logo
The deadly Ukrainian SBU has humbled Putin. Special Forces can be war winners

The deadly Ukrainian SBU has humbled Putin. Special Forces can be war winners

Telegraph2 days ago

The Ukrainians' Operation Spiderweb against Putin's strategic air fleet was a master stroke, executed as part of the Ukrainian strategy to grind Russia down and end the war. This is not only a matter of what it may cost Putin to replace high value weapon systems: in many cases he cannot replace them at all. With sanctions in place the necessary components are often unobtainable. The widening gap between the strategic assets available to Russia and Nato is part of a death dance: not unlike the 'Star Wars' programme which helped bring about the end of the Soviet Union.
In anticipation that West might allow the use of some long-ranging weapons against Russian territory, Putin moved his strategic assets further into Russia to put them out of harm's way (or so he thought). But the Ukrainians had a plan to deal with this.
As in the past, when a nation finds itself with its back to the wall, it it is likely to adopt an unconventional and indirect approach. The Ukrainians deployed the Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny, or SBU, the Ukrainian Security Service. The UK doesn't have a single organisation much like the SBU – it developed out of the Ukrainian branch of the KGB on the fall of the Soviet Union, and like the old KGB it does spying and internal security as well as special operations.
But we in the UK have also had to use our special forces to turn the tide of war. In June of 1942 Axis forces were pounding the British-held island of Malta, vital to the control of Mediterranean shipping to North Africa for both the Allied and Axis armies there. The survival of the British army in North Africa was at stake.
As pressure on Malta grew, a daring plan – Operation Style – was developed to deliver 32 badly needed Spitfire fighters to Malta to defend the island. The danger was that the Axis had air superiority and would destroy the convoy and the vital Spitfires before they could get in range of the island. The solution was SAS and SBS attacks on Axis airfields in North Africa and on Crete. The raids over a couple of nights destroyed a huge number of enemy aircraft, especially the deadly Stuka dive bombers that threatened the convoy. Huge amounts of air power would have been required to achieve the same results – air power which Britain simply did not have available. The raids means that 28 of the 32 Spitfires reached Malta safely and the island was saved. The effect of the raids on both Axis materiel and morale was profound.
Other examples of the daring use of Special Forces tend to be born of desperation also. During the Rhodesian Bush War Rhodesian SAS carried out several daring missions deep inside hostile territory and more recently Israeli special forces have conducted seemingly impossible missions to strike pre-emptively against threats. Russia itself attempted a Special Forces raid in March, sneaking through some disused gas pipelines with mixed results. But Operation Spiderweb, like the SAS raids of June 1942, was a full blown game-changer reliant on lateral thinking and extreme daring.
The most striking aspect of these raids is not only in the asymmetric outcome – Operation Spiderweb would have cost less than $1m to mount, whilst the damage is estimated at around $7bn – but the psychological effect on the enemy, military and civilian.
This may be just the start. Now the Ukrainians have demonstrated that they can and will use an indirect approach, the West may be emboldened to permit the use of long range missiles too – and these will be harder to guard against with one fewer Beriev A-50 to watch for low-flying missiles and drones.
In any case, each strategic strike inflicts expensive damage. The aircraft destroyed on Sunday ranged in value from $100m for a TU-22M supersonic 'Backfire' bomber to $280m for an A-50. The Ukrainians will now be aiming for the premier Russian missile defence systems: an S-400 is $1.5bn and the very latest S-500 is $2.5bn.
It may be that it is the cost of war rather than ferocity on the battlefield that wins in the end. Just as Al Capone was brought down by the tax man it may be that the mighty Russian war machine falls to the precision strike and the daring of the SBU.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ed Miliband is laying a trap for Nigel Farage
Ed Miliband is laying a trap for Nigel Farage

Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Ed Miliband is laying a trap for Nigel Farage

If Reform UK wins the next election, scrapping net zero is first on their list of policies. Party leader Nigel Farage believes the move could save tens of billions over the next parliament, freeing up funds for tax breaks and benefits boosts. Labour's Ed Miliband, on the other hand, appears to be building his platform on preventing this coming to pass. If Labour can block Reform by triumphing at the ballot box, that's all well and good. If it can't, then there are other tools. As the New Statesman has noted, Miliband's newfound enthusiasm for community wind projects may partly be an attempt to 'future-proof' net zero, pushing things through today that will be tricky to unwind tomorrow. Underhand, possibly, but potentially effective. And it's an approach we could well see expand to other elements of the policy in the near future. Reform's targeted savings from the transition to net zero are already under fire. While the party believes it's possible to save £225bn over the next parliament, the Institute for Government (whose report the figures are partly based on) has argued that some of this sum constitutes private sector spending. Just as important, however, is the question of how much of it will be easily cut. Depending on which analysis you follow, spending over the rest of this parliament could average somewhere between £13bn and £19bn per year, with the latest Climate Change Committee Carbon Budget suggesting that anywhere between £6bn and £23bn of public funding could be needed in 2035. Over the period to 2050, one Office for Budget Responsibility report (now a little old) estimated the net cost at £344bn to the public sector, with the downside risk at £553bn. These are large sums. The upper end – £22bn or so each year – would be enough to fund the reversal of the winter fuel payments cuts (£1.65bn per year), raise the personal allowance by £1,250 (£11.1bn), scrap the two-child benefit cap (£3.4bn) and add another 0.2pc of GDP onto the defence budget – covering almost half the gap between Labour's distant 3pc ambition and the mooted Nato 3.5pc target. It's also the case that these sums could be underestimated. The Climate Change Committee's analysis shows net zero coming in at a net annual cost of 0.2pc of GDP per year over the next quarter century, or roughly £4bn per year, with the costs front-loaded and net savings towards 2050. But underlying these figures are some very optimistic assumed cost curves for the future price of electricity capacity, including a forecast for offshore wind unit costs to fall by 39pc over the next 25 years. Now, this might happen. But it's worth noting that the UK's 2023 auction round for renewable energy projects resulted in no bids at all for offshore wind. These auctions award 'contracts for difference', which pay producers a set rate per unit of electricity produced. If the market rate is below that price, the producer receives a subsidy. If it's above it, then they pay the difference back. Barring a period between 2021 and 2023 when gas prices spiked over tensions and then outright war in Ukraine, these payments have tended to be large and positive: producers receive above-market-rate prices. Despite this, offshore wind was a no-go. In the subsequent auction round, the Government raised the maximum price on offer by 66pc, with the eventual contracts awarded coming in at 58pc above the previous record low. Even this wasn't quite enough. Ørsted's Hornsea 4 project won its funding in that round in September 2024. By March this year, it had been discontinued on the grounds of 'adverse developments relating to continued increase of supply chain costs, higher interest rates and an increase in the risk to construct and operate Hornsea 4 on the planned timeline'. Poof! 2.4 gigawatts (GW) of planned capacity vanished into the ether, just as the plan is to boost it from 15GW to 88GW by 2040. It's a neat illustration of one of net zero's risks. If other technologies also stall out on cost reductions, if delays to projects push the mooted benefits further back into the future, if higher interest rates raise the cost of capital, or if the costs of projects slip in typical fashion, then the costs of the transition could rise further still. And that uncertainty makes scrapping net zero even more appealing for Reform. A policy which they believe will cut energy bills – contracts for difference, the renewables obligation feed-in tariffs and the guarantee of origin system have added £280 to annual household costs between them, before we get to balancing payments and transmission costs – is also a way to work towards balancing the books and reducing fiscal risks. It's a win-win. If, that is, they can pull it off. The concern will be that Labour is trying to tie their hands, setting up contracts and legal commitments well in advance of the next election that will make it extremely hard for a future government to change course. There are early signs the party is moving in this direction, with the next auction round for renewable subsidies taking the approach of inviting bids first towards a targeted capacity, then setting a cash budget after reviewing them. Combined with Miliband's rush to complete decarbonisation of the grid by 2030, and increasing pressure on the private sector to follow along with schemes incentivising electrification of home heating and transport, and the intention could well be to tie Reform's hands. However, Richard Tice, deputy leader of Reform UK and the party's energy spokesman, isn't worried. 'Miliband is absolutely trying to lock us into his net zero plans,' he told me on Wednesday. 'And they're trying to tie up as many contracts as possible now to bind our hands when we win office – you can see that with the switch in renewable energy policy from cash budgets to capacity targets'. But just as Labour can play games with contracts and commitments, so too can Reform. 'We'll claw the public's money back by charging a windfall tax equal to the subsidy awarded, and bar producers from charging that tax back to the consumer,' Tice said. 'Wind farms that need promises of huge public subsidies to finish construction won't be economically viable. And battery storage systems will be outright banned on health and safety grounds; they are dangerous and toxic.' The result is a battle of pre-commitments. Miliband appears to be urging the private sector to pile in on net zero plans, waving the prospect of taxpayer funds at potential partners, and finding ways to make legally binding agreements that will be hard to unpick. Reform, however, isn't planning to unpick them, but to instead follow Miliband's example in the North Sea: restrict operating conditions, tax profits, and drive the value of projects to zero. The effect is to introduce considerable political risk into net zero projects, but potentially also to tempt Labour into finding ways to hand out funds upfront. All eyes on this space: whether Reform's pledges can succeed in scaring off the renewables sector could determine its ability to win the next election.

Energy costs 'an anchor on our ambition', CBI chief warns government
Energy costs 'an anchor on our ambition', CBI chief warns government

Sky News

time14 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Energy costs 'an anchor on our ambition', CBI chief warns government

The head of a major business lobby group is warning that energy bills in the UK are an "anchor" on private sector ambitions, exacerbating the effects of an annual £24bn burden from government costs. CBI boss Rain Newton-Smith was to tell the body's annual business dinner in London that a "serious" plan was needed to address the energy issue, arguing they were holding back investment and the country's competitiveness. A reliance on natural gas has meant that both households and businesses have been exposed to volatile prices since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The CBI says UK companies pay 50% more for their energy than counterparts in France and Germany - and four times more than comparable operators in the US and Canada. Ms Newton-Smith was to tell her audience of business leaders and politicians that 40% of UK firms were holding back on investment due to punitive energy costs alone. She argued they were on top of an estimated extra £24bn a year in tax and wage hikes imposed by government. They included three increases to minimum pay rates since the 2023/24 financial year and rises to employer national insurance contributions which came into force in April. 3:15 The CBI said Ms Newton-Smith will say: "Business is now straining under £24 billion in extra costs per year. "That's more than the cost of Crossrail. More than the Home Office budget - on business, every year." She will add: "With costs running so high, there is one issue we absolutely must tackle. "Without it, any industrial strategy, any serious plan for economic security will fall flat on its face. Energy." She will say the rising cost of energy "isn't just a cost issue". "It's a jobs issue. An investment issue. A security issue. "Because how can UK business compete with one hand tied behind its back - and the other straining to keep the lights on? "This is an anchor on our ambition. A crack in our economic security. And it must be fixed." The CBI's suggestions include removing policy costs from electricity bills and a focus on low-carbon energy to help achieve economic security. The latter wish has formed the centrepiece of the Labour government's approach, arguing that a push for renewable energy is a key pathway to bring down bills, emissions and grow the economy at the same time. A government spokesperson said: "Through our sprint to clean power, we will get off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets - protecting business and household finances with clean, homegrown energy that we control.

100,000 HMRC accounts hit as scammers steal £47m in phishing attack
100,000 HMRC accounts hit as scammers steal £47m in phishing attack

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

100,000 HMRC accounts hit as scammers steal £47m in phishing attack

A phishing scam has cost HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) £47 million, a group of MPs has been told. The personal tax accounts of tens of thousands of people were breached in what two senior civil servants at HMRC described to the Treasury Committee as an "organised crime" incident that began last year. According to John-Paul Marks, the chief executive of HMRC, the UK's tax authority, 100,000 people have been contacted, or are in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down. He added that taxpayers affected by the breach will suffer "no financial loss". Mr Marks told the Committee: 'It's about 0.2% of the PAYE population, around 100,000 people, who we have written to, are writing to, to notify them that we detected activity on their PAYE account.' Asked if this applied to individual working people's PAYE accounts, not companies, he replied: 'That's right, individuals. To be clear, no financial loss to those individuals. Mr Marks added: 'This was organised crime phishing for identity data outwith of HMRC systems, so stuff that banks and others will also unfortunately experience, and then trying to use that data to create PAYE accounts to pay themselves a repayment and/or access an existing account.' An investigation into the matter, which took place last year 'including jurisdictions outside the UK', led to 'some arrests last year,' Mr Marks told MPs. Angela MacDonald, HMRC's deputy chief executive and second permanent secretary, added: 'At the moment, they've managed to extract repayments to the tune of £47 million. 'Now that is a lot of money, and it's very unacceptable. 'We have overall, in the last tax year, we actually protected £1.9 billion worth of money which sought to be taken from us by attacks.' Ms MacDonald stressed the breach was 'not a cyber attack, we have not been hacked, we have not had data extracted from us'. She later added: 'The ability for somebody to breach your systems and to extract data, to hold you to ransomware and all of those things, that is a cyber attack. That is not what has happened here.' HMRC said it had locked down affected accounts and deleted log-in details to prevent future unauthorised access. Any incorrect information has been removed from tax records and officials have checked to ensure no other details have been changed. People affected will receive a letter from HMRC over the next three weeks. Elsewhere, Mr Marks told MPs that HMRC phone lines were down on Wednesday afternoon, but said this was 'coincidental'. They will be 'back up and available in the morning', he added. An HMRC spokesperson said: 'We've acted to protect customers after identifying attempts to access a very small minority of tax accounts, and we're working with other law enforcement agencies both in the UK and overseas to bring those responsible to justice. 'This was not a cyber-attack – it involved criminals using personal information from phishing activity or data obtained elsewhere to try to claim money from HMRC. 'We're writing to those customers affected to reassure them we've secured their accounts and that they haven't lost any money.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store