Jon is as advertised. I think Jon's a badass, and I do not think Jon Jones is walking away from anything." UFC CEO Dana White immediately labeled the heavyweight bout as the biggest the UFC can make after Jones' win over Miocic. Since then, White has maintained the promotion will get a deal done. Yet as time goes on, interest may be fading — and Sonnen says he's seen it through his own YouTube numbers. "I've never in my life seen something like this, it's going the other way. This fight isn't getting headlines anymore," he said. Advertisement "I don't think that's anything with the UFC and their ability. I think they could flip that script real quick. ... I have my own hypothesis, which is the audience is not convinced they're going to get it. They don't want to get excited. They don't want to hear about it anymore. They just don't believe we can get that fight to the ring. "This fight is getting smaller, not bigger." Jones infamously demanded "f*** you money" when asked what it'd take for him to fight Aspinall after Miocic. Aspinall joked in his chat with Sonnen that Jones is retired and wished him the best, though nothing official has been announced just yet. Advertisement Considering the situation, Sonnen believes what makes the numbers so tricky is whether or not Jones actually does fight beyond Aspinall. Because at heavyweight, that's about all there is right now. "No fighter ever — and there's not an exception, you can go through all their numbers — coming off a victory, fights for less in their next fight than they did in that fight, coming off a victory. Never," Sonnen said. "So you get a champion, it can be a very tough spot. Jon doesn't have two fights out there. He doesn't have three fights that people would be excited about. But Jon doesn't hold any of the records. He's got no pay-per-view, no live gate — he has zero records. And it wasn't a matter of Conor [McGregor] came in and beat him. Jon never had them. Jon was so good and so dominant, we would have lots of people dressed up in empty seats to come to a Jon Jones fight. "If you come to the table with $12 million for this one fight, you're not going to get him again. Who's his next fight? With Curtis Blaydes? It's with Derrick Lewis? ... It's a much smaller match, but you have to pay him the same thing. No fighter could ever look at him objectively and go, 'OK, that night was a big night. This one's less big. We've failed at our job promoting.' They don't look at it like that, man. They put that thing right on the promoter. That's where it becomes a problem. "You could justify $12 million to Jones for Aspinall plus back-end points, which is going to bring it to almost $20 million," he continued. " ... But you can't give him that against Ciryl [Gane]. You can't give him that against [Alexander] Volkov. That becomes the problem. If you are going to do that as a promoter, you better be goddamn sure that guy is going to get beat."
New York Times
19 minutes ago
- New York Times
French Open recap: Lorenzo Musetti avoids default after kicking ball into linesperson
Follow The Athletic's French Open coverage Welcome to the French Open briefing, where The Athletic will explain the stories behind the stories on each day of the tournament. On day 10, tennis' bizarre relationship with unsportsmanlike conduct took another twist, the wind whipped up the clay on Court Philippe-Chatrier, and Roland Garros' decision to keep line judges came under scrutiny. Lorenzo Musetti is headed to the semifinals of the French Open, but he could easily be heading home. Musetti, the occasionally feisty Italian, cruised through the first set of his quarterfinal against Frances Tiafoe on Tuesday afternoon. In the second, things started to go south. His slice backhand wasn't biting. His forehand was flying. Tiafoe had gotten used to his spins and was outplaying him. Advertisement As the second set wound down, Musetti vented by kicking a ball toward the back wall of Court Philippe-Chatrier. It accidentally whacked a line judge near her shoulder. The ball wasn't moving particularly fast, but sending a ball in flight in anger and hitting anyone with it, much less a line judge, comes with a ball abuse penalty that can include being ejected from the tournament. Tennis is weird about defaults — the ultimate penalty for bad behavior, which involves automatically losing the match. Whether or not a player smacks a ball in frustration, or throws or kicks it like Musetti, the penalty more often than not is outcome-based. If the person struck is in distress, the player gets defaulted, they are allowed to continue. But per the rulebook, that should be irrelevant. 'Players shall not violently, dangerously or with anger hit, kick or throw a tennis ball while on the grounds of the tournament site except in the reasonable pursuit of a point during a match (including warm-up). 'For purposes of this rule, abuse of balls is defined as intentionally or recklessly hitting a ball out of the enclosure of the court, hitting a ball dangerously or recklessly within the court or hitting a ball with disregard of the consequences.' The problem with the logic currently applied is that it gives players credit for being in control of something which they are not in control of. Smashing or kicking a ball into a crowd of people or an enclosed space is risky. Whether or not it hits someone with a glancing blow or square on is pure luck. On this occasion, chair umpire Timo Janzen let Musetti off with a warning. Tiafoe complained, but to no avail. Novak Djokovic was defaulted from the 2020 U.S. Open when he whacked a ball that inadvertently hit a line judge in the throat. Two years ago at Roland Garros, doubles player Miyu Kato and her partner were defaulted after Kato accidentally hit a ball kid in the neck when returning a ball to her — not even swatting it in frustration. Advertisement Kato originally received a warning, but her opponents complained and the supervisor ultimately disqualified Kato and her partner, Aldila Sutjiadi of Indonesia. The year before, Romania's Irina-Camelia Begu accidentally bounced her racket into the crowd. It hit a small child, who started crying but his parents said he was fine. She received a warning. If all this sounds a bit inconsistent, it is. Tiafoe was still annoyed with Janzen's handling of the situation an hour after the end of the match. He called the decision 'comical.' 'He did that and nothing happened,' Tiafoe said. 'Obviously it's inconsistent.' Musetti said later he was scared that he was going to get booted from the tournament. 'I did not want to harm anybody,' he said. 'There was no intention about it.' Matt Futterman Sports stadiums can be weird places when it comes to wind. The air can be nearly still four stories up, but swirling about at court level. That was Court Philippe-Chatrier on Tuesday, the second quarterfinal day for the men and the women. There were several moments during Iga Świątek's match against Elina Svitolina when the players had to stop and turn their heads away from the wind to avoid getting a mouthful of red dust. Players talk about feeling like small bugs in the cavernous stadium, which seats just 15,000. The stands slope gently outward, leaving a low broad opening at the top, while the retractable roof slides over from just one side, leaving a big opening at the top for gusts to get in. This was not as bad as 2019, when gusts measured at nearly 50 mph (and Rafael Nadal) sent Roger Federer packing in their semifinal. But it was not great. In tennis, wind direction can be just as important as its speed. Wind will make serving difficult regardless, but it has its clearest impact when it is blowing parallel to the sidelines, rather than perpendicular. At one end, players have to be wary of overhitting with the breeze at their back. On the other, they have to be mindful of how much it will hold up their shots. The player receiving a ball with wind behind it needs to react quicker; if it's slowing a ball down, their footwork needs to take them to it and adjust to any sudden changes of direction. Advertisement If air is buffeting around a stadium every which way, things get a little more chaotic. Świątek said the worst wind she has experienced was at Wimbledon, where she has problems on the grass even when it's still, but this was rough. 'In the second set, it got pretty crazy,' Świątek said. 'I never had that here, but in the first set it wasn't that bad. I think it kind of slowed down also at the end of the match.' Of course she thought that: she served three aces in the final game of her 6-1, 7-5 win. Matt Futterman From the start of play, it's felt inevitable that the French Open's decision to opt for line judges over electronic line calling (ELC) would come under scrutiny. Mixed events on clay, and every other surface, use ELC, but the tournament opted against it. The France Tennis Federation (FFT) president, Gilles Moretton, said in April that this was because it trusts their industry-leading officials to do a good job, claiming last week that ELC had been shown not to be totally effective at the earlier clay events this year. The downside of no ELC was duly exposed Tuesday when at a critical moment in the quarterfinal between Aryna Sabalenka and Zheng Qinwen, a bad error from the officials could have made a major difference. With Zheng serving at 5-6, 30-30, Sabalenka hit a backhand that looked to have drifted long — so much so that Zheng stopped the point, despite there being no out call. The umpire got off her chair to inspect the mark, and backed up the line judge's call, but television replays using Hawk-Eye technology showed that the ball had actually been 7mm out. ELC has a margin of error, but it is smaller than 7mm. Given the speed at which Sabalenka's ball was traveling, it should have been relatively easy for the line judge to track, but bad errors like this are always possible with humans calling the lines. Zheng was able to hold her serve, so the incorrect call didn't have a material impact on the match, but it's an embarrassing look for the sport that such a critical call at a Grand Slam could have been botched like that. Advertisement There were a couple of further wrong calls that were at least correctly overruled by the umpire. The FFT did not respond to a request for comment on the officiating errors from the match. Later on Chatrier, Tiafoe was involved in a number of heated discussions with the umpire Janzen during his defeat to Musetti. On one occasion in the fifth set, Janzen got off his chair and incorrectly overruled an out call. The players are generally in favour of ELC, partly because while they know it's not completely infallible, there's certainty and no argument. Speaking of arguments, it's getting harder and harder to make one for relying on humans to make these decisions. Charlie Eccleshare Pretty much everyone who even vaguely follows tennis knows about or remembers the Rafael Nadal vs. Roger Federer Wimbledon final in 2008. Very few remember either of their paths to that final, however. Both were incredibly straightforward, with just one set dropped between them along the way. As the rounds went on, it felt as though each was trying to outdo the other and send out a little statement. Something similar is happening here, where the top two seeds Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz are taking it in turns to showcase their title credentials in their bids to set up a meeting in Sunday's final. After Sinner eviscerated Jiří Lehečka Saturday for the loss of just three games, Alcaraz beat a much tougher opponent in Ben Shelton the following day, even if it took him four sets. Sinner then thrashed a similarly ranked opponent to Shelton in Andrey Rublev on Sunday night, losing eight games. Not to be outdone, Alcaraz only gave up five in a 6-0, 6-1, 6-4 battering of American world No. 12 Tommy Paul on Tuesday night. Sinner took two hours to beat Rublev; Alcaraz only took 94 minutes to get past Paul, who was physically hampered but would not have quelled the version of Alcaraz he played even at full fitness. Advertisement The way it's been going, perhaps Sinner was watching Alcaraz's masterclass against Paul and thinking about how he could improve on it in his own quarterfinal Wednesday. So good luck, Alexander Bublik. Charlie Eccleshare Tell us what you noticed on the tenth day… (Top photo of Lorenzo Musetti: Alain Jocard / AFP via Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton / The Athletic)
Fox Sports
19 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
Bruno Fernandes turns down lucrative Al Hilal offer to stay at Man United
Associated Press MUNICH (AP) — Manchester United captain Bruno Fernandes has turned down a proposed move to Saudi club Al Hilal because he wants 'to play at the highest possible level.' Fernandes confirmed Tuesday that he had received an 'exciting offer' from the Riyadh-based club to switch after what was a disappointing season for United. 'They waited for me to think about my future, because I said only if Manchester thought it was the time to move on, that I'd be willing to do so,' Fernandes said through an interpreter. 'I talked to the gaffer, Ruben Amorim, and at the time he asked me not to go. I then talked to Man United. They said they didn't want to sell me. If I wanted to go, I could, but they didn't need the money, they didn't need to sell me.' Media reports suggested Al Hilal was prepared to pay 100 million pounds ($135 million) to take the 30-year-old Fernandes from United while offering him a wage of 700,000 pounds ($946,000) per week to play for the Saudi Pro League team, which will compete in the Club World Cup this month in the United States. 'It was a very exciting offer,' Fernandes said. 'The president of Al Hilal, he was very nice to me. He talked to my manager but then I talked to my wife and as a family we wanted to see what I wanted to do. She asked me, what do you want to do with your future?' Fernandes last year signed a contract extension to stay at Old Trafford until June 2027. This season did not go as planned as the Red Devils failed to qualify for the Champions League after finishing 15th in the Premier League, while United also endured the heartbreak of losing the Europa League final to Tottenham. 'We had goals and we didn't meet them,' said Fernandes, a key figure for United since his arrival in January 2020. He said it would have been easy for the family to make the move to Riyadh, and for him to adjust to the team with Portugal teammates Ruben Neves and Joao Cancelo already playing for Al Hilal. 'I'm used to them, but I want to play at the highest possible level," Fernandes said. "I want play for major competitions. I know I still can, and I want to be happy doing the thing I love the most. And for better or worse, I'm still very passionate about football. This is how I see football. This is how I see my life and my future, and I'm happy about the decision I made.' Fernandes was speaking as a Portugal player before the team's Nations League semifinal against Germany on Wednesday in Munich. The winner of that game will face either France or Spain in Sunday's final. ___ AP soccer: recommended in this topic
