logo
As another busy summer looms, Laguna Beach braces for the impacts of tourists

As another busy summer looms, Laguna Beach braces for the impacts of tourists

Laguna Beach is gearing up early in preparation for an anticipated surge in visitors after traffic, trash and other impacts resulted in a summer of discontent for residents last year.
City officials addressed the public at a town hall meeting Thursday evening, the City Council chambers filled with residents interested in hearing — and contributing to — the new plan of action.
'I think we started our messaging last year a little too late,' City Manager Dave Kiff said at the outset of the meeting. '... As a result, we were probably not as prepared as we would have liked to have been for the visitors last year.'
Kiff acknowledged limitations to the city's ability to lessen the impacts. He noted that parking rates — while increased periodically — cannot 'charge what the market will bear' because of controls in place by ordinance and the Coastal Commission. Beach access is also protected by the Coastal Act and the city's local coastal program.
'We rely on visitors — hotel bed tax, parking revenue, sales taxes to serve the residents,' Kiff said. 'I wish that were different, but it is a big chunk of our money. It's not a majority, but it is a significant chunk of our revenues that we use to operate the city.'
From a traffic perspective, city officials are hopeful that an earlier start for the Summer Breeze trolley route will pay dividends. Trolleys will begin busing in people from a free peripheral parking lot at 16355 Laguna Canyon Road near the 405 Freeway on May 23, Kiff said.
Kiff also suggested that the messaging from Visit Laguna Beach needed to take a different approach. John Zegowitz, who is assisting the organization with a rebrand and awareness campaign, spoke to a plan to connect tourists to the local lifestyle.
Zegowitz said the mission will include 'leading guests' to engage with the area in a way that is aligned with and respectful of the local community and the environment.
Community input is being sought, including through a resident survey on tourism impacts currently being circulated on the city website.
Zegowitz shared some of the comments fielded so far, saying, 'Obviously, residents are feeling that their world and quality of life is compromised, right, overrun by those who just don't care. Visitors tend to lack understanding or respect for the community's values, leading to trash, traffic, noise, tensions and damage to already challenged environmental resources.'
The lodging establishments, who pay a self-assessment to help fund tourism-related initiatives through the tourism marketing district, recognize the environment and culture of Laguna Beach are their 'greatest amenity,' Zegowitz said.
'They want to be part of protecting it, and they want to make sure that it remains that beautiful amenity of theirs,' Zegowitz said. 'Curating and educating the right kind of visitor to raise the quality and experience for guests and the community alike by inspiring protection of what makes Laguna unique, that is something that we're really going to focus on, as well. The opportunity is to connect a different mindset by better representing Laguna as an environmentally- and creatively-driven place. If we can keep pulling those things forward, we're pulling our culture forward.'
Laguna Beach police officers made 284 arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs last year, Police Chief Jeff Calvert said. In January, the police department began notifying businesses when a DUI arrest could be connected to the alcohol-serving establishment.
'Part of the DUI arrest, the officers ask, 'Where did you last drink?'' Calvert said. 'We have taken that information, and we're actually sending a notification letter to the business. The owners don't know what they don't know. Well, now they know. We're telling them the date and time of arrest, and also, the blood-alcohol level of the person that was arrested.'
The 284 DUI arrests represent a 21% increase from 2023, said Calvert, who added that 238 of the arrestees were visitors. Of the notifications sent out following those arrests, 61 of the 83 letters were delivered to local businesses.
Other vehicle-related figures included over 22,000 parking tickets, close to 1,700 speeding infractions, and 340 loud exhaust citations.
Additional quality-of-life matters saw the department write 649 citations for drinking in public, 236 for dogs off a leash, 200 for smoking in public.
Laguna Beach will have nine park rangers in the field to deal with quality-of-life issues this summer, Calvert said. The city operated with seven park rangers last year. The program began in 2022.
Calvert expects to have a total of five motor officers — including a traffic sergeant — within four to six months.
City messaging will strike a different chord than that of Visit Laguna Beach, Kiff said, describing it as 'more enforcement-oriented.'
'Heavier on the don't and no's,' Kiff said. 'There'll still be some stewardship messaging, but we'll continue to start publicizing numbers of folks who get ticketed. … I think people need to know it's happening, but you'll see this, especially on social media.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1
Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1

The sanitation fee resolution, which caused many conversations and criticisms within Lebanon, was passed by the City Council in a 4-2 vote during Tuesday's meeting. The structure of the fee will be $20 for residential customers and $40 for business customers. The city's sanitation department does not pick up dumpsters used by businesses, only bins specifically used for the city service. Geri Ashley and Camille Burdine, Councilors for Ward 2 and 3 respectively, stuck to their votes against the fee for the second reading. Both raised concerns of how residents at or below the poverty line or seniors on fixed incomes may be impacted by the $20 per month fee. Questions regarding how the sanitation department is funded were asked as confusion rippled through the community. 'This was an unadvertised discussion in a work session. It was a 15-minute discussion,' Ashley said. 'I still don't have all my questions answered. I don't feel like I have the economic information.' 'I think that we should, as a City Council, have spent more time talking about it and seeing if we could come up with any other solutions,' Ashley added. 'If in fact we are paying for garbage in our city's taxes, and now we're incorporating a fee, then what happens next year when we get our taxes? Are our taxes going to be reduced at that point, because that is a double dip.' On Wednesday, Burdine reiterated her thoughts that the city should be more proactive in studying the impact on the citizens before a fee was implemented. She said the response to rising costs caused the city to be 'reactive instead of proactive.' Burdine said she is not opposed to a sanitation fee, but feels that more time should have been spent researching it. Also on Wednesday, Ashley called the fee a 'knee-jerk reaction' and likewise felt that not enough research was done. She also said instead of a flat fee, a property tax increase would take into account the property values and Wards 1, 2 and 3 would not have to deal with a monthly fee which might be a burden. Ashley said she wants to see if the sanitation fee will disappear from the property taxes. Ward 1 Councilor Joey Carmack said he supported the fee because it's a flat fee that all residents pay, which doesn't fluctuate. 'I do not feel it's fair for the sanitation fee to be a property tax,' Carmack said. 'A property tax would be unfair, because for example, person one has a $1 million house, and [may] only have one can of trash. They would pay more taxes than person two [who has] a $350,000 home.' 'We dump the trash from the city at Walter Hill (in Murfreesboro), which has been in the news about closing soon,' Carmack added. 'When that does happen, we will be paying even more to dump trash.' Middle Point Landfill has been working with Rutherford County to increase fees for 'out-of-county' tipping fees, as well as downsizing the number of counties allowed to dump there. During a meeting earlier this year, it was proposed to double the fees for non-Rutherford County clients from $1.20 per ton to $2.50 per ton to generate more revenue for that county. The town meeting hall had more residents in attendance than usual, which was commented on by the Councilors, who expressed gratitude for the increased attendance. Burdine, Chris Crowell, Councilor for Ward 4 and Phil Morehead, Councilor for Ward 6, particularly welcomed the attendance and interest in city business. During the public comment period, nearly a dozen people spoke to the City Council. One resident, Stephen Lawson, said he and others should have the option to opt out of the fee, and that he would rather pay a private company $30 to support that business than give the city $20. He also asked if there were other landfills which could be used. 'I thought there was a landfill in Wilson County. Is that one full?' Lawson asked. 'That's owned by the Wilson County government, and it's just open to construction materials,' Mayor Bell responded. 'It's not open to us.' Alex Buhler, former Ward 1 Councilor who stepped-down in 2012, also spoke. 'They should have that option to opt out,' Buhler said. 'If a thousand people opt out, that's a thousand houses you don't have to go to.' Bell responded by saying that wouldn't save as much money as people think because the sanitation trucks will still be driving by those houses anyway. Some of the Councilors said they don't know if private companies would have the same quality of work that the city does, as officials believe sanitation is a public health matter which the Council 'takes seriously.' Another resident wondered if the sanitation fee would lead to the start of 'nickel and diming' the residents of the city. Glenn Denton, County Commissioner for District 20, which covers the downtown Lebanon region of the county, criticized the growth of the city, which he thinks sparked the need for growing services and the fees to pay for them. 'Enough is enough. We have overbuilt in our city beyond what our infrastructure can handle,' Denton said. 'When do we stop building to where we cannot service and when we cannot pay for the infrastructure around it?' Nearly an hour and a half was spent discussing the sanitation fee and budget for the next year. With the passing of the resolution, the sanitation fee goes into effect July 1.

Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time
Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time

SALT LAKE CITY () — Parking in downtown Salt Lake City may start making a bigger dent in your wallet. As part of the city budget for the 2026 fiscal year, the Salt Lake City Council is considering changing the hourly rates for metered parking throughout the city, as well as the collection days and hours. Currently, metered parking is available at just $2.25 an hour. The city collects this fee between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday. On Saturday, the parking is free for two hours, while on Sunday, parking is free for the whole day. Carp chaos at Utah Lake as carp overpopulation becomes serious problem Under the proposed changes, the hourly rate for metered parking would rise to $3.50 an hour. The proposal would also take away the two free hours on Saturday and extend the collection hours from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Sunday would keep its free parking. The Salt Lake City Council will next meet on Tuesday, June 10, at 1 p.m. for a work session, where the calendar includes considering unresolved issues. A formal City Council meeting will be held at 7 p.m., where council members will consider adopting the proposed budget. Escape today to OUTRIGGER Ka'anapali Beach Resort Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump Salt Lake City Mission hosting pickleball event to help kids, change lives Elevate your outdoor adventure with the 2025 Forest River Rockwood Roo 17E Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Portland breaks ground on new Kiwanis Pool expected to open in 2026
Portland breaks ground on new Kiwanis Pool expected to open in 2026

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Portland breaks ground on new Kiwanis Pool expected to open in 2026

Jun. 6—The city of Portland broke ground on the construction of a new Kiwanis Pool on Thursday. Replacing the 60-year-old pool, the new facility will include a splash pad, waterslides, a lawn area, ADA accessible pool entry and lap lanes. The new pool will accommodate up to 400 swimmers at a time, about four times its previous capacity, according to a press release from the city. The updates to the Kiwanis pool, which first opened in 1961, have been in the works since 2019. But last August, when the pool closed for construction, the city was still short more than $5 million in funding needed to complete the project, a gap the city attributed to rising material costs. In the fall the City Council voted unanimously to allocate $4.6 million in American Rescue Plan Act dollars to the project to help fill that gap. Since then, the Portland Parks Conservancy has been raising money to come up with the remaining funds. The new pool is expected to be complete by summer 2026. Copy the Story Link We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion. You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs. Show less

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store