Bills aim to improve access to dental care in North Dakota
(Getty Images)
Two bills being considered by the North Dakota Legislature strive to make dental care more accessible to low-income and under-represented populations across the state. Supporters say the bills are needed but merely begin to address unmet dental care needs in the state.
House Bill 1567 would fund a study of the dental health care status among Medicaid recipients and look at ways to recruit dental care providers to improve access for low-income children, Native American children and people with disabilities.
Senate Bill 2231 would add dental coverage to Medicaid Expansion, the health insurance program for adults who aren't eligible for Medicaid but whose household incomes fall below 138% of the federal poverty line.
'We need to take action,' said Rep. Mary Schneider, D-Fargo, who is one of the sponsors for the House bill. 'We need effective and permanent ways to address lack of dental access for groups who rely on Medicaid for oral health.'
Adding dental benefits to the Medicaid Expansion program is one step toward that goal, supporters of Senate Bill 2231 say. Currently, anyone on Medicaid receives dental benefits, but those who receive insurance through the Medicaid Expansion program don't.
Tammy King is executive director of Bridging the Gap, a nonprofit dental clinic that operates in Bismarck. She said that patients often set up an appointment thinking they have dental benefits through Medicaid and only later find out they're on the Medicaid Expansion program.
'We can at least offer patients a discounted rate, but it's confusing and frustrating for patients,' she said. 'Our staff spend a lot of time explaining this to people.'
Nadine Boe, CEO of Northland Health Center in Turtle Lake, says the addition of dental benefits to Medicaid Expansion also will encourage patients to seek preventive and restorative care, which will result in improved health and reduced costly emergency visits.
In addition, increased Medicaid reimbursements for dental services would enhance her center's financial sustainability and allow the center to recruit more dentists and potentially expand to more locations.
Northland Health Center is one of five federally qualified health centers across the state. These centers provide primary medical care, behavioral health services and dental care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
'By adding benefits to Medicaid Expansion, this will bring more resources into the dental care system and strengthen it for everyone,' said Shelly Ten Napel, CEO of the Community HealthCare Association of the Dakotas. 'It won't solve all our problems. But it will help us expand.'
Approximately 34,000 North Dakotans rely on Medicaid Expansion for their health care coverage. Adding dental benefits would cost the state about $350,000, according to testimony shared with the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. Additional dollars would come from federal funding.
But these costs may offset what is being spent in emergency care. More than 1,700 people visited a North Dakota emergency room for tooth pain in 2021, according to data from the state Department of Health and Human Services.
'In the end, we will save a lot in health care costs,' said Sen. Judy Lee, R-West Fargo, one of the sponsors for the Senate bill. 'Also, people will seek care earlier, so they won't miss as much school and work.'
Lack of insurance coverage is only one of the barriers keeping people from receiving dental care in the state.
In North Dakota, about 44% of the need for dental providers is being met, according to a report from the state Department of Health and Human Services. Rural and low-income areas in the state face the most shortages.
The same report shows health of the mouth is directly related to overall health. Oral diseases like tooth decay (cavities) and periodontal (gum) disease are associated with many serious health problems like Type II diabetes, heart disease, lung disease, stroke, dementia, low birth weight, and pre-term birth.
The legislative study proposed by House Bill 1567 would dive deeper into the barriers that keep people from seeking dental care and the reasons private dental clinics may decline or limit the number of Medicaid patients they serve.
More 2025 legislative session coverage
Bridging the Gap serves patients who receive ND Medicaid benefits, in addition to those who are uninsured, under-insured and low-income. The clinic receives calls daily from people who say it's the only clinic accepting new Medicaid patients, King said.
'Everybody is at capacity, so they don't need to reach out to those on Medicaid,' she said.
The Legislature has commissioned studies before, but no action plans were drafted, said Rep. Schneider. The state needs to better understand how to recruit dentists and other dental care providers, she said. It needs to understand why people don't seek dental care before it's an emergency.
'We've documented unmet needs, but we haven't addressed the barriers in the system,' she said. 'That's where we need to make progress.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Senate Republicans double down and target clean energy in draft tax bill
Tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, albeit less quickly, under Senate Republicans' latest proposed changes to a massive tax bill. Electric vehicle incentives and other provisions intended to move the United States away from fossil fuels would be gutted rapidly. Senate Republicans cast their version of the bill as less damaging to the clean energy industry than the version House Republicans passed last month, but Democrats and advocates criticized it, saying it would still have significant consequences for wind, solar and other projects. Ultimately, wherever Congress ends up could have a big impact on consumers, companies and others that were depending on tax credits for green energy investments. It could also impact long-term how quickly America transitions to renewable energies. 'They want everybody to believe that after the flawed House bill, that they have come up with a much more moderate climate approach," said Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the finance committee, during a conference call with reporters Tuesday. 'The reality is, if the early projections on the clean energy cuts are accurate, the Senate Republican bill does almost 90%" as much damage as the House proposal, added Wyden, who authored clean energy tax credits included in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act passed during former President Joe Biden's term. 'Let's not get too serious about this new Senate bill being a kinder, gentler approach.' The Edison Electric Institute, a trade association representing investor-owned electric companies, issued a statement applauding the Senate proposal for including 'more reasonable timelines for phasing out energy tax credits.' 'These modifications are a step in the right direction,' said the statement from Pat Vincent-Collawn, the institute's interim chief executive officer, adding that the changes balance 'business certainty with fiscal responsibility.' Whether all of the changes will be enacted into law isn't clear yet. The Senate can still modify its proposals before they go to a vote. Any conflicts in the draft legislation will have to be sorted out with the House as the GOP looks to fast-track the bill for a vote by President Donald Trump's imminent Fourth of July target. Notably, many Republicans in Congress have advocated to protect the clean-energy credits, which have overwhelmingly benefited Republican congressional districts. A report by the Atlas Public Policy research firm found that 77% of planned spending on credit-eligible projects are in GOP-held House districts. The clean energy tax credits stem from Biden's climate law, which aimed to boost to the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions and toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. The House version of the bill took an ax to many of the credits and effectively made it impossible for wind and solar providers to meet the requirements and timelines necessary to qualify for the incentives. After the House vote, 13 House Republicans lobbied the Senate to preserve some of the clean energy incentives that GOP lawmakers had voted to erase. Language included Monday in the reconciliation bill from the Senate Finance Committee would still phase out — though more slowly than House lawmakers envisioned — some Biden-era green energy tax breaks. The Senate proposal further 'achieves significant savings by slashing Green New Deal spending and targeting waste, fraud and abuse in spending programs while preserving and protecting them for the most vulnerable,' said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho and chairman of the committee. On the chopping block are tax credits for residential rooftop solar installations, ending within 180 days of passage, and a subsidy for hydrogen production. Federal credits for wind and solar would have a longer phaseout than in the House version, but it would still be difficult for developers to meet the rules for beginning construction in order to receive the credit. At the same time, it would boost support for geothermal, nuclear and hydropower projects that begin construction by 2033. 'The bill will strip the ability of millions of American families to choose the energy savings, energy resilience, and energy freedom that solar and storage provide,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association. 'If this bill passes as is, we cannot ensure an affordable, reliable and secure energy system.' Opponents of the Senate's text also decry domestic manufacturing job and economic losses as a result. 'This is a 20-pound sledgehammer swung at clean energy. It would mean higher energy prices, lost manufacturing jobs, shuttered factories, and a worsening climate crisis,' said Jackie Wong, senior vice president for climate and energy at the Natural Resources Defense Council. The bill would also cancel incentives such as the Energy Efficient Home Improvement credit — which helps homeowners make improvements such as insulation or heating and cooling systems that reduce their energy usage and energy bills — 180 days after enactment. An incentive for builders constructing new energy-efficient homes and apartments would end 12 months after signing. The House's proposed end date for both is Dec. 31. 'Canceling these credits would increase monthly bills for American families and businesses,' Steven Nadel, executive director of the nonprofit American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy said in a statement. The Senate proposal moves up the timeline for ending the consumer electric vehicle tax credit from the end of this year to 180 days after passage. It also cuts the provision that would have extended until the end of 2026 a credit for automakers that had not made 200,000 qualifying EVs for U.S. sale. It would also immediately eliminate the $7,500 credit for leased EVs. This administration has staunchly gone after EVs amid Trump's targeting of what he calls a 'mandate,' incorrectly referring to a Biden-era target for half of new vehicle sales by 2030 be electric. ___
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Man charged with killing prominent lawmaker could face a rarity for Minnesota: the death penalty
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty. Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty. It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters. In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the U.S. courthouse in St. Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history. The federal case Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. 'Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options,' Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets, including officials in other states. Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea. On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison. Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates. President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions, more than the administration of any other president in modern history. The state's case The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd. At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged 'there's a tension' and said federal officials 'can speak for themselves.' Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday. As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors. 'Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts,' said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. 'Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here.' Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant U.S. attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors. 'There's no doubt that it's complicated,' Osler said. 'And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling.' What's next If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: 'a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas.' After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held. Thompson told reporters that the federal case 'does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere.' 'There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is,' Osler said. ___ Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed.
Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Man charged with killing prominent lawmaker could face a rarity for Minnesota: the death penalty
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty. Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty. It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters. In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the U.S. courthouse in St. Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history . The federal case Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. 'Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options,' Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets , including officials in other states . Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea. On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison . Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson . In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates. President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions , more than the administration of any other president in modern history. The state's case The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd . At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged 'there's a tension' and said federal officials 'can speak for themselves.' Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday. As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors. 'Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts,' said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. 'Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here.' Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant U.S. attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors. 'There's no doubt that it's complicated,' Osler said. 'And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling.' What's next If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: 'a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas.' After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held. Thompson told reporters that the federal case 'does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere.' Boelter's next federal court appearance is June 27. He does not have any further appearances scheduled in state court. 'There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is,' Osler said. ___ Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
