Cordlife receives offer for 10% stake from subsidiary of stem cell company Medeze
[SINGAPORE] Private cord-blood bank Cordlife announced on Tuesday (May 13) that it has received a voluntary conditional cash partial offer for a 10 per cent stake in the company from Medeze Treasury, a wholly owned subsidiary of Medeze, a South-east Asian stem cell company.
This is the Thai-listed group's first step into the Singapore market, as the company seeks to explore business opportunities with Cordlife.
The subsidiary of Medeze is seeking to acquire about 25.6 million shares at an offer price of S$0.25 per share. This reflects a premium of around 61.3 per cent over the last traded price of S$0.155 on Friday, and also the 12-month volume-weighted average price.
According to the offeror, it believes there are long-term opportunities that could benefit both Medeze Treasury and Cordlife with the voluntary conditional cash partial offer, including the promotion of services together for market expansion, products and services development, diversification of business in the region, and cost and operational synergies by leveraging each other's expertise.
As at Tuesday, Medeze Treasury holds nearly 1.7 million shares representing close to 0.7 per cent of the voting rights in Cordlife.
Assuming that the offer becomes unconditional and there are no changes to the number of shares up for offer, the resultant direct shareholding of the Medeze Treasury in Cordlife shall be around 10.7 per cent of the shares (excluding treasury shares) as at the record date.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
In a company statement, an example is provided where Medeze Group could offer services such as analysing and storing natural killer cell and hair follicle banking services to Cordlife's customers. Meanwhile, Cordlife could offer its chromosomal and genetic analysis and screening services to the customers of the offeror, if their collaboration eventuates. Such collaboration could strengthen the market position of both Cordlife and Medeze Group, and growth on an international level.
A private company incorporated in Singapore in May 2021, Medeze Treasury has an authorised share capital of close to S$27.3 million consisting of one class of ordinary shares of S$1 each.
Its directors are Sharon Lim and Veerapol Khemarangsan.
The Medeze Group has been listed on Thailand's stock exchange since October 2024, with a market capitalisation of about S$305.6 million as at May 13. It is engaged in the business of analysing, sorting, culturing and storing stem cells and testing the potential of immune cells.
Earlier in March, Cordlife sunk into the red with a net loss of S$6.3 million for its second half ended Dec 31, 2024, compared with a net profit of S$1.3 million in the previous corresponding period. This was mainly due to the fallout from lapses discovered in the storage of the company's cord-blood units two years ago.
Cordlife requested a trading halt on Tuesday morning. The counter closed 1.9 per cent or S$0.003 lower at S$0.155 on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Goh Jin Hian judgment clarifies scope of directors' duties, notes observers as ruling says directors should be a ‘sentinel', not a ‘sleuth'
[SINGAPORE] Former Inter-Pacific Petroleum (IPP) non-executive director Goh Jin Hian's recent win in his appeal in the Appellate Division of the High Court has given 'welcome relief' to other company directors with its clarification of the scope of directors' duties. The High Court in a judgement on Jun 5 overturned a previous ruling requiring Goh to pay damages of US$156 million to the insolvent marine fuel supplier after IPP's liquidators had accused him of 'sleepwalking through his time as a director'. 'Welcome relief' Adrian Chan, first vice-chair at the Singapore Institute of Directors (SID) and head of corporate at Lee & Lee, said the successful appeal was a 'welcome relief' as it clarifies the boundaries of a director's responsibilities and what qualifies as actionable 'red flags'. The judgment, he added, offers practical guidance by narrowing the scope of when a director should be held liable for inaction. Had the lower court's judgment stood, Chan believes directors could face liability even when unaware of fraud committed by peers or when financial reports show no warning signs. Kelvin Law, associate professor of accounting at Nanyang Technological University's Nanyang Business School, said that the case demonstrated that correlation does not equal causation – a mere link is insufficient. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up He said: 'This case is a powerful reminder that a link isn't enough as a plaintiff must prove that the director's specific failure was the direct cause of the financial loss. To obtain damages, (the) plaintiff has to show that there's a causal relationship between negligence and damage.' Boey Swee Siang, partner at law firm RPC, pointed out that while Goh's failure to be aware of the cargo trading business constituted a breach of his duty of care, the court clarified that the 'red flags' identified by the company's liquidators were insufficient to trigger an inquiry into its financials. In Goh's case, he was only required to satisfy himself within reasonable limits regarding the company's financial position. 'The non-executive director is not required to make exhaustive inquiries into individual transactions or events, so long as these transactions or events were not, on their face, of such a nature as would raise immediate concerns,' added Boey. Yee Chia Hsing, an independent director at several SGX-listed companies, agreed with the judgment, saying directors cannot be expected to be better than auditors and there is a right to presume no fraud unless clear warning signs exist. 'If (there is a) need to presume fraud, a lot of resources and effort would be wasted across the entire system as directors would need to be commissioning forensic investigations from auditors on a regular basis specifically to detect fraud,' he told BT. The court ruled that although Goh breached his duty of care by failing to stay informed about IPP's cargo trading operations, this breach was not due to ignoring red flags within the company. 'Get their hands dirty' Still, SID's Chan emphasised that directors, including non-executive ones, have a duty to guide and monitor management, going beyond mere compliance. He said: 'They have to ask tough questions, roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty. Rather than playing the role of a mere sentinel, sleuth, investigator or watchdog... a director should more appropriately look upon himself or herself as an active steward – sometimes being called upon to play all these roles and more, as the circumstances and director duties demand it.' The judgment's reference to '(a) director may be a sentinel, but he is not a forensics investigator or a sleuth' resonated with Chan, who stressed that directors cannot simply stand watch passively. 'There really is no such thing as a 'sleeping director' as a director's duty to act in the best interest of the company is an active one that doesn't ever go to sleep,' he added. RPC's Boey believes this decision serves as a reminder to independent directors of listed companies that 'they do owe a duty of care to their companies, but also sets the standard of care to a reasonable one'. Directors and officers liability insurance Beyond training, Nanyang Business School's Prof Law highlighted the importance of having directors and officers liability insurance. 'It provides the financial resources to defend themselves – which, as this case shows, can be a long and expensive process even if they are ultimately successful,' he added. Chan also advised directors to read 'the fine print, exclusions, coverage, territory, and ensure that the scope and size of the sum assured is appropriate for the size of the business'. He pointed to several high-profile cases involving non-executive directors under investigation or charged for failing to disclose material, price-sensitive information – including Hyflux, Eagle Hospitality Trust, Raffles Education and Cordlife. 'The outcomes of these cases will bring further clarity to the role of directors on listed boards, and will help shape corporate governance in Singapore,' he added.
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Petronas looks abroad to help cut production costs
[KUALA LUMPUR] Malaysia's state-owned oil and gas company Petronas is looking to expand output from more affordable assets abroad in an effort to cut production costs and rein in declining profits. Petronas is seeking to produce oil at a break-even level of US$50 per barrel, from US$60 to US$70 in the past five years, said Mohd Jukris Abdul Wahab, the chief executive officer of Petronas' upstream business, which includes exploring, developing and extracting oil and gas. The firm will focus more on countries where it already has a presence, including Canada, Suriname, Brazil, Turkmenistan and several South-east Asian nations. Still, Petronas does not rule out going into a new country if it provided 'headroom for us to grow', he added. 'We want to reshape the entire portfolio,' Jukris said in an interview on Jun 13 on the 79th floor of the steel-clad Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur. 'We are preparing ourselves, moving into a more volatile environment in the future.' Petronas is shifting its strategy as a drop in crude prices from a recent peak in 2022 slashed profits and forced the company to lower dividends. The state-owned company said earlier this month that it will cut about 10 per cent of its workforce to reduce costs. While crude prices recovered some of the lost ground on Friday (Jun 13) after Israel's air strikes on Iran fuelled concerns of a wider conflict in the Middle East, the supply-demand outlook for oil points to more pressure in the longer term. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up 'Any capital deployment for our international asset has got to provide a healthy return,' Jukris noted. 'We are dealing with a lot more risk in some of the geographies that we are present.' Petronas' woes pose a challenge for Malaysia's government, which relies on the company for billions of US dollars in income. The national oil company has pledged RM32 billion (S$9.7 billion) in dividends this year, down from RM50 billion in 2022. The firm said in September that over the 50 years since its inception in 1974, it had injected RM1.4 trillion into the nation's economy through dividends, taxes and cash payments. The company plans to increase the net present value of its international upstream contributions to about 60 per cent within the next five to 10 years, from about 40 to 50 per cent now, said Jukris, who started his career at the firm in 1990. Petronas produces the equivalent of about two million barrels of oil per day in Malaysia and around 700,000 barrels abroad, Jukris said. To maintain this level of production in the face of declining output from older assets the company needs to bring in new fields, he added. Even as Petronas looks for new assets abroad, Jukris is optimistic that Malaysia's reserves will last for 'years to come', because investors keep making new discoveries. He said that there is still untapped potential in the country, including off the coast of Peninsular Malaysia where international oil companies have shown interest to explore. 'For the last 10, 15 years, we have been saying that our reserves will last only 15 years,' Jukris said. 'So today, we will also last another 15, 20 years.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Goh Jin Hian judgement clarifies scope of directors' duties, notes observers as ruling says directors should be a ‘sentinel', not a ‘sleuth'
[SINGAPORE] Former Inter-Pacific Petroleum (IPP) non-executive director Goh Jin Hian's recent win in his appeal in the Appellate Division of the High Court has given 'welcome relief' to other company directors with its clarification of the scope of directors' duties. The High Court in a judgement on Jun 5 overturned a previous ruling requiring Goh to pay damages of US$156 million to the insolvent marine fuel supplier after IPP's liquidators had accused him of 'sleepwalking through his time as a director'. 'Welcome relief' Adrian Chan, first vice-chair at the Singapore Institute of Directors (SID) and head of corporate at Lee & Lee, said the successful appeal was a 'welcome relief' as it clarifies the boundaries of a director's responsibilities and what qualifies as actionable 'red flags'. The judgment, he added, offers practical guidance by narrowing the scope of when a director should be held liable for inaction. Had the lower court's judgment stood, Chan believes directors could face liability even when unaware of fraud committed by peers or when financial reports show no warning signs. Kelvin Law, associate professor of accounting at Nanyang Technological University's Nanyang Business School, said that the case demonstrated that correlation does not equal causation – a mere link is insufficient. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up He said: 'This case is a powerful reminder that a link isn't enough as a plaintiff must prove that the director's specific failure was the direct cause of the financial loss. To obtain damages, (the) plaintiff has to show that there's a causal relationship between negligence and damage.' Boey Swee Siang, partner at law firm RPC, pointed out that while Goh's failure to be aware of the cargo trading business constituted a breach of his duty of care, the court clarified that the 'red flags' identified by the company's liquidators were insufficient to trigger an inquiry into its financials. In Goh's case, he was only required to satisfy himself within reasonable limits regarding the company's financial position. 'The non-executive director is not required to make exhaustive inquiries into individual transactions or events, so long as these transactions or events were not, on their face, of such a nature as would raise immediate concerns,' added Boey. Yee Chia Hsing, an independent director at several SGX-listed companies, agreed with the judgment, saying directors cannot be expected to be better than auditors and there is a right to presume no fraud unless clear warning signs exist. 'If (there is a) need to presume fraud, a lot of resources and effort would be wasted across the entire system as directors would need to be commissioning forensic investigations from auditors on a regular basis specifically to detect fraud,' he told BT. The court ruled that although Goh breached his duty of care by failing to stay informed about IPP's cargo trading operations, this breach was not due to ignoring red flags within the company. 'Get their hands dirty' Still, SID's Chan emphasised that directors, including non-executive ones, have a duty to guide and monitor management, going beyond mere compliance. He said: 'They have to ask tough questions, roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty. Rather than playing the role of a mere sentinel, sleuth, investigator or watchdog... a director should more appropriately look upon himself or herself as an active steward – sometimes being called upon to play all these roles and more, as the circumstances and director duties demand it.' The judgment's reference to '(a) director may be a sentinel, but he is not a forensics investigator or a sleuth' resonated with Chan, who stressed that directors cannot simply stand watch passively. 'There really is no such thing as a 'sleeping director' as a director's duty to act in the best interest of the company is an active one that doesn't ever go to sleep,' he added. RPC's Boey believes this decision serves as a reminder to independent directors of listed companies that 'they do owe a duty of care to their companies, but also sets the standard of care to a reasonable one'. Directors and officers liability insurance Beyond training, Nanyang Business School's Prof Law highlighted the importance of having directors and officers liability insurance. 'It provides the financial resources to defend themselves – which, as this case shows, can be a long and expensive process even if they are ultimately successful,' he added. Chan also advised directors to read 'the fine print, exclusions, coverage, territory, and ensure that the scope and size of the sum assured is appropriate for the size of the business'. He pointed to several high-profile cases involving non-executive directors under investigation or charged for failing to disclose material, price-sensitive information – including Hyflux, Eagle Hospitality Trust, Raffles Education and Cordlife. 'The outcomes of these cases will bring further clarity to the role of directors on listed boards, and will help shape corporate governance in Singapore,' he added.
